Ventricular optimization of biventricular pacing: a systematic review

Evidence that conflict regarding size of haemodynamic response to interventricular delay optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy may arise from differences in how atrioventricular delay is kept constant

Aims

Whether adjusting interventricular (VV) delay changes haemodynamic efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is controversial, with conflicting results. This study addresses whether the convention for keeping atrioventricular (AV) delay constant during VV optimization might explain these conflicts.

Method and results

Twenty-two patients in sinus rhythm with existing CRT underwent VV optimization using non-invasive systolic blood pressure. Interventricular optimization was performed with four methods for keeping the AV delay constant: (i) atrium and left ventricle delay kept constant, (ii) atrium and right ventricle delay kept constant, (iii) time to the first-activated ventricle kept constant, and (iv) time to the second-activated ventricle kept constant. In 11 patients this was performed with AV delay of 120 ms, and in 11 at AV optimum. At AV 120 ms, time to the first ventricular lead (left or right) was the overwhelming determinant of haemodynamics (13.75 mmHg at ±80 ms, P < 0.001) with no significant effect of time to second lead (0.47 mmHg, P = 0.50), P < 0.001 for difference. At AV optimum, time to first ventricular lead again had a larger effect (5.03 mmHg, P < 0.001) than time to second (2.92 mmHg, P = 0.001), P = 0.02 for difference.

Conclusion

Time to first ventricular activation is the overwhelming determinant of circulatory function, regardless of whether this is the left or right ventricular lead. If this is kept constant, the effect of changing time to the second ventricle is small or nil, and is not beneficial. In practice, it may be advisable to leave VV delay at zero. Specifying how AV delay is kept fixed might make future VV delay research more enlightening.

Optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy for congestive heart failure

In patients with advanced systolic heart failure and mechanical dyssynchrony, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective means of improving symptoms and reducing mortality. There are now several recognized approaches to optimize CRT. Imaging modalities can assist with identifying the myocardium with the latest mechanical activation for targeted left ventricular lead implantation. Device programming can be tailored to maximize biventricular pacing, and thereby is its benefit. Cardiac imaging has shown that atrioventricular and interventricular intervals can be adjusted to further reduce dyssynchrony. We review these various approaches that maximize the benefit derived from CRT.

Validation of automated monitoring of cardiac output for biventricular pacing optimization

Biventricular pacing (BiVP) can increase cardiac output (CO) during acute failure of the left ventricle (LV) after cardiac surgery. This CO benefit is maximized by adjustment of atrioventricular (AVD) and interventricular (VVD) pacing delays. Real-time CO calculation could facilitate this optimization. Accordingly, we compared real-time automated analysis (AA) of CO with manual analysis (MA) in an animal model of pressure overload of the right ventricle (RV). In six anesthetized pigs, pacing leads were placed on the right atrium, RV, and LV. Complete heart block was induced with ethanol injection, and RV systolic pressure was doubled with a pulmonary artery snare. Atrioventricular pacing delay was varied over seven common values and VVD over nine, in random sequence. Two LV pacing sites (LVPS) were also tested. Aortic flow velocity, measured by ultrasonic flow probe, was integrated by AA and MA to calculate CO. Interexaminer Reliability Coefficient (IRC) was determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for two 10-second runs in each animal. Cardiac output-AVD and CO-VVD relations were similar for AA and MA. Interexaminer Reliability Coefficients were 0.997 and 0.994 for MA vs. AA. Automated analysis was available in real-time. Manual analysis was delayed at 2 hours or more. Automated analysis merits development for real-time optimization of intraoperative BiVP.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: back to ECG?

In recent years, considerable effort has been devoted to improving patient selection and the programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Mechanical dyssynchrony has been investigated through echocardiography and the reliability of ECG in selecting patients has been criticized and doubt has been cast on its role. Up to now, patient selection for CRT has relied upon the criteria of a prolonged QRS, evidence of the electrical impairment of the conduction system. Can we get more information from ECG morphology? Can it provide any marker for selecting candidates to CRT? Can we obtain useful information from the paced ECG morphology by analysis of fusion beats? Can we use ECG to optimize biventricular or single-site left ventricular pacing programming? The present review provides a critical analysis of the criteria for patient selection and the methods for optimal device setting, all based on 12-lead ECG morphology.