1
|
Strazzulla A, Ballarin M, Postorino MC, Lee R, Leroy P, Castan B, Diamantis S. Knowledge of recommended antibiotic treatments for community-acquired infections in general medical practice: a cross-sectional study in Occitanie region, France. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17312. [PMID: 37828124 PMCID: PMC10570346 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43809-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess and analyse the knowledge of recommended antibiotic treatments, focusing on the appropriate drugs and treatment durations for the most common community-acquired infections in general medical practice in Occitanie region, France. A web-based survey was conducted over a 3-month period, from October, 2018 to January, 2019. All participants answered directly through the online platform. For the analysis of overtreatment risk, a score based system was adopted and two scores were produced: the duration score and the treatment score. 413 general practitioners completed the survey. The overall rate of concordance with guidelines in terms of both drug choice and treatment length was 2974/4956 (60%) answers. Diseases with at least 70% good answers included cystitis, group A streptococcal pharyngitis, and bacterial superficial skin infections. Diseases with fewer than 50% good answers included pyelonephritis, dog bite wounds, and community-acquired pneumonia in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Factors associated with the risk of overtreatment were age > 40 years, country setting and hospital employment. Knowledge of treatment durations is satisfactory with 60% of recommendations being met. However, varying levels were observed according to different diseases. This study highlighted a very high rate of adherence when recommendations were clear. In contrast, low levels of adherence were observed when recommendations were ambiguous or when conflicting guidelines existed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Strazzulla
- Internal Medicine Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France.
| | - Manuel Ballarin
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
| | | | - Raphaël Lee
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
| | - Pierre Leroy
- Public Health Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
| | - Bernard Castan
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Périgueux, Périgueux, France
| | - Sylvain Diamantis
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
- Public Health Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France
- Research Unit "DYNAMIC", Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marbaix S, Mignon A, Taelman A, Averin A, Atwood M, Vietri J. Cost-utility of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to no vaccination and recommended alternative vaccines among Belgian adults. Expert Rev Vaccines 2023; 22:1008-1021. [PMID: 37872765 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2273892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC) preferentially recommended the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) for adults aged ≥65 years, immunocompromised patients, and patients aged ≥50 years suffering from conditions that increase their risk for pneumococcal infections. The objective of this paper is to present the cost-utility of PCV20 compared to no vaccination and the alternative sequence of PCV15 followed by the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) in this population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The analysis employed a static Markov model capturing lifetime risk of pneumococcal infections, associated disutility, mortality, and costs from different healthcare payer perspectives. RESULTS Results indicated use of PCV20 among Belgian older and at-risk adults is highly cost-effective compared to no vaccination, with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of €4,164. Compared to the sequential regimen (PCV15+PPV23), PCV20 vaccination is a cost-saving strategy. Subgroup analysis indicated PCV20 vaccination of at-risk adults aged 65-84 years would also be cost-saving from the national healthcare perspective. CONCLUSION Based on current knowledge, this analysis suggests that access to PCV20 should be proposed in all adults recommended for vaccination by the SHC as PCV20 prevents additional hospitalizations and deaths caused by pneumococcal infection at an affordable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Marbaix
- Health Economics, SNB management, Soignies, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons-UMONS, Mons, Belgium
| | | | | | - Ahuva Averin
- Health Economics, Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Mark Atwood
- Health Economics, Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Vietri
- Patient & Health Impact, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balanescu AR, Citera G, Pascual-Ramos V, Bhatt DL, Connell CA, Gold D, Chen AS, Sawyerr G, Shapiro AB, Pope JE, Schulze-Koops H. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the open-label, randomised controlled ORAL Surveillance trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 81:1491-1503. [PMID: 35922124 PMCID: PMC9606533 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-222405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterise infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ORAL Surveillance. METHODS In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients with RA aged≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg two times per day or a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first events/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for infections, overall and by age (50-<65 years; ≥65 years). Probabilities of infections were obtained (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Cox modelling identified infection risk factors. RESULTS IRs/HRs for all infections, serious infection events (SIEs) and non-serious infections (NSIs) were higher with tofacitinib (10>5 mg two times per day) versus TNFi. For SIEs, HR (95% CI) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively, were 1.17 (0.92 to 1.50) and 1.48 (1.17 to 1.87). Increased IRs/HRs for all infections and SIEs with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi were more pronounced in patients aged≥65 vs 50-<65 years. SIE probability increased from month 18 and before month 6 with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, respectively. NSI probability increased before month 6 with both tofacitinib doses versus TNFi. Across treatments, the most predictive risk factors for SIEs were increasing age, baseline opioid use, history of chronic lung disease and time-dependent oral corticosteroid use, and, for NSIs, female sex, history of chronic lung disease/infections, past smoking and time-dependent Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, C-reactive protein. CONCLUSIONS Infections were higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi. Findings may inform future treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02092467.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra-Rodica Balanescu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Sf Maria Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gustavo Citera
- Department of Rheumatology, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Virginia Pascual-Ramos
- Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - David Gold
- Pfizer Canada ULC, Kirkland, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Janet E Pope
- Division of Rheumatology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Simone C, Fargnoli MC, Amerio P, Bianchi L, Esposito M, Pirro F, Potenza C, Ricceri F, Rongioletti F, Stingeni L, Prignano F. Risk of infections in psoriasis: assessment and challenges in daily management. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:1211-1220. [PMID: 34696673 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.1997592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In daily practice management of psoriasis, evaluation of risk factors for infections is having a growing influence. Indeed, in psoriatic patients, risk of infections may be due to psoriasis itself, immunomodulatory therapy, and comorbidities that may increase this risk and patient hospitalization. AREAS COVERED Given the greater understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis and the increasing number of treatment options, it is particularly important to customize therapy according to each, single patient; psoriasis features and comorbidities are also essential to tailor treatment goals. EXPERT OPINION In this perspective, the current knowledge on the infectious risk in psoriatic patient, related to comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary, to 'special populations,' to chronic infections, such as latent tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis B and C, and HIV, and to the most recent Covid-19 pandemic scenario, is reviewed and discussed in order to suggest the most appropriate approach and achieve the best available therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara De Simone
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.,Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Paolo Amerio
- Department of Medicine and Aging Science and Dermatologic Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Luca Bianchi
- Dermatology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Esposito
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Pirro
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.,Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Ricceri
- Unit of Dermatology, Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Franco Rongioletti
- Dermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, via Università 40, 09124 Cagliari, Italy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Francesca Prignano
- Unit of Dermatology, Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|