Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection

Exploring the immunological relevance of pre-transplant donor-specific antibody in intestinal transplantation, with special consideration to the liver

Despite recent advances that have improved outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx), achieving long-term patient survival and rejection-free survival is still challenging. Understanding the relevance of pre-transplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibody (DSA) in ITx and the immunomodulatory potential of the liver within the allograft is crucial to providing an accurate assessment of pre-transplant immunological risk, which could influence and improve post-transplant outcomes further. This was the primary objective of this retrospective study of 95 adult ITx transplants which took place at Cambridge University Hospitals (United Kingdom) between 2007 and 2019. Two novel programs were developed and validated to identify DSA (tested by Luminex single antigen beads) in this dataset. Data analysis utilised Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and statistical analysis was performed using log-rank tests and adjusted Cox models. Fifty-four (57%) ITx cases contained a liver, and 36 (38%) were sensitised to HLA. Pre-transplant DSA > 500 mean fluorescent intensity appeared to negatively affect post-ITx patient survival and rejection outcomes. Additionally, liver-inclusive allografts seemed to show particular resistance to HLA class I DSA. Our data hints towards consistency with other ITx studies where deleterious effects of DSA have been demonstrated, and where liver inclusion is protective from HLA class I DSA. This is in line with current national guidelines for immunological risk. Our publicly available research programs could support future large or multicentre studies where statistically relevant data might be gained.

Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease

Transplantation of the liver in combination with other organs is an increasingly performed procedure. Over the years, continuous improvement in survival could be realized through careful patient selection and refined organ preservation techniques, in spite of the challenges posed by aging recipients and donors, as well as the increased use of steatotic liver grafts. Herein, we revisit the epidemiology, allocation policies in different transplant zones, indications, and outcomes with regard to simultaneous organ transplants involving the liver, that is combined heart-liver, liver-lung, liver-kidney, and multivisceral transplantation. We address challenges surrounding combined organ transplantation such as equity, utility, and logistics of dual organ implantation, but also advantages that come along with combined transplantation, thereby focusing on molecular mechanisms underlying immunoprotection provided by the liver to the other allografts. In addition, the current standing and knowledge of machine perfusion in combined organ transplantation, mostly based on center experience, will be reviewed. Notwithstanding all the technical advances, shortage of organs, and the lack of universal eligibility criteria for certain multi-organ combinations are hurdles that need to be tackled in the future.

Current approaches for risk assessment of intestinal transplant patients: A view from the histocompatibility laboratory

Despite its recent decline in volumes, intestinal transplantation remains an important option for patients with irreversible intestinal failures. The long-term outcome of an intestinal transplant has stagnated. The major cause of graft loss is rejection, resulting from mismatches in human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and the presence of antibodies to mismatched donor-specific HLA antigens (DSA). Literature has reported that DSAs, either preformed before transplantation or developed de novo after transplantation, are harmful to intestinal grafts, especially for those without combined liver grafts. A comprehensive assessment of DSA by the histocompatibility laboratory is critical for successful intestinal transplantation and its long-term survival. This paper briefly reviews the history and current status of different methods for detecting DSA and their clinical applications in intestinal transplantation. The focus is on applying different antibody assays to manage immunologically challenging intestinal transplant patients before and after transplantation. A clinical case is presented to illustrate the complexity of HLA tests and the necessity of multiple assays. The review of risk assessment by the histocompatibility laboratory also highlights the need for close interaction between the laboratory and the intestinal transplant program.

Including the liver in the visceral allograft: Impact on donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies and long-term outcomes

Humoral immunity emerges as a risk factor for graft failure after visceral transplantation (VTx) and development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) has been linked with poor outcomes. In most cases, a simultaneous liver transplant can be safely performed in sensitized patients with DSA and appears protective against lymphocytotoxic antibodies. We investigated the incidence of acute (AR) and chronic rejection (CR) in 32 VTx without any B cell-depleting pre-treatment (6 isolated intestinal transplants (IT) and 26 liver-containing, multivisceral transplants (MVT) and assessed the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) pre- and post-transplantation. Twenty-one patients (65 %) developed AR, 15 (57 %) of the MVT and 6 (100 %) of the IT (p = 0.05). CR occurred in 4 IT (60 %, p < 0.001). At one month, de novo DSA were present in 71 % of VTx (66 % MVT vs 100 % IT, p = 0.09). At the last available follow-up, 69 % of the MVT and 50 % of the IT patients were DSA-free. De novo DSA seemed more persistent (7/19, 37 %) than pre-Tx DSA (1/6, 17 %; p = n.s.), de novo DSA were more frequently specific for HLA class II than class I, 16/19 (84 %) vs. 7/19 (37 %; p = 0.003), and HLA-DQ was their most frequent target HLA. DQ mismatches appeared to be a risk factor for developing de novo DSA. In conclusion, liver-containing visceral allografts have superior short- and long-term outcomes compared with liver-free allografts. De novo DSA develop early and frequently after VTx performed without B cell-depleting induction therapy, but the exact role of DSA in the pathogenesis of rejection remains unclear.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

Successful combined auxiliary partial liver and intestinal transplantation in two highly sensitized, cross-match positive patients

INTRODUCTION

Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) creates an immunological barrier to intestinal transplantation (ITx). Current desensitization therapies are limited and ineffective in the most highly sensitized patients. A co-transplanted whole liver transplant can protect a kidney, heart, or intestinal allograft from antibody-mediated injury. Whether an auxiliary partial liver allograft provides effective protection for highly sensitized intestinal transplant recipients is unknown.

METHODS

Two patients with strong HLA donor-specific antibody at high titer against their deceased donors underwent combined auxiliary partial liver and ITx across a positive cross-match. The left lateral lobes from the combined-graft recipients and the right liver lobes from the deceased donors were transplanted as a domino procedure to other four patients.

RESULTS

Two combined-graft recipients have had an uneventful postoperative course without major complications at a 12- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Intestinal graft function has been excellent with no evidence of humoral or cellular rejection. While a positive cross-match turned negative, titers of donor-specific HLA antibodies gradually declined over time after transplant. The left liver lobes procured from the combined-graft recipients were successfully transplanted into two pediatric patients (age 1.9, 2.4 years) and the right lobes from two deceased donors were successfully transplanted into two adult patients. All transplant procedures went well, without post-operative complications related to the splitting technique.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that an auxiliary liver transplant can effectively protect a co-transplanted intestinal allograft against rejection and suggest that this combined procedure may serve as a useful therapeutic adjunct for a highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidate.

Native Spleen Preservation During Visceral Transplantation Inhibits Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Development: Clinical and Experimental Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess whether native spleen preservation during visceral transplantation (VT) affects graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) incidence.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

GVHD is one of the most severe and frequently lethal hematological complications after VT procedures. Because there is no specific treatment for GVHD, it is imperative to develop a strategy to reduce donor lymphocyte engraftment and proliferation.

METHODS

Our study included both clinical and experimental data. A total of 108 patients were divided into 3 groups: a native spleen preservation group, a native spleen removal with no donor spleen group, and a donor spleen included (allogeneic spleen) group. We also used an allogeneic VT rat model, in which recipients were divided into 2 groups: a native spleen preservation (+SP) group and a native spleen removal (-S) group. Skin rash appearance, histopathological changes, chimerism, and spleen effects on circulating allogeneic T-cells were assessed.

RESULTS

The patients with native spleen preservation showed a lower rate of GVHD ( P <.001) and better survival ( P <.05) than those in the other groups. Skin and histological signs of GVHD were lower in the rats in the +SP group ( P <.05). The donor T-cell frequency in the bloodstream and skin was also significantly reduced when the native spleen was preserved ( P <.01 and P <.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and experimental data indicate that recipient spleen preservation protects against GVHD after VT, and donor cell clearance from the bloodstream by spleen macrophages could be the underlying mechanism. Therefore, spleen preservation should be considered in VT procedures, whenever possible.

Long-term outcomes of intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, data from the intestinal transplant registry, recent publications and reviews in the field will be used to describe mortality, morbidity, complications, nutritional and psychosocial outcomes in intestinal transplant recipients with a focus on those furthest out from transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Registry data show static long-term survival data (41% 10-year survival in the most recent analysis), but experienced centres report improvements with survival between 60 and 70% at 10 years. Chronic rejection remains a problem for long-term graft survival, but understanding of humoral immunity is increasing. Nutritional outcomes are good with most recipients achieving enteral autonomy with an unrestricted diet. Health-related quality of life data generally shows improvement in the years after transplant, educational attainment is good, but some patients have ongoing psychosocial problems.

SUMMARY

Most patients do well in the long-term after transplant. Survival outcomes have improved in experienced centres, and nutrition and quality of life outcomes are good. Recognition of psychosocial outcomes is increasing. Nevertheless, challenges remain in areas such as infectious complications, renal function, chronic rejection, social support and mental health.

Current outcomes after pediatric and adult intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we will review the outcomes of patients with intestinal transplant (ITx) with a focus on factors affecting long-term graft and patient survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most recent International Intestinal Transplant Registry reports a 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival of 71%, 50%, and 41% respectively, for ITx grafts transplanted since 2000. Over the past decades, significant improvements have been achieved in short-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients. The improvement in short-term outcomes may be related to the focused treatment of antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies, the use of induction immunotherapy protocols, refinements in surgical techniques, establishment of dedicated ITx units, and improved postoperative management.However, long-term graft and patient outcomes for ITx recipients remain stagnant. Issues impairing long-term outcomes of ITx include the challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, progressive decline in renal function, and long-term infectious and malignancy risks especially related to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after ITx.

SUMMARY

Addressing and preventing early and late complications is the key to improving short-term and long-term outcomes after ITx.