Efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon ablation system: multicentre comparison of 1-year outcome

Repeat catheter ablation after very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurs in about one-third of patients after catheter ablation (CA), mostly in the first year. Little is known about the electrophysiological findings and the effect of re-ablation in very late AF recurrences (VLR) after more than 1 year. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of the first repeat CA after VLR of AF after index CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed patients from a prospective Swiss registry that underwent a first repeat ablation procedure. Patients were stratified depending on the time to recurrence after index procedure: early recurrence (ER) for recurrences within the first year and late recurrence (LR) if the recurrence was later. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF in the first year after repeat ablation. Out of 1864 patients included in the registry, 426 patients undergoing a repeat ablation were included in the analysis (28% female, age 63 ± 9.8 years, 46% persistent AF). Two hundred and ninety-one patients (68%) were stratified in the ER group and 135 patients (32%) in the LR group. Pulmonary vein reconnections were a common finding in both groups, with 93% in the ER group compared to 86% in the LR group (P = 0.052). In the LR group, 40 of 135 patients (30%) had a recurrence of AF compared to 90 of 291 patients (31%) in the ER group (log-rank P = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between the time to recurrence of AF after initial CA and the characteristics and outcomes of the repeat procedure.

A randomized controlled trial of the size-adjustable cryoballoon vs conventional cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial rationale and design

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon technology is a well-established therapy for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a size-adjustable cryoballoon (POLARxTM FIT) that enables delivery in a standard 28-mm or an expanded 31-mm size was introduced.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel cryoballoon compared to the conventional cryoballoon.

Methods

The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which 214 patients with paroxysmal AF will be randomized 1:1 to cryoballoon ablation with either a conventional cryoballoon (Arctic Front AdvanceTM Pro) or a size-adjustable cryoballoon (POLARx FIT). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all investigational sites and has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000052500).

Results

The primary endpoint of this study will be the incidence of phrenic nerve injury. Secondary endpoints include procedural success, chronic success through 12 months, procedure-related adverse events, biophysiological parameters during applications for each pulmonary vein (PV), total procedural and fluoroscopy times, level of PVI and isolation area, and probability of non-PV foci initiating AF.

Conclusion

The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the POLARx FIT vs the Arctic Front Advance Pro. The findings from this trial will provide additional utility data on the efficacy of the size-adjustable cryoballoon for isolating PVs in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry

AIMS

Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons.

METHODS

This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023.

RESULTS

Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice.

Initial clinical experience with the novel POLARx FIT cryoballoon system for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

The POLARx FIT system (Boston Scientific, MA, USA) is a novel cryoballoon (CB) ablation technology in which the balloon diameter can be expanded from 28 to 31 mm. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and safety of the new POLARx FIT system to those of the existing POLARx system currently in use for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods

The first 70 consecutive patients who underwent CB-based PVI with the POLARx FIT system were retrospectively compared with 200 consecutive patients treated with the POLARx system at Sakakibara Heart Institute from October 2021 to May 2023.

Results

The POLARx FIT system yielded a higher mean ± standard deviation nadir temperature in the right inferior PV (-59.2 ± 5.29 °C vs. - 62.0 ± 5.08 °C, p = 0.006), but this required a balloon size reduction to 28 mm in 30 % of cases. No significant differences were detected in the time to isolation and thaw time of any PV between the two groups. After the CB-based PVI procedure, no residual PV carina potentials were observed with the POLARx FIT system, whereas 4/20 were with the POLARx system (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

The POLARx FIT system had comparable effectiveness and safety to the basic POLARx system. This technology may improve the ablation area, including the PV carina. However, the 31-mm balloon alone was not sufficient to isolate certain PVs.

Characteristics of two different cryoballoon systems for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CONTRAST-CRYO Trial)

BACKGROUND

Single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing cryothermal energy is an effective and safe treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. A novel cryoballoon system, POLARx™, has been recently introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and biophysical parameters of PVI between the novel cryoballoon system, POLARx™, and the standard cryoballoon system, Arctic Front Advance Pro™ (AFA-Pro), in patients with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

The CONTRAST-CRYO trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study performed at seven large cardiac centers. This study was approved by the central ethics committee or the local ethics committee of each participating hospital and has been registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000049948). The trial will assign 200 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI to POLARx™ and AFA-Pro in a 1:1 randomization. The primary endpoint is the one-shot acute success rate of the right inferior pulmonary vein. Second endpoints include freedom from documented atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia without antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months after the procedure, freedom from re-do procedures, the incidence of procedure-related adverse events, freezing duration, and the biophysical parameters during applications for each PV, total procedure and fluoroscopy time, and PVI durability during re-do procedures.

CONCLUSION

The CONTRAST-CRYO trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to elucidate the difference in the efficacy, safety, and biophysical parameters between POLARx™ and AFA-Pro in paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PVI. The findings from this trial may provide a valuable indication for selecting the optimal cryoballoon system.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

 UMIN000049948.

Acute procedural efficacy and safety of a novel expandable diameter cryoballoon in atrial fibrillation ablation: Early results from a multicenter ablation registry

INTRODUCTION

The major limitation of the current cryoballoon (CB) system is a fixed 28 mm balloon-size. We sought to analyze real-world early experience with novel-sized adjustable CB.

METHODS

This multicenter observational study included 140 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients (71 years, 94 men, 86 paroxysmal) who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using expandable diameter CB capable of ablation at 28 or 31 mm.

RESULTS

Out of 544 targeted PVs, 526 (96.7%) were successfully isolated by a size-adjustable CB with a 770 [690-870] second median application dose, while the remaining 18 required touch-up ablation. Among them, 326 (62.0%) PVs were isolated by a 31 mm balloon, and the rate was significantly higher for upper than lower PVs (73.0% vs. 45.7%, p < .0001) and highest for right superior (78.5%) and lowest for right inferior (39.9%) PVs. The biophysical parameters and time to isolation were comparable between the 28 and 31 mm balloons, however, the real-time PV potential monitoring capability was significantly higher for 31 mm than 28 mm balloons for the left superior PV. The esophageal temperature reached 15°C during left inferior PV ablation significantly more often with 31 mm than 28 mm balloons (43.1% vs. 18.2%, p = .008). Right phrenic nerve injury (PNI) occurred in 9 (6.4%) patients during applications (6 right superior, 2 right inferior PVs), and most occurred with a 31 mm balloon.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world early data demonstrated high acute efficacy and safety of the novel-sized adjustable CB. The biophysical parameters were similar between the 28 and 31 mm balloons. No marked decrease in the incidence of PNI was observed even with 31 mm balloons.

Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel treatment technology for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon (CB) is the most frequently used single shot technology. A direct comparison to a novel CB system is lacking. We aimed to compare pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA vs. a novel CB system regarding efficiency, safety, myocardial injury, and outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI and were included (age 64 ± 9.7 years, ejection fraction 0.58 ± 0.09, left atrial size 40 ± 6.4 mm, paroxysmal AF 64%). 106 patients (59%) underwent PFA (FARAPULSE, Boston Scientific) and 75 patients (41%) underwent CB ablation (PolarX, Boston Scientific). The median procedure time, left atrial dwell time and fluoroscopic time were similar between the PFA and the CB group with 55 [interquartile range (IQR) 43-64] min vs. 58 (IQR 48-69) min (P < 0.087), 38 (30-49) min vs. 37 (31-48) min, (P = 0.871), and 11 (IQR 9.3-14) min vs. 11 (IQR 8.7-16) min, (P < 0.81), respectively. Three procedural complications were observed in the PFA group (two tamponades, one temporary ST elevation) and three complications in the CB group (3× reversible phrenic nerve palsies). During the median follow-up of 404 days (IQR 208-560), AF recurrence was similar in the PFA group and the CB group with 24 vs. 30%, P = 0.406.

CONCLUSION

Procedural characteristics were very similar between PFA and CB in regard to procedure duration fluoroscopy time and complications. Atrial fibrillation free survival did not differ between the PFA and CB groups.

Atrial fibrillation cryoablation is an effective day case treatment: the UK PolarX vs. Arctic Front Advance experience

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on the PolarX Cryoballoon. The study aimed to establish the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of same day discharge for Cryoballoon PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Multi-centre study across 12 centres. Procedural metrics, safety profile, and procedural efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon with the Arctic Front Advance (AFA) Cryoballoon were compared in a cohort large enough to provide definitive comparative data. A total of 1688 patients underwent PVI with cryoablation (50% PolarX and 50% AFA). Successful PVI was achieved with 1677 (99.3%) patients with 97.2% (n = 1641) performed as day case procedures with a complication rate of <1%. Safety, procedural metrics, and efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon were comparable with the AFA cohort. The PolarX Cryoballoon demonstrated a nadir temperature of -54.6 ± 7.6°C, temperature at 30 s of -38.6 ± 7.2°C, time to -40°C of 34.1 ± 13.7 s, and time to isolation of 49.8 ± 33.2 s. Independent predictors for achieving PVI included time to reach -40°C [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature (OR 1.24; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of ≤34 s [area under the curve (AUC) 0.73; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature of ≤-54.0°C (AUC 0.71; P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale UK multi-centre study has shown that Cryoballoon PVI is a safe, effective day case procedure. PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon was similarly safe and effective as the AFA Cryoballoon. The cryoablation metrics achieved with the PolarX Cryoballoon were different to that reported with the AFA Cryoballoon. Modified cryoablation targets are required when utilizing the PolarX Cryoballoon.

Comparison of the PolarX and the Arctic Front cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (COMPARE CRYO) - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Single-shot devices are increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The Arctic Front cryoballoon (Medtronic) is the most frequently used single-shot technology. A recently developed novel cryoballoon has been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific) with the aim to address limitations of the Arctic Front system.

METHODS

COMPARE CRYO is a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication by an independent clinical events committee. A total of 200 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI are randomized 1:1 between PolarX cryoballoon ablation and Arctic Front cryoballoon ablation. Continuous monitoring during follow-up is performed using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in all patients. The primary endpoint is time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia) ≥ 120 s between days 91 and 365 post ablation as detected on the (ICM). Procedural safety is assessed by a composite of cardiac tamponade, persistent phrenic nerve palsy >24 h, vascular complications requiring intervention, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula or death occurring during or up to 30 days after the procedure. Key secondary endpoints include (1) procedure and fluoroscopy times, (2) AF burden, (3) proportion of patients with recurrence in the blanking period, (4) proportion of patients undergoing repeat ablation, and (5) quality of life changes at 12 months compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

COMPARE CRYO will compare the efficacy and safety of the novel PolarX cryoballoon and the standard-of-practice Arctic Front cryoballoon for first PVI performed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04704986).

Pulmonary vein isolation by means of a novel cryoballoon technology in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients: 1-year outcome from a large Italian multicenter clinical registry

INTRODUCTION

Recently, a new cryoballoon (CB) technology (POLARx; Boston Scientific) has come onto the market. Preliminary data have shown that its acute safety and efficacy are similar to those of the first-generation CB. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the POLARxTM CB in a large multicenter registry.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on 125 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PVI by means of a novel CB system. Two cases of transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred, with full recovery in the 48h post procedure; no major procedure-related adverse events were reported. During the 90-day blanking period, 4 (3.2%) patients experienced an early recurrence. After the blanking period, over a mean follow-up of 411 ± 62 days, 19 patients (15.2%) suffered an AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. The 1-year freedom from AF/AT recurrence was 86.4% (n = 17): 10 (8%) patients had an AF recurrence, 6 (4.8%) had an AT occurrence and 1 (0.8%) suffered both events. Patients with AF/AT recurrences had both a shorter deflation time and total deflation time. Moreover, CB ablations with measured TTI < 90 s and TTI < 60 s were more frequent in patients without AF/AT recurrence (88.5% and 77.4%, respectively) than in those who experienced at least one AF/AT recurrence (67.5% and 55.0%, p = .001 and p = .005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The novel POLARx cryo-balloon system is safe and effective for PV isolation, displaying a 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence of 86.4%, which is in line to that reported with AFA-Pro CB or RF ablation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT03793998. Registration date: January 4, 2019.

Effects of Inflammatory Cell Death Caused by Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a serious healthcare burden on society due to its high morbidity and the resulting serious complications such as thrombosis and heart failure. The principle of catheter ablation is to achieve electrical isolation by linear destruction of cardiac tissue, which makes AF a curable disease. Currently, catheter ablation does not have a high long-term success rate. The current academic consensus is that inflammation and fibrosis are central mechanisms in the progression of AF. However, artificially caused inflammatory cell death by catheter ablation may have a significant impact on structural and electrical remodeling, which may affect the long-term prognosis. This review first focused on the inflammatory response induced by apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis and their interaction with arrhythmia. Then, we compared the differences in cell death induced by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation and pulsed-field ablation. Finally, we discussed the structural and electrical remodeling caused by inflammation and the association between inflammation and the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation. Collectively, pulsed-field ablation will be a revolutionary innovation with faster, safer, better tissue selectivity and less inflammatory response induced by apoptosis-dominated cell death.

Cardioneuroablation Using Epicardial Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia affecting millions of people worldwide. The cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is widely recognized as playing a key role in both the initiation and propagation of AF. This paper reviews the background and development of a unique cardioneuroablation technique for the modulation of the cardiac ANS as a potential treatment for AF. The treatment uses pulsed electric field energy to selectively electroporate ANS structures on the epicardial surface of the heart. Insights from in vitro studies and electric field models are presented as well as data from both pre-clinical and early clinical studies.

Outcomes after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with the PolarX or the Arctic front advance pro: a prospective multicentre experience

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare procedural efficacy and safety, including 1-year freedom from AF recurrence, between the novel cryoballoon system PolarX (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro) (Medtronic), in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicentre prospective observational study included 267 consecutive patients undergoing a first cryoablation procedure for paroxysmal AF (137 PolarX, 130 AFA-Pro). KM curves with the log-rank test was used to compare the 1-year freedom from AF recurrence between both groups. Multivariate Cox model was performed to evaluate whether the type of procedure (PolarX vs. AFA-Pro) had an impact on the occurrence of AF recurrences after adjustment on potentially confounding factors. The PolarX reaches lower temperatures than the AFA-Pro (LSPV 52 ± 5, vs. 59 ± 6; LIPV 49 ± 6 vs. 56 ± 6; right superior pulmonary vein: 49 ± 6 vs. 57 ± 7; right inferior pulmonary vein: 52 ± 6 vs. 59 ± 6; P < 0.0001). A higher rate of transient phrenic nerve palsy was found in patients treated with the PolarX system (15% vs. 7%, P = 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 15 ± 5 months, 20 patients (15%) had recurrences in AFA-Pro group and 27 patients (19%) in PolarX group (P = 0.35). Based on survival analysis, no significant difference was observed between both groups with a 12-month free of recurrence survival of 91.2% (85.1-95.4%) vs. 83.7% (76.0%-89.1%) (log-rank test P = 0.11). In multivariate Cox model hazard ratio of recurrence for PolarX vs. AFA-Pro was not significant [HR = 1.6 (0.9-2.8), P = 0.12].

CONCLUSION

PolarX and AFA-Pro have comparable efficacy and safety profiles for pulmonary veins isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.