P-element invasion fuels molecular adaptation in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Experimentally evolving Drosophila erecta populations may fail to establish an effective piRNA-based host defense against invading P-elements

To prevent the spread of transposable elements (TEs), hosts have developed sophisticated defense mechanisms. In mammals and invertebrates, a major defense mechanism operates through PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs). To investigate the establishment of the host defense, we introduced the P-element, one of the most widely studied eukaryotic transposons, into naive lines of Drosophila erecta We monitored the invasion in three replicates for more than 50 generations by sequencing the genomic DNA (using short and long reads), the small RNAs, and the transcriptome at regular intervals. A piRNA-based host defense was rapidly established in two replicates (R1, R4) but not in a third (R2), in which P-element copy numbers kept increasing for over 50 generations. We found that the ping-pong cycle could not be activated in R2, although the ping-pong cycle is fully functional against other TEs. Furthermore, R2 had both insertions in piRNA clusters and siRNAs, suggesting that neither of them is sufficient to trigger the host defense. Our work shows that control of an invading TE requires activation of the ping-pong cycle and that this activation is a stochastic event that may fail in some populations, leading to a proliferation of TEs that ultimately threaten the integrity of the host genome.

Spoink, a LTR retrotransposon, invaded D. melanogaster populations in the 1990s

During the last few centuries D. melanogaster populations were invaded by several transposable elements, the most recent of which was thought to be the P-element between 1950 and 1980. Here we describe a novel TE, which we named Spoink, that has invaded D. melanogaster. It is a 5216nt LTR retrotransposon of the Ty3/gypsy superfamily. Relying on strains sampled at different times during the last century we show that Spoink invaded worldwide D. melanogaster populations after the P-element between 1983 and 1993. This invasion was likely triggered by a horizontal transfer from the D. willistoni group, much as the P-element. Spoink is probably silenced by the piRNA pathway in natural populations and about 1/3 of the examined strains have an insertion into a canonical piRNA cluster such as 42AB. Given the degree of genetic investigation of D. melanogaster it is perhaps surprising that Spoink was able to invade unnoticed.

The impact of paramutations on the invasion dynamics of transposable elements

According to the prevailing view, the trap model, the activity of invading transposable elements (TEs) is greatly reduced when a TE copy jumps into a piRNA cluster, which triggers the emergence of piRNAs that silence the TE. One crucial component in the host defence are paramutations. Mediated by maternally deposited piRNAs, paramutations convert TE insertions into piRNA producing loci, thereby transforming selfish TEs into agents of the host defence. Despite this significant effect, the impact of paramutations on the dynamics of TE invasions remains unknown. To address this issue, we performed extensive forward simulations of TE invasions with piRNA clusters and paramutations. We found that paramutations significantly affect TE dynamics, by accelerating the silencing of TE invasions, reducing the number of insertions accumulating during the invasions and mitigating the fitness cost of TEs. We also demonstrate that piRNA production induced by paramutations, an epigenetically inherited trait, may be positively selected. Finally, we show that paramutations may account for three important open problems with the trap model. Firstly, paramutated TE insertions may compensate for the insufficient number of insertions in piRNA clusters observed in previous studies. Secondly, paramutations may explain the discrepancy between the observed and the expected abundance of different TE families in Drosophila melanogaster. Thirdly, piRNA clusters may be crucial to trigger the host defence, but paramutations render the clusters dispensable once the defence has been established. This could account for the lack of TE activation when three major piRNA clusters were deleted in a previous study.