Universal Constraints on Protein Evolution in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Purifying selection enduringly acts on the sequence evolution of highly expressed proteins in Escherichia coli

The evolutionary speed of a protein sequence is constrained by its expression level, with highly expressed proteins evolving relatively slowly. This negative correlation between expression levels and evolutionary rates (known as the E–R anticorrelation) has already been widely observed in past macroevolution between species from bacteria to animals. However, it remains unclear whether this seemingly general law also governs recent evolution, including past and de novo, within a species. However, the advent of genomic sequencing and high-throughput phenotyping, particularly for bacteria, has revealed fundamental gaps between the 2 evolutionary processes and has provided empirical data opposing the possible underlying mechanisms which are widely believed. These conflicts raise questions about the generalization of the E–R anticorrelation and the relevance of plausible mechanisms. To explore the ubiquitous impact of expression levels on molecular evolution and test the relevance of the possible underlying mechanisms, we analyzed the genome sequences of 99 strains of Escherichia coli for evolution within species in nature. We also analyzed genomic mutations accumulated under laboratory conditions as a model of de novo evolution within species. Here, we show that E–R anticorrelation is significant in both past and de novo evolution within species in E. coli. Our data also confirmed ongoing purifying selection on highly expressed genes. Ongoing selection included codon-level purifying selection, supporting the relevance of the underlying mechanisms. However, the impact of codon-level purifying selection on the constraints in evolution within species might be smaller than previously expected from evolution between species.

Idiosyncratic Purifying Selection on Metabolic Enzymes in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya all share a common set of metabolic reactions. This implies that the function and topology of central metabolism has been evolving under purifying selection over deep time. Central metabolism may similarly evolve under purifying selection during long-term evolution experiments, although it is unclear how long such experiments would have to run (decades, centuries, millennia) before signs of purifying selection on metabolism appear. I hypothesized that central and superessential metabolic enzymes would show evidence of purifying selection in the long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli (LTEE). I also hypothesized that enzymes that specialize on single substrates would show stronger evidence of purifying selection in the LTEE than generalist enzymes that catalyze multiple reactions. I tested these hypotheses by analyzing metagenomic time series covering 62,750 generations of the LTEE. I find mixed support for these hypotheses, because the observed patterns of purifying selection are idiosyncratic and population-specific. To explain this finding, I propose the Jenga hypothesis, named after a children's game in which blocks are removed from a tower until it falls. The Jenga hypothesis postulates that loss-of-function mutations degrade costly, redundant, and non-essential metabolic functions. Replicate populations can therefore follow idiosyncratic trajectories of lost redundancies, despite purifying selection on overall function. I tested the Jenga hypothesis by simulating the evolution of 1,000 minimal genomes under strong purifying selection. As predicted, the minimal genomes converge to different metabolic networks. Strikingly, the core genes common to all 1,000 minimal genomes show consistent signatures of purifying selection in the LTEE.

Low protein expression enhances phenotypic evolvability by intensifying selection on folding stability

Protein abundance affects the evolution of protein genotypes, but we do not know how it affects the evolution of protein phenotypes. Here we investigate the role of protein abundance in the evolvability of green fluorescent protein (GFP) towards the novel phenotype of cyan fluorescence. We evolve GFP in E. coli through multiple cycles of mutation and selection and show that low GFP expression facilitates the evolution of cyan fluorescence. A computational model whose predictions we test experimentally helps explain why: lowly expressed proteins are under stronger selection for proper folding, which facilitates their evolvability on short evolutionary time scales. The reason is that high fluorescence can be achieved by either few proteins that fold well or by many proteins that fold less well. In other words, we observe a synergy between a protein's scarcity and its stability. Because many proteins meet the essential requirements for this scarcity-stability synergy, it may be a widespread mechanism by which low expression helps proteins evolve new phenotypes and functions.

Selection Maintains Protein Interactome Resilience in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Most cellular functions are carried out by a dynamic network of interacting proteins. An open question is whether the network properties of protein interactomes represent phenotypes under natural selection. One proposal is that protein interactomes have evolved to be resilient, such that they tend to maintain connectivity when proteins are removed from the network. This hypothesis predicts that interactome resilience should be maintained by natural selection during long-term experimental evolution. I tested this prediction by modeling the evolution of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks in Lenski's long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli (LTEE). In this test, I removed proteins affected by nonsense, insertion, deletion, and transposon mutations in evolved LTEE strains, and measured the resilience of the resulting networks. I compared the rate of change of network resilience in each LTEE population to the rate of change of network resilience for corresponding randomized networks. The evolved PPI networks are significantly more resilient than networks in which random proteins have been deleted. Moreover, the evolved networks are generally more resilient than networks in which the random deletion of proteins was restricted to those disrupted in LTEE. These results suggest that evolution in the LTEE has favored PPI networks that are, on average, more resilient than expected from the genetic variation across the evolved strains. My findings therefore support the hypothesis that selection maintains protein interactome resilience over evolutionary time.