Integrated home monitoring predicts lead failure in a pacemaker dependent 4-year-old girl

Pacing device therapy in infants and children: a review

The number of pediatric pacemakers implanted is still relatively small. Children requiring pacing therapy have characteristics that are distinct from those of adults, including physical size, somatic growth, and cardiac anomalies. Considering these features, long-term follow-up of pediatric pacemaker implantation is necessary. Selection of appropriate generators, pacing modes, pacing sites, and leads is important. Generally, epicardial leads are commonly used in small infants. On the other hand, the use of endocardial leads in children is increasing worldwide because of their benefits over epicardial leads, such as minimal invasiveness, lower pacing threshold, and longer generator longevity. Endocardial leads are not suitable for patients with intracardiac shunts because of the high risk of systemic thrombosis. Venous occlusion is another significant problem with endocardial leads. With the increase in the number of pacing device implantations, the incidence of infection from such devices is also increasing. Complete device removal is sometimes recommended to treat device infection, but experience in the removal of endocardial leads in children is still scarce. This article gives an overview of pacing therapy in the pediatric population, including discussions on new pacing systems, such as remote monitoring systems, magnetic imaging compliant pacemaker systems, and leadless pacing devices.

Early detection of adverse events with daily remote monitoring versus quarterly standard follow-up program in patients with CRT-D

BACKGROUND

A relative high rate of clinical and device-related adverse events (AE) is generally reported in patients with implantable defibrillators for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). Aim of this study was to compare a daily remote monitoring (RM) to a standard program of in-office visits.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed RM database and hospital files of 99 CRT-D consecutive patients who were visited in the out-patient clinic every 3-4 months; thirty-three patients were in addition controlled remotely with RM (RM group). Kaplan-Meier curves of clinical or device-related AE-free rates were obtained. During a median follow-up of 7 months, clinical AEs were: ventricular and atrial arrhythmias in 14 and 11 patients, low CRT pacing in nine, heart failure, strokes, or death in 15. Device-related AEs were: insufficient pacing/sensing performances in nine patients, lead dislodgement in five. As comparing the RM group with the remaining patients, Kaplan-Meier curves of clinical AEs diverged to significantly different rates: 23.8% (confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-47.5%) in the RM group and 48.7% (21.6-75.7%) in the remaining patients (P = 0.00002), with a hazard ratio of 0.14 (CI 0.06-0.37). Nondivergent Kaplan-Meier curves were obtained for device-related AE-free rates.

CONCLUSION

CRT-D patients followed with quarterly in-office visits without a daily RM system had an 86% higher risk of delayed detection of clinical AEs, during a median follow-up of 7 months.

Monitoring capabilities of cardiac rhythm management devices

Since the advent of the first generation pacemakers, solely providing rate support, we have witnessed a technological outburst in the type and complexity of implantable devices. The introduction of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and later of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices enriched our therapeutic arsenal for the management of patients with heart failure and/or high risk of sudden cardiac death. In addition, during the last decade, newer generation cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMs) have been capable to provide a continuously expanding pool of diagnostic information derived by novel monitoring capabilities. Although at present the clinical role of this information is undervalued, it is evident that the clinical exploitation of data derived by CRMs may transform the standards of care for our patients by providing timely applied individualized diagnosis and treatment. In this context, even in the absence of solid data supporting the use of this information in everyday clinical practice, improving our familiarity with currently available monitoring algorithms is a prerequisite for the electrophysiologist who keeps in pace with the rapidly evolving technologies of CRMs and is prepared for their future role on clinical practice.

Remote Monitoring-The Future of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-up

Remote monitoring has developed out of the need to accommodate the demand of the growing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) population. After several years of clinical use, remote device interrogation systems have demonstrated ease of use for both patient and provider, reliability compared with in-office interrogations, and the ability to detect asymptomatic but clinically significant events. The effect of remote monitoring on morbidity and mortality is currently unknown, but several trials are underway to assess these outcomes. Many devices also have the capacity to remotely track physiologic parameters that may improve the management of heart failure. Remote monitoring of ICD-CRT populations is a promising technological advancement that likely will become the standard of care for ICD follow-up.