2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance.

RESULTS

Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation.

Predictors of recurrence after durable pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces AF recurrence, AF burden, and improves quality of life. Data on clinical and procedural predictors of arrhythmia recurrence are scarce and are flawed by the high rate of pulmonary vein reconnection evidenced during repeat procedures after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In this study, we identified clinical and procedural predictors for AF recurrence 1 year after CLOSE-guided PVI, as this strategy has been associated with an increased PVI durability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with paroxysmal AF, who received CLOSE-guided PVI and who participated in a prospective trial in our centre, were included in this study. Uni- and multivariate models were plotted to find clinical and procedural predictors for AF recurrence within 1 year. Three hundred twenty-five patients with a mean age of 63 years (CHA2DS2VASc 1 [1-3], left atrium diameter 41 ± 6 mm) were included. About 60.9% were male individuals. After 1 year, AF recurrence occurred in 10.5% of patients. In a binary logistic regression analysis, the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) was found to be the strongest predictor of AF recurrence (P = 0.011). Diagnosis-to-ablation time ≥1 year was associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk for developing AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The DAT is the most important predictor of arrhythmia recurrence in low-risk patients treated with durable pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF. Whether reducing the DAT could improve long-term outcomes should be investigated in another trial.

Improved Procedural Efficiency of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Dedicated Ablation Protocol and Lean Management

OBJECTIVES

In this study the authors hypothesized that "Lean management" within a dedicated ablation protocol could standardize the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure and improve quality.

BACKGROUND

There is a large variability in safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of PVI.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study with inclusion of all consecutive PVI procedures from 2017 to 2019. A 3-step intervention was introduced based on Lean management: step 1) simplification (CLOSE protocol); step 2) waste elimination (higher power shorter duration); and step 3) improved standardization (Lab Optimization Tool [LOT]). PVI was divided into steps that were tracked (in minutes) using LOT. Parameters were compared in 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

Overall, 295 patients (146 patients with LOT) were analyzed. Step 1 reduced skin-to-skin procedure duration (2017: 119 ± 21 min vs. 2018: 77 ± 15 min; p < 0.001) and variance (from 2018 to 2019 p = 0.024). Step 2 reduced the radiofrequency time (2017: 38 ± 6 min vs. 2018: 20 ± 3 min; p < 0.001) and variance (from 2018 to 2019 p < 0.001). Analysis of step 3 demonstrated that only 53% of the entire procedure length (143 ± 22 min) was used for treatment (skin-to-skin time 77 ± 16 min), the remaining time being devoted for setup (42 ± 12 min, 29%); left atrial access (16 ± 7 min, 12%); respiratory gating, left atrial map, and pseudo-circle annotation (10 ± 6 min, 7%); ablation (39 ± 10 min, 27%); and bilateral block validation (10 ± 8 min, 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of PVI using a dedicated ablation protocol and Lean management can help to reduce procedure and radiofrequency ablation duration and variance, and increase procedural efficiency without compromising safety. To improve health care utilization, increased efficiency should become an accepted goal in addition to procedural safety and effectiveness.