Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium

Worldwide, ∼4 million people die from sudden cardiac death every year caused in more than half of the cases by ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction by implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most common, even though not curative, therapy to date. Optimized ICD programming should be strived for in order to decrease the incidence of ICD interventions. Catheter ablation reduces the recurrence of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) and is an important adjunct to sole ICD-based treatment or pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ICM, as conclusively demonstrated by seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the last two decades. However, none of the conducted trials was powered to reveal a survival benefit for ablated patients as compared to controls. Whereas thorough consideration of an early approach is necessary following two recent RCTs (PAUSE-SCD, BERLIN VT), catheter ablation is particularly recommended in patients with recurrent VT after ICD therapy. In this context, novel, pathophysiologically driven ablation strategies referring to deep morphological and functional substrate phenotyping based on high-resolution mapping and three-dimensional visualization of scars appear promising. Emerging concepts like sympathetic cardiac denervation as well as radioablation might expand the therapeutical armamentarium especially in patients with therapy-refractory VT. Randomized controlled trials are warranted and on the way to investigate how these translate into improved patient outcome. This review summarizes therapeutic strategies currently available for the prevention of VT recurrences, the optimal timing of applicability, and highlights future perspectives after a PAUSE in BERLIN.

Sudden cardiac death after implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker: a case report illustrating that not always less is more

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves symptoms and survival in selected patients with systolic heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. In subjects without prior life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, clinicians have to select between implanting a CRT pacemaker (CRT-P) or a more complex device with additional defibrillator capability (CRT-D). This individual decision can be challenging in light of the available evidence and the potential risks and benefits.

Case summary

A 76-year-old male with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure New York Heart Association Class III, left bundle branch block (QRS duration 185 ms) and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% despite optimal medical therapy was indicated for CRT. In light of the patient characteristics and clinical condition, a CRT-P device was implanted. No complication occurred, and the patient was discharged after an appropriate device function was confirmed. Despite the clinical improvement, he died suddenly without prior symptoms approximately 2 months thereafter. Post-mortem device interrogation provided no evidence for device malfunction and confirmed sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to spontaneous ventricular fibrillation.

Discussion

Patients indicated for CRT often have overlapping internal cardioverter defibrillator indication for the primary prevention of SCD. By weighing individual risks and potential benefits, clinicians have to decide whether to implant a CRT-P (less is more) or a more complex and costly CRT-D device. Despite careful consideration of patient characteristics and clinical conditions, however, SCD can occur in subjects categorized as low risk and implanted with a CRT-P. More data from randomized clinical trials are needed to better support physicians in the often challenging process of selecting the most appropriate device for CRT.

EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management—status 2019

Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.