Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Attenuates the Benefit on Left Ventricular Function

Background: Conduction abnormality post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains clinically significant and usually requires chronic pacing. The effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing post-TAVI on clinical outcomes warrants further studies. Methods: We identified 147 consecutive patients who required chronic RV pacing after a successful TAVI procedure and propensity-matched these patients according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score to a control group of patients that did not require RV pacing post-TAVI. We evaluated routine echocardiographic measurements and performed offline speckle-tracking strain analysis for the purpose of this study on transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) images performed at 9 to 18 months post-TAVI. Results: The final study population comprised 294 patients (pacing group n = 147 and non-pacing group n = 147), with a mean age of 81 ± 7 years, 59% male; median follow-up was 354 days. There were more baseline conduction abnormalities in the pacing group compared to the non-pacing group (56.5% vs. 41.5%. p = 0.01). Eighty-eight patients (61.6%) in the pacing group required RV pacing due to atrioventricular (AV) conduction block post-TAVI. The mean RV pacing burden was 44% in the pacing group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar at follow-up in the pacing vs. non-pacing groups (57 ± 13.0%, 59 ± 11% p = 0.31); however, LV global longitudinal strain (-12.7 ± 3.5% vs. -18.8 ± 2.7%, p < 0.0001), LV apical strain (-12.9 ± 5.5% vs. 23.2 ± 9.2%, p < 0.0001), and mid-LV strain (-12.7 ± 4.6% vs. -18.7 ± 3.4%, p < 0.0001) were significantly worse in the pacing vs. non-pacing groups. Conclusions: Chronic RV pacing after the TAVI procedure is associated with subclinical LV systolic dysfunction within 1.5 years of follow-up.

Clinical significance and prognostic value of right bundle branch block in permanent pacemaker patients

AIMS

In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with no prior history of heart failure (HF), the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been identified as an independent predictor of HF-related death or hospitalization, while the prognostic significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the long-term risk of all-cause mortality in patients with a standard indication for permanent pacing and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function when RBBB is detected at the time of implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 1348 consecutive patients who had undergone single- or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at the study center, from January 1990 to December 2022. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or a prior diagnosis of HF were excluded.

RESULTS

The baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed an RBBB in 241 (18%) and an LBBB in 98 (7%) patients. During a median follow-up of 65 [25th-75th percentile: 32-117] months, 704 (52%) patients died. The combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was reached by 173 (13%) patients. On multivariate analysis, RBBB was confirmed as an independent predictor of death [hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.63; P  = 0.005]. However, when considering the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization, this endpoint was independently associated with LBBB (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.38-3.29; P  < 0.001), but not with RBBB.

CONCLUSION

In patients with standard pacemaker indications and normal or moderately depressed left ventricular function, the presence of basal RBBB was an independent predictor of mortality. However, it was not associated with the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization.

Cardiac Remodeling and Ventricular Pacing: From Genes to Mechanics

Cardiac remodeling and ventricular pacing represent intertwined phenomena with profound implications for cardiovascular health and therapeutic interventions. This review explores the intricate relationship between cardiac remodeling and ventricular pacing, spanning from the molecular underpinnings to biomechanical alterations. Beginning with an examination of genetic predispositions and cellular signaling pathways, we delve into the mechanisms driving myocardial structural changes and electrical remodeling in response to pacing stimuli. Insights into the dynamic interplay between pacing strategies and adaptive or maladaptive remodeling processes are synthesized, shedding light on the clinical implications for patients with various cardiovascular pathologies. By bridging the gap between basic science discoveries and clinical translation, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of cardiac remodeling in the context of ventricular pacing, paving the way for future advancements in cardiovascular care.

Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing on cardiac function: prevalence, prevention and treatment with physiologic pacing

Right ventricular (RV) pacing is the main treatment modality for patients with advanced atrioventricular (AV) block. Chronic RV pacing can cause cardiac systolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss studies that have shown deleterious effects of chronic RV pacing on systolic cardiac function causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM), heart failure (HF), HF hospitalization, atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiac mortality. RV apical pacing is the most widely used and studied. Adverse effects of RV pacing appear to be directly related to pacing burden and are worse in patients with pre-existing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Chronic RV pacing is also associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Mechanisms, risk factors, clinical and echocardiographic features, and strategies to minimize RV pacing-induced cardiac dysfunction are discussed in light of the latest data. Studies on biventricular (Bi-V) pacing upgrade in patients who develop RV PiCM, use of alternate RV pacing sites, de novo Bi-V pacing, and physiologic pacing using HIS bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle area (LBBA) pacing in patients with an anticipated high RV pacing burden are discussed.

Risk factors for developing pacing induced LV dysfunction: Experience from a tertiary centre in the UK

INTRODUCTION

The risk factors for developing pacing induced Left Ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in patients with high burden of right ventricular pacing (RVP) is poorly understood. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the determinants of pacing induced LVD.

METHODS

Our data were retrospectively collected from 146 patients with RVP > 40% who underwent generator change (GC) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) upgrade between 2016-2019 who had left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% at initial implant.

RESULTS

75 patients had CRT upgrade due to pacing induced LVD (EF<50%) and 71 patients with preserved LV function (EF ≥50%) had a GC. Primary indication for pacing in both groups was complete heart block. Male predominance (p = 0.008), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.001), atrial fibrillation (AF) (p = 0.009), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p = 0.005), and borderline low systolic function (BLSF) (EF 50-55%) (p = 0.04) were more prevalent in the CRT upgrade group. Presence of AF (OR = 3.05, 95% CI 1.42-6.58; p = 0.004), BLSF (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 1.22-11.8; p = 0.02) and male gender (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.14-5.08; p = 0.02) were independent predictors for RVP induced LVD. Age (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14; p = 0.005) and BLSF (OR = 5.33, 95% CI 1.26-22.5; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of earlier development of LVD after implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that AF, BLSF and male gender are predictors for development of pacing induced LVD in patients with high RVP burden. LVD can occur at any time after pacemaker implant with BLSF and increasing age associated with earlier development of LVD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Bedside Temporary Transvenous Pacemaker Insertion in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Experience

Objectives

Insertion of a temporary transvenous pacemaker (TTPM) is one of the life-saving interventions performed in the emergency department (ED). The aim of the study was to determine demographic, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent TTPM insertion due to hemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmia in the ED.

Methods

In our study, 234 consecutive patients who underwent TTPM insertion at the bedside in the ED between January 2014 and October 2019 were included in the study. Etiological characteristics, electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, requirements for permanent pacemaker (PPM), and in-hospital mortality of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Extrinsic causes were the most common etiology of unstable bradyarrhythmia (57.6%). Most extrinsic causes were drug therapy-related factors (60.7%). Bradyarrhythmia persisted in 60% of patients after extrinsic causes were eliminated. The most common ECG finding was a high-degree atrioventricular block (62%). PPM was implanted in 44% of patients. In-hospital mortality rate was 19.7%. In the multivariate regression analysis, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measured at admission (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) were determined to be independent predictors for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

First diagnosis and intervention in the ED are of great importance for patients with unstable bradyarrhythmia. The fastest possible TTPM insertion in the ED can reduce mortality by reducing the exposure time to hypoperfusion of vital organs, especially in patients with reduced LVEF and low DBP. Furthermore, it should be kept in mind that an underlying latent conduction system disease can also be present in bradyarrhythmias thought to occur potentially due to extrinsic factors.

Midrange ejection fraction as a risk factor for deterioration of cardiofunction after permanent pacemaker implantation

PURPOSE

To determine whether the midrange ejection fraction (mrEF) is associated with increased risk of deterioration of cardiac function (DCF) after dual chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of relevance in patients with EF ≥ 40% and indications for PPMs. Patient characteristics were recorded at baseline and 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after PPM implantation with leads placed in the right ventricular apex. These included clinical symptoms, signs, biochemical parameters, BNP, echocardiography and ECG parameters, and pacing-related parameter changes. The patients were followed-up for 6 months. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 879 patients were included, aged 35 to 88 years (mean age 67.2 ± 9.6); a total of 81 patients (9.2%) developed DCF after PPM implantation, including LVEF < 40% (57 cases) and increased NYHA class (24 cases). Cox models demonstrated that age ≥ 75 years (HR 2.273 [95% CI, 1.541-3.626]), OMI (HR 2.078 [95% CI, 1.275-3.604]), mrEF (HR 2.762 [95% CI, 1.558-4.769]), moderate mitral regurgitation (HR 2.819 [95% CI, 1.604-4.153]), and right ventricular pacing ≥ 50% (HR 2.311 [95% CI, 1.478-3.937]) were strong predictors for DCF, and NT-proBNP > 1000 ng/L and paced QRS duration ≥ 180 ms were also the independent predictors of DCF.

CONCLUSIONS

MrEF was associated with increased risk of deterioration of cardiac function after PPM implantation. Moderate mitral regurgitation and increased NT-proBNP levels are also potential independent predictors for deterioration of cardiac function after PPM implantation.

Clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

AIMS

We investigated the clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From a retrospective analysis of 1418 consecutive pacemaker patients, 618 were found to have a preserved baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), follow-up echocardiographic data, and no history of heart failure (HF). PiCM was defined as a reduction in LVEF (< 50%) along with either (i) a ≥ 10% decrease in LVEF, or (ii) new-onset regional wall motion abnormality unrelated to coronary artery disease. PiCM occurred in 87 of 618 patients (14.1%), with a decrease in mean LVEF from 60.5% to 40.1%. The median time to PiCM was 4.7 years. Baseline left bundle branch block, wider paced QRS duration (≥ 155 ms), and higher ventricular pacing percentage (≥ 86%) were identified as independent predictors of PiCM in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk of PiCM increased gradually with the number of identified predictors, becoming more significant in the presence of two or more predictors (P < 0.001). During the entire follow-up (median 7.2 years), the risk of all-cause death or HF admission was significantly higher in patients with PiCM compared to those without PiCM (38.3% vs. 54.0%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.93; 95% confidence interval 1.82-4.72; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy patients showed a worse long-term prognosis than those without PiCM. Therefore, patients with multiple risk factors of PiCM should be monitored carefully even if their left ventricular systolic function is preserved initially. A timely upgrade to a biventricular or His-bundle pacing device needs to be considered in patients with PiCM.

Comparison of De Novo versus Upgrade Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Focused on the Upgrade for Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) shows better outcomes than de novo CRT. To do so, we compared the efficacy of CRT between de novo and upgrade groups, focusing particularly on the effect of upgrade CRT on patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PiCM was defined as new-onset dilated cardiomyopathy following pacemaker implantation in patients with baseline normal ejection fraction ≥50%. Electro-mechanical reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes were compared among the de novo (n=62), PiCM upgrade (n=7), and non-PiCM upgrade (n=8) CRT groups.

RESULTS

The PiCM upgrade group showed significantly greater electro-mechanical reverse remodeling than the de novo CRT or non-PiCM upgrade groups at 6-month follow-up. The rate of super-responders was significantly higher in the PiCM upgrade group than the other CRT groups. The group factor of the PiCM upgrade was identified as an independent predictor of super-responder in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.4, 95% confidential interval 1.08-99.4, p=0.043). During the median follow-up of 15.8 months, the PiCM upgrade group showed the lowest rate of composite clinical outcomes, including cardiac death, heart transplantation, and heart failure-related rehospitalization (p=0.059).

CONCLUSION

The upgrade CRT for PiCM patients showed better performance in terms of electro-mechanical reverse remodeling than de novo implantation or upgrade CRT in non-PiCM patients.

Prevalence and clinical significance of left bundle branch block according to classical or strict definition criteria in permanent pacemaker patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac mortality and heart failure (HF). Recently, new criteria to define strict LBBB have been proposed: QRS duration ≥140 ms for men and ≥130 ms for women, along with mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 contiguous leads.

HYPOTHESIS

We assessed the prevalence and prognostic significance of LBBB according to classical (QRS duration ≥120ms) and strict criteria in permanent pacemaker patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 723 consecutive patients who had undergone single- or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation at the study center from July 2002 to December 2014. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% or a prior diagnosis of HF were excluded.

RESULTS

LBBB was reported in 54 (7%) patients, and strict-LBBB in 15 (2%) patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 18-92 months), 147 (20%) patients reached the combined endpoint of death or HF hospitalization. Patients with LBBB and those with strict-LBBB displayed significantly higher rates of death or HF hospitalization (log-rank test, all P < 0.0001). In particular, strict-LBBB was associated with the worst outcome. The presence of LBBB according to classical definition criteria (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.98, confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-3.19, P = 0.005) and to strict criteria (HR = 2.20; CI: 1.04-4.65; P = 0.039) were both confirmed as independent predictors of death or HF hospitalization after adjustment for relevant clinical covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had undergone standard pacemaker implantation, the prevalence of LBBB was 7% according to classical definition criteria and 2% according to strict criteria. The presence of LBBB, and particularly of strict-LBBB, at the baseline predicted a poor outcome in terms of death or HF hospitalization.

Impact of prior permanent pacemaker on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been studied.

HYPOTHESIS

PPM may increase heart failure (HF) burden on patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We recruited consecutive patients undergoing PCI and carried out a nested case-control study. Patients with confirmed PPM undergoing first PCI were identified and matched by age and sex in 1:1 fashion to patients without PPM undergoing first PCI. Clinical data were collected and analyzed. The primary endpoint outcomes were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 156 patients. The mean follow-up period was 4.6 ± 2.9 years. The overall all-cause mortality was 21.15%, without significant difference between the 2 groups (21.79% vs 20.51%; P = 0.85). However, the rate of HF-related hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with PPM than in controls (26.92% vs 10.26%; P = 0.008). After adjustment for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, stroke, left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), PCI patients with PPM were still associated with a greater hospitalization rate for HF (odds ratio: 4.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-19.80, P = 0.061). Further analysis in the ACS subgroup showed VVI-mode pacing enhanced the risk for HF-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio: 8.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.37-49.75, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

PPM has no effect on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing first PCI but significantly increases the HF-associated hospitalization rate, especially in ACS patients.

Self-Care, Sense Of Coherence And Depression In Patients Hospitalized For Decompensated Heart Failure

OBJECTIVE To analyze the self-care behaviors according to gender, the symptoms of depression and sense of coherence and compare the measurements of depression and sense of coherence according to gender. METHOD A correlational, cross-sectional study that investigated 132 patients with decompensated heart failure (HF). Data were collected through interviews and consultation to medical records, and analyzed using the chi-square and the Student's t tests with significance level of 0.05. Participants were 75 men and 57 women, aged 63.2 years on average (SD = 13.8). RESULTS No differences in self-care behavior by gender were found, except for rest after physical activity (p = 0.017). Patients who practiced physical activity showed fewer symptoms of depression (p<0.001). There were no differences in sense of coherence according to self-care behavior and gender. Women had more symptoms of depression than men (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Special attention should be given to women with HF considering self-care and depressive symptoms.

Risk of heart failure- and cardiac death gradually increases with more right ventricular pacing

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) events. However, the extent and shape of this association is hardly assessed.

OBJECTIVE

We quantified whether the undesired effects of RVP are confirmed in an unselected population of first bradycardia pacemaker recipients. Furthermore, we studied the shape of the association between RVP and HF death and cardiac death.

METHODS

Cumulative percentage RVP (%RVP) was measured in 1395 patients. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis with %RVP as time-dependant co-variate we evaluated the association between %RVP and HF- and cardiac death, both unadjusted and adjusted for confounders, including age, gender, pacemaker-indication, cardiac disease, HF at baseline, diabetes, hypertension, atrio-ventricular synchrony, usage of beta-blocking drugs, anti-arrhythmic medication, HF medication, and prior atrial fibrillation/flutter. Non-linear associations were evaluated with restricted cubic splines.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 5.8 (SD 1.1) years 104 HF deaths and 144 cardiac deaths were observed. %RVP was significantly associated with HF- and cardiac death in both unadjusted (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively) and adjusted analyses (p=0.046 and p=0.009, respectively). Our results show a linear association between %RVP and HF- and cardiac death. We observed a constant increase of 8% risk of HF death per 10% increase in RVP. A model incorporating various non-linear transformations of %RVP using restrictive cubic splines showed no improved model fit over linear associations.

CONCLUSION

This long-term, prospective study observed a significant, though linear association between %RVP and risk of HF death and/or cardiac death in unselected bradycardia pacing recipients.

Right versus left atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Riverleft study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of sick sinus syndrome will increase due to population ageing. Consequently, this will result in an increase in the number of pacemaker implantations. The atrial lead is usually implanted in the right atrial appendage, but this position may be ineffective for prevention of atrial fibrillation. It has been suggested that pacing distally in the coronary sinus might be more successful in preventing atrial fibrillation episodes. The aim of this trial is to study the efficacy of distal coronary sinus versus right atrial appendage pacing in preventing atrial fibrillation episodes in patients with sick sinus syndrome.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is designed as a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Patients with sick sinus syndrome and at least one atrial fibrillation episode of 30 seconds or more in the six months before recruitment will be eligible for participation in this study.All participants will be randomized between pacing distally in the coronary sinus and right atrial appendage. Randomization is stratified for all participating centers. Conventional dual-chamber pacemakers with advanced home monitoring functionality will be implanted. The ventricular lead will be implanted in the right ventricular apex. The first three months of the 36-month follow-up period are considered as run-in time. During the pre-randomization visit and follow-up, an interview, electrocardiogram and pacemaker assessment will be performed, prescribed antiarrhythmic medication will be reviewed and patients will be asked to complete an SF-36 questionnaire. An echocardiographic examination will be conducted in the pre-randomization phase and at the end of each follow-up year. Home monitoring will be used to send daily reports in case of atrial fibrillation episodes.

DISCUSSION

This randomized controlled trial is the first in which home monitoring will be used to compare atrial fibrillation recurrences between pacing in the distal coronary sinus or right atrial appendage. Home monitoring gives the opportunity to accurately detect atrial fibrillation episodes and to study characteristics of atrial fibrillation episodes. Should distal coronary sinus pacing significantly diminish atrial fibrillation recurrences, this study will redefine the preferential location of an atrial lead for preventive pacing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN65911661, registered on 8 July 2013.

Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.30; P=0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.17; P=0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.30; P=0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.85; P=0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time (P=0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, -2.26; 95% confidence interval, -4.07 to -0.44; P=0.013; R(2)=0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.