Actual conditions of atrial septal lead implantation and the factors related to successful implantation

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker leads were originally implanted into the right atrial appendage (RAA) and right ventricular apex, but septal pacing, which is more physiological, is becoming increasingly popular. The usefulness of atrial lead implantation in the RAA or atrial septum is inconclusive, and whether or not atrial septum implantation is accurate has not yet been verified.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pacemaker implantation between January 2016 and December 2020 were included. The success rate of atrial septal implantation was validated using thoracic computed tomography performed for any reason postoperatively. We examined factors related to the successful implantation of the atrial lead in the atrial septum.

RESULTS

Forty-eight people were included in this study. Lead placement was performed with a delivery catheter system (SelectSecure MRI SureScan; Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in 29 cases and a conventional stylet in 19 cases. The mean age was 74 ± 12 years old, and 28 (58%) were male. Successful atrial septal implantation was performed in 26 patients (54%), with only 4 (21%) successful implantations in the stylet group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pacing P wave axis, duration, or amplitude between the atrial septal implantation group and non-septal groups. The only significant difference was for delivery catheter use [22 (85%) vs. 7 (32%), p < 0.001]. In multivariate logistic analysis, the use of a delivery catheter was independently associated with successful septal implantation [odds ratio (OR): 16.9, 95% confidence interval 3.0-90.9] after adjusting for the age, gender, and BMI.

CONCLUSION

The success rate of atrial septal implantation was very low at 54%, and only the use of a delivery catheter was associated with successful septal implantation. However, even with a delivery catheter, the success rate was 76%, so further investigations are warranted.

[Surgical basics of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation from skin incision through closure]

Implantation of pacemakers is generally considered a "minor intervention". Younger colleagues obtain their skills from experienced ones; ideally not just over the course of one or two interventions under surveillance but until a certain level of confidence is achieved. In Germany, certification is still optional. The German Cardiology Society (DSC, "Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie") provides expertise courses to obtain basic knowledge of pacemaker therapy; the GCS/GSCVS has been offering certification modules since 2013 to acquire fundamental knowledge from experts and basic technical skills by simulator training. The present article illustrates the major aspects of pacemaker implantation procedures and some avoidable pitfalls.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adult survivors of congenital heart disease (CHD) are at increased risk of arrhythmia. The goal of this review is to outline diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to arrhythmia in adult CHD patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Macro-reentrant atrial tachyarrhythmia is the most common arrhythmia encountered in adults with CHD. Approximately 25% of hospitalizations associated with arrhythmia. The risk of ventricular arrhythmia is estimated as high as 25-100 times that for the general population and increased after two decades. Routine ambulatory monitoring is important for arrhythmia risk assessment in adults with CHD. There are limitations, potential adverse effects, and risk of recurrence with antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and surgical approaches. Adults with CHD suffer various forms of arrhythmia, are at increased risk of sudden death, and require special consideration for medical and interventional therapy.

[Bachmann bundle pacing]

In pacemaker and ICD therapy, atrial leads are usually implanted in the right atrial appendage (RAA). This is easy but associated with a risk of negative hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects. Atrial depolarization, atrial contraction, and atrioventricular conduction can be delayed and desynchronized by RAA pacing leading to atrial fibrillation, pacing-induced long first-degree AV block, right ventricular pacing and the development of heart failure. High-septal atrial pacing near Bachmann's bundle that connects the right and left atrium can prevent the negative effects of RAA pacing and synchronize atrial excitation as demonstrated by the shortening of the PQ time and P wave duration during Bachmann bundle pacing. This review presents techniques to implant atrial leads at Bachmann's bundle. Apart from fluoroscopy in left anterior oblique projection, no additional effort compared to RAA implantation is required. Clinical studies on Bachmann bundle pacing are sparse; our own results suggest beneficial effects in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who receive atrial pacing for ≥50% of the time. Bachmann bundle pacing represents an interesting and simple option for atrial pacing. It is desirable to make this technique known to a wider spectrum of implanters and to generate more data on its clinical potential.

Pacing and Defibrillators in Complex Congenital Heart Disease

Device therapy in the complex congenital heart disease (CHD) population is a challenging field. There is a myriad of devices available, but none designed specifically for the CHD patient group, and a scarcity of prospective studies to guide best practice. Baseline cardiac anatomy, prior surgical and interventional procedures, existing tachyarrhythmias and the requirement for future intervention all play a substantial role in decision making. For both pacing systems and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, numerous factors impact on the merits of system location (endovascular versus non-endovascular), lead positioning, device selection and device programming. For those with Fontan circulation and following the atrial switch procedure there are also very specific considerations regarding access and potential complications. This review discusses the published guidelines, device indications and the best available evidence for guidance of device implantation in the complex CHD population.

Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial septal (LRAS) instead of right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing.

METHODS

We studied 102 dual-chamber pacemaker recipients with SND. The PQ interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram and the atrial paced to ventricular sensed interval (Ap-Vs) during LRAS and RAA pacing were measured and compared at implantation, 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. Group 1 included 62 patients with baseline PQ interval <200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 28) versus RAA (n = 34) pacing. Group 2 included 40 patients with baseline PQ ≥200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 20) versus RAA (n = 20) pacing. cum%VP were measured at 3 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

The characteristics and AV conduction properties were similar and the Ap-Vs interval was significantly shorter in the LRAS than in the RAA pacing group up to 1 year (193 ± 32 milliseconds vs. 220 ± 27 milliseconds in Group 1; P = 0.003, 222 ± 41 milliseconds vs. 281 ± 30 milliseconds in Group 2; P < 0.001). While cumulative percent atrial pacing was consistently similar, cum%VP was significantly smaller during LRAS than RAA pacing (1 ± 1% vs. 8 ± 18% in Group 1; P = 0.03, 7 ± 10% vs. 48 ± 38% in Group 2; P < 0.001). Similar observations were made with or without left atrial (LA) enlargement.

CONCLUSION

Compared with RAA, LRAS pacing showed shorter AV interval in SND patients with or without 1st degree AV block and LA enlargement. This beneficial effect persisted through 1-year follow-up, and decreased cum%VP significantly.

Prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of site and rate of atrial pacing on long-term progression of atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome: Septal Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Evaluation (SAFE) Study

BACKGROUND

Atrial-based pacing is associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in sick sinus syndrome compared with ventricular pacing; nevertheless, the impact of site and rate of atrial pacing on progression of AF remains unclear. We evaluated whether long-term atrial pacing at the right atrial (RA) appendage versus the low RA septum with (ON) or without (OFF) a continuous atrial overdrive pacing algorithm can prevent the development of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 385 patients with paroxysmal AF and sick sinus syndrome in whom a pacemaker was indicated to pacing at RA appendage ON (n=98), RA appendage OFF (n=99), RA septum ON (n=92), or RA septum OFF (n=96). The primary outcome was the occurrence of persistent AF (AF documented at least 7 days apart or need for cardioversion). Demographic data were homogeneous across both pacing site (RA appendage/RA septum) and atrial overdrive pacing (ON/OFF). After a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, persistent AF occurred in 99 patients (25.8%; annual rate of persistent AF, 8.3%). Alternative site pacing at the RA septum versus conventional RA appendage (hazard ratio=1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.75; P=0.65) or continuous atrial overdrive pacing ON versus OFF (hazard ratio=1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.74; P=0.69) did not prevent the development of persistent AF.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with paroxysmal AF and sick sinus syndrome requiring pacemaker implantation, an alternative atrial pacing site at the RA septum or continuous atrial overdrive pacing did not prevent the development of persistent AF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT00419640.