Ablation for atrial fibrillation improves the outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Catheter-based ablation to improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Rationale and design of the CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 trial

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in heart failure (HF) and negatively impacts outcomes. The role of ablation-based rhythm control in patients with AF and HF with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is not known. The CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 (CAtheter-Based Ablation of atrial fibrillation compared to conventional treatment in patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial will determine whether early catheter ablation for AF can prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.

METHODS

CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 (NCT05508256) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, interventional multicentre strategy trial with blinded outcome assessment. Approximately 1548 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF diagnosed within 24 months prior to enrolment and HFpEF or HFmrEF will be randomized to early catheter ablation within 4 weeks after randomization or to usual care. All patients receive anticoagulation, rate control, and HF management according to current guideline recommendations. Usual care can include rhythm control in symptomatic patients. Patients will be followed until the end of the trial for the primary outcome, a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, and total unplanned hospitalizations for HF or acute coronary syndrome. The safety outcome comprises complications of catheter ablation and death. The trial is powered for a rate ratio of 0.75 (two-sided alpha = 0.05, 1-beta = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

CABA-HFPEF-DZHK27 will define the role of systematic and early catheter ablation in patients with AF and HFpEF or HFmrEF.

Sex differences in atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on the impact of sex on the outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to analyze the association of sex with outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

The National Readmissions Database (NRD) was analyzed from 2016 to 2019 to identify patients ≥ 18 years old with heart failure (HF) undergoing AF ablation. The outcomes of interest included peri-procedural complications, in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and unplanned 1-year readmissions. The final cohort was divided into patients with HFrEF and HFpEF and outcomes were compared between males and females in both cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 23,277 patients with HF underwent AF ablation between 2016 and 2019, of which 14,480 had HFrEF and 8,797 had HFpEF. Among patients with HFrEF, 61.6% were males and 38.4% were females whereas, among patients with HFpEF, 35.4% were males and 64.6% were females. On a multivariable-adjusted analysis, in patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in the odds of in-hospital mortality, peri-procedural complications, or 1-year HF-related/AF-related/all-cause readmissions between males and females. In patients with HFpEF, females had a higher risk 1-year HF-related readmissions (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.13-1.87; p = 0.01), without any difference in the 1-year AF-related/all-cause readmissions, in-hospital mortality, or peri-procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that females with HFrEF undergoing AF ablation have similar outcomes whereas females with HFpEF have higher 1-year HF readmissions with no difference in the other outcomes, compared to males.

The impact of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes in heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction patients

BACKGROUND

The combined effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) remains complex.

OBJECTIVE

In this post hoc analysis of the TOPCAT trial, we aimed to evaluate the impact of AF on clinical outcomes in patients with HF stratified by LVEF range.

METHODS

A total of 3442 patients were included, stratified into 3 groups according to LVEF range-HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), LVEF of 45%-50% (n = 823); HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), LVEF of 51%-60% (n = 1682); and HF with normal ejection fraction (HFnEF), LVEF >60% (n = 937)-and subdivided according to the presence of AF at enrollment. Cox regression analysis was used to define independent associations between AF and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

AF was prevalent in 38.6% in HFmrEF, 34.6% in HFpEF, and 33.7% in HFnEF (P = .07). AF was associated with worse primary outcome in each subgroup and with HF hospitalizations and worse cardiovascular mortality in HFpEF and HFnEF. The hazard ratio for the primary outcome in those with AF compared with sinus rhythm (SR) was 1.11 (1.01-1.22; P = .03) in HFmrEF, 1.20 (1.11-1.29; P < .001) in HFpEF, and 1.16 (1.05-1.28; P = .004) in HFnEF. When LVEF was treated as a continuous variable, there was a linear negative association between LVEF and the effect of AF vs SR for the primary end point and HF hospitalizations and a linear positive association for cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSION

Compared with SR, AF was independently associated with worse outcomes across all LVEF ranges.