A new criterion to differentiate atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia: Combined AVR criterion

AIM

A combined aVR criterion is described as the presence of a pseudo r' wave in aVR during tachycardia in patients without r' wave in aVR in sinus rhythm and/or a ≥50% increase in r' wave amplitude compared to sinus rhythm in patients with r' wave in the basal aVR lead. We aimed to investigate the use of combined aVR criterion in differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT).

METHODS

In this prospective study, 480 patients with inducible narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was conducted during tachycardia and sinus rhythm. The patients were divided into two groups according to the arrhythmia mechanism that determined via EPS, AVNRT, and AVRT. Criteria of narrow QRS complex tachycardia were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

AVNRT was present in 370 (77%) patients and AVRT in 110 (23%) patients. Combined aVR criterion was found to be more frequent in patients with AVNRT (84.1% and 9.1%, p < 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, combined aVR criterion and classical ECG criterion were found to be the most important predictors of AVNRT (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the combined aVR criterion for AVNRT were 84.1%, 90.9%, 96.9%, and 62.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the differential diagnosis of patients with SVT, the combined aVR criterion identifies the presence of AVNRT with an independent and acceptable diagnostic value. In addition to classical ECG criteria for AVNRT, it is necessary to evaluate the combined aVR criterion in daily practice.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Several Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Prediction of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) whose diagnosis can be strongly suspected based on the surface eletrocardiogram alone. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of several electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the prediction of AVNRT.

METHODS

Between November 2010 and January 2014, a total of 256 patients who underwent electrophysiological testing (EP) with regular, paroxysmal and narrow QRS complex tachycardia were prospectively enrolled. We classified the ECG recordings during tachycardia for the presence of the following criteria: a) classical ECG findings of pseudo S wave in inferior leads and/or pseudo r' wave in lead V1, b) notch in lead aVL, c) no retrograde P waves visible during tachycardia; d) pseudo r' wave in lead aVR, e) notch in lead D1, f) any deflection after 100 ms of the QRS complex during tachycardia.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of AVNRT diagnosis were female sex (OR 4.17; 95% CI [2.11-8.24]; p <0.001), age >60 years (OR 3.53; 95% CI [1.25-9.96]; p = 0.017) and the classical ECG criteria (OR 7.41; 95% CI [3.62-15.17]; p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Female, age >60 years and the classical ECG criteria were the independent predictors of AVNRT diagnosis. Although several of the ECG criteria for AVNRT diagnosis showed acceptable sensitivities and specificities, they do not improve its accuracy.

Differentiation of Slow-Slow Form of AVNRT from AVRT through a Posteroseptal Accessory Pathway by Retrograde P-Wave Amplitude

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify whether retrograde P-wave amplitude during tachycardia can be used to differentiate slow-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (S/S-AVNRT) from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia through a posteroseptal accessory pathway (PS-AVRT).

METHODS

Sixteen patients with S/S-AVNRT and 14 patients with PS-AVRT constituted the study group. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological parameters were compared between both the groups. HA(CS-His), which indicates the location of the earliest atrial activation site during tachycardia, was calculated as the difference of the shortest HA interval in the His bundle region and the coronary sinus region.

RESULTS

Negative deflection of the retrograde P wave during tachycardia was significantly greater in S/S-AVNRT than in PS-AVRT in the inferior leads (lead aVF, -0.22 ± 0.04 mV vs -0.10 ± 0.07 mV; P < 0.001). Among the electrocardiographic parameters, retrograde P-wave amplitude in lead aVF had the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve 0.975, sensitivity 93%, and specificity 88% for a cutoff value of -0.16 mV). HA(CS-His) was negatively greater in S/S-AVNRT than in PS-AVRT (-24 ± 13 ms vs -3 ± 18 ms; P = 0.001), and was significantly correlated with the retrograde P-wave amplitude in lead aVF (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Deeper negative deflection of the retrograde P wave in the inferior lead can help differentiate S/S-AVNRT from PS-AVRT.

Validation of Standard and New Criteria for the Differential Diagnosis of Narrow QRS Tachycardia in Children and Adolescents

To establish an appropriate treatment strategy and determine if ablation is indicated for patients with narrow QRS complex supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), analysis of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required, which can differentiate between the 2 most common mechanisms underlying SVT: atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (OAVRT). Recently, new, highly accurate electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of SVT in adults were proposed; however, those criteria have not yet been validated in a pediatric population.All ECGs were recorded during invasive electrophysiology study of pediatric patients (n = 212; age: 13.2 ± 3.5, range: 1-18; girls: 48%). We assessed the diagnostic value of the 2 new and 7 standard criteria for differentiating AVNRT from OAVRT in a pediatric population.Two of the standard criteria were found significantly more often in ECGs from the OAVRT group than from the AVNRT group (retrograde P waves [63% vs 11%, P < 0.001] and ST-segment depression in the II, III, aVF, V1-V6 leads [42% vs 27%; P < 0.05]), whereas 1 standard criterion was found significantly more often in ECGs from the AVNRT group than from the OAVRT group (pseudo r' wave in V1 lead [39% vs 10%, P < 0.001]). The remaining 6 criteria did not reach statistical significance for differentiating SVT, and the accuracy of prediction did not exceed 70%. Based on these results, a multivariable decision rule to evaluate differential diagnosis of SVT was performed.These results indicate that both the standard and new electrocardiographic criteria for discriminating between AVNRT and OAVRT have lower diagnostic values in children and adolescents than in adults. A decision model based on 5 simple clinical and ECG parameters may predict a final diagnosis with better accuracy.

Update on arrhythmias and cardiac pacing 2013

This report discusses a selection of the most relevant articles on cardiac arrhythmias and pacing published in 2013. The first section discusses arrhythmias, classified as regular paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias, together with their treatment by means of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The next section reviews cardiac pacing, subdivided into resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring of implantable devices, and pacemakers. The final section discusses syncope.