Factors affecting practice nurse involvement in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction

Australian nurses in general practice based heart failure management: implications for innovative collaborative practice

BACKGROUND

The growing global burden of heart failure (HF) necessitates the investigation of alternative methods of providing co-ordinated, integrated and client-focused primary care. Currently, the models of nurse-coordinated care demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials are only available to a relative minority of clients and their families with HF. This current gap in service provision could prove fertile ground for the expansion of practice nursing [The Nurse in Family Practice: Practice Nurses and Nurse Practitioners in primary health care. 1988, Scutari Press, London: Impact of rural living on the experience of chronic illness. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 2001. 9: 235-240].

AIM

This paper aims to review the published literature describing the current and potential role of the practice nurse in HF management in Australia.

METHODS

Searches of electronic databases, the reference lists of published materials and the internet were conducted using key words including 'Australia', 'practice nurse', 'office nurse', 'nurs*', 'heart failure', 'cardiac' and 'chronic illness'. Inclusion criteria for this review were English language literature; nursing interventions for heart failure (HF) and the role of practice nurses in primary care.

RESULTS

There is currently a paucity of data evaluating the potential role for practice nurses in a reconfigured, collaborative health care system. Those studies that were identified were, largely, of a descriptive nature. In addition to identifying the practice nurse as a largely unexplored resource, key themes that emerged from the review include: (1) current general practice services face significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based HF practice; (2) there is considerable variation in the practice nurse role between general practices; (3) there are significant barriers to the expansion of the practice nurse role; (4) multidisciplinary interventions can effectively deliver secondary prevention strategies; (5) practice nurses can potentially facilitate these multidisciplinary interventions; and (6) practice nurses are favorably perceived by consumers although there is some confusion about the nature of their role.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this literature review, practice nurses represent a potentially useful adjunct to current models of service provision in HF management. Further research needs to comprehensively investigate the role of the practice nurse in the Australian context with a view to developing effective and sustainable frameworks for clinical practice. In particular, high-level evidence is required to evaluate the efficacy of the practice nurse role compared to current disease management strategies.

Patients' and practice nurses' perceptions of secondary preventive care for established ischaemic heart disease: a qualitative study

A significant proportion of patients with established ischaemic heart disease remain unrecognized in general practice and those who are receiving treatment are experiencing sub-optimal care. The provision of coronary prevention by practice nurses may be an important strategy to improve the quality of this care, and this is feasible and effective. This study explored what occurred during patients' initial assessment for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease with a practice nurse and investigated patients' and practice nurses' views ofnurse-led clinics in primary care. Nurses were effective in history taking and offering reassurance and dietary advice, yet were less confident in discussing patients' understandings of heart disease and related medication. Practice nurse-led coronary preventive care is acceptable to both nurses and patients. Further practice nurse education is required in heart disease, cardiac medications and skills necessary for exploring and challenging patients' understandings of these issues.

The success of an integrated care programme for patients with ischaemic heart disease: the practice nurses' perspective of SHIP

Follow-up care of patients with angina and myocardial infarction after hospital discharge is known to be suboptimal across the UK. The employment of cardiac liaison nurses ensured timely notification of hospital discharge and good communication of each patient's current and planned care. The direct ongoing support of the liaison nurse was valued by more practice nurses than educational support meetings and the initial counselling skills course. The most important factor which enabled practice nurses to expand their role to provide post-hospital follow-up care was the support of the doctors in the practice. After the conclusion of the Southampton Heart Integrated Care Project (SHIP) and the withdrawal of cardiac liaison nurses, the lack of hospital discharge notification was the most important reason for practice nurses discontinuing follow-up care.