1
|
Poelstra JW, Montero BK, Lüdemann J, Yang Z, Rakotondranary SJ, Hohenlohe P, Stetter N, Ganzhorn JU, Yoder AD. RADseq data reveal a lack of admixture in a mouse lemur contact zone contrary to previous microsatellite results. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20220596. [PMID: 35946151 PMCID: PMC9364002 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsatellites have been a workhorse of evolutionary genetic studies for decades and are still commonly in use for estimating signatures of genetic diversity at the population and species level across a multitude of taxa. Yet, the very high mutation rate of these loci is a double-edged sword, conferring great sensitivity at shallow levels of analysis (e.g. paternity analysis) but yielding considerable uncertainty for deeper evolutionary comparisons. For the present study, we used reduced representation genome-wide data (restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq)) to test for patterns of interspecific hybridization previously characterized using microsatellite data in a contact zone between two closely related mouse lemur species in Madagascar (Microcebus murinus and Microcebus griseorufus). We revisit this system by examining populations in, near, and far from the contact zone, including many of the same individuals that had previously been identified as hybrids with microsatellite data. Surprisingly, we find no evidence for admixed nuclear ancestry. Instead, re-analyses of microsatellite data and simulations suggest that previously inferred hybrids were false positives and that the program NewHybrids can be particularly sensitive to erroneously inferring hybrid ancestry. Combined with results from coalescent-based analyses and evidence for local syntopic co-occurrence, we conclude that the two mouse lemur species are in fact completely reproductively isolated, thus providing a new understanding of the evolutionary rate whereby reproductive isolation can be achieved in a primate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelmer W. Poelstra
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA,Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
| | - B. Karina Montero
- Institute of Zoology, Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
| | - Jan Lüdemann
- Institute of Zoology, Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
| | - Ziheng Yang
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - S. Jacques Rakotondranary
- Institute of Zoology, Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany,Anthropobiologie et Développement Durable, Faculté des Sciences, Université d'Antananarivo, PO Box 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
| | - Paul Hohenlohe
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
| | - Nadine Stetter
- Institute of Zoology, Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany,Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg U. Ganzhorn
- Institute of Zoology, Department of Animal Ecology and Conservation, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 20146, Germany
| | - Anne D. Yoder
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ho CLA, Fichtel C, Huber D. The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) as a model for early primate brain evolution. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2021; 71:92-99. [PMID: 34768148 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), one of the world's smallest primates, is thought to share a similar ecological niche and many anatomical traits with early euprimates. As a result, it has been considered a suitable model system for early primate physiology and behavior. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that mouse lemurs have comparable cognitive abilities and cortical functional organization as haplorhines. Finally, the small brain size of mouse lemurs provides us with actual lower limits for miniaturization of functional brain circuits within the primate clade. Considering its phylogenetic position and early primate-like traits, the mouse lemurs are a perfect model species to study the early evolution of primate brains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Lum Andy Ho
- University of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Fichtel
- Verhaltensökologie und Soziobiologie, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; Leibniz Science Campus 'Primate Cognition', 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Huber
- University of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chaudron Y, Pifferi F, Aujard F. Overview of age-related changes in psychomotor and cognitive functions in a prosimian primate, the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus): Recent advances in risk factors and antiaging interventions. Am J Primatol 2021; 83:e23337. [PMID: 34706117 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Aging is not homogeneous in humans and the determinants leading to differences between subjects are not fully understood. Impaired glucose homeostasis is a major risk factor for cognitive decline in middle-aged humans, pointing at the existence of early markers of unhealthy aging. The gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), a small lemuriform Malagasy primate, shows relatively slow aging with decreased psychomotor capacities at middle-age (around 5-year old). In some cases (∼10%), it spontaneously leads to pathological aging. In this case, some age-related deficits, such as severe cognitive decline, brain atrophy, amyloidosis, and glucoregulatory imbalance are congruent with what is observed in humans. In the present review, we inventory the changes occurring in psychomotor and cognitive functions during healthy and pathological aging in mouse lemur. It includes a summary of the cerebral, metabolic, and cellular alterations that occur during aging and their relation to cognitive decline. As nutrition is one of the major nonpharmacological antiaging strategies with major potential effects on cognitive performances, we also discuss its role in brain functions and cognitive decline in this species. We show that the overall approach of aging studies in the gray mouse lemur offers promising ways of investigation for understanding, prevention, and treatments of pathological aging in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Chaudron
- UMR CNRS/MNHN 7179, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution, Brunoy, France
| | - Fabien Pifferi
- UMR CNRS/MNHN 7179, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution, Brunoy, France
| | - Fabienne Aujard
- UMR CNRS/MNHN 7179, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution, Brunoy, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yohe LR, Fabbri M, Hanson M, Bhullar BAS. Olfactory receptor gene evolution is unusually rapid across Tetrapoda and outpaces chemosensory phenotypic change. Curr Zool 2021; 66:505-514. [PMID: 34484311 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoaa051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemosensation is the most ubiquitous sense in animals, enacted by the products of complex gene families that detect environmental chemical cues and larger-scale sensory structures that process these cues. While there is a general conception that olfactory receptor (OR) genes evolve rapidly, the universality of this phenomenon across vertebrates, and its magnitude, are unclear. The supposed correlation between molecular rates of chemosensory evolution and phenotypic diversity of chemosensory systems is largely untested. We combine comparative genomics and sensory morphology to test whether OR genes and olfactory phenotypic traits evolve at faster rates than other genes or traits. Using published genomes, we identified ORs in 21 tetrapods, including amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals and compared their rates of evolution to those of orthologous non-OR protein-coding genes. We found that, for all clades investigated, most OR genes evolve nearly an order of magnitude faster than other protein-coding genes, with many OR genes showing signatures of diversifying selection across nearly all taxa in this study. This rapid rate of evolution suggests that chemoreceptor genes are in "evolutionary overdrive," perhaps evolving in response to the ever-changing chemical space of the environment. To obtain complementary morphological data, we stained whole fixed specimens with iodine, µCT-scanned the specimens, and digitally segmented chemosensory and nonchemosensory brain regions. We then estimated phenotypic variation within traits and among tetrapods. While we found considerable variation in chemosensory structures, they were no more diverse than nonchemosensory regions. We suggest chemoreceptor genes evolve quickly in reflection of an ever-changing chemical space, whereas chemosensory phenotypes and processing regions are more conserved because they use a standardized or constrained architecture to receive and process a range of chemical cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel R Yohe
- Department of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Matteo Fabbri
- Department of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Michael Hanson
- Department of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| | - Bhart-Anjan S Bhullar
- Department of Earth & Planetary Science, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou Y, Shearwin-Whyatt L, Li J, Song Z, Hayakawa T, Stevens D, Fenelon JC, Peel E, Cheng Y, Pajpach F, Bradley N, Suzuki H, Nikaido M, Damas J, Daish T, Perry T, Zhu Z, Geng Y, Rhie A, Sims Y, Wood J, Haase B, Mountcastle J, Fedrigo O, Li Q, Yang H, Wang J, Johnston SD, Phillippy AM, Howe K, Jarvis ED, Ryder OA, Kaessmann H, Donnelly P, Korlach J, Lewin HA, Graves J, Belov K, Renfree MB, Grutzner F, Zhou Q, Zhang G. Platypus and echidna genomes reveal mammalian biology and evolution. Nature 2021; 592:756-762. [PMID: 33408411 PMCID: PMC8081666 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03039-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Egg-laying mammals (monotremes) are the only extant mammalian outgroup to therians (marsupial and eutherian animals) and provide key insights into mammalian evolution1,2. Here we generate and analyse reference genomes of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) and echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus), which represent the only two extant monotreme lineages. The nearly complete platypus genome assembly has anchored almost the entire genome onto chromosomes, markedly improving the genome continuity and gene annotation. Together with our echidna sequence, the genomes of the two species allow us to detect the ancestral and lineage-specific genomic changes that shape both monotreme and mammalian evolution. We provide evidence that the monotreme sex chromosome complex originated from an ancestral chromosome ring configuration. The formation of such a unique chromosome complex may have been facilitated by the unusually extensive interactions between the multi-X and multi-Y chromosomes that are shared by the autosomal homologues in humans. Further comparative genomic analyses unravel marked differences between monotremes and therians in haptoglobin genes, lactation genes and chemosensory receptor genes for smell and taste that underlie the ecological adaptation of monotremes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhou
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- Villum Center for Biodiversity Genomics, Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linda Shearwin-Whyatt
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jing Li
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhen Song
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Takashi Hayakawa
- Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
- Japan Monkey Centre, Inuyama, Japan
| | - David Stevens
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane C Fenelon
- School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Peel
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yuanyuan Cheng
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Filip Pajpach
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Natasha Bradley
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Masato Nikaido
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joana Damas
- The Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Tasman Daish
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tahlia Perry
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Zexian Zhu
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuncong Geng
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ying Sims
- Tree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Wood
- Tree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bettina Haase
- The Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Olivier Fedrigo
- The Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qiye Li
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Huanming Yang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Guangdong Provincial Academician Workstation of BGI Synthetic Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jian Wang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Stephen D Johnston
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adam M Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kerstin Howe
- Tree of Life Programme, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erich D Jarvis
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | | | - Henrik Kaessmann
- Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Donnelly
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Harris A Lewin
- The Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Reproduction and Population Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Graves
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine Belov
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marilyn B Renfree
- School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frank Grutzner
- School of Biological Sciences, The Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Qi Zhou
- MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis and Protection and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Neuroscience and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Guojie Zhang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
- Villum Center for Biodiversity Genomics, Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
- Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tirindelli R. Coding of pheromones by vomeronasal receptors. Cell Tissue Res 2021; 383:367-386. [PMID: 33433690 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-020-03376-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Communication between individuals is critical for species survival, reproduction, and expansion. Most terrestrial species, with the exception of humans who predominantly use vision and phonation to create their social network, rely on the detection and decoding of olfactory signals, which are widely known as pheromones. These chemosensory cues originate from bodily fluids, causing attractive or avoidance behaviors in subjects of the same species. Intraspecific pheromone signaling is then crucial to identify sex, social ranking, individuality, and health status, thus establishing hierarchies and finalizing the most efficient reproductive strategies. Indeed, all these features require fine tuning of the olfactory systems to detect molecules containing this information. To cope with this complexity of signals, tetrapods have developed dedicated olfactory subsystems that refer to distinct peripheral sensory detectors, called the main olfactory and the vomeronasal organ, and two minor structures, namely the septal organ of Masera and the Grueneberg ganglion. Among these, the vomeronasal organ plays the most remarkable role in pheromone coding by mediating several behavioral outcomes that are critical for species conservation and amplification. In rodents, this organ is organized into two segregated neuronal subsets that express different receptor families. To some extent, this dichotomic organization is preserved in higher projection areas of the central nervous system, suggesting, at first glance, distinct functions for these two neuronal pathways. Here, I will specifically focus on this issue and discuss the role of vomeronasal receptors in mediating important innate behavioral effects through the recognition of pheromones and other biological chemosignals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Tirindelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Volturno, 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller CH, Campbell P, Sheehan MJ. Distinct evolutionary trajectories of V1R clades across mouse species. BMC Evol Biol 2020; 20:99. [PMID: 32770934 PMCID: PMC7414754 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01662-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many animals rely heavily on olfaction to navigate their environment. Among rodents, olfaction is crucial for a wide range of social behaviors. The vomeronasal olfactory system in particular plays an important role in mediating social communication, including the detection of pheromones and recognition signals. In this study we examine patterns of vomeronasal type-1 receptor (V1R) evolution in the house mouse and related species within the genus Mus. We report the extent of gene repertoire turnover and conservation among species and clades, as well as the prevalence of positive selection on gene sequences across the V1R tree. By exploring the evolution of these receptors, we provide insight into the functional roles of receptor subtypes as well as the dynamics of gene family evolution. RESULTS We generated transcriptomes from the vomeronasal organs of 5 Mus species, and produced high quality V1R repertoires for each species. We find that V1R clades in the house mouse and relatives exhibit distinct evolutionary trajectories. We identify putative species-specific gene expansions, including a large clade D expansion in the house mouse. While gene gains are abundant, we detect very few gene losses. We describe a novel V1R clade and highlight candidate receptors for future study. We find evidence for distinct evolutionary processes across different clades, from largescale turnover to highly conserved repertoires. Patterns of positive selection are similarly variable, as some clades exhibit abundant positive selection while others display high gene sequence conservation. Based on clade-level evolutionary patterns, we identify receptor families that are strong candidates for detecting social signals and predator cues. Our results reveal clades with receptors detecting female reproductive status are among the most conserved across species, suggesting an important role in V1R chemosensation. CONCLUSION Analysis of clade-level evolution is critical for understanding species' chemosensory adaptations. This study provides clear evidence that V1R clades are characterized by distinct evolutionary trajectories. As receptor evolution is shaped by ligand identity, these results provide a framework for examining the functional roles of receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Polly Campbell
- Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Poelstra JW, Salmona J, Tiley GP, Schüßler D, Blanco MB, Andriambeloson JB, Bouchez O, Campbell CR, Etter PD, Hohenlohe PA, Hunnicutt KE, Iribar A, Johnson EA, Kappeler PM, Larsen PA, Manzi S, Ralison JM, Randrianambinina B, Rasoloarison RM, Rasolofoson DW, Stahlke AR, Weisrock DW, Williams RC, Chikhi L, Louis EE, Radespiel U, Yoder AD. Cryptic Patterns of Speciation in Cryptic Primates: Microendemic Mouse Lemurs and the Multispecies Coalescent. Syst Biol 2020; 70:203-218. [PMID: 32642760 DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Mouse lemurs (Microcebus) are a radiation of morphologically cryptic primates distributed throughout Madagascar for which the number of recognized species has exploded in the past two decades. This taxonomic revision has prompted understandable concern that there has been substantial oversplitting in the mouse lemur clade. Here, we investigate mouse lemur diversity in a region in northeastern Madagascar with high levels of microendemism and predicted habitat loss. We analyzed RADseq data with multispecies coalescent (MSC) species delimitation methods for two pairs of sister lineages that include three named species and an undescribed lineage previously identified to have divergent mtDNA. Marked differences in effective population sizes, levels of gene flow, patterns of isolation-by-distance, and species delimitation results were found among the two pairs of lineages. Whereas all tests support the recognition of the presently undescribed lineage as a separate species, the species-level distinction of two previously described species, M. mittermeieri and M. lehilahytsara is not supported-a result that is particularly striking when using the genealogical discordance index (gdi). Nonsister lineages occur sympatrically in two of the localities sampled for this study, despite an estimated divergence time of less than 1 Ma. This suggests rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the focal lineages and in the mouse lemur clade generally. The divergence time estimates reported here are based on the MSC calibrated with pedigree-based mutation rates and are considerably more recent than previously published fossil-calibrated relaxed-clock estimates. We discuss the possible explanations for this discrepancy, noting that there are theoretical justifications for preferring the MSC estimates in this case. [Cryptic species; effective population size; microendemism; multispecies coalescent; speciation; species delimitation.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jordi Salmona
- CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, IRD; UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - George P Tiley
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Dominik Schüßler
- Research Group Ecology and Environmental Education, Department of Biology, University of Hildesheim, Universitaetsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Marina B Blanco
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Duke Lemur Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Jean B Andriambeloson
- Department of Zoology and Animal Biodiversity, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
| | - Olivier Bouchez
- INRA, US 1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France
| | - C Ryan Campbell
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Paul D Etter
- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Paul A Hohenlohe
- Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
| | - Kelsie E Hunnicutt
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA
| | - Amaia Iribar
- CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, IRD; UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Eric A Johnson
- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Peter M Kappeler
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter A Larsen
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - Sophie Manzi
- CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, IRD; UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - JosÉ M Ralison
- Department of Zoology and Animal Biodiversity, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
| | - Blanchard Randrianambinina
- Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Primates de Madagascar (GERP), BP 779, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar.,Faculté des Sciences, University of Mahajanga, Mahajanga, Madagascar
| | - Rodin M Rasoloarison
- Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - David W Rasolofoson
- Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Primates de Madagascar (GERP), BP 779, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar
| | - Amanda R Stahlke
- Department of Biological Sciences, Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
| | - David W Weisrock
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA
| | - Rachel C Williams
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Duke Lemur Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - LounÈs Chikhi
- CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, IRD; UMR5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France.,Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande, 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Edward E Louis
- Grewcock Center for Conservation and Research, Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ute Radespiel
- Institute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany Jelmer Poelstra, Jordi Salmona, George P. Tiley are the joint first authors. Ute Radespiel and Anne D. Yoder are the joint senior authors
| | - Anne D Yoder
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brand P, Hinojosa-Díaz IA, Ayala R, Daigle M, Yurrita Obiols CL, Eltz T, Ramírez SR. The evolution of sexual signaling is linked to odorant receptor tuning in perfume-collecting orchid bees. Nat Commun 2020; 11:244. [PMID: 31932598 PMCID: PMC6957680 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14162-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Sexual signaling is an important reproductive barrier known to evolve early during the formation of new species, but the genetic mechanisms that facilitate the divergence of sexual signals remain elusive. Here we isolate a gene linked to the rapid evolution of a signaling trait in a pair of nascent neotropical orchid bee lineages, Euglossa dilemma and E. viridissima. Male orchid bees acquire chemical compounds from their environment to concoct species-specific perfumes to later expose during courtship. We find that the two lineages acquire chemically distinct perfumes and are reproductively isolated despite low levels of genome-wide differentiation. Remarkably, variation in perfume chemistry coincides with rapid divergence in few odorant receptor (OR) genes. Using functional assays, we demonstrate that the derived variant of Or41 in E. dilemma is specific towards its species-specific major perfume compound, whereas the ancestral variant in E. viridissima is broadly tuned to multiple odorants. Our results show that OR evolution likely played a role in the divergence of sexual communication in natural populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Brand
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA.
- Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, 10065, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Ismael A Hinojosa-Díaz
- Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito s/n Ciudad Universitaria Delegación Coyoacán, Apartado Postal 70-153, Ciudad de México, 04510, Mexico
| | - Ricardo Ayala
- Estación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 21, San Patricio, Jalisco, 48980, Mexico
| | - Michael Daigle
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA
| | - Carmen L Yurrita Obiols
- Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Avenida La Reforma, 0-63, Guatemala, 01000, Guatemala
| | - Thomas Eltz
- Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany
| | - Santiago R Ramírez
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|