Biatrial ablation vs. left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Atrial Fibrillation Occurring During Acute Hospitalization: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Acute atrial fibrillation is defined as atrial fibrillation detected in the setting of acute care or acute illness; atrial fibrillation may be detected or managed for the first time during acute hospitalization for another condition. Atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery is a distinct type of acute atrial fibrillation. Acute atrial fibrillation is associated with high risk of long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence, warranting clinical attention during acute hospitalization and over long-term follow-up. A framework of substrates and triggers can be useful for evaluating and managing acute atrial fibrillation. Acute management requires a multipronged approach with interdisciplinary care collaboration, tailoring treatments to the patient's underlying substrate and acute condition. Key components of acute management include identification and treatment of triggers, selection and implementation of rate/rhythm control, and management of anticoagulation. Acute rate or rhythm control strategy should be individualized with consideration of the patient's capacity to tolerate rapid rates or atrioventricular dyssynchrony, and the patient's ability to tolerate the risk of the therapeutic strategy. Given the high risks of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with acute atrial fibrillation, clinical follow-up and heart rhythm monitoring are warranted. Long-term management is guided by patient substrate, with implications for intensity of heart rhythm monitoring, anticoagulation, and considerations for rhythm management strategies. Overall management of acute atrial fibrillation addresses substrates and triggers. The 3As of acute management are acute triggers, atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management, and anticoagulation. The 2As and 2Ms of long-term management include monitoring of heart rhythm and modification of lifestyle and risk factors, in addition to considerations for atrial fibrillation rate/rhythm management and anticoagulation. Several gaps in knowledge related to acute atrial fibrillation exist and warrant future research.

Comparative characteristics of a pacemaker implantation after biatrial or left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic heart disease and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Aim      To compare the incidence of a permanent pacemaker (PP) implantation based on the chosen treatment technology (biatrial ablation, BA, or left atrial ablation (LAA) for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with simultaneous coronary bypass (CB).Material and methods  The study included 116 patients with long-standing persistent AF and indications for CB. Patients were randomized to two equal groups (58 patients in each). Group 1 underwent BA in combination with CB; group 2 patients underwent isolated LAA with simultaneous CB under the conditions of artificial circulation. Incidence of PP implantation was assessed during the early (to 30 days) and late (to 60 months) postoperative periods.Results For the observation period, a total of 9 PPs was implanted in both groups, 6 in the BA group and 3 in the LAA group (odds ratio, OR, 0.5; 95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.1-2.4; р=0.490). During the early postoperative period, 5 patients in the BA group and 2 patients in the LAA group were implanted with PP (OR, 0.4; 95 % CI. 0-2.5; р=0.438). During the late postoperative period, one (2%) patient of the BA group was implanted with a permanent PP at 30 months of follow-up due to the development of sick sinus syndrome (SSS); also, one (2%) patient of the LAA group required PP implantation at 54 months of follow-up due to the development of SSS. The causes for PP implantation in the BA group included the development of complete atrioventricular (AV) block in 9 % of cases (95 % CI, 4-19 %); sinus node dysfunction and junctional rhythm in 2 % of cases (95 % CI, 0-9 %). Compared to this group, the LAA group showed a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AV block (0 cases, р=0.047). The major cause for PP implantation in the LAA group was the development of sinus node dysfunction in 3 (5 %) patients (95 % CI, 2-14 %).Conclusion      The use of BA in surgical treatment of long-standing persistent AF with simultaneous myocardial revascularization is associated with a high risk of AV block, which requires permanent PP implantation in the postoperative period. Total incidence of permanent PP implantation for dysfunction of the cardiac conduction system following the combination surgical treatment of long-standing persistent AF and IHD, either CB and LAA or BA, did not differ between the treatment groups both in early and late postoperative periods.

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Impact of Ablation Lesion Sets

BACKGROUND

The lesion sets for surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) that provide optimal outcomes have remained controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of left-atrial (LA) ablation of AF compared with bi-atrial (BA) ablation on the clinical and rhythm outcomes, and examined the predictors for AF recurrence and permanent pacing in consideration of ablation lesion sets.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2018, 1,965 patients underwent surgical ablation during cardiac surgery at our institution. Among these, 796 and 1,169 patients underwent LA and BA ablation, respectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated after propensity score adjustment, with death accounting for a competing event. The probability of AF recurrence was estimated with the generalized estimating equations model.

RESULTS

The patients with BA ablation had morbidities greater than those with LA ablation. The probability of AF recurrence at 1 and 5 years was 13.9% and 37.1% in patients with LA ablation, and 11.2% and 30.1% in those with BA ablation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.61; P = 0.100). After adjustment, LA ablation was associated with a decreased risk of early death (<30 days) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31-0.96; P = 0.041) and new-onset dialysis (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.27-0.78; P = 0.003). However, the risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.75-1.41; P = 0.878) and permanent pacing (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.06; P = 0.091) was comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of AF recurrence and adverse events was comparable between the 2 ablation lesion sets. BA ablation was not related to an increased risk of permanent pacing.

Bi-atrial or left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a routine procedure during concomitant cardiac surgery, however, the extension of lesion sets remain controversial. We sought to compare the relative benefit and risk of different lesion sets through a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Trials databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the rhythm outcome of AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), left atrial Maze (LAM), bi-atrial Maze (BAM), or no ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery. An NMA was conducted to explore the difference of over 1 year AF freedom as well as risks for early mortality and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI).

RESULTS

A total of 2031 patients of 19 RCTs were included. PVI, LAM, and BAM (OR [95% Cr.I]: 5.02 [2.72, 10.02], 7.97 [4.93, 14.29], 8.29 [4.90, 14.86], p < .05) demonstrated higher freedom of AF compared with no ablation, however, no significant difference of rhythm outcome was found among the three ablation strategies based on the random-effects model. BAM was associated with an increase in early mortality when compared with no ablation (OR [95% Cr.I]: 4.08 [1.23, 17.30], p < .05), while none of the remaining comparisons reached statistical difference in terms of early mortality and PPMI.

CONCLUSION

Bi-atrial ablation is not superior to left atrial ablation strategies in reducing AF recurrence for un-selected surgical patients. BAM has a higher risk of early mortality than no ablation, but no difference was found between bi-atrial and left atrial ablation in regard to early mortality and PPMI based on the current evidence.

Incidence and clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are common within the 3-month blanking period after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little evidence is available regarding the current guidelines on the blanking period after surgical AF ablation. We investigate the incidence and significance of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) and evaluate the optimal blanking period after surgical AF ablation.

METHODS

Data from 259 patients who underwent surgical AF ablation from 2009 to 2016 were collected. ERAT was defined as documented ATA episodes lasting for 30 s. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to evaluate the role of ERAT as a predictor of late recurrences (LR) for AF.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients (49.0%) experienced their last episodes of ERAT during the first (n = 65), second (n = 14), or third (n = 48) month of the 3-month blanking period (p < .001). One year freedom from ATAs was 97.8% in patients without ERAT compared with 95.4%, 64.3%, and 8.3% in patients with ERAT in the first, second, and third months after the index procedure, respectively (p < .001). Hazard ratios of LR according to the timing of the last episode of ERAT first, second, and third months after the procedure were 2.84, 16.70, and 119.75, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAT occurred in 49.0% of patients within the first 3 months after surgical ablation. The occurrence of ERAT within 3 months after surgical AF ablation was a significant independent predictor of LR. Hence, the currently accepted 3-month blanking period may be considered for redefining in patients with AF surgical ablation.

Treatment Complications of Atrial Fibrillation and Their Management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a rhythm disturbance defined by irregular, rapid electrical, and mechanical activation of the atria, which causes unsynchronized atrial contraction and promotes thromboembolism. AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Its prevalence and incidence are increasing due to aging and improved survival from acute heart diseases. This article is a review on AF management from both a surgical and catheter-based perspective. While both treatment approaches to AF have been shown to be successful in the management of AF, they are not without their own inherent complications. This article seeks to review some of these complications and help to guide treatment.

Sudden death in patients with Ebstein anomaly

Aims

Ventricular dysfunction or structural alteration of either ventricle is a well-established risk factor for sudden death (SD). Ebstein anomaly (EA) can present with both right and left heart abnormalities; however, predictors of SD have not been described. We therefore sought to characterize the incidence and risk factors of SD among a large cohort of patients with EA.

Methods and results

All EA patients who underwent evaluation at a high-volume institution over a 4-decade period were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical variables, cardiovascular surgical procedure(s), and cause of death were recorded. Sudden death incidence from birth and following tricuspid valve (TV) surgery were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify clinical and surgical predictors of SD. The cohort comprised of 968 patients [mean age 25.3 years, 41.5% male; 79.8% severe EA, 18.6% accessory pathway, 0.74% implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement]. The 10-, 50-, and 70-year cumulative incidences of SD from birth were 0.8%, 8.3%, and 14.6%, respectively. Prior ventricular tachycardia [hazard ratio (HR) 6.37, P < 0.001)], heart failure (HR 5.64, P < 0.001), TV surgery (HR 5.94, P < 0.001), syncope (HR 2.03, P = 0.019), pulmonic stenosis (HR 3.42, P = 0.001), and haemoglobin > 15 g/dL (HR 2.05, P = 0.026) were multivariable predictors of SD. In a similar subgroup analysis of patients who underwent TV surgery, all of the above factors except syncope were significantly associated with post-operative SD on multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Patients with EA are at significant risk for SD. Key clinical SD predictors identified can aid in risk stratification and potentially guide primary prevention ICD implantation.

Five-year results of a modified left atrial maze IV procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a randomized study

Background

The left atrial maze IV (LAM‐IV) alone has been used to eliminate atrial fibrillation (AF) without severe right heart diseases. However, we felt that it could be improved and developed a modified LAM‐IV (MLAM‐IV). In this prospective trial, we aimed to investigate 5‐year clinical outcomes of AF in patients treated by the novel MLAM‐IV technique.

Methods

Between September 2012 and October 2013, 120 patients who underwent valve surgery and bipolar radiofrequency ablation for AF were randomized into the LAM‐IV group (n = 60) or MLAM‐IV group (n = 60). At postoperative follow‐up examinations, data were recorded at 1, 3 and 6 months, and annually thereafter.

Results

The mean ablation time and postoperative ventilation time were shorter in the MLAM‐IV group than in the LAM‐IV group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). At 5 years, the rate of freedom from AF was 69.0% in the MLAM‐IV group and 60.0% in the LAM‐IV group (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 1.32, P = 0.42). There were no differences with respect to the early operative mortality and major complications, late mortality, and major adverse events.

Conclusions

The MLAM‐IV provides a technically simpler ablation process. The MLAM‐IV was associated with less ventilation support in the early postoperative period. The long‐term efficacy of the MLAM‐IV in the treatment of AF is comparable to that of the LAM‐IV.

Sick Sinus Syndrome After the Maze Procedure Performed Concomitantly With Mitral Valve Surgery

Background

To characterize the development of sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the additive maze procedure (MP) during mitral valve surgery.

Methods and Results

Follow‐up data (median, 3.6 years) of 750 patients with a prevalence of rheumatic cause of 57.6% were analyzed. SSS occurred in 35 patients with a time‐dependent increase: the incidence rates at 1, 2, and 4 years after surgery were 2.9%, 3.7%, and 4.3%, respectively. The additive MP showed higher risks of SSS development (hazard ratio, 7.44; 95% confidence interval, 3.45–16.05; P<0.001) and pacemaker implantation (hazard ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–6.67; P<0.001). Patients who developed SSS showed higher 4‐year rates of clinical events (death, stroke, and hospital admission) (67.5±8.5% versus 33.0±1.9%; P<0.001). After adjustment for age and preoperative peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure, the lesion extent (biatrial versus left atrial MP), not the underlying cause (rheumatic versus nonrheumatic), was independently associated with SSS development (hazard ratio, 3.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–11.86; P=0.037). The adverse effect of the biatrial MP was confirmed in patients with trivial or mild preoperative tricuspid regurgitation showing higher SSS incidence (4.6±1.4% versus 1.0±0.7%; P=0.023), not in those with moderate‐to‐severe tricuspid regurgitation (6.8±1.7% versus 3.8±3.8%; P=0.337). Recurrence of atrial fibrillation was not associated with the lesion extent of the MP.

Conclusions

After the additive MP, the ongoing risk of SSS development should be acknowledged irrespective of the underlying cause. Considering additive risk of biatrial MP with similar atrial fibrillation recurrence rate, minimizing lesion extent is warranted.

Atrial fibrillation: Current and emerging surgical strategies

OBJECTIVE

(a) To provide a comprehensive review of current literature on the surgical management of atrial fibrillation (AF), highlighting surgical approaches and outcomes. (b) To summarize the latest guidelines pertinent to the surgical management of AF.

BACKGROUND

AF is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, primarily related to the associated risk of stroke. The mainstay of management is pharmacologic rate or rhythm control and catheter-based ablation. Surgical ablation (SA) is an alternative strategy that is effective in select patient populations. Recently, novel techniques and technologies have been introduced and this has expanded the surgical capacity to manage AF.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted.

RESULTS

Surgery can be a highly effective alternative therapeutic option for the management of AF in the appropriate patient population. The need for permanent pacemaker implantation is controversial among patients undergoing surgical intervention for AF. Surgical outcomes are promising, with long-term control of AF and symptomatic relief achieved in select groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides a comprehensive review of the surgical management of AF. We have summarized the latest surgical outcomes and contextualized the most recent guidelines.

Noninvasive mapping before surgical ablation for persistent, long-standing atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to study the electrophysiologic mechanism of atrial fibrillation using a noninvasive, beat-by-beat, 3-dimensional mapping technique in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant surgical ablation.

METHODS

In this pilot trial, 10 patients (6 male; mean age, 70 ± 10 years) with persistent atrial fibrillation were mapped preoperatively with a noninvasive surface system (ECVUE, CardioInsight, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Eight patients were candidates for mitral valve surgery, 1 patient was a candidate for aortic valve and ascending aortic replacement, and 1 patient was a candidate for coronary bypass surgery. In 5 patients, tricuspid valve repair was also performed. The Cox-Maze III/IV was performed using combined cryoablation and bipolar radiofrequency, and the left appendage was removed in all cases. The median preprocedural duration of atrial fibrillation was 30 months, and the diameter of the left atrium was 63 mm. Atrial regions were divided according to the Bordeaux classification.

RESULTS

Preoperative mapping was successful in all patients with clear identification of the potential mechanism of atrial fibrillation. Biatrial pathology was recognized in all subjects. Rotor and macro re-entry activity were present in all patients, whereas focal activity was demonstrated in only 6 patients. Rotor activity in the right atrium was documented in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on the preoperative use of the ECUVE in surgical candidates for concomitant surgical procedures. The fact that a biatrial mechanism for atrial fibrillation was detected in all patients emphasizes the importance of a Cox-Maze III/IV procedure to treat patients with valvular heart disease and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Preoperative mapping has the potential to significantly improve our understanding of the pathophysiology in atrial fibrillation and better guide the surgical ablation procedure of choice in a single patient.

Biatrial versus Isolated Left Atrial Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The outcomes of biatrial ablation (BA) and isolated left atrial ablation (LA) in atrial fibrillation remain inconclusive. In this meta-analysis, we assess the currently available evidence to compare outcomes between BA and LA.

Methods

Electronic searches were performed from database inception to December 2016, and relevant studies were accessed. Odds ratios and weight mean differences with 95% confidence intervals are reported. Twenty-one studies comprising 3609 patients were included in the present meta-analysis.

Results

The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the BA cohort was similar to that in the LA cohort at discharge, at 12 months, and after more than 1 year of follow-up. However, at 6 months, the prevalence of sinus rhythm was higher in the BA cohort than in the LA cohort. The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the BA cohort than in the LA cohort. However, 30-day and late mortality and neurological events were similar between the BA and LA groups.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the rate of restored sinus rhythm, the risk of death, and cerebrovascular events between BA and LA, but BA had a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.

The long-term efficacy of concomitant maze IV surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. AF surgery is widely used for rhythm control of AF, but previous studies have shown varying results. This study sought to investigate the long-term efficacy of concomitant maze IV (CMIV) surgery in an unselected AF population and identify predictors of late AF recurrence.

Methods

In total 144 consecutive patients, who underwent CMIV between January 2006 and December 2010 were enrolled. By data from electronic medical records, registers, and rhythm prints, late AF recurrences and heart rhythm at latest follow-up were retrospectively registered. All patients still alive were invited to an ambulant follow-up to update rhythm status.

Results

During a median (IQR) follow-up of 7.39 (2.67) years, 114 (79.2%) patients had recurrence. The cumulative incidence of sinus rhythm (SR) without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 52.3% after 1 year. Long-term results after 2, 5 and 7 years were 47.9%, 32.6% and 25.1%, respectively. At latest follow-up 34.7% were in SR off AADs. No difference in 10-year event-free survival stratified by recurrence were found (p = 0.678). Contrary, time to death (5.40 vs. 3.43 years, p = 0.004) revealed death as competing risk event. The Fine-Gray model identified preoperative sustained AF (SAF) (SHR 3.54, 95%CI [2.35;5.32], p < 0.001), AF duration (1.08, [1.05;1.11], p < 0.001), and postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) (2.29, [1.21;4.35], p = 0.011) as predictors.

Conclusion

CMIV in the present cohort provided limited long-term success in obtaining SR. SAF, longer AF duration, and postoperative ATA were associated with late AF recurrence.

Left atrial concomitant surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Surgical ablation is a generally established treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery. Left atrial (LA) lesion set for ablation is a simplified procedure suggested to reduce the surgery time and morbidity after procedure. The present meta-analysis aims to explore the outcomes of left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A literature research was performed in six database from their inception to July 2017, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in AF patient undergoing cardiac surgery. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

Eleven relevant RCTs were included for analysis in the present study. The prevalence of sinus rhythm in ablation group was significantly higher at discharge, 6-month and 1-year follow-up period. The morbidity including 30 day mortality, late all-cause mortality, reoperation for bleeding, permanent pacemaker implantation and neurological events were of no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of our meta-analysis demonstrates that left atrial lesion set is an effective and safe surgical ablation strategy for AF patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery.

Effectiveness and safety of simultaneous hybrid thoracoscopic endocardial catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in obese and non-obese patients

Background

We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the hybrid thoracoscopic endocardial epicardial ablation technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in obese versus non-obese patients.

Methods

Between January 2010 and January 2015, a cohort of 61 patients were retrospectively identified to undergo ablation of AF as a stand-alone procedure using a thoracoscopic, hybrid epicardial-endocardial technique. All patients underwent continuous 7-day Holter monitoring at 3, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter.

Results

A total of 40% of the obese cohort had persistent or long-standing AF, compared to 54.9% of the non-obese cohort. There were no deaths or conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass required. At 3-year follow-up, 60% of the obese group were in sinus rhythm (SR) with no episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia lasting 30 s off anti-arrhythmic drugs. This was compared to 70.6% in the non-obese group, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.468). For success rates on anti-arrhythmic drugs, this was 80% in the obese group compared to 86% in the non-obese group at 3-year follow-up (P=0.637). No patient died and no thromboembolic/bleeding events or procedure-related complications occurred during the follow-up.

Conclusions

In a retrospective cohort with approximately half with persistent or long-standing AF, thoracoscopic hybrid epicardial endocardial ablation proved to be equally effective and safe in obese versus non-obese patients. Current preliminary findings require further validation in multi-institutional prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

Surgical and Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in humans and is known to be associated with an increased risk of stroke, dementia, heart failure and mortality. Non-pharmacological therapy with ablation using either surgical or percutaneous techniques is recommended in drug refractory AF. Early attempts to devise procedures to ablate AF and restore sinus rhythm culminated with the Cox-Maze procedure, the first truly successful procedure. Since then, ablation surgery has been conducted predominately as a concomitant procedure. The Cox Maze procedure is complex and technically demanding and has, therefore, been extensively modified with new techniques for creating the linear ablation lines, new lesion sets, minimally invasive surgical techniques and most recently hybrid surgical-catheter ablation techniques. Surgical ablation techniques result in a marked reduction in atrial fibrillation when compared to conventional therapy with only a small increase in procedural risk. However, further research is required to more accurately quantify those benefits and to determine the optimal lesion sets, specific to the underlying arrhythmia mechanism and the optimal energy sources for ablation.

Atrial flutter after surgical maze: incidence, diagnosis, and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation is increasing and surgical ablation is becoming more common, both as a stand-alone procedure and when performed concomitantly with other cardiac surgery. Although surgical ablation is effective, with it unique challenges arise, including iatrogenic macroreentrant tachycardias that are often highly symptomatic and difficult to manage conservatively.

RECENT FINDINGS

Postsurgical ablation, localization of the arrhythmic circuit is difficult to determine using surface ECG alone because of alterations in the atrial myocardium, and multiple different pathways are often present. Most, however, localize to the left atrium, and percutaneous catheter ablation is emerging as an effective treatment modality.

SUMMARY

Patients with complex postoperative arrhythmias should be referred to a dedicated atrial fibrillation center when possible and symptomatic arrhythmias mapped and ablated. Knowledge of the previously performed surgical lesion set is of vital importance in understanding the mechanism of the arrhythmia and increasing procedural success rates.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/HCO/A31.

Atrial fibrillation: review of current treatment strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in modern clinical practice, with an estimated prevalence of 1.5-2%. The prevalence of AF is expected to double in the next decades, progressing with age and increasingly becoming a global medical challenge. The first-line treatment for AF is often medical treatment with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic agents for rhythm control, in addition to anti-coagulants such as warfarin for stroke prevention in patient at risk. Catheter ablation has emerged as an alternative for AF treatment, which involves myocardial tissue lesions to disrupt the underlying triggers and substrates for AF. Surgical approaches have also been developed for treatment of AF, particularly for patients requiring concomitant cardiac surgery or those refractory to medical and catheter ablation treatments. Since the introduction of the Cox-Maze III, this procedure has evolved into several modern variations, including the use of alternative energy sources (Cox-Maze IV) such as radiofrequency, cryo-energy and microwave, as well as minimally invasive thoracoscopic epicardial approaches. Another recently introduced technique is the hybrid ablation approach, where in a single setting both epicardial thoracoscopic ablation lesions and endocardial catheter ablation lesions are performed by the cardiothoracic surgeon and cardiologist. There remains controversy surrounding the optimal approach for AF ablation, energy sources, and lesion sets employed. The goal of this article is review the history, classifications, pathophysiology and current treatment options for AF.

Long-term efficacy of surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in a low-volume centre

Surgical ablation is a recommended procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing a cardiac surgery operation. However, the procedure is associated with significant risk of late recurrence of AF. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy of the procedure with respect to the comorbidities. The study group consisted of 22 patients: 9 women and 13 men, who underwent surgical AF ablation in the 2008-2013 period. The patients were interviewed by telephone and were asked to send their recently performed 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). The semi-structured interview consisted of 25 items regarding the history of AF, concomitant comorbidities, lifelong syncopal history, smoking, family history of premature cardiovascular diseases, and current medical treatment. Furthermore, the Epworth test was performed to measure the daytime sleepiness, which in turn is related to the presence of obstructive sleep apnoea. On the basis of the obtained data, the CHADS₂, and Epworth scale scores were calculated for each patient.

As a result of the study six patients (27%) had sinus rhythm or paced dual chamber rhythm, and 16 patients had atrial fibrillation. The multivariate analysis revealed that Epworth scale scoring > 9, CHADS₂ score > 0, and persistent type of AF were related to poor outcome of surgical ablation procedure. In conclusion, patients with AF treated with surgical ablation have similar prognosis of sinus rhythm maintenance to those treated with radiofrequency ablation. Moreover, the same predisposing factors play a significant role in AF recurrence both in surgical patients and in patients treated with radiofrequency ablation.

Long-term results of minimally invasive stand-alone bi-atrial surgical ablation with a bipolar ablation device for persistent and longstanding persistent AF: a single-center case series of 91 patients

Background

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is an alternative for AF that is refractory to medical treatment. We present long-term results of standalone surgical ablation of AF using a bipolar ablation device in 91 consecutive patients.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective study of 91 patients (77 % males; mean age, 53 ± 10 years [range, 23–75 years]) who underwent minimally invasive standalone surgical ablation of persistent and longstanding persistent AF using a bipolar ablation device from 2008 to 2014. Mean follow-up was 60 ± 21 months. The absence of arrhythmia was confirmed at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter, with 24-hour Holter monitoring.

Results

The mean duration of preoperative AF was 6.5 ± 5.4 years. Persistent AF was present in 86 % of patients and longstanding persistent AF in 14 %. Mean left atrial diameter was 4.3 ± 0.8 cm. There were two postoperative strokes (2 %) and three conversions to median sternotomy (3 %). Permanent pacemakers were implanted in six (7 %) patients. There were no intra- or postoperative deaths. At 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postoperatively, freedom from AF was 59, 45, 41, 38, and 38 % of patients, respectively. The failure to achieve pulmonary vein isolation was the only independent predictor of long-term recurrence of AF (HR −3 [95 % CI 1,858 to 8,586], p = 0,001). There was a tendency towards higher rates of SR at long term follow up in patients with pulmonary vein isolation if division of ligament of Marshall was performed (HR - 2 [95 % CI 0.987 to 4,202], p = 0,067).

Conclusions

In the present series, the efficacy of epicardial surgical ablation was similar to that reported previously. The rate of arrhythmia recurrence increased over time. Achieving pulmonary vein isolation is essential to AF elimination. The division of ligament of Marshall could contribute to improved rates of SR restoration in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF if PVI is achieved.

Electrophysiological Perspectives on Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

To overcome limitations of minimally invasive surgical ablation as a standalone procedure in eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF), hybrid approaches incorporating adjunctive endovascular catheter ablation have been proposed in recent years. The endovascular component targets residual conduction gaps and identifies additional electrophysiological targets with the goal of minimizing recurrent atrial arrhythmia. We performed a systematic review of published studies of hybrid AF ablation, analyzing 432 pooled patients (19% paroxysmal, 29% persistent, 52% long-standing persistent) treated using three different approaches: A. bilateral thoracoscopy with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) clamp-based approach; B. right thoracoscopic suction monopolar RF catheter-based approach; and C. subxiphoid posterior pericardioscopic ("convergent") approach. Freedom from recurrence off antiarrhythmic medications at 12 months was seen in 88.1% [133/151] for A, 73.4% [47/64] for B, and 59.3% [80/135] for C, with no significant difference between paroxysmal (76.9%) and persistent/long-standing persistent AF (73.4%). Death and major surgical complications were reported in 8.5% with A, 0% with B and 8.6% with C. A critical appraisal of hybrid ablation is presented, drawing from experiences and insights published over the years on catheter ablation of AF, with a discussion of the rationale underlying hybrid ablation, its strengths and limitations, where it may have a unique role in clinical management of patients with AF, which questions remain unanswered and areas for further investigation.

Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic arrhythmia in the adult population. Ablation lines have largely replaced the historical and challenging cut and sew techniques. Surgical ablation of AF is commonly performed in cases with other indications for cardiac surgery and less commonly as a stand-alone therapy. Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of this procedure. Extended left atrial ablation lines may increase efficacy in cases with longstanding persistent or permanent AF. Additional efficacy by adding right atrial ablation is controversial but is often performed in cases undergoing right atrial or atrial septal surgery. Left atrial volume reduction is recommended in cases with large left atria and AF undergoing another cardiac surgery. Arrhythmia recurrence is not uncommon after surgical ablation of AF and varies among studies due to heterogeneity in patient population, lesion set and endpoints. Freedom from AF recurrence was 65-87% at 12 months and 58-70% at 2 years follow-up. Long-term monitoring is recommended due to an increased prevalence of asymptomatic recurrences. The strongest predictors of AF recurrence are longstanding or persistent AF and a large left atrium. The most common mechanisms of recurrence are pulmonary vein reconnection, nonpulmonary vein triggers, and gaps in the ablation lines. About 20% of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences are atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia. There are not enough data in the surgical literature to support withdrawal of anticoagulation after surgical AF ablation. Patients selected for stand-alone surgical ablation usually have low risk profiles and low postoperative mortality rates (0.2%).

Patients with minimal atrial fibrillation events should not undergo concomitant atrial ablation during open heart procedures

Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated improved freedom from atrial fibrillation with intraoperative atrial ablation. However, the increased bypass time and the risk for ablation-related complications should be weighed against the benefits in the decision-making. It is important to establish reasonable criteria to define candidates for surgical ablation. Furthermore, the efficacy and short- and long-term risks related to surgical ablation need to be considered. This article reviews the data on surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation as it pertains to these important issues. As shown the evidence does not support surgical ablation at the time of coronary artery bypass graft in some patients.