Effect of left bundle branch pacing on right ventricular function: A 3-dimensional echocardiography study

BACKGROUND

The effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) on right ventricular (RV) function is not well known, and there is conflicting evidence regarding whether cardiac resynchronization therapy improves RV function.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to investigate the effect of LBBP on RV function and to evaluate the response of RV dysfunction (RVD) to LBBP.

METHODS

Sixty-five LBBP candidates were prospectively included in the study and underwent echocardiography at baseline and 6-month follow-up. LBBP response was left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling, defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume of ≥15% at follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were assigned to 2 subgroups on the basis of 3-dimensional echocardiography-derived RV ejection fraction (EF) before LBBP implantation: 30 patients (46%) in the no RVD group and 35 patients (54%) in the RVD group. The RVD group was characterized by higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, New York Heart Association functional class, and larger LV/RV size. LBBP induced a significant reduction in QRS duration, LV size, and improvement in LVEF and mechanical dyssynchrony in both the no RVD and RVD groups, and a significant improvement in RV volumes and RVEF in the RVD group (all P<.01). LBBP resulted in a similar percentage reduction in QRS duration, LV dimensions, LV volumes, and percentage improvement in LVEF in RVD and no RVD groups (all P＞.05). LV reverse remodeling (29 of 35 patients vs 27 of 30 patients; P = .323) in the RVD group was similar to that in the no RVD group after LBBP.

CONCLUSION

LBBP induces excellent electrical and mechanical resynchronization, with a significant improvement in RV volumes and function. RVD did not diminish the beneficial effects on LV reverse remodeling after LBBP.

Post-implantation CMR imaging to study biventricular pacing effects on the right ventricle in left bundle branch block patients

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a left bundle branch block. However, its impact on right ventricular (RV) function remains uncertain. This cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study found that CRT did not improve RV volumes and function, and CRT-off during follow-up had an immediate detrimental effect on the RV, which may suggest potential unfavorable RV remodeling with RV pacing during CRT.

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 2-imaging after device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) improve quality of life and prolong survival, but there are additional considerations for cardiovascular imaging after implantation-both for standard indications and for diagnosing and guiding management of device-related complications. This clinical consensus statement (part 2) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients after implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the role and optimal use of various cardiac imaging modalities in patients with suspected CIED-related complications and also discusses CRT optimization, the safety of magnetic resonance imaging in CIED carriers, and describes the role of chest radiography in assessing CIED type, position, and complications. The role of imaging before and during CIED implantation is discussed in a companion document (part 1).

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 1-imaging before and during device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

More than 500 000 cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are implanted in the European Society of Cardiology countries each year. The role of cardiovascular imaging in patients being considered for CIED is distinctly different from imaging in CIED recipients. In the former group, imaging can help identify specific or potentially reversible causes of heart block, the underlying tissue characteristics associated with malignant arrhythmias, and the mechanical consequences of conduction delays and can also aid challenging lead placements. On the other hand, cardiovascular imaging is required in CIED recipients for standard indications and to assess the response to device implantation, to diagnose immediate and delayed complications after implantation, and to guide device optimization. The present clinical consensus statement (Part 1) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients undergoing implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the use of imaging in patient selection and during the implantation procedure and also underlines gaps in evidence in the field. The role of imaging after CIED implantation is discussed in the second document (Part 2).

Right Ventricular Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Three-Dimensional and Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) induces left ventricle reverse remodeling; however, its effects on right ventricular (RV) volumes and function were not well described. This study aimed to assess the effects of CRT on RV. Of 112 patients, 63 enrolled with a mean age of 62.77 ± 7.23 years, including 40 males (63.5%). All patients met criteria for CRT implantation and were followed at 3-month and 6-month intervals. Standard 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and speckle-tracking analyses were conducted for assessment of LV and left atrium (LA). RV maximum diameters, tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, RV global (RV 4-chamber strain (RV4CSL), and RV free wall strain (RVFWSL), in addition to 3D echocardiographic assessment of RV, were done before CRT implantation and at follow-up visits. Mean follow-up period was 6.76 ± 1.25 months. A total of 48 patients (76.2%) were LV responders (LVR) whereas the rest were nonresponders (LVNR). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, risk factors, device implantation, and programming values. Only LVR had significant reduction in RV basal diameter, together with significant improvement of RV systolic performance: systolic velocity, fractional area change, RV4CSL, RVFWSL, and 3D-derived RV volumes and ejection fraction, compared with baseline values. In addition, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure decreased in LVR with reduction of tricuspid regurgitation severity. LV response, percentage change of RV4CSL, LA end-systolic volume index, and LA emptying fraction at 3-month follow-up were the most independent predictors of RV response by multivariate analysis. Reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume >13.5% had 92.3% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity. In conclusion, CRT-induced RV reverse remodeling and improved RV-arterial coupling. These effects were associated with left side response to CRT.

Improved Right Ventricular Systolic Function After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) to improve left ventricular function, the effect of CRT on the right ventricle in patients with heart failure has not been well described.

METHODS

We evaluated the effect of CRT on right ventricular systolic function in 20 patients (80% men; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [9.8] y) with cardiomyopathy and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (New York Heart Association class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS interval ≥120 ms). The median follow-up time was 15 months. Right ventricular systolic function, defined as a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) index of 16 mm or less, was evaluated in patients before and after CRT.

RESULTS

Twelve (60%) patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 12 (60%) patients had left bundle branch block detected using surface electrocardiogram. The mean (SD) QRS duration was 160.5 (24.4) ms. From before CRT to the time of follow-up after CRT, the mean (SD) ejection fraction increased significantly from 22.5% (5.6%) to 29.4% (7.4%) (P < .001). The mean (SD) TAPSE index also increased significantly from 13.70 (1.78) mm to 16.50 (4.77) mm (P = .018). Eleven (55%) patients showed improved right ventricular systolic function (TAPSE ≥16 mm) after CRT. Patients with a favorable right ventricular response to CRT were significantly older (64.6 [8.2] y vs 53.6 [8.4] y, respectively) and more likely to have nonischemic origin of cardiomyopathy than were patients with unimproved right ventricular function (66.7% vs 18.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that CRT is associated with improved right ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure and right ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients with nonischemic heart disease more often show improved right ventricular function after CRT.

Right ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction and relationship to QRS duration in patients with left bundle branch block and cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Marked QRS widening in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) may reduce efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that extreme QRS prolongation may accompany right ventricular (RV) dilatation/systolic dysfunction (RVD/RVsD) as well as left ventricular dilatation/systolic dysfunction (LVD/LVsD).

METHODS

We assessed rates of both ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction according to widening of QRS duration (QRSd) in 100 consecutive cardiomyopathy patients with true LBBB (QRSd ≥ 130 ms in female or ≥140 ms in male, QS or rS in leads V1/V2, and mid-QRS notching/slurring in ≥2 contiguous leads of I, aVL, and V1/V2/V5/V6). Ventricular dimensions and function were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

There was a trend toward an increase in the prevalence of LVD (13%, 20%, and 90%), LVsD (67%, 77%, and 90%), RVD (23%, 27%, and 50%), RVsD (27%, 27%, and 40%), RVD plus RVsD (13%, 17%, and 40%), or RVD/RVsD (37%, 37%, and 50%) according to the degree of QRS prolongation (<150 ms, n = 30; 150-180 ms, n = 60; and ≥180 ms, n = 10). Similarly, patients in the highest quartile of QRSd (QRSd ≥ 168 ms, n = 26) showed greater rates of RVD (23% vs. 44%, p = .069), RVsD (22% vs. 48%, p = .032), RVD plus RVsD (10% vs. 30%, p = .040), or RVD/RVsD (33% vs. 57%, p = .050) compared to those in the remaining quartiles (n = 74). QRSd ≥ 180 ms was identified as an independent predictor for the presence of RVD plus RVsD.

CONCLUSION

The rates of RVD and/or RVsD increased with QRS widening, particularly when QRSd exceeded 180 ms. This may diminish anticipated CRT response rates in cardiomyopathy patients with LBBB.

His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Ventricular Fusion Pacing for Electrical Resynchronization in Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (HOT-CRT) for reducing left ventricular activation time (LVAT) compared to His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing (including multipoint pacing [MPP]), using electrocardiographic (ECG) imaging.

BACKGROUND

HBP may correct bundle branch block (BBB) and has shown encouraging results for providing CRT. However, HBP does not correct BBB in all patients and may be combined with univentricular or BiV fusion pacing to deliver HOT-CRT to maximize resynchronization.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with a standard indication for CRT, implanted with HBP without correction of BBB and BiV (n = 14) or right ventricular (n = 5) leads, were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent ECG imaging while pacing in different configurations using different LV electrodes and at different HBP ventricular pacing (VP) delays. The primary endpoint was reduction in LVAT with HOT-CRT, and the secondary endpoints included various other dys-synchrony measurements including right ventricular activation time (RVAT).

RESULTS

Compared to HBP, HOT-CRT reduced LVAT by 21% (-17 ms [95% confidence interval [CI]: -25 to -9 ms]; p < 0.001) and outperformed BiV by 24% (-22 ms [95% CI: -33 to -10 ms]; p = 0.002) and MPP by 13% (-11 ms [95% CI: -21 to -1 ms]; p = 0.035). Relative to HBP, HOT-CRT also reduced RVAT by 7% (-5 ms [95% CI: -9 to -1 ms; p = 0.035) in patients with right BBB, whereas RVAT was increased by BiV. The other electrical dyssynchrony measurements also improved with HOT-CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

HOT-CRT acutely improves ventricular electrical synchrony beyond BiV and MPP. The impact of this finding needs to be evaluated further in studies with clinical follow-up. (Electrical Resynchronization and Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Direct His Bundle Pacing Compared to Biventricular Pacing; NCT03452462).

Equilibrium radionuclide angiography compared with tissue doppler imaging for detection of right ventricular dyssynchrony and prediction of acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare tissue doppler imaging (TDI) and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) for detection of right ventricular (RV) dyssynchrony and prediction of the acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS

This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Huai'an First People's Hospital. Patient consent was not provided due to the use of completely anonymous images from which the individual could not be identified in this study. Thirty-three patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent both TDI and ERNA before and within 48 hour after CRT implantation. RV dyssynchrony was measured with TDI using the difference in time to peak systolic velocity between the RV free wall and ventricular septum (RV-T). With ERNA, the standard of RV mean phase angle and RV phase standard deviation (RVmPA% and RVPSD%) were assessed.

RESULTS

Moderate positive correlations were observed among baseline RVmPA%, RVPSD% and RV-T (r = 0.689 and 0.716, P < .001). Twenty patients (61%) with a reduction of at least 15% in LV end-systolic volume were categorized as acute responders after CRT. Responders showed significant reduction in RVmPA% and RVPSD% after CRT (53.60 ± 4.15% to 43.95 ± 6.88% and 14.00 ± 2.41% to 10.40 ± 1.67%, P < .05), whereas RV-T remained unchanged (50.10 ± 10.28 ms to 49.25 ± 13.64ms, NS). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cut-off value of RV-T was 48.5ms, yielding 65% sensitivity and 77% specificity to predict acute respond to CRT. The cut-off value of RVmPA% was 49.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 85% specificity and the cut-off value of RVPSD% was 11.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 92% specificity.

CONCLUSION

ERNA might be an appropriate alternative to TDI for assessment of RV dyssynchrony. Either RVmPA% or RVPSD% was highly predictive for acute response to CRT.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventriculo-arterial Coupling: Clinical Correlates and Prognostic Impact in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Right ventriculo-arterial coupling (RV-PA) can be estimated by echocardiography using the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and it has prognostic value in the general heart failure (HF) population. We aimed to study the clinical correlates and prognostic value of RV-PA in HF patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 70 HF patients undergoing CRT implantation.

RESULTS

RV-PA coupling was estimated by TAPSE/PASP ratio using baseline echocardiography. Non-response to CRT was defined as improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction < 5% in a follow-up echo 6-12 months after CRT. Those with lower TAPSE/PASP ratios (worse RV-PA coupling) had higher NT-proBNP concentrations and increased E/e' ratio. TAPSE/PASP ratio and PASP, but not TAPSE, predicted nonresponse to CRT with TAPSE/PASP ratio showing the best discriminative ability with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 71%. Among these parameters, PASP independently predicted all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

RV-PA coupling estimated by TAPSE/PASP ratio was associated with established prognostic markers in HF. It numerically outperformed PASP and TAPSE in predicting the response to CRT. Our data suggest that this simple and widely available echocardiographic parameter conveys significant pathophysiological and prognostic meaning in HF patients undergoing CRT.

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on right ventricular function during rest and exercise, as assessed by radionuclide angiography, and on NT-proBNP levels

AIM

We carried out this study to investigate mid-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on right ventricular (RV) function and neurohormonal response, expressed by N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), in heart failure patients stratified by baseline RV ejection fraction (RVEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent technetium-99m radionuclide angiography with bicycle exercise immediately after CRT implantation (during spontaneous rhythm and after CRT activation) and 3 months later. Plasma NT proBNP was assessed before implantation and after 3 months. At baseline, RVEF was impaired (≤35%) in 14 patients, preserved (>35%) in 22. At 3 months, RVEF improved during rest and exercise (P = .02) in patients with impaired RV function, while remaining unchanged in patients with preserved RV function. Rest and exercise RV dyssynchrony decreased in both groups at follow-up (P < .05). A similar mid-term improvement in left ventricular (LV) function and NT-proBNP was observed in patients with impaired and preserved RVEF. In the former, the decrease in NT-proBNP correlated with the improvements both in LV and RV dyssynchrony and functions.

CONCLUSION

CRT may improve RV performance, during rest and exercise, and neurohormonal response in heart failure patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and baseline RV dysfunction. RV dysfunction should not be considered per se a primary criterion for excluding candidacy to CRT.

Assessment of right ventriclular systolic function prior to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Does it make any difference?

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Nearly 30% of candidates are inadequate responders. The benefit of patients with right sided heart failure from CRT is still a matter of debate. We examined the effect of CRT on right ventricular (RV) dimensions and overall systolic function and whether RV function prior to CRT could have an impact on CRT response.

Methods

94 patients with a mean age of 53.7 ± 14.6 years including 19 (20%) females, with advanced HF (EF < 35%, LBBB > 120 ms, or non-LBBB > 150 ms, with NYHA –III or ambulatory class IV) were enrolled and underwent CRT implantation. Standard two dimensional (2D) echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, for assessment of Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic (LVEDV), and end-systolic volumes (LVESV), ejection fraction, RV maximum basal (RVD basal), maximum mid (RVD mid) transverse, maximum longitudinal (RVD long) diameters, TAPSE, fractional area change (FAC), and tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (S′), in addition to RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) measured by speckle tracking echocardiography, were done before CRT implantation and at the end of the follow up period (5.9 ± 1.2 months). Patients presenting with reductions of LVESV of >15% were termed volumetric responders for further statistical analysis.

Results

63 (67%) cases were volumetric responders. Both groups were matched regarding demographic, clinical, ECG, and echocardiographic criteria apart from the RV significantly smaller transverse diameters and significantly better systolic function parameters in the responders group prior to CRT compared to non-responders (NR) group. At the end of the follow up, only the responders group had further significant reduction in RV basal, mid and longitudinal diameters (33.6 ± 7.1 vs 40.7 ± 8.6, 21.4 ± 4.9 vs 27 ± 6.1, 68.3 ± 10.8 vs 81.2 ± 15, respectively), p < 0.01, together with significant improvement in RV systolic performance: FAC (47.7 ± 7.3 vs 40.9 ± 6.4), TAPSE (25.2 ± 4.6 vs 22.1 ± 4.9), S′ (15.3 ± 2.3 vs 12.8 ± 2.3), and GLS (26.1 ± 2.1 vs 18.5 ± 1.6), P < 0.01, compared to baseline readings. S' and GLS were the only independent predictors of CRT response by multivariate analysis. S′ >9 cm/s, and GLS >12.45% had 100% sensitivity and 70%, 99.7% specificity, respectively for prediction of response to CRT.

Conclusions

CRT induces RV reverse remodeling and improves RV systolic function particularly in cardiac volumetric responders. RV systolic dysfunction before CRT implantation could identify patients that might not benefit from CRT thus helping proper patient selection and optimizing CRT response.

Prognostic significance of improvement in right ventricular systolic function during cardiac resynchronization therapy

Objectives There is conflicting evidence concerning the role of right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction in the long-term clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Therefore we aimed to assess evolution of RV systolic function during CRT, covariates associated with its improvement, and its impact on outcome. Methods and results All CRT device implantations (Jan 2009-Dec 2011) in our institution were reviewed. Records of 69 patients (25% female, mean age 62.8 ± 9.2 years, mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 27 ± 8%) were analyzed. Baseline RV fractional area change (FAC) < 35% was present in 37 patients (54%). At one year, 24 of them (65%) improved in RV FAC. LV remodeling and mitral regurgitation were significantly associated with the likelihood of RV FAC improvement (OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.13-20.46, P = 0.034 and OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.89, P = 0.029, respectively). The composite endpoint of death or heart transplantation occurred in 23 patients (33%) over a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.4 years. RV FAC at one year (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94, P < .001) was, independently of NYHA class and LV remodeling, associated with clinical outcome. Conclusions RV systolic function might improve during CRT. This seems mainly due to changed left-sided hemodynamics and LV remodeling. Good RV systolic function is independently related with better outcome.

Interplay between right ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and intraright ventricular dyssynchrony (IRVD) is questionable. Furthermore, it is unclear whether baseline IRVD and RVEF influences response to CRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of CRT on RVEF and IRVD and to investigate whether baseline IRVD and RVEF impacts response to CRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Equilibrium radionuclide angiography and clinical evaluation were performed in 32 nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients before and 3 months after CRT implantation. SD of the right ventricle mean phase angle expressed in degrees was used to quantify right intraventricular synchrony. RVEF was also evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in the RVEF and IRVD between the baseline and at 3 months after CRT equilibrium radionuclide angiography studies (RVEF: 40.5±10.6 vs. 40.4±10.4%, P=0.75; IRVD: 36.6±13.7 vs. 36.3±13.3°, P=0.35). Of 32 patients, 6/14 (43%) patients with baseline IRVD responded compared with 16/18 (89%) without baseline IRVD (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

CRT did not cause any significant change in RVEF and IRVD. Patients with IRVD are less likely to respond to CRT.

Right heart-pulmonary circulation unit and cardiac resynchronization therapy

Clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been known for years to be highly variable, with a spectrum of responses from no change or even deterioration of cardiac function to spectacular improvements. In the plethora of clinical, echocardiographic, biohumoral, and electrophysiological predictors of response to CRT and postimplant issues besides patient selection, the role of right ventricular (RV) function has been largely overlooked. In reviewing current evidence, we noticed conflicting results between observational studies and randomized trials not only concerning the impact of baseline RV function on CRT efficacy but also on the effects of CRT on RV size and function. Hence, we aimed to provide a critical reappraisal of current knowledge and unresolved issues on the reciprocal interactions between RV function and CRT, shifting the spotlight on the concept of right heart pulmonary circulation unit and on the clinical and prognostic significance of impaired ventricular-arterial coupling reserve. In this viewpoint, we propose that (1) CRT should not be denied to potential candidate because of "isolated" RV dysfunction and (2) assessment of baseline right heart pulmonary circulation unit and its dynamic response to pharmacological stress should be considered in future studies, as well as in the preimplant evaluation of individual candidates among other clinical factors.

Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Baseline Right Ventricular Function to Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) size and function in patients with markedly abnormal electrocardiogram QRS duration. However, relation of baseline RV function with response to CRT has not been well described. In this study, we aim to investigate the relation of baseline RV function with response to CRT as assessed by change in LV ejection fraction (EF). A systematic search of studies published from 1966 to May 31, 2015 was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and the Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they have reported (1) parameters of baseline RV function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] or RVEF or RV basal strain or RV fractional area change [FAC]) and (2) LVEF before and after CRT. Random-effects metaregression was used to evaluate the effect of baseline RV function parameters and change in LVEF. Sixteen studies (n = 1,764) were selected for final analysis. Random-effects metaregression analysis showed no significant association between the magnitude of the difference in EF before and after CRT with baseline TAPSE (β = 0.005, p = 0.989); baseline RVEF (β = 0.270, p = 0.493); baseline RVFAC (β = -0.367, p = 0.06); baseline basal strain (β = -0.342, p = 0.462) after a mean follow-up period of 10.5 months. In conclusion, baseline RV function as assessed by TAPSE, FAC, basal strain, or RVEF does not determine response to CRT as assessed by change in LVEF.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in the presence of left-to-right intracardiac shunting: more good than harm?

An elderly Chinese man with moderately impaired left ventricular function, left bundle branch block and ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular septal rupture had class IV heart failure symptoms refractory to medical and surgical interventions. As a treatment of last resort, a cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) pacemaker was implanted apprehensively, as preoperative concerns were raised whether CRT could exacerbate left-to-right shunting, hence negating the potential benefits of CRT. Introduction of CRT significantly improved the patient's haemodynamic status and symptoms, allowing for successful discharge home. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with severely symptomatic acute heart failure, widened QRS and active left-to-right intracardiac shunting, treated successfully with CRT.

Comparison of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: the SEPTAL CRT Study

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a recommended treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and wide QRS. The optimal right ventricular (RV) lead position being a matter of debate, we sought to examine whether RV septal (RVS) pacing was not inferior to RV apical (RVA) pacing on left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients receiving a CRT-defibrillator.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n = 263, age = 63.4 ± 9.5 years) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to RVS (n = 131) vs. RVA (n = 132) pacing. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction between baseline and 6 months was not different between the two groups (-25.3 ± 39.4 mL in RVS group vs. -29.3 ± 44.5 mL in RVA group, P = 0.79). Right ventricular septal pacing was not non-inferior (primary endpoint) to RVA pacing with regard to LVESV reduction (average difference = -4.06 mL; P = 0.006 with a -20 mL non-inferiority margin). The percentage of 'echo-responders' defined by LVESV reduction >15% between baseline and 6 months was similar in both groups (50%) with no difference in the time to first HF hospitalization or death (P = 0.532). Procedural or device-related serious adverse events occurred in 68 patients (RVS = 37) with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.401).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that septal RV pacing in CRT is non-inferior to apical RV pacing for LV reverse remodelling at 6 months with no difference in the clinical outcome. No recommendation for optimal RV lead position can hence be drawn from this study.

CLINICALTRIALS GOV NUMBER

NCT 00833352.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Reverse Remodeling After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Subsequent Events

Background—

Studies of echocardiographic predictors of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have largely involved single parameters. We hypothesized that combining parameters would be more robust and sought to develop a multiparametric echocardiographic score for predicting CRT response.

Methods and Results—

Global longitudinal strain of left ventricle was added to standard echocardiographic measurements in 334 consecutive patients (224 men; mean, 65±12 years) who underwent baseline echocardiography before CRT and underwent follow-up echocardiograms at 1 year. Regression analysis was performed to create an echocardiographic score for prediction of LV reverse remodeling (defined as ≥15% reduction in the LV end-systolic volume). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the association of the score with death, transplantation or LV assist device implantation, and heart failure hospitalization during 57±22 months of follow-up. LV reverse remodeling (n=161; 48%) was associated with pre-CRT LV end-diastolic dimension index <3.1 cm/m 2 , global longitudinal strain of left ventricle <–7%, left atrial area <26 cm 2 , right ventricular end-diastolic area index <10.0 cm 2 /m 2 , right atrial area <20 cm 2 , and right ventricular fractional area change ≥35%. Combination of these into an echocardiographic score allowed prediction of LV reverse remodeling with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 79%. During follow-up, there were 134 deaths, 18 heart transplantations/LV assist device implantations, and 93 heart failure admissions. The score was associated with heart failure admission, heart transplantation/LV assist device, or death (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–0.98; P <0.001) and all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–0.98; P <0.001), independent of age, sex, ischemic cause, and initial functional class.

Conclusions—

A multiparametric echocardiographic score is helpful in selecting patients likely to undergo reverse remodeling after CRT and predicts clinical outcomes.

Global and regional ventricular repolarization study by body surface potential mapping in patients with left bundle-branch block and heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The controversial effects promoted by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the ventricular repolarization (VR) have motivated VR evaluation by body surface potential mapping (BSPM) in CRT patients.

METHODS

Fifty-two CRT patients, mean age 58.8 ± 12.3 years, 31 male, LVEF 27.5 ± 9.2, NYHA III-IV heart failure with QRS181.5 ± 14.2 ms, underwent 87-lead BSPM in sinus rhythm (BASELINE) and biventricular pacing (BIV). Measurements of mean and corrected QT intervals and dispersion, mean and corrected T peak end intervals and their dispersion, and JT intervals characterized global and regional (RV, Intermediate, and LV regions) ventricular repolarization response.

RESULTS

Global QTm (P < 0.001) and QTc(m) (P < 0.05) were decreased in BIV; QTm was similar across regions in both modes (P = ns); QTc(m) values were lower in RV/LV than in Intermediate region in BASELINE and BIV (P < 0.001); only RV/Septum showed a significant difference (P < 0.01) in the BIV mode. QTD values both of BASELINE (P < 0.01) and BIV (P < 0.001) were greater in the Intermediate than in the LV region. CRT effect significantly reduced global/regional QTm and QTc(m) values. QTD was globally decreased in RV/LV (Intermediate: P = ns). BIV mode significantly reduced global T peak end mean and corrected intervals and their dispersion. JT values were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular repolarization parameters QTm, QTc(m), and QTD global/regional values, as assessed by BSPM, were reduced in patients under CRT with severe HF and LBBB. Greater recovery impairment in the Intermediate region was detected by the smaller variation of its dispersion.

QRS pattern and improvement in right and left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a radionuclide study

Background

Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a challenge. We evaluated the role of baseline QRS pattern to predict response in terms of improvement in biventricular ejection fraction (EF).

Methods

Consecutive patients (pts) undergoing CRT implantation underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and at mid-term follow-up. The relationship between baseline QRS pattern and mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis was evaluated. Changes in left and right ventricular EF (LVEF and RVEF) were analyzed with regard to baseline QRS pattern.

Results

We enrolled 56 pts, 32 with left bundle branch block (LBBB), 4 with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and 20 with non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD). A total of 48 pts completed follow-up. LBBB pts had significantly greater improvement in LVEF compared to RBBB or non-specific IVCD pts (+9.6 ± 10.9% vs. +2.6 ± 7.6%, p = 0.003). Response (defined as ≥ 5% increase in LVEF) was observed in 68% of LBBB vs. 24% of non-specific IVCD pts (p = 0.006). None of the RBBB pts were responders. RVEF was significantly improved in LBBB (+5.0 ± 9.0%, p = 0.007), but not in non-specific IVCD and RBBB pts (+0.4 ± 5.8%, p = 0.76). At multivariate analysis, LBBB was the only predictor of LVEF response (OR, 7.45; 95% CI 1.80-30.94; p = 0.006), but not QRS duration or extent of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Conclusions

Presence of a LBBB is a marker of a positive response to CRT in terms of biventricular improvement. Pts with non-LBBB pattern show significantly less benefit from CRT than those with LBBB.

Right ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of non-response and clinical outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in advanced heart failure (HF). However, an important subset does not derive a significant benefit. Despite an established predictive role in HF, the significance of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in predicting clinical benefit from CRT remains unclear. We investigated the role of RV function, assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting response to and major adverse clinical events in HF patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients were evaluated with CMR prior to CRT implantation in a tertiary cardiac centre. The primary end-point was a composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event. The secondary end-point was response to therapy, defined as improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 5% on echocardiography at one year.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (30%) met the primary end-point over a median follow-up period of 26 months, and 27 out of 56 patients (48%) were considered responders to CRT. On time-to-event analysis, only atrial fibrillation (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.02-6.84, p = 0.047) and RV dysfunction, either by a reduced right ventricular ejection fraction-RVEF (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p = 0.006) or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-TAPSE (HR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.80-0.96, p = 0.006), were significant predictors of adverse events. On logistic regression analysis, preserved RVEF (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, p = 0.01) and myocardial scar burden (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.96, p = 0.004) were the sole independent predictors of response to CRT. Patients with marked RV dysfunction (RVEF < 30%) had a particularly low response rate (18.2%) to CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Right ventricular function is an important predictor of both response to CRT and long-term clinical outcome. Routine assessment of the right ventricle should be considered in the evaluation of patients for CRT.

The importance of tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular overload in ICD/CRT recipients: beside the left, beyond the left

Device therapy for advanced heart failure has become increasingly employed in the last 10 years. Several retrospective studies have postulated a harmful effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead placement on tricuspid valve function and right heart hemodynamics, in particular among patients with preexisting pulmonary vascular overload and both left and right ventricular remodeling/dysfunction. This functional hypothesis is also supported by long-term clinical follow-up analyses of ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients. In this viewpoint, we propose that the possibility of worsening tricuspid regurgitation and consequent hemodynamic deterioration following device implantation should be considered in future studies, as well as in the preimplant evaluation of individual candidates among other clinical factors. 

Right ventricular ejection fraction <20% is an independent predictor of mortality but not of hospitalization in older systolic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Reduced right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (HF). Although most HF patients are older adults, little is known about the relationship between low RVEF and outcomes in older adults with systolic HF.

METHODS

Of the 2008 Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST) participants with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%) 822 were ≥ 65 years and had data on baseline RVEF estimated by gated-equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography. Using RVEF ≥ 40% (n = 308) as reference, we examined association of RVEF 30-39% (n = 214), 20-29% (n = 206) and <20% (n = 94) with outcomes using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

All-cause mortality occurred in 36%, 40%, 39% and 56% of patients with RVEF ≥ 40%, 30-39%, 20-29% and <20% respectively. Compared with RVEF ≥ 40%, unadjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with RVEF 30-39%, 20-29% and <20% were 1.19 (0.90-1.57; P = 0.220), 1.13 (0.84-1.51; P = 0.423) and 1.97 (1.43-2.73; P<0.001) respectively. Respective multivariable-adjusted HR's (95% CI's) for all-cause mortality were 1.19 (0.88-1.60; P = 0.261), 1.00 (0.73-1.39; P = 0.982) and 1.70 (1.14-2.53; P = 0.009). Adjusted HR's (95% CI's) associated with RVEF <20% (versus ≥ 40%) for cardiovascular mortality and HF mortality were 1.79 (1.17-2.76; P = 0.008) and 1.97 (1.02-3.83; P = 0.045) respectively. RVEF had no independent association with sudden cardiac death, all-cause or HF hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormally low RVEF is a significant independent predictor of mortality, but not of HF hospitalization, in older adults with systolic HF.

Heart failure patients selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for refractory chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. The patient selection for this therapy remains the basis for response improvement. Various parameters, methods and technology for identification of appropriate patient are under research. The influences of age and gender, disease progress stage such as mild and late stage CHF including right ventricular dysfunction, dyssynchrony and scar identified by imaging techniques like echocardiography, magnetic resonance and nuclear imaging, and atrial fibrillation on CRT benefits were respectively discussed. This review summarizes the current advancement in these areas.