1
|
Buclin CP, von Arx M, Jolidon V, Sandoval JL, Buholzer-Mercier F, Daverio JE, van der Linden BWA, Wanner P, Guessous I, Courvoisier DS, Cullati S. Linguistic difference in the effect of organized programs on socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening: ecological study in Switzerland. Eur J Cancer Prev 2024:00008469-990000000-00164. [PMID: 39150692 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to examine how the effect of organized mammography screening programs on breast cancer screening participation differ between socioeconomic strata and how this relationship may be modified by the context of linguistic differences. Switzerland, marked by its diverse linguistic landscape, reflects cultural variations alongside differences in public health strategies. The goal of this study was to assess potential socioeconomic differences in regional mammography screening programs effectiveness to improve breast cancer screening participation. METHODS Data on 14 173 women in the regionally adapted breast cancer screening age range was drawn from five cross-sectional waves of the nationally representative Swiss Health Interview Survey (1997-2017). Socioeconomic indicators included education, household income, and employment status. Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date (last 2 years) mammography uptake. Inequality was assessed using relative index of inequality and the slope index of inequality. RESULTS Organized screening programs were generally effective and increased up-to-date mammography uptake by close to 20 percentage points in both regions. While in the Latin cantons, screening programs had no impact on socioeconomic inequalities in screening, it reduced inequalities for women with lower education in the German cantons. This modification effect of screening programs was not seen for income and employment-related inequalities and did not differ across linguistic regions. CONCLUSIONS Public health agencies should consider the different cultural reception of programs as addressing these differences could help ensure that breast cancer screening initiatives are not only effective, but also culturally equitable across different socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina von Arx
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- School of International Business and Marketing, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - José Luis Sandoval
- Division of Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva
| | - Fabienne Buholzer-Mercier
- Department of Community Health, Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg
| | - Justine E Daverio
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Quality of care division, Medical directorate, Geneva University Hospitals
| | | | - Philippe Wanner
- Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Idris Guessous
- Division of Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Department of Community Health, Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg
- Quality of care division, Medical directorate, Geneva University Hospitals
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jolidon V, De Prez V, Bracke P, Bell A, Burton-Jeangros C, Cullati S. Revisiting the Effects of Organized Mammography Programs on Inequalities in Breast Screening Uptake: A Multilevel Analysis of Nationwide Data From 1997 to 2017. Front Public Health 2022; 10:812776. [PMID: 35198524 PMCID: PMC8858931 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.812776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study revisits the effects of mammography screening programs on inequalities in breast screening uptake in Switzerland. The progressive introduction of regional mammography programs by 12 out of the 26 Swiss cantons (regions) since 1999 offers an opportunity to perform an ecological quasi-experimental study. We examine absolute income and marital status inequalities in mammography uptake, and whether the cantons' implementation of mammography programs moderate these inequalities, as previous research has devoted little attention to this. We use five waves of the Swiss Health Interview Survey covering the 1997-2017 period and comprising data on 14,267 women aged 50-70. Both up-to-date and ever-screening outcomes are analyzed with multilevel models which assess the mammography programs' within-canton effect. Findings show that higher income women and married women (compared to unmarried women) had significantly higher mammography uptake probabilities. Mammography programs did not moderate absolute income differences in up-to-date screening; however, they were associated with smaller absolute income differences in ever-screening uptake. Mammography programs related to higher screening uptake for married women, more than for unmarried women. In conclusion, we showed absolute income inequalities in mammography uptake which were not revealed by previous studies using relative inequality measures. Mammography programs may have contributed to reducing income inequalities in ever-screening, yet this was not observed for up-to-date screening. This study has implication for preventive health interventions-e.g., cancer screening promotion should pay attention to women's marital status since screening programs may widen the screening gap between married and unmarried women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Jolidon
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Piet Bracke
- Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew Bell
- Sheffield Methods Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stéphane Cullati
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Willems B, Cullati S, Prez VD, Jolidon V, Burton-Jeangros C, Bracke P. Cancer Screening Participation and Gender Stratification in Europe. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 2020; 61:377-395. [PMID: 32686508 DOI: 10.1177/0022146520938708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The current study examines whether the extent of macrolevel gender inequality affects the association between women's educational attainment and their participation in cervical and breast cancer screening and how this relationship is moderated by a country's cancer screening strategy (organized vs. opportunistic). A multilevel design with women (Ncervical = 99,794; Nbreast = 55,021) nested in 30 European countries was used to analyze data from the European Health Interview Survey (2013-2015). Results of multilevel logistic regression models demonstrate that higher macrolevel gender inequality is associated with (a) a lower overall likelihood that women have had a mammography and Pap smear and (b) a larger gap in participation between women with low and high levels of education, regardless of a country's screening strategy (i.e., no moderation by a country's screening strategy was found). We conclude that macrolevel gender stratification should not be neglected when designing cancer screening policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stéphane Cullati
- University of Geneva, Geneva, GE, Switzerland
- University of Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Piet Bracke
- Ghent University, Gent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Have Health Reforms in Brazil Reduced Inequities in Access to Cancer Screenings for Women? J Ambul Care Manage 2020; 43:257-266. [PMID: 32467438 DOI: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We measured asset-based and education-based inequity in utilization of 2 cancer screening tests, Pap tests and mammograms, using nationally representative surveys conducted in 2003, 2008, and 2013. Utilization of Pap tests (ages 25-59 years) and mammograms (ages 50-69 years) increased over time. Asset-based and education-based inequities declined significantly for both screening tests, particularly among women who reported a doctor visit in the previous year. This decline coincided with increases in the coverage of primary health care in Brazil. However, barriers persisted; in 2013, college-educated women were still 2.27 times more likely to have a mammogram than those who were illiterate.
Collapse
|
5
|
Willems B, Bracke P. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:943. [PMID: 30514273 PMCID: PMC6280447 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigate whether the extent of educational inequalities in the use of Pap smears (cervical cancer screening) and mammograms (breast cancer screening) in Belgium has changed over time in accordance with the pattern predicted by diffusion of innovation theory, as well as how the regional cancer screening policies of Flanders and Wallonia influence this pattern. METHODS Data were obtained from five successive cross-sectional waves (1997-2001-2004-2008-2013) of the Belgian Health Interview Survey. Final sample sizes consisted of 8988 women aged 25-64 years for cervical cancer screening and 4194 women aged 50-69 years for breast cancer screening. We calculated absolute and relative measures of inequality, more specifically, the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII), and their development over time. RESULTS In both Flanders and Wallonia, mammogram use increased greatly between 1997 and 2013, while Pap smear use has remained quite stable over time. Educational inequalities in cervical-cancer screening have been largely persistent over time in both regions. In contrast, educational inequalities in breast cancer screening fluctuated more between 1997 and 2013. Between 1997 and 2001, when the breast cancer screening programme was implemented in Flanders, RII reduced significantly by 45%. Inequality measures did not change significantly in Wallonia, where it is known that most women are screened opportunistically outside the programme. CONCLUSIONS By focussing on Belgium, this study demonstrates that regional variations in the support of a national screening programme can result in regional variations in the pattern of diffusion for cancer screening, as well as to the development of inequalities in cancer screening participation. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that high visibility and awareness of the screening programme, as was more the case in Flanders than it was in Wallonia, are required in order to reduce or eliminate educational inequalities in cancer screening participation over time. General practitioners and gynaecologists can play a decisive role in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Willems
- Health and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Piet Bracke
- Health and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cullati S, von Arx M, Courvoisier DS, Sandoval JL, Manor O, Burton-Jeangros C, Bouchardy C, Guessous I. Organised population-based programmes and change in socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening: A 1992-2012 nationwide quasi-experimental study. Prev Med 2018; 116:19-26. [PMID: 30145347 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Organised mammography screening programmes may reduce socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening, but evidence is contradictory. Switzerland has no national organised mammography screening programme, but regional programmes were progressively introduced since 1999, giving the opportunity to conduct a nationwide quasi-experimental study. We examined the evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening in Switzerland and if exposure to regional organised programmes reduced socioeconomic inequalities. Data of 10,927 women aged 50 to 70 years old were collected from the Swiss Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey repeated 5 times (1992-2012). Socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using education, income, employment status, and occupational class. Adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date mammography screening were estimated with Poisson regressions and weighted for sampling strategy and non-participation bias. In the absence of organised screening programmes (1992-1997), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 23% and was associated with tertiary education and working part time. During the period of progressive introduction of regionally organised programmes (2002-2012), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 19% every 5 years and was associated with exposure to regional programmes and with independent/artisan occupations. Tertiary education and working part time were no longer associated. Exposure to organised programmes did not modify socioeconomic inequalities except for employment status: not employed women benefitted more from organised programmes compared to women working full time. In conclusion, socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening decreased over time but organised programmes did not greatly modify them, except women not employed whose prevalence passed employed women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Cullati
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Swiss NCCR "LIVES - Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Switzerland; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Martina von Arx
- Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Delphine S Courvoisier
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - José Luis Sandoval
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Orly Manor
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Israel
| | - Claudine Burton-Jeangros
- Swiss NCCR "LIVES - Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Bouchardy
- Geneva Cancer Registry, Global Health Institute, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Idris Guessous
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi E, Lee YY, Suh M, Lee EY, Mai TTX, Ki M, Oh JK, Cho H, Park B, Jun JK, Kim Y, Choi KS. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015. Yonsei Med J 2018; 59:1026-1033. [PMID: 30328316 PMCID: PMC6192888 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Consistent evidence indicates that cervical and breast cancer screening rates are low among socioeconomically deprived women. This study aimed to assess trends in cervical and breast cancer screening rates and to analyze socioeconomic inequalities among Korean women from 2005 to 2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annual nationwide cross-sectional survey, were utilized. A total of 19910 women were finally included for analysis. Inequalities in education and household income status were estimated by slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII), along with calculation of annual percent changes (APCs), to show trends in cancer screening rates. RESULTS Cervical and breast cancer screening rates increased from 54.8% in 2005 to 65.6% in 2015 and from 37.6% in 2005 to 61.2% in 2015, respectively. APCs in breast cancer screening rates were significant among women with higher levels of household income and education status. Inequalities by household income in cervical cancer screening uptake were observed with a pooled SII estimate of 10.6% (95% CI: 8.1 to 13.2) and RII of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3 to 1.6). Income inequalities in breast cancer screening were shown to gradually increase over time with a pooled SII of 5.9% (95% CI: 2.9 to 9.0) and RII of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.3). Educational inequalities appeared to diminish over the study period for both cervical and breast cancer screening. CONCLUSION Our study identified significant inequalities among socioeconomically deprived women in cervical and breast cancer screening in Korea. Especially, income-related inequalities were greater than education-related inequalities, and these were constant from 2005 to 2015 for both cervical and breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunji Choi
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yoon Young Lee
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Young Lee
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tran Thi Xuan Mai
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Moran Ki
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jin Kyoung Oh
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyunsoon Cho
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yeol Kim
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kui Son Choi
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Introduction of an organised programme and social inequalities in mammography screening: A 22-year population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland. Prev Med 2017; 103:49-55. [PMID: 28778819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2017] [Revised: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In developed countries, breast cancer mortality has decreased during the last decades due to, at least partially, the advent of mammography screening. Organised programmes aim, among other objectives, to increase participation and decrease social inequalities in screening access. We aimed to characterise the evolution of socioeconomic disparities in mammography screening before and after the implementation of an organised programme in Geneva, Switzerland. We included 5345 women, aged 50-74years, without past history of breast cancer who participated in the cross-sectional Bus Santé study, between 1992 and 2014. Outcome measures were: 1) never had a mammography (1992-2014) and 2) never had a mammography or not screened in the two years before being surveyed (subgroup analysis, 2007-2014). Educational attainment was divided in three groups (primary, secondary and tertiary) and period in two (before/after introduction of a screening programme in 1999). We calculated measures of relative and absolute change, including the relative (RII) and slope (SII) indices of social inequality adjusted for age and nationality. We compared the prevalence of screening before and after screening programme implementation using Poisson models. The proportion of unscreened women decreased during the study period from 30.5% to 3.6%. Lower educated women were more frequently unscreened (RII=2.39, p<0.001; SII=0.10, p<0.001). Organised screening decreased the proportion of unscreened women independently of education (prevalence ratiobefore vs. after=4.41, p<0.001), but absolute and relative inequalities persisted (RII=2.11, p=0.01; SII=0.04, p=0.01). Introduction of an organised programme increased women's adherence to mammography screening but did not eliminate social disparities in screening participation.
Collapse
|