1
|
Kulagin KA, Starodubova ES, Osipova PJ, Lipatova AV, Cherdantsev IA, Poddubko SV, Karpov VL, Karpov DS. Synergistic Effect of a Combination of Proteasome and Ribonucleotide Reductase Inhibitors in a Biochemical Model of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a Glioblastoma Cell Line. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:3977. [PMID: 38612788 PMCID: PMC11011839 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitors are used in the therapy of several cancers, and clinical trials are underway for their use in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). However, GBM becomes resistant to chemotherapy relatively rapidly. Recently, the overexpression of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) genes was found to mediate therapy resistance in GBM. The use of combinations of chemotherapeutic agents is considered a promising direction in cancer therapy. The present work aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of proteasome and RNR inhibitors in yeast and GBM cell models. We have shown that impaired proteasome function results in increased levels of RNR subunits and increased enzyme activity in yeast. Co-administration of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the RNR inhibitor hydroxyurea was found to significantly reduce the growth rate of S. cerevisiae yeast. Accordingly, the combination of bortezomib and another RNR inhibitor gemcitabine reduced the survival of DBTRG-05MG compared to the HEK293 cell line. Thus, yeast can be used as a simple model to evaluate the efficacy of combinations of proteasome and RNR inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirill A. Kulagin
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Elizaveta S. Starodubova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Pamila J. Osipova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
- Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences, 123007 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Anastasia V. Lipatova
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Igor A. Cherdantsev
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
| | - Svetlana V. Poddubko
- Institute of Biomedical Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences, 123007 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Vadim L. Karpov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Dmitry S. Karpov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.A.K.); (E.S.S.); (P.J.O.); (A.V.L.); (I.A.C.)
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yeast Ribonucleotide Reductase Is a Direct Target of the Proteasome and Provides Hyper Resistance to the Carcinogen 4-NQO. J Fungi (Basel) 2023; 9:jof9030351. [PMID: 36983519 PMCID: PMC10057556 DOI: 10.3390/jof9030351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Various external and internal factors damaging DNA constantly disrupt the stability of the genome. Cells use numerous dedicated DNA repair systems to detect damage and restore genomic integrity in a timely manner. Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is a key enzyme providing dNTPs for DNA repair. Molecular mechanisms of indirect regulation of yeast RNR activity are well understood, whereas little is known about its direct regulation. The study was aimed at elucidation of the proteasome-dependent mechanism of direct regulation of RNR subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteome analysis followed by Western blot, RT-PCR, and yeast plating analysis showed that upregulation of RNR by proteasome deregulation is associated with yeast hyper resistance to 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO), a UV-mimetic DNA-damaging drug used in animal models to study oncogenesis. Inhibition of RNR or deletion of RNR regulatory proteins reverses the phenotype of yeast hyper resistance to 4-NQO. We have shown for the first time that the yeast Rnr1 subunit is a substrate of the proteasome, which suggests a common mechanism of RNR regulation in yeast and mammals.
Collapse
|
3
|
Karpov DS, Spasskaya DS, Tutyaeva VV, Karpov VL. Rpn4p without the DNA-Binding Domain Provides Saccharomyces cerevisiae Resistance to Oxidative Stress and Cycloheximide. Mol Biol 2022. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026893322040057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
4
|
A CRISPR Interference Screen of Essential Genes Reveals that Proteasome Regulation Dictates Acetic Acid Tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mSystems 2021; 6:e0041821. [PMID: 34313457 PMCID: PMC8407339 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00418-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) is a powerful tool to study cellular physiology under different growth conditions, and this technology provides a means for screening changed expression of essential genes. In this study, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRISPRi library was screened for growth in medium supplemented with acetic acid. Acetic acid is a growth inhibitor challenging the use of yeast for the industrial conversion of lignocellulosic biomasses. Tolerance to acetic acid that is released during biomass hydrolysis is crucial for cell factories to be used in biorefineries. The CRISPRi library screened consists of >9,000 strains, where >98% of all essential and respiratory growth-essential genes were targeted with multiple guide RNAs (gRNAs). The screen was performed using the high-throughput, high-resolution Scan-o-matic platform, where each strain is analyzed separately. Our study identified that CRISPRi targeting of genes involved in vesicle formation or organelle transport processes led to severe growth inhibition during acetic acid stress, emphasizing the importance of these intracellular membrane structures in maintaining cell vitality. In contrast, strains in which genes encoding subunits of the 19S regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome were downregulated had increased tolerance to acetic acid, which we hypothesize is due to ATP salvage through an increased abundance of the 20S core particle that performs ATP-independent protein degradation. This is the first study where high-resolution CRISPRi library screening paves the way to understanding and bioengineering the robustness of yeast against acetic acid stress. IMPORTANCE Acetic acid is inhibitory to the growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, causing ATP starvation and oxidative stress, which leads to the suboptimal production of fuels and chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. In this study, where each strain of a CRISPRi library was characterized individually, many essential and respiratory growth-essential genes that regulate tolerance to acetic acid were identified, providing a new understanding of the stress response of yeast and new targets for the bioengineering of industrial yeast. Our findings on the fine-tuning of the expression of proteasomal genes leading to increased tolerance to acetic acid suggest that this could be a novel strategy for increasing stress tolerance, leading to improved strains for the production of biobased chemicals.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bautista C, Marsit S, Landry CR. Interspecific hybrids show a reduced adaptive potential under DNA damaging conditions. Evol Appl 2021; 14:758-769. [PMID: 33767750 PMCID: PMC7980265 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Hybridization may increase the probability of adaptation to extreme stresses. This advantage could be caused by an increased genome plasticity in hybrids, which could accelerate the search for adaptive mutations. High ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a particular challenge in terms of adaptation because it affects the viability of organisms by directly damaging DNA, while also challenging future generations by increasing mutation rate. Here we test whether hybridization accelerates adaptive evolution in response to DNA damage, using yeast as a model. We exposed 180 populations of hybrids between species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus) and their parental strains to UV mimetic and control conditions for approximately 100 generations. Although we found that adaptation occurs in both hybrids and parents, hybrids achieved a lower rate of adaptation, contrary to our expectations. Adaptation to DNA damage conditions comes with a large and similar cost for parents and hybrids, suggesting that this cost is not responsible for the lower adaptability of hybrids. We suggest that the lower adaptive potential of hybrids in this condition may result from the interaction between DNA damage and the inherent genetic instability of hybrids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Bautista
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Département de BiologieFaculté des Sciences et de GénieUniversité LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Regroupement québécois de recherche sur la fonction, la structure et l'ingénierie des protéines (PROTEO)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Centre de Recherche en Données Massives (CRDM)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
| | - Souhir Marsit
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Département de BiologieFaculté des Sciences et de GénieUniversité LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Regroupement québécois de recherche sur la fonction, la structure et l'ingénierie des protéines (PROTEO)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Centre de Recherche en Données Massives (CRDM)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
| | - Christian R. Landry
- Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Département de BiologieFaculté des Sciences et de GénieUniversité LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Regroupement québécois de recherche sur la fonction, la structure et l'ingénierie des protéines (PROTEO)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Centre de Recherche en Données Massives (CRDM)Université LavalQuébecQCCanada
- Département de Biochimie, de Microbiologie et de Bio‐informatiqueFaculté des Sciences et de GénieUniversité LavalQuébecQCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spasskaya DS, Kotlov MI, Lekanov DS, Tutyaeva VV, Snezhkina AV, Kudryavtseva AV, Karpov VL, Karpov DS. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Engineering Reveals the Contribution of the 26S Proteasome to the Extremophilic Nature of the Yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. ACS Synth Biol 2021; 10:297-308. [PMID: 33501828 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The marine yeast Debaryomyces hansenii is of high importance in the food, chemical, and medical industries. D. hansenii is also a popular model for studying molecular mechanisms of halo- and osmotolerance. The absence of genome editing technologies hampers D. hansenii research and limits its biotechnological application. We developed novel and efficient single- and dual-guide CRISPR systems for markerless genome editing of D. hansenii. The single-guide system allows high-efficiency (up to 95%) mutation of genes or regulatory elements. The dual-guide system is applicable for efficient deletion of genomic loci. We used these tools to study transcriptional regulation of the 26S proteasome, an ATP-dependent protease complex whose proper function is vital for all cells and organisms. We developed a genetic approach to control the activity of the 26S proteasome by deregulation of its essential subunits. The mutant strains were sensitive to geno- and proteotoxic stresses as well as high salinity and osmolarity, suggesting a contribution of the proteasome to the extremophilic properties of D. hansenii. The developed CRISPR systems allow efficient D. hansenii genome engineering, providing a genetic way to control proteasome activity, and should advance applications of this yeast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria S. Spasskaya
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Mikhail I. Kotlov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Dmitriy S. Lekanov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Vera V. Tutyaeva
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Anastasiya V. Snezhkina
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Anna V. Kudryavtseva
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Vadim L. Karpov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Dmitry S. Karpov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, Moscow 119991, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spasskaya DS, Nadolinskaia NI, Tutyaeva VV, Lysov YP, Karpov VL, Karpov DS. Yeast Rpn4 Links the Proteasome and DNA Repair via RAD52 Regulation. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21218097. [PMID: 33143019 PMCID: PMC7672625 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental and intracellular factors often damage DNA, but multiple DNA repair pathways maintain genome integrity. In yeast, the 26S proteasome and its transcriptional regulator and substrate Rpn4 are involved in DNA damage resistance. Paradoxically, while proteasome dysfunction may induce hyper-resistance to DNA-damaging agents, Rpn4 malfunction sensitizes yeasts to these agents. Previously, we proposed that proteasome inhibition causes Rpn4 stabilization followed by the upregulation of Rpn4-dependent DNA repair genes and pathways. Here, we aimed to elucidate the key Rpn4 targets responsible for DNA damage hyper-resistance in proteasome mutants. We impaired the Rpn4-mediated regulation of candidate genes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and tested the sensitivity of mutant strains to 4-NQO, MMS and zeocin. We found that the separate or simultaneous deregulation of 19S or 20S proteasome subcomplexes induced MAG1, DDI1, RAD23 and RAD52 in an Rpn4-dependent manner. Deregulation of RAD23, DDI1 and RAD52 sensitized yeast to DNA damage. Genetic, epigenetic or dihydrocoumarin-mediated RAD52 repression restored the sensitivity of the proteasome mutants to DNA damage. Our results suggest that the Rpn4-mediated overexpression of DNA repair genes, especially RAD52, defines the DNA damage hyper-resistant phenotype of proteasome mutants. The developed yeast model is useful for characterizing drugs that reverse the DNA damage hyper-resistance phenotypes of cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria S. Spasskaya
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (D.S.S.); (V.V.T.)
| | - Nonna I. Nadolinskaia
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (N.I.N.); (Y.P.L.); (V.L.K.)
| | - Vera V. Tutyaeva
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (D.S.S.); (V.V.T.)
| | - Yuriy P. Lysov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (N.I.N.); (Y.P.L.); (V.L.K.)
| | - Vadim L. Karpov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (N.I.N.); (Y.P.L.); (V.L.K.)
| | - Dmitry S. Karpov
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov str. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (D.S.S.); (V.V.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +7-499-135-98-01
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rpn4 and proteasome-mediated yeast resistance to ethanol includes regulation of autophagy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2020; 104:4027-4041. [PMID: 32157425 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10518-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Distilled spirits production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires understanding of the mechanisms of yeast cell response to alcohol stress. Reportedly, specific mutations in genes of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, e.g., RPN4, may result in strains exhibiting hyper-resistance to different alcohols. To study the Rpn4-dependent yeast response to short-term ethanol exposure, we performed a comparative analysis of the wild-type (WT) strain, strain with RPN4 gene deletion (rpn4-Δ), and a mutant strain with decreased proteasome activity and consequent Rpn4 accumulation due to PRE1 deregulation (YPL). The stress resistance tests demonstrated an increased sensitivity of mutant strains to ethanol compared with WT. Comparative proteomics analysis revealed significant differences in molecular responses to ethanol between these strains. GO analysis of proteins upregulated in WT showed enrichments represented by oxidative and heat responses, protein folding/unfolding, and protein degradation. Enrichment of at least one of these responses was not observed in the mutant strains. Moreover, activity of autophagy was not increased in the RPN4 deletion strain upon ethanol stress which agrees with changes in mRNA levels of ATG7 and PRB1 genes of the autophagy system. Activity of the autophagic system was clearly induced and accompanied with PRB1 overexpression in the YPL strain upon ethanol stress. We demonstrated that Rpn4 stabilization contributes to the PRB1 upregulation. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated repression of PACE-core Rpn4 binding sites in the PRB1 promoter inhibits PRB1 induction in the YPL strain upon ethanol treatment and results in YPL hypersensitivity to ethanol. Our data suggest that Rpn4 affects the autophagic system activity upon ethanol stress through the PRB1 regulation. These findings can be a basis for creating genetically modified yeast strains resistant to high levels of alcohol, being further used for fermentation in ethanol production.
Collapse
|