Timely diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: the GP's role

Measuring the quality of skin cancer management in primary care: A scoping review

Skin cancer is a growing global problem and a significant health and economic burden. Despite the practical necessity for skin cancer to be managed in primary care settings, little is known about how quality of care is or should be measured in this setting. This scoping review aimed to capture the breadth and range of contemporary evidence related to the measurement of quality in skin cancer management in primary care settings. Six databases were searched for relevant texts reporting on quality measurement in primary care skin cancer management. Data from 46 texts published since 2011 were extracted, and quality measures were catalogued according to the three domains of the Donabedian model of healthcare quality (structure, process and outcome). Quality measures within each domain were inductively analysed into 13 key emergent groups. These represented what were deemed to be the most relevant components of skin cancer management as related to structure, process or outcomes measurement. Four groups related to the structural elements of care provision (e.g. diagnostic tools and equipment), five related to the process of care delivery (e.g. diagnostic processes) and four related to the outcomes of care (e.g. poor treatment outcomes). A broad range of quality measures have been documented, based predominantly on articles using retrospective cohort designs; systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials were limited.

Facilitators of and obstacles to consultation in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma: a French pilot study

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer for which surgery is usually the unique and definitive treatment. Advanced basal cell carcinoma is not eligible to surgery when underlying structures are destroyed. Delayed consultation is the principal cause of advanced basal cell carcinoma. It is questionable why some patients seek care only when the tumour is advanced. The objective of this study was to identify the psychosocial factors involved in delayed consultation. We used a qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with advanced basal cell carcinoma patients and the healthcare staff of a dermatology unit to explore why some patients consult only when basal cell carcinoma is advanced. We then put our findings into perspective and created a logical model for change. We interviewed 14 patients and 12 healthcare staff. The first lesion was associated with banalization. Then, denial and fear of diagnosis or treatment were post common. Finally, the advanced basal cell carcinoma's symptoms, along with social pressure, created the intention to seek medical help and improved disease awareness. We developed a logical model that summarizes these findings. In this pilot study, we modelled factors that delayed consultation. This will aid future research and targeted interventions reducing delay, in particular by improving knowledge and by using social pressure as facilitators. Trial registration: NCT04124796.