Clinical impact of smoking on atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of smoking on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have contradictory results in previous studies, performed on Asian populations.

METHODS AND AIM

Smoking habit and other cardiovascular risk-factors were assessed in patients who underwent their first radiofrequency PVI for symptomatic AF. The study aims to assess the clinical impact of smoking on AF recurrences after PVI in a contemporary European cohort of patients.

RESULTS

The study included 186 consecutive patients (135 males [72.6%]) with a mean age of 63.4 ± 9.7 years. Current smokers resulted 29 (15.7%). No statistically significant baseline differences were detected between current smokers and non-current smokers. After a follow-up of 418 ± 246 days, AF recurrence was higher in currently smoking patients vs. non-currently smoker patients, the latter intended as a combination between previous smokers and never smokers (34.5% vs. 14% p = 0.01). A previous smoking habit was not associated with increased risk of AF recurrence when compared with patients who never smoked (13.2% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.23), while a current smoking habit impacted on AF recurrence in comparison with previous smokers (p = 0.01) and never smokers (p = 0.04). The increased incidence of AF recurrence in current smokers was consistent also considering only paroxysmal AF (31.4% vs 9.6%, p = 0.012) or persistent AF (50% vs 31.2%, p = 0.03). Smoking (HR =2.96 95% CI 1.32-6.64) and persistent AF (HR =2.64 95% CI 1.22-5.7) resulted independent predictors of AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrences after PVI, both in paroxysmal and in persistent AF.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Identification of epicardial connections can improve the success rate of first-pass right pulmonary vein isolation

Background

Epicardial connections between the right pulmonary vein (PV) and the right atrium have been reported.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of our new pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) strategy with identification of these epicardial connections.

Methods

Overall, 235 patients with atrial fibrillation were included. High-density mapping of the left atrium was performed to identify the earliest activation sites (EASs) before PVI in all patients. With our new strategy, if EASs around the right PV carina were identified, we ablated these sites and performed usual first-pass circumferential PVI. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the ablation strategy. One hundred fifteen patients underwent first-pass PVI without information on EASs (nonanalyzed group), and 78 patients underwent ablation at EASs around the right PV carina in addition to PVI (analyzed group). After first-pass ablation around the PV antrum, remapping was performed.

Results

High-density mapping before PVI showed that the prevalence of EASs around the right PV carina was 10.9% in all patients (9.6% in the nonanalyzed group, 12.8% in the analyzed group; P = .74. The first-pass right PVI success rate was higher in the analyzed group than in the nonanalyzed group (93.6% vs 82.6%; P = .04). The radiofrequency application time for PVI was significantly shorter in the analyzed group than in the nonanalyzed group (45.6 ± 1.0 minutes vs 51.2 ± 0.9 minutes; P <.05).

Conclusion

Identification of epicardial connections before ablation could improve the success rate of first-pass right PVI.

Surpoint algorithm for improved guidance of ablation for ventricular tachycardia (SURFIRE-VT): A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The utility of ablation index (AI) to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with structural heart disease is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes achieved using AI-guided strategy (target value 550) or conventional non-AI-guided parameters in patients undergoing scar-related VT ablation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 103) undergoing initial VT ablation at a single center from 2017 to 2022 were evaluated. Patient groups were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics. Single lesion characteristics for all 4707 lesions in the matched cohort (n = 74) were analyzed. The impact of ablation characteristics was assessed by linear regression and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

After propensity-matching, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between AI (n = 37) and non-AI (n = 37) groups. Lesion sets were similar (scar homogenization [41% vs. 27%; p = .34], scar dechanneling [19% vs. 8%; p = .18], core isolation [5% vs. 11%; p = .4], linear and elimination late potentials/local abnormal ventricular activities [35% vs. 44%; p = .48], epicardial mapping/ablation [11% vs. 14%; p = .73]). AI-guided strategy had 21% lower procedure duration (-47.27 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-81.613, -12.928]; p = .008), 49% lower radiofrequency time per lesion (-13.707 s, 95% CI [-17.86, -9.555]; p < .001), 21% lower volume of fluid administered (1664 cc [1127, 2209] vs. 2126 cc [1750, 2593]; p = .005). Total radiofrequency duration (-339 s [-24%], 95%CI [-776, 62]; p = .09) and steam pops (-155.6%, 95% CI [19.8%, -330.9%]; p = .08) were nonsignificantly lower in the AI group. Acute procedural success (95% vs. 89%; p = .7) and VT recurrence (0.97, 95% CI [0.42-2.2]; p = .93) were similar for both groups. Lesion analysis (n = 4707) demonstrated a plateau in the magnitude of impedance drops once reaching an AI of 550-600.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, an AI-guided ablation strategy for scar-related VT resulted in shorter procedure time and average radiofrequency time per lesion with similar acute procedural and intermediate-term clinical outcomes to a non-AI-guided approach utilizing traditional ablation parameters.

Catheter-tissue contact optimizes pulsed electric field ablation with a large area focal catheter

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation relies on the intersection of a critical voltage gradient with tissue to cause cell death. Field-based lesion formation with PEF technologies may still depend on catheter-tissue contact (CTC). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of CTC on PEF lesion formation with an investigational large area focal (LAF) catheter in a preclinical model.

METHODS

PEF ablation via a 10-spline LAF catheter was used to create discrete right ventricle (RV) lesions and atrial lesion sets in 10 swine (eight acute, two chronic). Local impedance (LI) was used to assess CTC. Lesions were assigned to three cohorts using LI above baseline: no tissue contact (NTC: ≤∆10 Ω, close proximity to tissue), low tissue contact (LTC: ∆11-29 Ω), and high tissue contact (HTC: ≥∆30 Ω). Acute animals were infused with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) and killed ≥2 h post-treatment. Chronic animals were remapped 30 days post-index procedure and stained with infused TTC.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) RV treatment sizes between LTC (n = 14) and HTC (n = 17) lesions were not significantly different (depth: 5.65 ± 1.96 vs. 5.68 ± 2.05 mm, p = .999; width: 15.68 ± 5.22 vs. 16.98 ± 4.45 mm, p = .737), while mean treatment size for NTC lesions (n = 6) was significantly smaller (1.67 ± 1.16 mm depth, 5.97 ± 4.48 mm width, p < .05). For atrial lesion sets, acute and chronic conduction block were achieved with both LTC (N = 7) and HTC (N = 6), and NTC resulted in gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

PEF ablation with a specialized LAF catheter in a swine model is dependent on CTC. LI as an indicator of CTC may aid in the creation of consistent transmural lesions in PEF ablation.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Performance and safety of temperature- and flow-controlled radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmia

AIMS

High-power ablation is effective for ventricular arrhythmia ablation; however, it increases the risk of steam pops. The aim of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of QMODE ablation in the ventricle and the risk of steam pop.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing ventricular ablation using QDOT were included in a prospective single-centre registry. Procedural data, complications, and follow-up were systematically analysed and compared with a historical ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) cohort ablated using STSF. QMODE (≤50 W) ablation was performed in 107 patients [age 62 ± 13 years; 76% male; VT (n = 41); PVC (n = 66)]. A total of 2456 applications were analysed [power: 45.9 ± 5.0 W with minimal power titration (90% > 95% max power); duration 26 ± 8 s; impedance drop 9.4 ± 4.7 Ω; ablation index: 569 ± 163; mean-max temperature 44.3 ± 2.6°C]. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was associated with shorter radiofrequency (RF) time and a trend towards shorter procedure times using QDOT (QDOT vs. STSF: 20.1 ± 14.7 vs. 31 ± 17 min; P = 0.002, 151 ± 59 vs. 172 ± 48 min; P = 0.06). Complications, VT recurrence, and mortality rates were comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 2% vs. 2%; P = 0.9, 24% vs. 27%; P = 0.82, and 2% vs. 4%; P = 0.67). Five audible steam pops (0.02%) occurred. Premature ventricular complex ablation was associated with comparable RF and procedure times (QDOT vs. STSF: 4.8 ± 4.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3.1 min; P = 0.25 and 96.1 ± 31.9 vs. 94.6 ± 24.7 min; P = 0.75). Complication and PVC recurrence were also comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 0% vs. 3%; P = 0.17 and 19% vs. 22%; P = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

Ventricular ablation using QMODE ≤ 50 W is safe and effective for both VT and PVC ablation and is associated with a low risk for steam pop.

Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies have suggested the superiority of high-power compared to standard-power radiofrequency ablation ablation (RFCA). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-power compared to standard-power RFCA guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion index (LSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing IGHP and IGLP approaches for AF ablation was conducted. The relevant published studies comparing IGHP and IGSP methods for RFCA in AF patients until October 2022 were collected from Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 2579 AF patients from 11 studies were included, 1682 received IGHP RFCA, and 897 received IGSP RFCA. To achieve successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the IGHP RFCA group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the IGHP RFCA group (mean difference (MD) -19.91 min; 95% CI -25.23 to -14.59 min; p < 0.01), radiofrequency (RF) application time (MD -10.92 min; 95% CI -14.70 to -7.13 min; p < 0.01), and fewer number of lesions (MD -10.90; 95% CI -18.77 to -3.02; p < 0.01) than the IGSP RFCA. First-pass PVI was significantly greater in the IGHP RFCA group than in the IGSP RFCA group (risk ratio (RR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; p < 0.01). The IGHP RFCA is an effective and efficient strategy for AF ablation. The superiority of IGHP RFCA includes the shorter procedure time, shorter RF application time, fewer number of lesions for complete PVI, and more excellent first-pass PVI.

The Impact of Regional Maximum Tolerated Interlesion Distance on the Long-Term Ablation Outcomes in Ablation Index Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

An adequate interlesion distance (ILD) applied during point-by-point pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has never been established. We hypothesized that maximum tolerated ILD may differ between PV regions and may influence long-term ablation outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 260 AF patients underwent PV isolation with 3D electroanatomical platform. Postablation, ILD values were classified into 5 groups (6-5.5 mm, 5.5-5.0 mm, 5.0-4.5 mm, 4.5-4.0 mm and <4.0 mm); the number of tags in each group was calculated and correlated with postablation AF recurrence (AFR). All measurements were performed globally for the entire encirclement around each individual PV and regionally for designated PV anatomic segments.

RESULTS

Single-procedure freedom from AF was 81% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF at 12 months. Global analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD nor the number of lesions within each ILD tag group for any PV. Segmental analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD. However, the presence of tags from the 5.5-6.0 mm ILD group located on the posterior aspect of right upper PV (RUPV) correlated with AFR. This was confirmed in a multivariable logistic regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum tolerated ILD of 6.0 mm translated into well-accepted ablation results. However, the study suggests that it may be inadequate at the posterior aspect of RUPV.

[Arrhythmias : Update on ablations and devices]

The field of invasive electrophysiology is technically evolving and especially the catheter ablation treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The technically innovative method of so-called electroporation (pulsed field ablation, PFA) is characterized by a rapid and effective treatment of AF. The current study data confirm a high success rate for ablation and a good safety profile in the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF. In the field of radiofrequency ablation (RF) of AF the modified form of energy transfer, the very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) protocols, show good results and can reduce the procedural time. There are also technical innovations in other single-shot devices. There is a device based on the RF technique that could show good clinical results in an initial study and can combine the targeted delivery of RF energy with the advantages of a single-shot device. For ventricular tachycardia (VT) there are innovations in the diagnostics and clarification in the new European guidelines that were presented in August 2022. These make individual recommendations for different types of cardiomyopathy. There are also technical developments in the field of active rhythm implants. In cardiac pacemaker treatment and specifically for conduction system pacing (CSP) there is evidence for a targeted stimulation of the bundle of His or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). This form of stimulation is particularly advantageous for patients with heart failure and a broad QRS complex. For leadless pacemakers (leadless pacing) there are now good long-term results and also a two-chamber approach.

Comparison of Radiofrequency and Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation for the Early and Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation

Objective Early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to resolve within the recommended 3-month blanking period, irrespective of the ablation device used. To compare the occurrence and relationship of AF within the blanking period and subsequent late recurrence (LR) with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 294 patients (mean age=62±9, 70.0% male) undergoing PVI for drug-refractory paroxysmal AF was done. After categorizing the patients into the RF group (n=152) and the CB group (n=142), a group-wise comparison was done to investigate the impact of ER on LR throughout a 2-year follow-up. Results The groups were similar regarding the occurrence of ER (RF=22.4%, CB=24.6%, p=0.62), while LR was significantly higher in the RF group (p=0.003). ER was associated with LR in the RF group (p<0.01) but not in the CB group (p=0.08), while a significant independent association with an increased LR risk was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.56-10.51, p<0.01]. RF ablation also significantly increased the risk of LR (HR=2.93; 95% CI=1.64-5.23, p<0.01). Conclusion A recurrence of atrial arrhythmia is more frequent with RF-PVI than with CB-PVI for patients with paroxysmal AF. ER and RF-ablation are strong predictors for LR after the 3-month blanking period.

The effect of left atrial wall thickness and pulmonary vein sizes on the acute procedural success of atrial fibrillation ablation

Nowadays, a novel contact-force guided ablation technique is used for enclosing pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to determine whether left atrial (LA) wall thickness (LAWT) and pulmonary vein (PV) dimensions, as assessed by cardiac CT, could influence the success rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In a single-center, prospective study, we enrolled consecutive patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF who underwent initial radiofrequency catheter ablation using a modified CLOSE protocol. Pre-procedural CT was performed in all cases. Additionally, the diameter and area of the PV orifices were obtained. A total of 1034 LAWT measurements and 376 PV area measurements were performed in 94 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.1 ± 1.5, mean age 62.4 ± 12.6 years, 39.5% female, 38.3% persistent AF). Mean procedure time was 81.2 ± 19.3 min. Complete isolation of all PVs was achieved in 100% of patients. First-pass isolation rate was 76% and 71% for the right-sided PVs and the left-sided PVs, respectively. No difference was found regarding comorbidities and imaging parameters between those with and without first-pass isolation. LAWT (mean of 11 regions or separately) had no effect on the acute procedural outcome on logistic regression analysis (all p ≥ 0.05). Out of all assessed parameters, only RSPV diameter was associated with a higher rate of successful right-sided first pass isolation (OR 1.01, p = 0.04). Left atrial wall thickness does not have an influence on the acute procedural success of PVI using ablation index and a standardized ablation protocol. RSPV diameter could influence the probability of right sided first-pass isolation.

The impact of current strategy using intracardiac echocardiography, lesion index, and minimum substrate ablation on clinical outcomes after catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

We developed the intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) technique to minimize radiation exposure and other recent technology during ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to validate the impact of the current strategy using the recent technology for AF ablation on outcomes after procedure.

METHODS

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the current strategy in consecutive set of patients undergoing first-time ablation for AF (N = 233) compared with the conventional strategy in earlier consecutive set of patients (N = 223). The current strategy included the technique of ICE to reduce radiation exposure, Ablation Index®-guided pulmonary veins isolation, and minimum substrate ablation targeting only for induced AF. Outcome measures were radiation exposure, procedure time, in-hospital adverse outcomes, and event-free survival from tachyarrhythmias.

RESULTS

Puncture-to-ablation time was slightly, but significantly increased in the current strategy than in the conventional strategy (48.0 minutes vs 44.7 minutes, P = .002), although total procedure time was significantly decreased in the current strategy (143.9 minutes vs 156.9 minutes, P < .001). Likewise, radiation time and absorbed dose were significantly decreased in the current strategy (9.8 minutes vs 38.8 minutes, P < .001; 102.3 mGy vs 490.5 mGy, P < .001). The incidence of overall in-hospital adverse outcomes was 3.9% in the current strategy and each complication rate was comparable with the conventional protocol. The event-free survival from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias was not significantly different between two groups (72.3% vs 77.1% at 2-year, P = .32).

CONCLUSION

The current strategy using the recent technology with ICE, lesion index, and minimum substrate ablation was feasible and reduced total procedure time and radiation exposure. However, the arrhythmia-free survival could not be improved.

Fast anatomical mapping of the carina and its implications for acute pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

Fast anatomical mapping (FAM) of the left atrium and pulmonary veins (PV) during PV isolation (PVI) generates anatomical information about the carina region additionally. We aimed to investigate the utility of these data in relation to conduction abilities of the intervenous carina.

METHODS

We investigated 71 patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent first-time circumferential PVI using an electroanatomical mapping system. Carina width between ipsilateral PV was measured using FAM and an integrated distance measurement tool. Encirclings were divided into carina ablation and noncarina ablation groups based on the necessity of carina ablation to achieve PVI.

RESULTS

In total, 142 encirclings were analyzed and first-pass isolation was observed in 102 (72%) encirclings. Nonfirst-pass PVI solely due to a gap on the line or persistent carina conduction was observed in 10 (7%) and 30 (21%) encirclings, respectively. Encirclings were classified into a carina ablation group (n = 30, 21%) and noncarina ablation group (n = 112, 79%). Carina width was significantly larger in the carina ablation vs nonarina ablation group (right: 11.9 ± 1.5 mm vs 8 ± 1.4 mm, P < .001/left: 12.1 ± 1.3 mm vs 8.1 ± 1.1 mm, P < .001) requiring additional carina ablation.

CONCLUSION

Carina-related PV conduction is a common finding after the first-pass ablation during PVI. Measurement of carina width using FAM is feasible and its value correlates with the necessity of carina ablation to achieve PVI.

High-power, short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: Pros and cons

This article reviews and compares the rationale and evidence supporting high-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The pros and cons of each approach, biophysics of ablation, pre-clinical studies informing clinical utilization, and the accumulated clinical evidence are presented. Both conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation and high-power, short-duration ablation are similarly safe, and effective approaches for AF ablation. Theoretical advantages of high-power, short-duration ablation, including greater procedure efficiency and limited conductive heating of collateral structures, must be weighed against the narrower safety margin related to rapid energy delivery during high power ablation.

Early clinical experience of radiofrequency catheter ablation using an audiovisual telesupport system

BACKGROUND

An audiovisual telesupport system that enables real-time audiovisual communications between 2 long-distance hospitals is one method of telemedicine. The usefulness and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) using an audiovisual telesupport system has not been well established.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RFCA using an audiovisual telesupport system.

METHODS

An audiovisual telesupport system using a strictly secured virtual network was established between Kamisu Saiseikai Hospital (operator with 10 years' experience and 800 procedures) and the University of Tsukuba (advisor with >20 years' experience and 8000 procedures). We evaluated 19 initial consecutive patients who underwent RFCA using this system for tachyarrhythmia: 10 with atrial fibrillation (AF), 5 with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), 3 with premature ventricular contraction (PVC), and 1 with atrial flutter. Electrophysiological and procedural characteristics were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

Acute success was achieved in all 19 patients without any major complications, with the advisor's audiovisual assistance. Mean procedure time and fluoroscopic time were 161 ± 44 minutes and 24 ± 14 minutes for AF, 110 ± 17 minutes and 28 ± 8 minutes for PVC, and 132 ± 19 minutes and 32 ± 2 minutes for PSVT, respectively. There was no recurrence of clinical arrhythmia in 17 of the 19 patients (89%) during 13 ± 9 month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

An audiovisual telesupport system for RFCA is a useful and safe method that enabled the electrophysiologist with limited human resources to make an optimal decision regarding procedural strategy and endpoint with the remote advisor's audiovisual assistance.

Ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-real-life results from a middle-volume electrophysiology laboratory

Introduction

A significant improvement in safety and efficacy of ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been reported by experienced centers over recent years; however, data from real-life surveys and smaller electrophysiology (EP) laboratories have been less optimistic.

Aim

To asses efficacy of ablation for PAF in a middle-volume EP center over last years.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 1 year efficacy and safety of ablation for PAF in three cohorts of patients treated between 2011 and 2014 (period I), 2015–2017 (period II), and 2018–2019 (period III).

Results

Of 234 patients (mean age 57 ± 9 years, 165 males), 81 (35%) were treated in period I, 84 (36%) in period II, and 69 (29%) in period III. The overall efficacy of ablation during all analyzed periods was 67%. The overall efficacy of ablation increased over time—from 56% in period I to 68% in period II and 81% in period III. Significant improvement was achieved using radiofrequency ablation (RF) (53% in period I vs 82% in period III, and 55% in period II vs 82% in period III, p = 0.003 and 0.0012, respectively) whereas positive trend in the improvement of cryoballoon efficacy was NS. The rate of peri-procedural complications was 9% and it did not change significantly over time.

Conclusions

This real-life observational study from a medium volume EP center shows that progress in PAF ablation, especially RF, reported by highly-skilled centers, can be reproduced in real life by less experienced operators.

Improved Procedural Efficiency of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Dedicated Ablation Protocol and Lean Management

OBJECTIVES

In this study the authors hypothesized that "Lean management" within a dedicated ablation protocol could standardize the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure and improve quality.

BACKGROUND

There is a large variability in safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of PVI.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study with inclusion of all consecutive PVI procedures from 2017 to 2019. A 3-step intervention was introduced based on Lean management: step 1) simplification (CLOSE protocol); step 2) waste elimination (higher power shorter duration); and step 3) improved standardization (Lab Optimization Tool [LOT]). PVI was divided into steps that were tracked (in minutes) using LOT. Parameters were compared in 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

Overall, 295 patients (146 patients with LOT) were analyzed. Step 1 reduced skin-to-skin procedure duration (2017: 119 ± 21 min vs. 2018: 77 ± 15 min; p < 0.001) and variance (from 2018 to 2019 p = 0.024). Step 2 reduced the radiofrequency time (2017: 38 ± 6 min vs. 2018: 20 ± 3 min; p < 0.001) and variance (from 2018 to 2019 p < 0.001). Analysis of step 3 demonstrated that only 53% of the entire procedure length (143 ± 22 min) was used for treatment (skin-to-skin time 77 ± 16 min), the remaining time being devoted for setup (42 ± 12 min, 29%); left atrial access (16 ± 7 min, 12%); respiratory gating, left atrial map, and pseudo-circle annotation (10 ± 6 min, 7%); ablation (39 ± 10 min, 27%); and bilateral block validation (10 ± 8 min, 7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of PVI using a dedicated ablation protocol and Lean management can help to reduce procedure and radiofrequency ablation duration and variance, and increase procedural efficiency without compromising safety. To improve health care utilization, increased efficiency should become an accepted goal in addition to procedural safety and effectiveness.

ASJ, Meira K, Pezzin F, Lacerda Jr. O, Batista Jr. W, Nogueira Jr. A, Amaral D. The First-Pass Isolation Effect in High-Power Short-Duration Compared to Low-Power Long-Duration Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: a Predictor of Success

Introduction: Different results are described after atrial fibrillation ablation and multiples predictors of recurrence are well established. Objective: Evaluate and analyze if first-pass isolation effect (FPI) during first atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with high-power short-duration (HPSD) comparing to low-power long-duration (LPLD) can impact on late outcome. Methods: Observational, retrospective study, 144 patients submitted to HPSD and LPLD ablation. HPSD: 71 patients, 50 (70.42%) males, mean age 59.73 years, 52 (73.24%) hypertension, 44 (61.97%) obstructive apnea, 23 (32.39%) arterial disease, 20 (28.17%) diabetes, and 10(14.08%) stroke. CHADS2VASC2 2.57. CT: 73 patients, 50 (68.49%) males, mean age 60.7 years, 53 (72.60%) hypertension, 41 (56.16%) obstructive apnea, 28 (38.36%) arterial disease, 14 (19.17%) diabetes and 8 (10.96%) stroke. CHAD2SVASC2 2.22. Results: Recurrence occurred in 33 patients (22.92%) at 12 months follow-up, HPSD with 9 patients and LPLD with 24 patients. Higher rate of bilateral FPI were observed in HPSD patients with 62 of 71 patients comparing to 17 of 73 patients in LPLD (P < 0.00001). At the end of study 62 (87.32%) of 71 HPSD patients were in sinus rhythm comparing to 49 (67.12%) of 73 patients in LPLD (P 0.0039). Conclusion: HPSD ablation produced higher rates of FPI comparing to LPLD. HPSD compared to LPLD showed a superiority in maintaining sinus rhythm at 12 months. At patients submitted to HPSD protocol ablation, FPI could predict higher rate of sinus rhythm at 12 months follow-up.

Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: How do You Perform it?

Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) presents unique challenges and the lack of large body of evidence surrounding management makes for disagreement and different approaches for treatment. Outlined is a case example that offers a comprehensive approach to ablation in patients with LSPAF that consists of risk factor management, an ablation strategy, a rigorous trigger protocol and follow-up rhythm monitoring. The case presented highlights management of this difficult population as best guided by current evidence and our experience. Ablation treatment and management strategies will continue to evolve with further randomized data and the advent of improved ablation technologies.

Clinical outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation using an automated tagging module in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

An automated tagging module (VISITAG™; Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA) allows objective demonstration of energy delivery. However, the effect of VISITAG™ on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluated (1) clinical outcome after AF ablation using VISITAG™ and (2) the prevalence of gaps in the ablation line.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 157 consecutive patients (mean age, 56.7 years; 73.2% men) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent successful PVI between 2013 and 2016. Outcomes after the index procedure were compared between those using the VISITAG™ module (VISITAG group, n = 62) and those not using it (control group, n = 95). The primary outcome was recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia after a blanking period of 3 months.

Results

The VISITAG group showed significantly shorter overall procedure time (172.2 ± 37.6 min vs. 286.9 ± 66.7 min, P < 0.001), ablation time (49.8 ± 9.7 min vs. 82.8 ± 28.2 min, P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy time (11.8 ± 5.3 min vs. 34.2 ± 30.1 min, P < 0.001) compared with controls. The 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was not statistically different between the groups (70.8% in the VISITAG group vs. 79.2% in the control group, P = 0.189). Gaps in the VISITAG line were common in the both carina and left side pulmonary veins. Patients without gaps (≥ 5 mm) by the criteria emphasizing catheter stability (> 15 s, < 4 mm range, > 60% force over time, > 6 g contact force) showed higher recurrence-free survival rate compared with those with gaps (borderline statistical significance, 91.7% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.094).

Conclusion

Use of the VISITAG™ module significantly reduced procedure, ablation, and fluoroscopic times with a similar AF/AT recurrence rate compared with the conventional ablation. Clinical implications of minimizing gaps along the ablation line should be evaluated further in the future prospective studies.

Randomized study defining the optimum target interlesion distance in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation

Aims

While the CLOSE protocol proposes a maximally tolerable interlesion distance (ILD) of 6 mm for ablation index ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, a target ILD has never been defined. This randomized study sought to establish a target ILD for ablation index-guided AF ablation.

Methods and results

Consecutive patients scheduled for first-time pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) were randomly assigned to ablation protocols with a target ILD of 5.0–6.0 mm or 3.0–4.0 mm, with the primary endpoint of first-pass PVI. In compliance with the CLOSE protocol, the maximum tolerated ILD was 6.0 mm in both study protocols. A target ablation index of ≥550 (anterior) or ≥400 (posterior) was defined for the ‘5–6 mm’ protocol and ≥500 (anterior) or ≥350 (posterior) for the ‘3–4 mm’ protocol. The study was terminated early for superiority of the ‘3–4 mm’ protocol. Forty-two consecutive patients were randomized and 84 ipsilateral PV pairs encircled according to the study protocol. First-pass PVI was accomplished in 35.0% of the ‘5–6 mm’ group and 90.9% of the ‘3–4 mm’ group (P &lt; 0.0001). Median ILD was 5.2 mm in the ‘5–6 mm’ group and 3.6 mm in the ‘3–4 mm’ group (P &lt; 0.0001). In line with the distinct ablation index targets, median ablation index was lower in the ‘3–4 mm’ group (416 vs. 452, P &lt; 0.0001). While mean procedure time was shorter in the ‘3–4 mm’ group (149 ± 27 vs. 167 ± 33min, P = 0.004), fluoroscopy times did not differ significantly (4.7 ± 2.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.8 min, P = 0.565).

Conclusion

In ablation index-guided AF ablation, an ILD of 3.0–4.0 mm should be targeted rather than 5.0–6.0 mm. Moreover, the lower target ILD may allow for less extensive ablation at each given point.

Risk of esophageal thermal injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by different ablation index

BACKGROUND

During ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), energy delivery toward the left atrial posterior wall may cause esophageal injury (EI). Ablation index (AI) was introduced to estimate ablation lesion size, however, the impact of AI technology on the risk of EI has not been explored.

METHOD

From March 2019 to December 2019, 60 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing first-time ablation were prospectively enrolled. The first 30 consecutive patients were ablated with the AI target value of 400 (AI-400 group), and the later 30 consecutive patients were ablated with the AI target value of 350 at the posterior wall (AI-350 group). Endoscopic ultrasonography was used to evaluate EI postablation. EI was classified as a category 1 (erythema or erosion) or a category 2 (hematoma or ulceration).

RESULTS

Compared with the AI-400 group (59.9 ± 8.4 years; male, 60%), the AI-350 group (59.1 ± 9.9 years; male, 50%) had a lower incidence of EI (3.3% vs 26.7%, P = .03). There was no significant difference in the percentage of first-pass PVI between the AI-400 group and the AI-350 group (left PVI: 80% vs 73.4%, P = .54; right PVI: 80% vs 60%, P = .1). Neither ablation time nor fluoroscopy time was significantly different between the AI-400 group and the AI-350 group.

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation guide by AI target value of 350 may reduce esophageal thermal injury and has a similar efficiency on the acute success rate of first-pass PVI compared with an AI target value of 400 at the posterior wall.