Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic cardiomyopathy: A review and local experience

Myocardial scar in ischemic cardiomyopathy is predominantly endocardial, however, between 5% and 15% of these patients have an arrhythmogenic epicardial substrate. Percutaneous epicardial ablation should be considered in patients with ICM and VT especially if they failed an endocardial ablation. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial ablation of VT in ICM may reduce short- and medium-term VT recurrence compared with an endocardial only approach. Cardiac imaging could be used to help guide patient selection for a combined epi-endo approach. Complications related to epicardial access can happen in up to 7% of patients. Epicardial ablation in these patients should be referred to experienced tertiary centers. We review the literature and share interesting cases.

Influence of standard modifiable risk factors on ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction

Background

Inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) at electrophysiology study (EPS) predicts sudden cardiac death because of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, the single greatest cause of death within 2 years after myocardial infarction (MI).

Objectives

We aimed to assess the association between standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) and inducible VT at EPS early after MI.

Methods

Consecutive patients with left ventricle ejection fraction ≤40% on days 3-5 after ST elevation MI (STEMI) who underwent EPS were prospectively recruited. Positive EPS was defined as induced sustained monomorphic VT cycle length ≥200 ms for ≥10 s or shorter if hemodynamically compromised. The primary outcome was inducibility of VT at EPS, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality on follow-up.

Results

In 410 eligible patients undergoing EPS soon (median of 9 days) after STEMI, 126 had inducible VT. Ex-smokers experienced an increased risk of inducible VT [multivariable logistic regression adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.0, p = 0.033] compared with current or never-smokers, with comparable risk. The presence of any SMuRFs apart from being a current smoker conferred an increased risk of inducible VT (adjusted OR 1.9, p = 0.043). Neither the number of SMuRFs nor the presence of any SMuRFs was associated with mortality at a median follow-up of 5.4 years.

Conclusions

In patients with recent STEMI and impaired left ventricular function, the presence of any SMuRFs, apart from being a current smoker, conferred an increased risk of inducible VT at EPS. These results highlight the need to modify SMuRFs in this high-risk subset of patients.

Correlation of exit sites of inducible ventricular tachycardia post-ST elevation myocardial infarction on electrophysiology study, with region of infarct

BACKGROUND

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death post-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be inducible in electrophysiology studies (EPS) early (<40 days) post-STEMI. Whether it originates from the infarct site remains unknown. We examined the correlation between inducible VT and infarct location post-STEMI.

AIMS

To investigate the correlation between inducible VT and infarct location post-STEMI.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 46 patients from 2005 to 2017 with STEMI who underwent early programmed ventricular stimulation through EPS (>48 h post-STEMI and <40 days from admission). Gated heart pool scans were used to visualise infarct scar regions, and VT exit sites were derived from induction 12-lead electrocardiography. Patients were followed up for primary outcomes of recurrent VA and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included for analysis, with 50 uniquely induced VT exit sites. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30 ± 8.7% and 22% had impaired right ventricular ejection fraction. Mean time from presentation to EPS was 16 ± 31.3 days. Of the induced VT, 44 (88%) were from within scar and scar-border regions, whereas 6 (12%) of the induced VT were found to be remote to imaging-derived scar. Over a median follow-up period of 75 months, 6 (13%) patients died, and 7 (15%) patients had recurrent VA. No deaths occurred in patients with remote VT.

CONCLUSION

The majority of early inducible post-infarct VT arises from acute myocardial scar; however, a small portion arises from sites remote from scars with a possible focal aetiology.

Optimizing electrophysiology studies to prevent sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction

AIMS

This study assessed associations of minimum final extrastimulus coupling interval utilized within electrophysiology study (EPS) after myocardial infarction (MI) and possible site of origin of induced ventricular tachycardia (VT) with long-term occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia and long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective study recruited consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% who underwent EPS days 3-5 after MI between 2004 and 2017. Positive EPS was defined as sustained monomorphic VT cycle length ≥200 ms for ≥10 s or shorter duration if haemodynamic compromise occurred. Each of the four extrastimuli was shortened by 10 ms at a time, until it failed to capture the ventricle (ventricular refractoriness) or induced ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Outcomes included spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurrence and all-cause mortality. Shorter coupling interval length of final extrastimulus that induced VT was associated with higher risk of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (P < 0.001). Significantly higher rates of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (65.2% vs. 23.2%; P < 0.001) were observed for final coupling interval at EPS <200 ms vs. >200 ms. Right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology of induced VT, with possible site of origin from the left ventricle, was associated with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, P = 0.044] and a composite of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence or mortality (HR 1.8, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Ventricular tachycardia induced with shorter coupling intervals was associated with higher risk of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythymia on follow-up, indicating that the final extrastimulus coupling interval at EPS early after MI should be determined by ventricular refractoriness. Induced VT with possible origin from left ventricle was associated with increased risk of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence or death.

Duration of Inducible Ventricular Tachycardia Early After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Its Impact on Mortality and Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence

Background

The clinical significance of the duration of inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) at electrophysiology study (EPS) in patients soon after ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction and its predictive utility for VT recurrence are not known.

Methods and Results

Consecutive ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients with day 3 to 5 left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% underwent EPS. A positive EPS was defined as sustained monomorphic VT with cycle length ≥200 ms. The induced VT was terminated by overdrive pacing or direct current shock at 30 s or earlier if hemodynamic decompensation occurred. Patients with inducible VT duration 2 to 10 s were compared with patients with inducible VT >10 s. The primary end point was survival free of VT or cardiac mortality. From 384 consecutive ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent EPS, 29% had inducible VT (n=112, 87% men). After mean follow‐up of 5.9±3.9 years, primary end point occurred in 35% of patients with induced VT 2 to 10 s duration (n=68) and in 22% of patients with induced VT >10 s (n=41) (P=0.61). This was significantly different from the noninducible VT group, in which primary end point occurred in 3% of patients (n=272) (P=0.001).

Conclusions

This study is the first to show that in patients who undergo EPS early after myocardial infarction, inducible VT of short duration (2–10 s) has similar predictive utility for ventricular tachyarrhythmia as longer duration (>10 s) inducible VT, which was significantly different to those without inducible VT. It is possible that immediate cardioversion of rapid VT might have contributed to some of the short durations of inducible VT.

The Role of Cardiac MRI in the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Ischaemic and Non-ischaemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and VF account for the majority of sudden cardiac deaths worldwide. Treatments for VT/VF include anti-arrhythmic drugs, ICDs and catheter ablation, but these treatments vary in effectiveness and carry substantial risks and/or expense. Current methods of selecting patients for ICD implantation are imprecise and fail to identify some at-risk patients, while leading to others being overtreated. In this article, the authors discuss the current role and future direction of cardiac MRI (CMRI) in refining diagnosis and personalising ventricular arrhythmia management. The capability of CMRI with gadolinium contrast delayed-enhancement patterns and, more recently, T1 mapping to determine the aetiology of patients presenting with heart failure is well established. Although CMRI imaging in patients with ICDs can be challenging, recent technical developments have started to overcome this. CMRI can contribute to risk stratification, with precise and reproducible assessment of ejection fraction, quantification of scar and 'border zone' volumes, and other indices. Detailed tissue characterisation has begun to enable creation of personalised computer models to predict an individual patient's arrhythmia risk. When patients require VT ablation, a substrate-based approach is frequently employed as haemodynamic instability may limit electrophysiological activation mapping. Beyond accurate localisation of substrate, CMRI could be used to predict the location of re-entrant circuits within the scar to guide ablation.

The clinical challenge of preventing sudden cardiac death immediately after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Unfortunately, of all patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (MI), usually in the form of ST-elevation MI, 25-35% will die of sudden cardiac death (SCD) before receiving medical attention, most often from ventricular fibrillation. For patients who reach the hospital, prognosis is considerably better and has improved over the years. Reperfusion therapy, best attained with primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared to thrombolysis, has made a big difference in reducing the risk of SCD early and late after ST-elevation MI. In-hospital SCD due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias is manageable, with either preventive measures or drugs or electrical cardioversion. There is general agreement for secondary prevention of SCD post-MI with implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) when malignant ventricular arrhythmias occur late (>48 h) after an MI, and are not due to reversible or correctable causes. The major challenge remains that of primary prevention, that is, how to prevent SCD during the first 1-3 months after ST-elevation MI for patients who have low left ventricular ejection fraction and are not candidates for an ICD according to current guidelines, due to the results of two studies, which did not show any benefits of early (<40 days after an MI) ICD implantation. Two recent documents may provide direction as to how to bridge the gap for this early post-MI period. Both recommend an electrophysiology study to guide implantation of an ICD, at least for those developing syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, who have an inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia at the electrophysiology study. An ICD is also recommended for patients with indication for a permanent pacemaker due to bradyarrhythmias, who also meet primary prevention criteria for SCD.