Electrocardiographic Patterns in Patients with Neurally Mediated Syncope

The baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) is less informative in neurally mediated syncope (NMS) than in arrhythmic syncope. However, some of the ECG patterns present in NMS can have diagnostic and prognostic value in such patients. Electrocardiographic documentation of a syncopal spell and thus identification of the ECG changes can be performed during tilt table test (TTT) or during prolonged ECG monitoring. This work reviews the specific ECG patterns in NMS, which are primarily related to the cardioinhibitory reflex. In addition, there are other ECG findings present in patients with NMS that are being analyzed, such as increased heart rate variability as well as specific QRS voltage patterns. In addition to the diagnostic and prognostic value, these ECG patterns in NMS may help improving the selection of patients for pacemaker implant.

Heart rhythm characterisation during unexplained transient loss of consciousness in dogs

The identification of the heart rhythm during an episode of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is considered the reference standard method to elucidate the underlying aetiology. This study aimed to characterise heart rhythm in dogs during TLOC using Holter and external loop recorder monitoring. We retrospectively reviewed 24-h Holter monitoring and external loop recorder tracings from 8084 dogs. Heart rhythms from dogs that experienced TLOC during the recording was analysed to identify rhythm disturbances that occurred during episodes of TLOC. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were subsequently categorised into Type 1 (ventricular arrest), Type 2 (sinus bradycardia), Type 3 (no/slight rhythm variations), and Type 4 (tachycardia). Transient LOC was documented in 92 dogs over 230 episodes of TLOC. Percentage of cases with ECGs compatible with each classification were as follows: 72.1%, Type 1; 6.1%, Type 2; 20.9%, Type 3; and 0.9%, Type 4. Cardiac rhythm during the TLOC could have been a consequence of a neurocardiogenic mechanism in 46.7% cases, while intrinsic rhythm disturbances of the sinus node or of the atrioventricular node were diagnosed in 31.5% cases. In two cases, tachycardia was the possible cause of the TLOC. ECG patterns in dogs presenting with multiple TLOC episodes were completely reproducible during each episode. TLOC in dogs was primarily caused by ventricular arrest. Most dogs with TLOC had electrocardiographic finding suggestive of a reflex or neurally-mediated syncope, but one third had an ECG more suggestive of a conduction disorder. Distinguishing these two entities could help inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic plans.

Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats

Pacemaker implantation is considered as a standard procedure for treatment of symptomatic bradycardia in both dogs and cats. Advanced second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular blocks, sick sinus syndrome, persistent atrial standstill, and vasovagal syncope are the most common rhythm disturbances that require pacing to either alleviate clinical signs or prolong survival. Most pacemakers are implanted transvenously, using endocardial leads, but rarely epicardial leads may be necessary. To decide whether a patient is a candidate for pacing, as well as which pacing modality should be used, the clinician must have a clear understanding of the etiology, the pathophysiology, and the natural history of the most common bradyarrhythmias, as well as what result can be achieved by pacing patients with different rhythm disturbances. The goal of this review was, therefore, to describe the indications for pacing by evaluating the available evidence in both human and veterinary medicine. We described the etiology of bradyarrhythmias, clinical signs and electrocardiographic abnormalities, and the choice of pacing modality, taking into account how different choices may have different physiological consequences to selected patients. It is expected that this review will assist veterinarians in recognizing arrhythmias that may require permanent pacing and the risk-benefit of each pacing modality and its impact on outcome.

The Current Indication for Pacemaker in Patients with Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope

The most frequent cause of syncope is vasovagal reflex. It is associated with worse quality of life, depression, fatigue and physical injury. Recurrence of vasovagal syncope is an aggravating, reaching the rate of 69%. Initial step and pharmacological treatment may not work, especially in patients with recurrent syncope without prodrome. These patients can present cardioinhibitory response with asystole. Studies were designed to analyses the effectiveness of pacemaker for prevention of syncope. In this review, nonrandomized clinical trials, open-label randomized, double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled, and studies based on tilt test or Implantable Loop Recorder findings will be discussed.