1
|
Martelossi J, Iannello M, Ghiselli F, Luchetti A. Widespread HCD-tRNA derived SINEs in bivalves rely on multiple LINE partners and accumulate in genic regions. Mob DNA 2024; 15:22. [PMID: 39415259 PMCID: PMC11481361 DOI: 10.1186/s13100-024-00332-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) are non-autonomous non-LTR retrotransposons widespread across eukaryotes. They exist both as lineage-specific, fast-evolving elements and as ubiquitous superfamilies characterized by highly conserved domains (HCD). Several of these superfamilies have been described in bivalves, however their overall distribution and impact on host genome evolution are still unknown due to the extreme scarcity of transposon libraries for the clade. In this study, we examined more than 40 bivalve genomes to uncover the distribution of HCD-tRNA-related SINEs, discover novel SINE-LINE partnerships, and understand their possible role in shaping bivalve genome evolution. RESULTS We found that bivalve HCD SINEs have an ancient origin, and they can rely on at least four different LINE clades. According to a "mosaic" evolutionary scenario, multiple LINE partner can promote the amplification of the same HCD SINE superfamilies while homologues LINE-derived tails are present between different superfamilies. Multiple SINEs were found to be highly similar between phylogenetically related species but separated by extremely long evolutionary timescales, up to ~ 400 million years. Studying their genomic distribution in a subset of five species, we observed different patterns of SINE enrichment in various genomic compartments as well as differences in the tendency of SINEs to form tandem-like and palindromic structures also within intronic sequences. Despite these differences, we observed that SINEs, especially older ones, tend to accumulate preferentially within genes, or in their close proximity, consistently with a model of survival bias for less harmful, short non-coding transposons in euchromatic genomic regions. CONCLUSION Here we conducted a wide characterization of tRNA-related SINEs in bivalves revealing their taxonomic distribution and LINE partnerships across the clade. Moreover, through the study of their genomic distribution in five species, we highlighted commonalities and differences with other previously studied eukaryotes, thus extending our understanding of SINE evolution across the tree of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Martelossi
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mariangela Iannello
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Ghiselli
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Andrea Luchetti
- Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kozak KM, Escalona M, Chumchim N, Fairbairn C, Marimuthu MPA, Nguyen O, Sahasrabudhe R, Seligmann W, Conroy C, Patton JL, Bowie RCK, Nachman MW. A highly contiguous genome assembly for the pocket mouse Perognathus longimembris longimembris. J Hered 2024; 115:130-138. [PMID: 37793045 PMCID: PMC10838119 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esad060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The little pocket mouse, Perognathus longimembris, and its nine congeners are small heteromyid rodents found in arid and seasonally arid regions of Western North America. The genus is characterized by behavioral and physiological adaptations to dry and often harsh environments, including nocturnality, seasonal torpor, food caching, enhanced osmoregulation, and a well-developed sense of hearing. Here we present a genome assembly of Perognathus longimembris longimembris generated from PacBio HiFi long read and Omni-C chromatin-proximity sequencing as part of the California Conservation Genomics Project. The assembly has a length of 2.35 Gb, contig N50 of 11.6 Mb, scaffold N50 of 73.2 Mb, and includes 93.8% of the BUSCO Glires genes. Interspersed repetitive elements constitute 41.2% of the genome. A comparison with the highly endangered Pacific pocket mouse, P. l. pacificus, reveals broad synteny. These new resources will enable studies of local adaptation, genetic diversity, and conservation of threatened taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof M Kozak
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| | - Merly Escalona
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California–Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, United States
| | - Noravit Chumchim
- DNA Technologies and Expression Analysis Core Laboratory, Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - Colin Fairbairn
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, United States
| | - Mohan P A Marimuthu
- DNA Technologies and Expression Analysis Core Laboratory, Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - Oanh Nguyen
- DNA Technologies and Expression Analysis Core Laboratory, Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - Ruta Sahasrabudhe
- DNA Technologies and Expression Analysis Core Laboratory, Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States
| | - William Seligmann
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, United States
| | - Chris Conroy
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| | - James L Patton
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| | - Rauri C K Bowie
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| | - Michael W Nachman
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haq IU, Muhammad M, Yuan H, Ali S, Abbasi A, Asad M, Ashraf HJ, Khurshid A, Zhang K, Zhang Q, Liu C. Satellitome Analysis and Transposable Elements Comparison in Geographically Distant Populations of Spodoptera frugiperda. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:521. [PMID: 35455012 PMCID: PMC9026859 DOI: 10.3390/life12040521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) is a member of the superfamily Noctuoidea that accounts for more than a third of all Lepidoptera and includes a considerable number of agricultural and forest pest species. Spodoptera frugiperda is a polyphagous species that is a significant agricultural pest worldwide, emphasizing its economic importance. Spodoptera frugiperda's genome size, assembly, phylogenetic classification, and transcriptome analysis have all been previously described. However, the different studies reported different compositions of repeated DNA sequences that occupied the whole assembled genome, and the Spodoptera frugiperda genome also lacks the comprehensive study of dynamic satellite DNA. We conducted a comparative analysis of repetitive DNA across geographically distant populations of Spodoptera frugiperda, particularly satellite DNA, using publicly accessible raw genome data from eight different geographical regions. Our results showed that most transposable elements (TEs) were commonly shared across all geographically distant samples, except for the Maverick and PIF/Harbinger elements, which have divergent repeat copies. The TEs age analysis revealed that most TEs families consist of young copies 1-15 million years old; however, PIF/Harbinger has some older/degenerated copies of 30-35 million years old. A total of seven satellite DNA families were discovered, accounting for approximately 0.65% of the entire genome of the Spodoptera frugiperda fall armyworm. The repeat profiling analysis of satellite DNA families revealed differential read depth coverage or copy numbers. The satellite DNA families range in size from the lowest 108 bp SfrSat06-108 families to the largest (1824 bp) SfrSat07-1824 family. We did not observe a statistically significant correlation between monomer length and K2P divergence, copy number, or abundance of each satellite family. Our findings suggest that the satellite DNA families identified in Spodoptera frugiperda account for a considerable proportion of the genome's repetitive fraction. The satellite DNA families' repeat profiling revealed a point mutation along the reference sequences. Limited TEs differentiation exists among geographically distant populations of Spodoptera frugiperda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inzamam Ul Haq
- College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, No. 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China; (I.U.H.); (A.K.); (K.Z.); (Q.Z.)
| | - Majid Muhammad
- College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710100, China; (M.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Huang Yuan
- College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710100, China; (M.M.); (H.Y.)
| | - Shahbaz Ali
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan;
| | - Asim Abbasi
- Department of Zoology, Bahawalpur Campus, University of Central Punjab, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan;
| | - Muhammad Asad
- College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
| | - Hafiza Javaria Ashraf
- College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
| | - Aroosa Khurshid
- College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, No. 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China; (I.U.H.); (A.K.); (K.Z.); (Q.Z.)
| | - Kexin Zhang
- College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, No. 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China; (I.U.H.); (A.K.); (K.Z.); (Q.Z.)
| | - Qiangyan Zhang
- College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, No. 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China; (I.U.H.); (A.K.); (K.Z.); (Q.Z.)
| | - Changzhong Liu
- College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, No. 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China; (I.U.H.); (A.K.); (K.Z.); (Q.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements in Genus Calliptamus Grasshoppers Revealed That Satellite DNA Contributes to Genome Size Variation. INSECTS 2021; 12:insects12090837. [PMID: 34564277 PMCID: PMC8466570 DOI: 10.3390/insects12090837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Calliptamus is a genus of grasshoppers belonging to the family Acrididae. The genus Calliptamus includes approximately 17 recognized species. Calliptamus abbreviatus, Calliptamus italicus, and Calliptamus barbarus are three species that are widely found in northern China. These species are polyphagous, feeding on a variety of wild plants as well as crops, particularly legumes. The genome sizes, phylogenetic position, and transcriptome analysis of the genus Calliptamus were already known previous to this research. The repeatome analysis of these species was missing, which is directly linked to the larger genome sizes of the grasshoppers. Here, we classified repetitive DNA sequences at the level of superfamilies and sub-families, and found that LINE, TcMar-Tc1 and Ty3-gypsy LTR retrotransposons dominated the repeatomes of all genomes, accounting for 16–34% of the total genomes of these species. Satellite DNA dynamic evolutionary changes in all three genomes played a role in genome size evolution. This study would be a valuable source for future genome assemblies. Abstract Transposable elements (TEs) play a significant role in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes genome size evolution, structural changes, duplication, and functional variabilities. However, the large number of different repetitive DNA has hindered the process of assembling reference genomes, and the genus level TEs diversification of the grasshopper massive genomes is still under investigation. The genus Calliptamus diverged from Peripolus around 17 mya and its species divergence dated back about 8.5 mya, but their genome size shows rather large differences. Here, we used low-coverage Illumina unassembled short reads to investigate the effects of evolutionary dynamics of satDNAs and TEs on genome size variations. The Repeatexplorer2 analysis with 0.5X data resulted in 52%, 56%, and 55% as repetitive elements in the genomes of Calliptamus barbarus, Calliptamus italicus, and Calliptamus abbreviatus, respectively. The LINE and Ty3-gypsy LTR retrotransposons and TcMar-Tc1 dominated the repeatomes of all genomes, accounting for 16–35% of the total genomes of these species. Comparative analysis unveiled that most of the transposable elements (TEs) except satDNAs were highly conserved across three genomes in the genus Calliptamus grasshoppers. Out of a total of 20 satDNA families, 17 satDNA families were commonly shared with minor variations in abundance and divergence between three genomes, and 3 were Calliptamus barbarus specific. Our findings suggest that there is a significant amplification or contraction of satDNAs at genus phylogeny which is the main cause that made genome size different.
Collapse
|
5
|
Solovyeva A, Levakin I, Zorin E, Adonin L, Khotimchenko Y, Podgornaya O. Transposons-Based Clonal Diversity in Trematode Involves Parts of CR1 (LINE) in Eu- and Heterochromatin. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:1129. [PMID: 34440303 PMCID: PMC8392823 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Trematode parthenitae have long been believed to form clonal populations, but clonal diversity has been discovered in this asexual stage of the lifecycle. Clonal polymorphism in the model species Himasthla elongata has been previously described, but the source of this phenomenon remains unknown. In this work, we traced cercarial clonal diversity using a simplified amplified fragment length polymorphism (SAFLP) method and characterised the nature of fragments in diverse electrophoretic bands. The repetitive elements were identified in both the primary sequence of the H. elongata genome and in the transcriptome data. Long-interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTRs) were found to represent an overwhelming majority of the genome and the transposon transcripts. Most sequenced fragments from SAFLP pattern contained the reverse transcriptase (RT, ORF2) domains of LINEs, and only a few sequences belonged to ORFs of LTRs and ORF1 of LINEs. A fragment corresponding to a CR1-like (LINE) spacer region was discovered and named CR1-renegade (CR1-rng). In addition to RT-containing CR1 transcripts, we found short CR1-rng transcripts in the redia transcriptome and short contigs in the mobilome. Probes against CR1-RT and CR1-rng presented strikingly different pictures in FISH mapping, despite both being fragments of CR1. In silico data and Southern blotting indicated that CR1-rng is not tandemly organised. CR1 involvement in clonal diversity is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Solovyeva
- Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Science, Tikhoretsky Ave 4, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
- Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Ivan Levakin
- Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Nab 1, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Evgeny Zorin
- All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Pushkin 8, 196608 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
| | - Leonid Adonin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutskiy per 9, 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia;
| | - Yuri Khotimchenko
- School of Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Sukhanova St 8, 690091 Vladivostok, Russia;
| | - Olga Podgornaya
- Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Science, Tikhoretsky Ave 4, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
- Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Nab 7/9, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lu JY, Chang L, Li T, Wang T, Yin Y, Zhan G, Han X, Zhang K, Tao Y, Percharde M, Wang L, Peng Q, Yan P, Zhang H, Bi X, Shao W, Hong Y, Wu Z, Ma R, Wang P, Li W, Zhang J, Chang Z, Hou Y, Zhu B, Ramalho-Santos M, Li P, Xie W, Na J, Sun Y, Shen X. Homotypic clustering of L1 and B1/Alu repeats compartmentalizes the 3D genome. Cell Res 2021; 31:613-630. [PMID: 33514913 PMCID: PMC8169921 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-00466-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Organization of the genome into euchromatin and heterochromatin appears to be evolutionarily conserved and relatively stable during lineage differentiation. In an effort to unravel the basic principle underlying genome folding, here we focus on the genome itself and report a fundamental role for L1 (LINE1 or LINE-1) and B1/Alu retrotransposons, the most abundant subclasses of repetitive sequences, in chromatin compartmentalization. We find that homotypic clustering of L1 and B1/Alu demarcates the genome into grossly exclusive domains, and characterizes and predicts Hi-C compartments. Spatial segregation of L1-rich sequences in the nuclear and nucleolar peripheries and B1/Alu-rich sequences in the nuclear interior is conserved in mouse and human cells and occurs dynamically during the cell cycle. In addition, de novo establishment of L1 and B1 nuclear segregation is coincident with the formation of higher-order chromatin structures during early embryogenesis and appears to be critically regulated by L1 and B1 transcripts. Importantly, depletion of L1 transcripts in embryonic stem cells drastically weakens homotypic repeat contacts and compartmental strength, and disrupts the nuclear segregation of L1- or B1-rich chromosomal sequences at genome-wide and individual sites. Mechanistically, nuclear co-localization and liquid droplet formation of L1 repeat DNA and RNA with heterochromatin protein HP1α suggest a phase-separation mechanism by which L1 promotes heterochromatin compartmentalization. Taken together, we propose a genetically encoded model in which L1 and B1/Alu repeats blueprint chromatin macrostructure. Our model explains the robustness of genome folding into a common conserved core, on which dynamic gene regulation is overlaid across cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Yuyang Lu
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Lei Chang
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, and College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510005, China
| | - Tong Li
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Ting Wang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yafei Yin
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Ge Zhan
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Xue Han
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yibing Tao
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Michelle Percharde
- MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), London, W120NN, UK
- Institute of Clinical Sciences (ICS), Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W120NN, UK
| | - Liang Wang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Qi Peng
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Pixi Yan
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Xianju Bi
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Wen Shao
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yantao Hong
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Zhongyang Wu
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Runze Ma
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Peizhe Wang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Wenzhi Li
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Zai Chang
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yingping Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, and College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Bing Zhu
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Miguel Ramalho-Santos
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3H7, Canada
| | - Pilong Li
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Wei Xie
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Jie Na
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yujie Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, and College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
| | - Xiaohua Shen
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Medicine and School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van der Mude A. Structure encoding in DNA. J Theor Biol 2020; 492:110205. [PMID: 32070719 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 12/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
It is proposed that transposons and related long non-coding RNA define the fine structure of body parts. Although morphogens have long been known to direct the formation of many gross structures in early embryonic development, they do not have the necessary precision to define a structure down to the individual cellular level. Using the distinction between procedural and declarative knowledge in information processing as an analogy, it is hypothesized that DNA encodes fine structure in a manner that is different from the genetic code for proteins. The hypothesis states that repeated or near-repeated sequences that are in transposons and non-coding RNA define body part structures. As the cells in a body part go through the epigenetic process of differentiation, the action of methylation serves to inactivate all but the relevant structure definitions and some associated cell type genes. The transposons left active will then physically modify the DNA sequence in the heterochromatin to establish the local context in the three-dimensional body part structure. This brings the encoded definition of the cell type to the histone. The histone code for that cell type starts the regulatory cascade that turns on the genes associated with that particular type of cell, transforming it from a multipotent cell to a fully differentiated cell. This mechanism creates structures in the musculoskeletal system, the organs of the body, the major parts of the brain, and other systems.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sultana T, van Essen D, Siol O, Bailly-Bechet M, Philippe C, Zine El Aabidine A, Pioger L, Nigumann P, Saccani S, Andrau JC, Gilbert N, Cristofari G. The Landscape of L1 Retrotransposons in the Human Genome Is Shaped by Pre-insertion Sequence Biases and Post-insertion Selection. Mol Cell 2019; 74:555-570.e7. [PMID: 30956044 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
L1 retrotransposons are transposable elements and major contributors of genetic variation in humans. Where L1 integrates into the genome can directly impact human evolution and disease. Here, we experimentally induced L1 retrotransposition in cells and mapped integration sites at nucleotide resolution. At local scales, L1 integration is mostly restricted by genome sequence biases and the specificity of the L1 machinery. At regional scales, L1 shows a broad capacity for integration into all chromatin states, in contrast to other known mobile genetic elements. However, integration is influenced by the replication timing of target regions, suggesting a link to host DNA replication. The distribution of new L1 integrations differs from those of preexisting L1 copies, which are significantly reshaped by natural selection. Our findings reveal that the L1 machinery has evolved to efficiently target all genomic regions and underline a predominant role for post-integrative processes on the distribution of endogenous L1 elements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Sultana
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France
| | | | - Oliver Siol
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Amal Zine El Aabidine
- Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Léo Pioger
- Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Pilvi Nigumann
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France
| | - Simona Saccani
- Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm, CNRS, IRCAN, Nice, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Andrau
- Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Gilbert
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France; Institut de Médecine Régénératrice et de Biothérapie, Inserm U1183, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
A comprehensive analysis of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)-specific LINE-1 retrotransposons. Gene 2019; 693:46-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
10
|
Bodea GO, McKelvey EGZ, Faulkner GJ. Retrotransposon-induced mosaicism in the neural genome. Open Biol 2019; 8:rsob.180074. [PMID: 30021882 PMCID: PMC6070720 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.180074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, major discoveries in retrotransposon biology have depicted the neural genome as a dynamic structure during life. In particular, the retrotransposon LINE-1 (L1) has been shown to be transcribed and mobilized in the brain. Retrotransposition in the developing brain, as well as during adult neurogenesis, provides a milieu in which neural diversity can arise. Dysregulation of retrotransposon activity may also contribute to neurological disease. Here, we review recent reports of retrotransposon activity in the brain, and discuss the temporal nature of retrotransposition and its regulation in neural cells in response to stimuli. We also put forward hypotheses regarding the significance of retrotransposons for brain development and neurological function, and consider the potential implications of this phenomenon for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela O Bodea
- Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, TRI Building, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia .,Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Eleanor G Z McKelvey
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Geoffrey J Faulkner
- Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, TRI Building, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia .,Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Evolutionary Loss of Genomic Proximity to Conserved Noncoding Elements Impacted the Gene Expression Dynamics During Mammalian Brain Development. Genetics 2019; 211:1239-1254. [PMID: 30796012 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.301973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) have a significant regulatory influence on their neighboring genes. Loss of proximity to CNEs through genomic rearrangements can, therefore, impact the transcriptional states of the cognate genes. Yet, the evolutionary implications of such chromosomal alterations have not been studied. Through genome-wide analysis of CNEs and the cognate genes of representative species from five different mammalian orders, we observed a significant loss of genes' linear proximity to CNEs in the rat lineage. The CNEs and the genes losing proximity had a significant association with fetal, but not postnatal, brain development as assessed through ontology terms, developmental gene expression, chromatin marks, and genetic mutations. The loss of proximity to CNEs correlated with the independent evolutionary loss of fetus-specific upregulation of nearby genes in the rat brain. DNA breakpoints implicated in brain abnormalities of germline origin had significant representation between a CNE and the gene that exhibited loss of proximity, signifying the underlying developmental tolerance of genomic rearrangements that allowed the evolutionary splits of CNEs and the cognate genes in the rodent lineage. Our observations highlighted a nontrivial impact of chromosomal rearrangements in shaping the evolutionary dynamics of mammalian brain development and might explain the loss of brain traits, like cerebral folding of the cortex, in the rodent lineage.
Collapse
|
12
|
Attig J, Ule J. Genomic Accumulation of Retrotransposons Was Facilitated by Repressive RNA-Binding Proteins: A Hypothesis. Bioessays 2019; 41:e1800132. [DOI: 10.1002/bies.201800132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Attig
- Dr. J. Attig, Prof. J. Ule; The Francis Crick Institute; 1 Midland Road London NW1 1AT UK
| | - Jernej Ule
- Dr. J. Attig, Prof. J. Ule; The Francis Crick Institute; 1 Midland Road London NW1 1AT UK
- Prof. J. Ule; Department of Molecular Neuroscience; UCL Institute of Neurology; Queen Square London WC1N 3BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bourque G, Burns KH, Gehring M, Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Hammell M, Imbeault M, Izsvák Z, Levin HL, Macfarlan TS, Mager DL, Feschotte C. Ten things you should know about transposable elements. Genome Biol 2018; 19:199. [PMID: 30454069 PMCID: PMC6240941 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 659] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are major components of eukaryotic genomes. However, the extent of their impact on genome evolution, function, and disease remain a matter of intense interrogation. The rise of genomics and large-scale functional assays has shed new light on the multi-faceted activities of TEs and implies that they should no longer be marginalized. Here, we introduce the fundamental properties of TEs and their complex interactions with their cellular environment, which are crucial to understanding their impact and manifold consequences for organismal biology. While we draw examples primarily from mammalian systems, the core concepts outlined here are relevant to a broad range of organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Bourque
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
- Canadian Center for Computational Genomics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, H3A 0G1, Canada.
| | - Kathleen H Burns
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Mary Gehring
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Vera Gorbunova
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA
| | - Andrei Seluanov
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA
| | - Molly Hammell
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 11724, USA
| | - Michaël Imbeault
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Zsuzsanna Izsvák
- Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henry L Levin
- The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Todd S Macfarlan
- The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Dixie L Mager
- Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency and Department of Medical Genetics, University of BC, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1L3, Canada
| | - Cédric Feschotte
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guichard E, Peona V, Malagoli Tagliazucchi G, Abitante L, Jagoda E, Musella M, Ricci M, Rubio-Roldán A, Sarno S, Luiselli D, Pettener D, Taccioli C, Pagani L, Garcia-Perez JL, Boattini A. Impact of non-LTR retrotransposons in the differentiation and evolution of anatomically modern humans. Mob DNA 2018; 9:28. [PMID: 30147753 PMCID: PMC6094920 DOI: 10.1186/s13100-018-0133-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transposable elements are biologically important components of eukaryote genomes. In particular, non-LTR retrotransposons (N-LTRrs) played a key role in shaping the human genome throughout evolution. In this study, we compared retrotransposon insertions differentially present in the genomes of Anatomically Modern Humans, Neanderthals, Denisovans and Chimpanzees, in order to assess the possible impact of retrotransposition in the differentiation of the human lineage. Results We first identified species-specific N-LTRrs and established their distribution in present day human populations. These analyses shortlisted a group of N-LTRr insertions that were found exclusively in Anatomically Modern Humans. These insertions are associated with an increase in the number of transcriptional/splicing variants of those genes they inserted in. The analysis of the functionality of genes containing human-specific N-LTRr insertions reflects changes that occurred during human evolution. In particular, the expression of genes containing the most recent N-LTRr insertions is enriched in the brain, especially in undifferentiated neurons, and these genes associate in networks related to neuron maturation and migration. Additionally, we identified candidate N-LTRr insertions that have likely produced new functional variants exclusive to modern humans, whose genomic loci show traces of positive selection. Conclusions Our results strongly suggest that N-LTRr impacted our differentiation as a species, most likely inducing an increase in neural complexity, and have been a constant source of genomic variability all throughout the evolution of the human lineage. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13100-018-0133-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Guichard
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Peona
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.,2Department of Evolutionary Biology (EBC), Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Lucia Abitante
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Evelyn Jagoda
- 4Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
| | - Margherita Musella
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Ricci
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alejandro Rubio-Roldán
- 5GENYO - Pfizer - Universidad de Granada - Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research, PTS Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
| | - Stefania Sarno
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Donata Luiselli
- 6Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna Campus, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
| | - Davide Pettener
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristian Taccioli
- 7Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Pd Italy
| | - Luca Pagani
- 8Department of Biology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.,9Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, 51010 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jose Luis Garcia-Perez
- 5GENYO - Pfizer - Universidad de Granada - Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research, PTS Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain.,MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine (IGMM), University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU UK
| | - Alessio Boattini
- 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zeng L, Pederson SM, Kortschak RD, Adelson DL. Transposable elements and gene expression during the evolution of amniotes. Mob DNA 2018; 9:17. [PMID: 29942365 PMCID: PMC5998507 DOI: 10.1186/s13100-018-0124-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transposable elements (TEs) are primarily responsible for the DNA losses and gains in genome sequences that occur over time within and between species. TEs themselves evolve, with clade specific LTR/ERV, LINEs and SINEs responsible for the bulk of species-specific genomic features. Because TEs can contain regulatory motifs, they can be exapted as regulators of gene expression. While TE insertions can provide evolutionary novelty for the regulation of gene expression, their overall impact on the evolution of gene expression is unclear. Previous investigators have shown that tissue specific gene expression in amniotes is more similar across species than within species, supporting the existence of conserved developmental gene regulation. In order to understand how species-specific TE insertions might affect the evolution/conservation of gene expression, we have looked at the association of gene expression in six tissues with TE insertions in six representative amniote genomes. Results A novel bootstrapping approach has been used to minimise the conflation of effects of repeat types on gene expression. We compared the expression of orthologs containing recent TE insertions to orthologs that contained older TE insertions, and the expression of non-orthologs containing recent TE insertions to non-orthologs with older TE insertions. Both orthologs and non-orthologs showed significant differences in gene expression associated with TE insertions. TEs were found associated with species-specific changes in gene expression, and the magnitude and direction of expression changes were noteworthy. Overall, orthologs containing species-specific TEs were associated with lower gene expression, while in non-orthologs, non-species specific TEs were associated with higher gene expression. Exceptions were SINE elements in human and chicken, which had an opposite association with gene expression compared to other species. Conclusions Our observed species-specific associations of TEs with gene expression support a role for TEs in speciation/response to selection by species. TEs do not exhibit consistent associations with gene expression and observed associations can vary depending on the age of TE insertions. Based on these observations, it would be prudent to refrain from extrapolating these and previously reported associations to distantly related species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Zeng
- 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
| | - Stephen M Pederson
- 2Bioinformatics Hub, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
| | - R Daniel Kortschak
- 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
| | - David L Adelson
- 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5005 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buckley RM, Kortschak RD, Adelson DL. Divergent genome evolution caused by regional variation in DNA gain and loss between human and mouse. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14:e1006091. [PMID: 29677183 PMCID: PMC5931693 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The forces driving the accumulation and removal of non-coding DNA and ultimately the evolution of genome size in complex organisms are intimately linked to genome structure and organisation. Our analysis provides a novel method for capturing the regional variation of lineage-specific DNA gain and loss events in their respective genomic contexts. To further understand this connection we used comparative genomics to identify genome-wide individual DNA gain and loss events in the human and mouse genomes. Focusing on the distribution of DNA gains and losses, relationships to important structural features and potential impact on biological processes, we found that in autosomes, DNA gains and losses both followed separate lineage-specific accumulation patterns. However, in both species chromosome X was particularly enriched for DNA gain, consistent with its high L1 retrotransposon content required for X inactivation. We found that DNA loss was associated with gene-rich open chromatin regions and DNA gain events with gene-poor closed chromatin regions. Additionally, we found that DNA loss events tended to be smaller than DNA gain events suggesting that they were able to accumulate in gene-rich open chromatin regions due to their reduced capacity to interrupt gene regulatory architecture. GO term enrichment showed that mouse loss hotspots were strongly enriched for terms related to developmental processes. However, these genes were also located in regions with a high density of conserved elements, suggesting that despite high levels of DNA loss, gene regulatory architecture remained conserved. This is consistent with a model in which DNA gain and loss results in turnover or "churning" in regulatory element dense regions of open chromatin, where interruption of regulatory elements is selected against.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben M. Buckley
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, The University of Adelaide, North Tce, Adelaide, Australia
| | - R. Daniel Kortschak
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, The University of Adelaide, North Tce, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David L. Adelson
- Department of Genetics and Evolution, The University of Adelaide, North Tce, Adelaide, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|