A negative relationship between first-pass pulmonary vein isolation and body mass index in ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation

Background

We previously reported the relationship between first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (FPI) and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. Obesity is a worsening factor for atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence. However, the impact of obesity on FPI has been scarcely reported. General anesthesia (GA) facilitates completing PVI by preventing airway obstruction caused by sedative drug use. However, the impact of GA on the relationship also has not been elucidated.

Objective

The study sought to evaluate the impact of obesity and its relationship with GA on FPI.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 2187 consecutive patients undergoing ablation index-guided first atrial fibrillation ablation (conscious sedation in 1969 and GA in 218). We divided them into 4 groups according to body mass index (BMI): underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) (n = 80), normal (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2) (n = 1,160), overweight (25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2) (n = 763), and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) (n = 184).

Results

FPI rate decreased as BMI increased in both conscious sedation (68.1% in underweight, 61.5% in normal, 48.7% in overweight, and 39.0% in obesity; P < .001) and GA (87.5%, 67.1%, 61.3%, and 44.7%, respectively; P = .01). Multivariate analysis revealed overweight (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.79, P < .001, vs normal) and obesity (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62 P < .001, vs normal) as independent predictors for FPI and obesity as an AT recurrence predictor (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81, P = .04).

Conclusion

BMI increase was negatively related to the FPI rate. Notably, the FPI rate in obese patients, even under GA, was low, which might be related to their high AT recurrence.

Safety and efficacy of steerable versus non-steerable sheaths for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

With the development of radiofrequency (RF) ablation technology. In recent years, more and more patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been treated with RF ablation. Steerable sheaths (SS) have been widely used in RF ablation of AF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of AF ablation using SS and non-steerable sheaths (NSS).

METHODS

From the beginning to March 2022, we conducted a comprehensive, systematic search of the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to finish the study. For categorical and continuous data, we used ORs and mean difference to calculate the effect. We also estimated the 95% CI.

RESULTS

Five studies of RF ablation of AF were selected, three prospective and two retrospective, involving 282 SS and 236 NSS ablation patients. The rate of recurrence of AF or atrial arrhythmias was 27.3% versus 42.8% (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.36, 0.76, z=3.41, p=0.0006) and acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection (8.7% vs 17.4%, OR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.23, 0.95, z=2.10, p=0.04). In the SS group and the NSS group, the total ablation time (p=0.25), fluoroscopy time (p=0.26) and total operative time (p=0.35) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the use of NSS, the use of SS for RF ablation of AF can effectively reduce the recurrence rate of AF and the occurrence of acute PVs reconnection events. However, there is no advantage in shortening the total RF time, fluoroscopy time, total surgical time and reducing complications.

Muscle usage and workload assessment of cardiac ablation procedure with the use of a novel catheter torque tool in a pediatric simulator

BACKGROUND

Cardiac ablation catheters are small in diameter and pose ergonomic challenges that can affect catheter stability. Significant finger dexterity and strength are necessary to maneuver them safely. We evaluated a novel torque tool to reduce muscle activation when manipulating catheters and improve perceived workload of ablation tasks. The objective was to evaluate measurable success, user perception of workload, and muscle usage when completing a simulated ablation task with and without the use of a catheter torque tool.

METHODS

Cardiology attendings and fellows were fitted with surface electromyographic (EMG) sensors on 6 key muscle groups in the left hand and forearm. A standard ablation catheter was inserted into a pediatric cardiac ablation simulator and subjects navigated the catheter tip to 6 specific electrophysiologic targets, including a 1-min simulated radiofrequency ablation lesion. Time to complete the task, number of attempts required to complete the lesion, and EMG activity normalized to percentage of maximum voluntary contraction were collected throughout the task. The task was completed 4 times, twice with and twice without the torque tool, in semi-randomized order. A NASA Task Load Index survey was completed by the participant at the conclusion of each task.

RESULTS

Time to complete the task and number of attempts to create a lesion were not altered by the tool. Subjectively, participants reported a significant decrease in physical demand, effort, and frustration, and a significant increase in performance. Muscle activation was decreased in 4 of 6 muscle groups.

CONCLUSION

The catheter torque tool may improve the perceived workload of cardiac ablation procedures and reduce muscle fatigue caused by manipulating catheters. This may result in improved catheter stability and increased procedural safety.

Visualizable vs. standard, non-visualizable steerable sheath for pulmonary vein isolation procedures: Randomized, single-centre trial

INTRODUCTION

Steerable sheaths (SSs) are frequently used to improve catheter contact during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. A new type of visualizable (by electroanatomical mapping system) SS has become available in clinical treatment.

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare procedural data of visualizable vs. non-visualizable steerable sheath assisted PVI procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

In this single-centre randomized study, we enrolled a total of 100 consecutive patients who underwent PVI due to AF.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were randomized into 2 groups (visualizable SS group: 50; non-visualizable SS group: 50). Acute ablation success was 100% and the rate of the first pass isolation were similar (92% vs. 89%; p = 0.88). Using visualizable SS, left atrial (LA) procedure time (53.1 [41.3; 73.1] min vs. 59.5 [47.6; 74.1] min.; p = 0.04), LA fluoroscopy time (0 [0; 0] s vs. 17.5 [5.5; 69.25] s; p < 0.01) and LA fluoroscopy dose (0 [0; 0.27] mGy vs. 0.74 [0.16; 2.34] mGy; p < 0.01) was significantly less, however, there was no difference in the total procedural time (90 ± 35.2 min vs. 99.5 ± 31.8 min; p = 0.13), total fluoroscopy time (184 ± 89 s vs. 193 ± 44 s; p = 0.79), and total fluoroscopy dose (9.12 ± 1.98 mGy vs. 9.97 ± 2.27 mGy; p = 0.76). Compared to standard, non-visualizable SS group, the number of radiofrequency ablations was fewer (69 [58; 80] vs. 79 [73; 86); p < 0.01) as well as total ablation time was reduced (1049 sec. [853; 1175] vs. 1265 sec. [1085; 1441]; p < 0.01) in the visualizable SS cohort. No major complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the standard, non-visualizable SS, visualizable SS significantly reduces the left atrial procedure time, RF delivery and fluoroscopy exposure without compromising its safety or effectiveness in patients undergoing PVI procedures for AF.

Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Catheter placement and stability are well-known challenges in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. As a result, steerable sheaths (SS) were developed to improve catheter stabilization and maintain proper catheter-tissue contact. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to see if employing a SS influences procedure outcome.

Method

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SS compared to nonsteerable sheaths (NSS) in AF ablation. The primary outcome was the rate of atrial arrhythmia (AA) freedom by the time of the last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the procedure-related complications and procedural characteristics. Risk ratio (RR) or the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 10 studies, including 967 AF patients (mean age: 59.2 ± 11.1 years, 516 patients managed with SS vs. 454 with NSS), were included. SS group showed a higher rate of freedom of AA compared to NSS (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.29; p < .001). Both techniques had similar rate for procedural-related complication (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.50-2.39; p = .83). The SS strategy had a shorter procedure time (MD -10.6 [min], 95% CI -20.97, -0.20; p = .05) but comparable fluoroscopic and radiofrequency application times to the NSS group.

Conclusions

The SS for AF catheter ablation not only reduced the total procedure time but also significantly increased the rate of successful ablation while maintaining a similar safety profile when compared to the traditional NSS.

First clinical experience using a visualized sheath for atrial fibrillation ablation

INTRODUCTION

Recently, a novel steerable sheath allowing its real-time visualization within a 3D-mapping system was introduced to facilitate atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

AIM

This study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of AF ablation using the visualized sheath and to compare its performance with a matched control group of patients who received ablation with conventional and non-visualized sheaths.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients between 09/2019 and 02/2021 who underwent routine AF ablation using the visualized sheath. Patients were regularly followed-up in our outpatient's clinic. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial fibrillation (AF)/ atrial tachycardia (AT) episode lasting > 30 s after a blanking period of 3 months.

RESULTS

A total number of 100 patients undergoing ablation using the visualized sheath were compared to a group of 99 matched patients. No major complications were observed. Total procedure duration (108 ± 22 min vs. 112 ± 12 min; p = 0.045), fluoroscopy time (7 ± 3 min vs. 10 ± 5 min; p < 0.001) and -dose (507 ± 501 cGy*cm² vs. 783 ± 433 cGy*cm² ; p < 0.001) were significantly lower using the visualized sheath. The benefit in terms of procedure duration was mainly driven by a shortened left atrial dwell time (73 ± 13 min vs. 79 ± 12 min; p = 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 12 months, the overall procedural success was 85% in the visualized sheath group versus 83% in the control group (p = 0.948).

CONCLUSION

AF ablation using the novel visualized sheath is safe and effective and leads to a measurable decrease of procedure duration and radiation exposure. The integration of the novel sheath might help to further improve safety and efficacy of AF ablation.

Use of a Steerable Sheath for Retrograde Access to Antegrade Branches in Branched Stent-Graft Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms

Purpose: To describe how to use a steerable sheath from a femoral access to catheterize antegrade branches in a branched aortic stent-graft. Technique: Following femoral cutdown, a stent-graft with antegrade branches destined for renovisceral target vessels was deployed in the desired position. A steerable sheath with a tip that rotates up to 180° was introduced from the common femoral artery and navigated to the antegrade branches for consecutive catheterization of the target vessels and deployment of one or more bridging stents per branch. The technique is demonstrated in 4 patients who underwent successful complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal branched endovascular repairs with 1, 2, and 4 antegrade branches. Conclusion: Retrograde access for complex aortic endografts with antegrade branches using a steerable sheath appears feasible and effective and may serve as an alternative to upper extremity access.

Recent advances in managing vascular occlusions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Vascular occlusions continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The management of vascular occlusions in patients is complex, requiring specialized expertise in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and from other disciplines. Knowledge of currently available tools at the operator’s disposal is important to optimize the success of these procedures. In this review, we discuss some of the recent advances in recanalization procedures of vascular occlusions and thrombotic lesions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Transseptal Techniques for Emerging Structural Heart Interventions

The development of new transseptal transcatheter interventions for patients with structural heart disease is fueling increasing interest in transseptal puncture techniques. The authors review contemporary transseptal puncture indications and techniques and provide a step-by-step approach to challenging transseptal access and procedural complications.

Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force

PURPOSE

The influence of left atrial (LA) enlargement on the efficacy of steerable sheath usage during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is poorly understood. Here, we compared the catheter-tissue contact force (CF) and clinical outcomes between steerable and non-steerable sheaths among patients with different severities of LA enlargement.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 90 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for PV isolation (paroxysmal, 67 %) were enrolled and divided into tertiles of the LA volume (LA1, <124 cm³; LA2, 124 to 145 cm³; LA3, ≥146 cm³). An ipsilateral PV isolation was completed using either a steerable (n = 57) or non-steerable sheath (n = 33).

RESULTS

The average CF of each ipsilateral PV was lower in the LA3 group (right 13.8 ± 5.8 g; left 9.7 ± 5.2 g) than LA1 (right 15.6 ± 6.8 g, p = 0.005; left 12.5 ± 5.6 g, p < 0.0001) or LA2 (right 15.2 ± 7.3 g, p = 0.04; left 12.6 ± 5.3 g, p < 0.0001) groups. In total, the average CF around the left PVs was significantly higher with steerable sheaths than without (12.7 ± 5.5 vs. 10.2 ± 4.9 g, p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed that a tendency toward higher CF around the left PVs was observed in the LA3 group (12.3 ± 7.3 vs. 8.5 ± 3.9 g, p = 0.08) but was not in the LA1 and LA2 groups. Further, in the LA3 group, steerable sheath usage showed better clinical outcomes: shorter procedural (55 ± 29 min vs. 81 ± 39 min, p = 0.04) and fluoroscopic times (27 ± 11 min vs. 37 ± 17 min, p = 0.045) and a tendency toward a lower 1-year AF recurrence rate (39 vs. 12 %, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The beneficial effects of using steerable sheaths were more prominent in patients with severe LA enlargement.

Laparoscopic manipulation of a probe-based confocal laser endomicroscope using a steerable intravascular catheter

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy is an emerging imaging modality that enables visualization of histologic details during endoscopy and surgery. A method of guiding the probe with millimeter accuracy is required to enable imaging in all regions of the abdomen accessed during laparoscopy. On the basis of a porcine model of laparoscopic liver resection, we report our experience of using a steerable intravascular catheter to guide a probe-based confocal laser endomicroscope.

Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background—

Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation, but few high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exist, leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Methods and Results—

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, and clinicaltrials.gov for RCTs and non-RCTs reporting clinical outcomes after CA for persistent atrial fibrillation. Forty-six eligible studies were identified containing 3819 patients. After a single procedure, CA significantly reduced the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.53; P <0.001). Outcomes were better if the pulmonary veins were encircled (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; P =0.01), and electrical isolation reduced AF recurrence compared with purely anatomic encirclement (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.86; P =0.02). Linear ablation within the left atrium (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10–0.49; P <0.001), but not complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35–1.18; P =0.15), significantly reduced AF recurrence. Results were not improved by performing more extensive linear lesion sets (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41–1.43; P =0.40) or from biatrial ablation (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31–1.24; P =0.17). Where data were available, the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s). Sensitivity analyses showed that inclusion of non-RCTs increased statistical power without biasing the calculated effect sizes.

Conclusions—

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy. The most efficacious strategy is likely to combine isolation of the pulmonary veins with limited linear ablation within the left atrium.

Current hot potatoes in atrial fibrillation ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has evolved to the treatment of choice for patients with drug-resistant and symptomatic AF. Pulmonary vein isolation at the ostial or antral level usually is sufficient for treatment of true paroxysmal AF. For persistent AF ablation, drivers and perpetuators outside of the pulmonary veins are responsible for AF maintenance and have to be targeted to achieve satisfying arrhythmia-free success rate. Both complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation and linear ablation are added to pulmonary vein isolation for persistent AF ablation. Nevertheless, ablation failure and necessity of repeat ablations are still frequent, especially after persistent AF ablation. Pulmonary vein reconduction is the main reason for arrhythmia recurrence after paroxysmal and to a lesser extent after persistent AF ablation. Failure of persistent AF ablation mostly is a consequence of inadequate trigger ablation, substrate modification or incompletely ablated or reconducting linear lesions. In this review we will discuss these points responsible for AF recurrence after ablation and review current possibilities on how to overcome these limitations.

The utility of manually controlled steerable sheath in epicardial mapping and ablation procedure in patients with ventricular tachycardia

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of manually controlled steerable sheath, which provides greater flexibility and stability, in mapping and ablation procedure of ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients who underwent epicardial mapping and conclusive ablation. The first attempt to reach the primary endpoint defined as successful creation of detailed map of entire epicardial space and was achieved in 16 patients. Among the remaining 24 patients, we used the steerable sheath and achieved further success to create an entire map in all patients. After the delivery of RF energy, final procedural success was defined as complete abolishment of late potential and no more induction of any VT, and that was obtained in 10 out of 16 patients mapped with conventional sheath and 21 out of 24 patients with steerable sheath. The advantage of the steerable sheath seemed to be consistent, regardless of the site of ablation. There was no procedure-related adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

The manually controlled steerable sheath was safe and effective to achieve procedural success in patients with epicardial VT.

A review of mitral isthmus ablation

Mitral isthmus ablation forms part of the electrophysiologist’s armoury in the catheter ablation treatment of atrial fibrillation. It is well recognised however, that mitral isthmus ablation is technically challenging and incomplete ablation may be pro-arrhythmic, leading some to question its role. This article first reviews the evidence for the use of adjunctive mitral isthmus ablation and its association with the development of macroreentrant perimitral flutter. It then describes the practical techniques of mitral isthmus ablation, with particular emphasis on the assessment of bi-directional mitral isthmus block. The anatomy of the mitral isthmus is also discussed in order to understand the possible obstacles to successful ablation. Finally, novel techniques which may facilitate mitral isthmus ablation are reviewed.

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments. Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation. Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF, and the need to continue sinus rhythm, ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative. Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been developed.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of catheter ablation (CA) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA.

SEARCH METHODS

Searches were run on The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2009, MEDLINE (1950 to August 2009), EMBASE (1980 to August 2009), the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (1978 to August 2009) and the CKNI Chinese Paper Database (1994 to 2009) . Several journals published in Chinese were also handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with paroxysmal and persistent AF treated by any type of CA method. Two reviewers independently selected the trials for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessments of risk of bias were performed by two reviewers, and relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for dichotomous variables. Meta-analysis were performed where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 32 RCTs (3,560 patients) were included. RCTs were small in size and of poor quality.CA compared with medical therapies: seven RCTs indicated that CA had a better effect in inhibiting recurrence of AF [RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.18, 0.41)] but there was significant heterogeneity. There was limited evidence to suggest that sinus rhythm was restored during CA (one small trial: RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.40), and at the end of follow-up (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.31-2.67; I(2)=83%). There were no differences in mortality (RR, 0.50, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.65), fatal and non-fatal embolic complication (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.18 to 5.68) or death from thrombo-embolic events (RR 3.04, 95% CI 0.13 to 73.43).Comparisons of different CAs; 25 RCTs compared CA of various kinds. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation was better than segmental pulmonary vein ablation in improving symptoms of AF (p<=0.01) and in reducing the recurrence of AF (p<0.01). There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF. This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method.

Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Steerable sheath technology is designed to facilitate catheter access, stability, and tissue contact in target sites of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. We hypothesized that rhythm control after interventional AF treatment is more successful using a steerable as compared with a nonsteerable sheath access.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients with paroxysmal or persistent drug-refractory AF undergoing their first ablation procedure were prospectively included in a randomized fashion in 2 centers. Ablation was performed by 10 operators with different levels of clinical experience. Treatment outcome was measured with serial 7-day Holter ECGs and additional symptom-based arrhythmia documentation. Single procedure success (freedom from AF and/or atrial macroreentrant tachycardia) was significantly higher in patients ablated with a steerable sheath (78% versus 55% after 3 months, P=0.005; 76% versus 53% after 6 months, P=0.008). Rate of pulmonary vein isolation, procedure duration, and radiofrequency application time did not differ significantly, whereas fluoroscopy time was lower in the steerable sheath group (33±14 minutes versus 45±17 minutes, P<0.001). Complication rates showed no significant difference (3.2% versus 5%, P=0.608). On multivariable analysis, steerable sheath usage remained the only powerful predictor for rhythm outcome after 6 months of follow-up (hazard ratio, 2.837 [1.197 to 6.723]).

CONCLUSIONS

AF catheter ablation using a manually controlled, steerable sheath for catheter navigation resulted in a significantly higher clinical success rate, with comparable complication rates and with a reduction in periprocedural fluoroscopy time.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00469638.

Long-term results and the predictors of outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using steerable sheath catheter navigation after single procedure in 674 patients

AIMS

Identifying suitable candidates for circumferential left atrial pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA). CPVA is widely used as an ablation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Understanding the predictors of long-term success of single catheter ablation procedure of AF based on CPVA can help to identify those patients who have a high risk of recurrence based on this approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective analysis 674 consecutive patients (464 male, mean age 57.3 +/- 10.8 years) with AF (84.8%, paroxysmal) treated with CPVA ablation between May 2005 and August 2007 using a manually controlled steerable sheath (Agilis((R)) St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA), were included. The endpoint of the ablation was the completion of predefined lesions (CPVA for paroxysmal, and CPVA+mitral isthmus and roof line ablation for persistent AF). Seven day Holter recordings were done immediately, 3, 6, and 12 month after ablation. AF longer than 30 s was considered as recurrence. The success was defined as lack of recurrence during 7-day Holter recordings done 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence during the first 7-day Holter recording immediately after ablation. Forty-five and 20.8% of the patients received antiarrhythmic medications for the first 3 and 6 months after ablation procedure, respectively. After 6 months all antiarrhythmics were discontinued. About 51.5% experienced early recurrence. Twelve months success rate was 75.7% (paroxysmal: 75.7%, persistent: 75.0%, P = 1.0). Using multivariate analysis left atrial (LA) diameter > or =50 mm was the predictor of early recurrence {Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 5.1 (2.0-12.9)}. LA Diameter > or =50 mm [HR (95% CI) = 4.6 (2.6-9.1)]; early recurrence [HR (95% CI) = 4.3 (2.0-9.1)]; and arterial hypertension [HR (95% CI) = 4.6 (2.6-9.1)] were predictors of late recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In our patients' cohort, a single catheter ablation procedure based on CPVA using steerable sheath for catheter navigation resulted in a 1 year success rate of 75.7% [without (91.0%) and with (58.6%) early recurrence, respectively, P = 0.0001]. Among those patients who are at high risk for recurrence after CPVA other ablation endpoints rather than completion of predefined lesions might be necessary to increase the success rate.