Advancing the science of management of arrhythmic disease in children and adult congenital heart disease patients within the last 25 years

This review article reflects how publications in EP Europace have contributed to advancing the science of management of arrhythmic disease in children and adult patients with congenital heart disease within the last 25 years. A special focus is directed to congenital atrioventricular (AV) block, the use of pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the young with and without congenital heart disease, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, mapping and ablation technology, and understanding of cardiac genomics to untangle arrhythmic sudden death in the young.

Risk Stratification in Pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White: Practice Variation Among Pediatric Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists

BACKGROUND

Published guidelines provide recommendations for risk stratification in pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW). There are no data on provider concordance with these guidelines. We hypothesized that significant practice variation exists between pediatric cardiologists (PC) and electrophysiologists (EP).

METHOD

The records of all patients, age 8 to 21 years, with a new ECG diagnosis of WPW between 1/1/2013 and 12/31/2018, from a single center, were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were categorized on the basis of symptoms and resting ECG findings as one of the following: asymptomatic intermittent WPW, asymptomatic persistent WPW, or symptomatic WPW. The performance and results of diagnostic testing, including Holter monitor, event monitor, exercise stress test (EST), and electrophysiology study (EPS), were recorded. The primary outcome was concordance with published guidelines. A secondary outcome was documentation of a discussion of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk.

RESULTS

615 patient encounters were analyzed in 231 patients with newly diagnosed WPW pattern on ECG (56% male; mean age at diagnosis 13.9 ± 2.5 years). EP were observed to have a significantly higher rate of guideline concordance than PC (95% vs. 71%, p < 0.001). There was significant practice variation between PC and EP in the documentation of a discussion of SCD risk: 96% in EP vs. 39% in PC (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significant practice variation exists in the non-invasive and invasive risk stratification of pediatric WPW, with lower concordance to published guidelines amongst PC, when compared to EP. This report highlights the need to promote awareness of current WPW guidelines in the pediatric cardiology community at large.

The success rate of radiofrequency catheter ablation in Wolff-Parkinson-White-Syndrome patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for symptomatic Wolff Parkinson White (WPW) patients according to the American Heart Association. We conducted this study to assess the success rate, recurrence rate, and rate of complications associated with the utilization of radiofrequency catheter ablation for managing patients with WPW.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science and Scopus databases using all identified keywords and index terms through 4 January 2022. We included all studies conducted on WPW patients who were treated with ablation. We conducted the analysis using Open Meta Analyst and MedCalc version 19.1.

RESULTS

Among 2268 unique articles identified, only 11 articles met our inclusion criteria. The pooled effect estimates showed high success rate (94.1%[95%CI:92.3-95.9], p < 0.001)), low recurrence rate (6.2% [95%CI:4.5-7.8, p < 0.001]) and low rate of complications (1%[95%CI:0.4-1.5, p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

RFA showed a high success rate, low recurrence rate and low rate of complications in WPW patients.

Comparison of Outcomes of Catheter Ablation in Asymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Preexcitation to Guidelines and Beyond

Management of asymptomatic subjects with preexcitation remains controversial. Our objective was to analyze the reasons an electrophysiological study (EPS) was performed in an asymptomatic population referred for the procedure, and compare the results of catheter ablation between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Patients ≥18 years of age with preexcitation referred for an EPS and ablation were grouped as either symptomatic or asymptomatic. We analyzed in both subsets for (1) reasons for the procedure, (2) EPS results (anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway, tachycardia/atrial fibrillation inducibility, anatomical localization), (3) success of the procedure, and (4) incidence of complications. We included 175 patients, 121 of which were symptomatic (39 ± 16 years) and 54 were asymptomatic (35 ± 14 years, p = NS not significant). The most frequent symptoms were palpitations (87%) and syncope (7%). EPS was performed in 44 of 54 asymptomatic patients mainly because of involvement in sports (60%) or high-risk employment (14%). Anterograde effective refractory period was significantly longer in asymptomatic patients (314 ± 55 milliseconds) than in symptomatic patients (278 ± 46 milliseconds; p <0.001). Orthodromic tachycardia inducibility was significantly higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic patients (69% and 27%, respectively; p <0.001). A total of 170 accessory pathways (49% left free wall, 12% right free wall, 39% septal) were observed without significant differences in the anatomical location between groups. Catheter ablation was attempted in all patients, succeeding in 98% of symptomatic and 95% of asymptomatic patients, without major complications in either group. In conclusion, the reasons for invasive evaluation of asymptomatic patients with preexcitation may be outside the scope of current guidelines. Catheter ablation produces excellent results without major complications.

Review paper on WPW and athletes: Let sleeping dogs lie?

Accessory pathways are present in 1 in 300 young individuals. They are often asymptomatic and potentially lethal arrhythmias may be the first presentation. During long-term follow-up, up to 20% of asymptomatic individuals with pre-excitation go on to develop an arrhythmia and the absence of traditional clinical and electrophysiological high-risk markers does not guarantee the "safe" nature of an accessory pathway. The widespread availability of permanent cure for the condition at low risk by catheter ablation, creates an incentive to screen for accessory pathways with a 12-lead ECG, particularly in individuals who are perceived to be at increased risk, such as athletes and high-risk professions. We review the existing literature on the assessment and management of accessory pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White [WPW] syndrome) and discuss its implications for the young athletic population.

Management of Asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White Pattern in Young Patients: Has Anything Changed?

The approach to pediatric asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) patients is controversial. The objective of this review is to update the last consensus of specialists of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society/Heart Rhythm Society on this subject in order to summarize the most recent evidence on the management of young patients with asymptomatic WPW pattern. A systematic review of the literature published between 2008 and 2018 was performed taking into account the protocol of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in PubMed (including Cochrane), Embase, and Web of Science. Observational, experimental, and multicentric studies were included. Out of a total of 37 articles selected, 4 were considered eligible. Most studies considered a cutoff age of 8 or greater as recommended in the 2012 consensus. The identification of a shortest pre-excitatory RR interval (SPERRI) ≤ 250 ms seems to be the best predictor for risk stratification. The importance of routine isoprenaline use to improve the sensitivity of the electrophysiological study to identify patients at high risk of sudden death was consensual. Prophylactic ablative therapy has been indicated in asymptomatic children with an accessory pathway (AP) who have a low SPERRI and/or a low effective anterograde period of the AP and/or multiple APs. Despite the evidence found in the most recent studies, more studies are warranted in this setting.

[AV-reentrant tachycardia and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome : Diagnosis and treatment]

The AV-reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) is a supraventricular tachycardia with an incidence of 1-3/1000. The pathophysiological basis is an accessory atrioventricular pathway (AP). Patients with AVRT typically present with palpitations, an on-off characteristic, anxiety, dyspnea, and polyuria. This type of tachycardia may often be terminated by vagal maneuvers. Although the clinical presentation of AVRT is quite similar to AV-nodal reentrant tachycardias, the correct diagnosis is often facilitated by analyzing a standard 12-lead ECG at normal heart rate showing ventricular preexcitation. Curative catheter ablation of the AP represents the therapy of choice in symptomatic patients. This article is the fourth part of a series written to improve the professional education of young electrophysiologists. It explains pathophysiology, symptoms, and electrophysiological findings of an invasive EP study. It focusses on mapping and ablation of accessory pathways.

EHRA research network surveys: 6 years of EP wires activity

Clinical practice should follow guidelines and recommendations mainly based on the results of controlled trials, which are often conducted in selected populations and special conditions, whereas clinical practice may be influenced by factors different from controlled scientific studies. Hence, the real-world setting is better assessed by the observational registries enrolling patients for longer periods of time. However, this may be difficult, expensive, and time-consuming. In 2009, the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has instigated a series of surveys covering the controversial issues in clinical electrophysiology (EP). With this in mind, an EHRA EP research network has been created, which included EP centres in Europe among which the surveys on 'hot topic' were circulated. This review summarizes the overall experience conducting EP wires over the past 6 years, categorizing and assessing the topics regarding clinical EP, and evaluating the acceptance and feedback from the responding centres, in order to improve participation in the surveys and better address the research needs and aspirations of the European EP community.

Electrophysiology testing and catheter ablation are helpful when evaluating asymptomatic patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern: the pro perspective

Important advances in the natural history and diagnosis of, and therapy for, asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome have been made in the last decade by our group. These data have necessitated revisiting current practice guidelines to decide on the optimal management of the asymptomatic WPW population. There has also been an emphasis on identifying initially asymptomatic individuals who are at risk by nationwide screening programs using the electrocardiogram for prophylactic catheter ablation to prevent the lifetime risk of sudden cardiac death, particularly in young asymptomatic people, because only a subgroup of them is at high risk, requiring early catheter ablation.

Risk factors responsible for atrial fibrillation development between symptomatic patients with concealed or manifest atrioventricular accessory pathways

Background

Patients with manifest atrioventricular accessory pathways (mAPs) have a greater tendency to develop atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with patients with concealed atrioventricular accessory pathways (cAPs). However, the risk factors of developing AF in patients with various atrioventricular accessory pathways (APs) are not clear.

Methods

This retrospective study included 460 symptomatic patients with either cAPs (n = 246) or mAPs (n = 214) who underwent electrophysiological study and successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of APs. Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared between cAPs and mAPs and between AF and non-AF groups with cAPs or mAPs. Independent risk factors of AF were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

AF was more frequent in mAPs group than in cAPs group (23.4% vs 9.8%, p < 0.01). Clinical features were similar between cAPs and mAPs. Anterograde conduction properties served as the major electrophysiological feature of mAPs. Multivariate analysis indicated that mAPs, hypertension, post-ablation P wave dispersion (Pd), N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and creatinine were independent risk factors of AF in the complete cohort. Hypertension, post-ablation Pd and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were independent risk factors of AF in cAPs group. Post-ablation Pd, NT-proBNP, creatinine and shorter effective refractory period of anterograde accessory pathways (AAP ERP) were independent risk factors of AF in mAPs group.

Conclusions

Results from this study demonstrate that the risk factors of AF are not homogenous between concealed and manifest APs, which might suggest heterogeneous pathogenesis of AF in these two types of APs.

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in the era of catheter ablation: insights from a registry study of 2169 patients

BACKGROUND

The management of Wolff-Parkinson-White is based on the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic presentations, but evidence is limited in the asymptomatic population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Wolff-Parkinson-White registry was an 8-year prospective study of either symptomatic or asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White patients referred to our Arrhythmology Department for evaluation or ablation. Inclusion criteria were a baseline electrophysiological testing with or without radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). Primary end points were the percentage of patients who experienced ventricular fibrillation (VF) or potentially malignant arrhythmias and risk factors. Among 2169 enrolled patients, 1001 (550 asymptomatic) did not undergo RFA (no-RFA group) and 1168 (206 asymptomatic) underwent ablation (RFA group). There were no differences in clinical and electrophysiological characteristics between the 2 groups except for symptoms. In the no-RFA group, VF occurred in 1.5% of patients, virtually exclusively (13 of 15) in children (median age, 11 years), and was associated with a short accessory pathway antegrade refractory period (P<0.001) and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia initiating atrial fibrillation (P<0.001) but not symptoms. In the RFA group, ablation was successful in 98.5%, and after RFA, no patients developed malignant arrhythmias or VF over the 8-year follow-up. Untreated patients were more likely to experience malignant arrhythmias and VF (log-rank P<0.001). Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting VF identified an optimal anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway cutoff of 240 milliseconds.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome essentially depends on intrinsic electrophysiological properties of AP rather than on symptoms. RFA performed during the same procedure after electrophysiological testing is of benefit in improving the long-term outcomes.

Prevalence, causes of reappearance of symptoms or preexcitation syndrome after ablation of accessory pathway and management

AIM

The purpose of the study was to look for the prevalence, significance and management of preexcitation syndrome (PS) or symptoms reappearance after accessory pathway (AP) ablation. AP ablation actually is the first treatment of PS.

METHODS

Successful AP ablation was performed in 261 patients; reappearance of symptoms or PS on ECG occurred in 47 patients (18%) from 20minutes to several years. Their data were compared with remaining patients.

RESULTS

Recurrences were more frequent in patients with spontaneous malignant form (34 vs. 21%), in congenital heart disease (4.2 vs. 0%) (P<0.002), in case of complication (11 vs. 2%) (P<0.007) and of a longer duration of applications (304±209 vs. 188±182sec) (P<0.019). Forty percent of patients had the same symptoms and electrophysiological data as before ablation. Twenty-four percent had an improvement of symptoms and/or electrophysiological data. However, 3 initially asymptomatic patients became symptomatic after ablation. Twenty-six percent had another AP or another rhythm disorder. We recommend transesophageal electrophysiological study for the control because only 40% of patients required second ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reappearance of symptoms or a PS on ECG after AP ablation was not rare (18%) and was inconsistently associated with the reappearance of all initial AP electrophysiological properties. Only 40% of patients required a second AP ablation. Another arrhythmia was possible. Non-invasive second evaluation should be preferred. However, asymptomatic patients before ablation could become symptomatic.