Elevated energy costs of biomass production in mitochondrial respiration-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisia

A fast method to distinguish between fermentative and respiratory metabolisms in single yeast cells

Saccharomyces cerevisiae adjusts its metabolism based on nutrient availability, typically transitioning from glucose fermentation to ethanol respiration as glucose becomes limiting. However, our understanding of the regulation of metabolism is largely based on population averages, whereas nutrient transitions may cause heterogeneous responses. Here we introduce iCRAFT, a method that couples the ATP Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor yAT1.03 with Antimycin A to differentiate fermentative and respiratory metabolisms in individual yeast cells. Upon Antimycin A addition, respiratory cells experienced a sharp decrease of the normalized FRET ratio, while respiro-fermentative cells showed no response. Next, we tracked changes in metabolism during the diauxic shift of a glucose pre-grown culture. Following glucose exhaustion, the entire cell population experienced a progressive rise in cytosolic ATP produced via respiration, suggesting a gradual increase in respiratory capacity. Overall, iCRAFT is a robust tool to distinguish fermentation from respiration, offering a new single-cell opportunity to study yeast metabolism.

Elevated energy costs of biomass production in mitochondrial respiration-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisia

Microbial growth requires energy for maintaining the existing cells and producing components for the new ones. Microbes therefore invest a considerable amount of their resources into proteins needed for energy harvesting. Growth in different environments is associated with different energy demands for growth of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, although the cross-condition differences remain poorly characterized. Furthermore, a direct comparison of the energy costs for the biosynthesis of the new biomass across conditions is not feasible experimentally; computational models, on the contrary, allow comparing the optimal metabolic strategies and quantify the respective costs of energy and nutrients. Thus in this study, we used a resource allocation model of S. cerevisiae to compare the optimal metabolic strategies between different conditions. We found that S. cerevisiae with respiratory-impaired mitochondria required additional energetic investments for growth, while growth on amino acid-rich media was not affected. Amino acid supplementation in anaerobic conditions also was predicted to rescue the growth reduction in mitochondrial respiratory shuttle-deficient mutants of S. cerevisiae. Collectively, these results point to elevated costs of resolving the redox imbalance caused by de novo biosynthesis of amino acids in mitochondria. To sum up, our study provides an example of how resource allocation modeling can be used to address and suggest explanations to open questions in microbial physiology.