Renal-function change after transjugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt placement and its relationship with survival: a single-center experience

Effects of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt on Renal and Pulmonary Function in Hepatic Decompensation with and without Hepatorenal and Hepatopulmonary Syndromes: A Review

Cirrhosis is often characterized by decreased liver function, ranging from a compensated, typically asymptomatic phase to a decompensated phase characterized by the appearance of ascites or variceal bleeding, and ultimately hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS). The latter two complications are associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment efficacy. In cases of ascites or variceal bleeding resistant to medical therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is effective and safe. Shunting blood by TIPS diverts portal blood to the systemic circulation, potentially increasing systemic blood volume and benefiting renal function. However, TIPS could also divert nitric oxide to the systemic circulation, potentially worsening systemic hypotension and perfusion, which could be detrimental to renal function. Available evidence indicates that TIPS often improves renal function in patients with portal hypertension, with or without HRS. No studies have shown persistently decreased renal function after TIPS. However, these data are insufficient to support a recommendation for the use of TIPS specifically for HRS. In patients without pre-existing HPS, TIPS does not appear to significantly affect pulmonary gas exchange. Results of TIPS in HPS have been inconsistent; some studies have shown improvement, but effects were transient. No studies have shown a persistent decline in pulmonary function after TIPS. The evidence supports the need for large randomized controlled trials to investigate the beneficial effects of TIPS for HRS. Similar pulmonary function data are less clear regarding TIPS for HPS. The aim of the current report was to review the literature regarding the effects of TIPS on renal and pulmonary function in hepatic decompensation, with or without the development of HRS or HPS.

The Impact of Renal Function on Hepatic Encephalopathy Following TIPS Placement for Refractory Ascites

BACKGROUND

The impact of renal function on hepatic encephalopathy (HE) following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for refractory ascites is poorly understood. We investigated the role of renal function on HE following TIPS placement.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed for patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites from 2007-2019. Patients were stratified by GFR at time of TIPS placement and by whether they were on hemodialysis (HD). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3 or higher was defined as pre-TIPS GFR < 60 for at least 3 months. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the role of GFR and CKD at time of TIPS placement on HE within 60 days post TIPS placement.

RESULTS

Among 201 TIPS patients for refractory ascites (61% male; mean age 59.1), 78 (39%) patients were in CKD, and 16 (21%) were on HD. Mean GFR at time of TIPS placement was 62.7 ± 28.2 for all non-HD patients (n = 185). Compared with the GFR ≥ 90 group, GFR < 30 or HD (OR, 3.56; 95%CI, 1.19-10.7; p = 0.023) and CKD (OR, 2.52; 95%CI, 1.40-4.53; p = 0.002) at time of TIPS placement were significant predictors of post-TIPS placement HE within 60 days. GFRs between 30-60 and 60-90 were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In TIPS patients for recurrent ascites, patients with acutely impaired renal function or chronic renal dysfunction were at an increased risk for HE after TIPS.

A Comprehensive Review of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt-Related Complications

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is one of the most technically complex procedures in interventional radiology, the need to connect two veins with variable anatomy, located in two different planes in hard and many times small cirrhotic livers using a needle, can be quite challenging. Despite more than 30 years of performing TIPS, the complex hemodynamics of the portal system are not fully understood, and sometimes unpredictable alterations of the portal flow can lead to serious unexpected complications. The best strategies to prevent TIPS complications are optimal patient selection, meticulous technique, operator experience, and immediate correction of identified adverse events. The purpose of this article is to review the technical complications with TIPS, the unique complications related to the use of stent grafts, and the late complications after the procedure, with emphasis on ways to prevent and treat them.

Evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and modified sclerotherapy in preventing rebleeding of esophageal and gastric varices

Esophageal and gastric varices are complications of decompensated portal hypertension due to cirrhosis, and gastrointestinal bleeding and can seriously trigger major bleeding and crisis life. Seriously endangers patients' physical and mental health and attracts great attention in the clinic. To compare the efficacy and safety of MES (combined with lauromacrogol and tissue adhesive) and TIPS in the treatment of esophageal and gastric varices. The 62 cases of esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the MES group and TIPS group according to the treatment method. The rebleeding rate, complications, 2-year birth rate, treatment cost, and hospitalization time within 2 years after operation were compared between the two groups. Among the 62 patients, there were 32 in the MES group and 30 in the TIPS group. The rebleeding rate within 1 year after operation in the MES group was higher than that in the TIPS group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The rebleeding rate within 2 years after operation in the MES group was 40.63%, significantly higher than 13.33% in the TIPS group (P < 0. 05). In the MES group, the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy after the operation was 9.38%, significantly lower than 33.33% in TIPS group (P < 0. 05). The survival rate within 2 years after operation in MES group (81.25%) and TIPS group (83.33), the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between the MES group and TIPS group (P > 0.05). The treatment cost of the MES group was lower than that of the TIPS group (P < 0.05). MES is more suitable for development and promotion in grass-roots hospitals, but TIPS treatment should be carried out as soon as possible for patients with poor efficacy of endoscopic treatment.