1
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez‐Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi J, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier‐Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim‐Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang J, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel‐Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. J Arrhythm 2023; 39:250-302. [PMID: 37324757 PMCID: PMC10264760 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health HospitalJapan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | | | | | | | - Janet K. Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCalifornia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of LethbridgeLethbridgeAlbertaCanada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi JI, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier-Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang JL, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel-Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. Europace 2023; 25:euad123. [PMID: 37208301 PMCID: PMC10199172 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Olivia Gilbert
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet K Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, Smith AC, Gray LC, Caffery LJ. Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17298. [PMID: 33074157 PMCID: PMC7605980 DOI: 10.2196/17298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth represents an opportunity for Australia to harness the power of technology to redesign the way health care is delivered. The potential benefits of telehealth include increased accessibility to care, productivity gains for health providers and patients through reduced travel, potential for cost savings, and an opportunity to develop culturally appropriate services that are more sensitive to the needs of special populations. The uptake of telehealth has been hindered at times by clinician reluctance and policies that preclude metropolitan populations from accessing telehealth services. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate if telehealth reduces health system costs compared with traditional service models and to identify the scenarios in which cost savings can be realized. METHODS A scoping review was undertaken to meet the study aims. Initially, literature searches were conducted using broad terms for telehealth and economics to identify economic evaluation literature in telehealth. The investigators then conducted an expert focus group to identify domains where telehealth could reduce health system costs, followed by targeted literature searches for corresponding evidence. RESULTS The cost analyses reviewed provided evidence that telehealth reduced costs when health system-funded travel was prevented and when telehealth mitigated the need for expensive procedural or specialist follow-up by providing competent care in a more efficient way. The expert focus group identified 4 areas of potential savings from telehealth: productivity gains, reductions in secondary care, alternate funding models, and telementoring. Telehealth demonstrated great potential for productivity gains arising from health system redesign; however, under the Australian activity-based funding, it is unlikely that these gains will result in cost savings. Secondary care use mitigation is an area of promise for telehealth; however, many studies have not demonstrated overall cost savings due to the cost of administering and monitoring telehealth systems. Alternate funding models from telehealth systems have the potential to save the health system money in situations where the consumers pay out of pocket to receive services. Telementoring has had minimal economic evaluation; however, in the long term it is likely to result in inadvertent cost savings through the upskilling of generalist and allied health clinicians. CONCLUSIONS Health services considering implementing telehealth should be motivated by benefits other than cost reduction. The available evidence has indicated that although telehealth provides overwhelmingly positive patient benefits and increases productivity for many services, current evidence suggests that it does not routinely reduce the cost of care delivery for the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Centaine L Snoswell
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Monica L Taylor
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tracy A Comans
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leonard C Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Liam J Caffery
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|