Long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in the Elderly: An International Ventricular Tachycardia Center Collaborative Group Analysis

BACKGROUND

Successful ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation is associated with improved survival in patients with heart failure. However, the safety and efficacy of VT ablation in the elderly, a population with higher competing nonsudden death risk and comorbidities, have not been well defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The International Ventricular Tachycardia Center Collaborative Study Group registry of 2061 patients who underwent VT ablation at 12 international centers was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival of patients ≥70 years with and without VT recurrence. Of the 2049 patients who met inclusion criteria, 681 (33%) patients were ≥70 years of age (mean age, 75±4 years). Among these, 92% were men, 71% had ischemic VT, and 42% had VT storm at presentation. Mean (±SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 30±11%. Compared with patients <70 years, patients ≥70 years had higher in-hospital (4.4% versus 2.3%; P=0.01) and 1-year mortality (15% versus 11%; P=0.002) but a similar incidence of VT recurrence at 1 year (26% versus 25%; P=0.74) and time to VT recurrence (280 versus 289 days; P=0.20). Absence of VT recurrence during follow-up was strongly associated with improved survival in patients ≥70 years.

CONCLUSION

VT ablation in the elderly is feasible and reasonably safe with a modestly higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality, with similar rates of VT recurrence at 1 year compared with younger patients. Successful VT ablation, that is, lack of VT recurrence, is strongly associated with improved survival even in this elderly subgroup.

Ventricular arrhythmias: device therapy and ablation

There are few randomized, well-controlled studies to guide decision making with respect to the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in the elderly treated with either device implantation or catheter ablation. Although some data are conflicting, the elderly appear to have a greater degree of risk related to treatment compared with younger ones; however, this increased risk is in part a consequence of age itself and comorbid conditions. Conversely, in terms of benefit, although the data may again be mixed, there is ample information indicating that age should not contraindicate aggressive treatment when accepted indications for intervention exist.

Mortality and safety of catheter ablation for antiarrhythmic drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

As the population ages, recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) is increasingly encountered in elderly patients with ischemic heart disease. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is useful for reducing VT therapy in patients with an implantable defibrillator. The utility of radiofrequency catheter ablation in the elderly is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of postinfarct VT in elderly patients.

METHODS

Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 285 consecutive patients with recurrent postinfarct VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Mortality and outcomes were compared for an elderly group (age >or=75 years, n = 72) and a younger group (age <75 years, n = 213).

RESULTS

The groups were similar with regard to baseline characteristics, except for a greater number of females in the elderly group (20.8% vs 10.8%, P = .03). Inducible VTs were abolished or modified in 79.2% of the elderly group and 87.8% of the younger group (P = .12). Major complications occurred in 5.6% of elderly patients and 2.3% of younger patients (P = .48). Periprocedural mortality was similar between both groups (2/72 in elderly and 9/213 in younger group, P = .74). During mean follow-up of 42 +/- 33 months, 50.0% of the elderly group and 35.2% of the younger group died (P = .08). No VT was observed in 63.9% of the elderly patients and 60.1% of the younger patients, respectively (mean follow-up 18 +/- 24 months, P = .80).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of catheter ablation are similar for selected elderly and younger patients. Advanced age should not preclude ablation when recurrent VT is adversely affecting quality of life in elderly patients who otherwise have a reasonable expectation for survival.