On the clustered exchanges of the RecBCD pathway operating on phage lambda

RecBCD enzyme and Chi recombination hotspots as determinants of self vs. non-self: Myths and mechanisms

Bacteria face a challenge when DNA enters their cells by transformation, mating, or phage infection. Should they treat this DNA as an invasive foreigner and destroy it, or consider it one of their own and potentially benefit from incorporating new genes or alleles to gain useful functions? It is frequently stated that the short nucleotide sequence Chi (5' GCTGGTGG 3'), a hotspot of homologous genetic recombination recognized by Escherichia coli's RecBCD helicase-nuclease, allows E. coli to distinguish its DNA (self) from any other DNA (non-self) and to destroy non-self DNA, and that Chi is "over-represented" in the E. coli genome. We show here that these latter statements (dogmas) are not supported by available evidence. We note Chi's wide-spread occurrence and activity in distantly related bacterial species and phages. We illustrate multiple, highly non-random features of the genomes of E. coli and coliphage P1 that account for Chi's high frequency and genomic position, leading us to propose that P1 selects for Chi's enhancement of recombination, whereas E. coli selects for the preferred codons in Chi. We discuss other, previously described mechanisms for self vs. non-self determination involving RecBCD and for RecBCD's destruction of DNA that cannot recombine, whether foreign or domestic, with or without Chi.

Homologous Recombination-Enzymes and Pathways

Homologous recombination is an ubiquitous process that shapes genomes and repairs DNA damage. The reaction is classically divided into three phases: presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic. In Escherichia coli, the presynaptic phase involves either RecBCD or RecFOR proteins, which act on DNA double-stranded ends and DNA single-stranded gaps, respectively; the central synaptic steps are catalyzed by the ubiquitous DNA-binding protein RecA; and the postsynaptic phase involves either RuvABC or RecG proteins, which catalyze branch-migration and, in the case of RuvABC, the cleavage of Holliday junctions. Here, we review the biochemical properties of these molecular machines and analyze how, in light of these properties, the phenotypes of null mutants allow us to define their biological function(s). The consequences of point mutations on the biochemical properties of recombination enzymes and on cell phenotypes help refine the molecular mechanisms of action and the biological roles of recombination proteins. Given the high level of conservation of key proteins like RecA and the conservation of the principles of action of all recombination proteins, the deep knowledge acquired during decades of studies of homologous recombination in bacteria is the foundation of our present understanding of the processes that govern genome stability and evolution in all living organisms.

How RecBCD enzyme and Chi promote DNA break repair and recombination: a molecular biologist's view

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential for cell viability and important for homologous genetic recombination. In enteric bacteria such as Escherichia coli, the major pathway of DSB repair requires the RecBCD enzyme, a complex helicase-nuclease regulated by a simple unique DNA sequence called Chi. How Chi regulates RecBCD has been extensively studied by both genetics and biochemistry, and two contrasting mechanisms to generate a recombinogenic single-stranded DNA tail have been proposed: the nicking of one DNA strand at Chi versus the switching of degradation from one strand to the other at Chi. Which of these reactions occurs in cells has remained unproven because of the inability to detect intracellular DNA intermediates in bacterial recombination and DNA break repair. Here, I discuss evidence from a combination of genetics and biochemistry indicating that nicking at Chi is the intracellular (in vivo) reaction. This example illustrates the need for both types of analysis (i.e., molecular biology) to uncover the mechanism and control of complex processes in living cells.

Physical analyses of E. coli heteroduplex recombination products in vivo: on the prevalence of 5' and 3' patches

Background

Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli creates patches (non-crossovers) or splices (half crossovers), each of which may have associated heteroduplex DNA. Heteroduplex patches have recombinant DNA in one strand of the duplex, with parental flanking markers. Which DNA strand is exchanged in heteroduplex patches reflects the molecular mechanism of recombination. Several models for the mechanism of E. coli RecBCD-mediated recombinational double-strand-end (DSE) repair specify that only the 3′-ending strand invades the homologous DNA, forming heteroduplex in that strand. There is, however, in vivo evidence that patches are found in both strands.

Methodology/Principle Findings

This paper re-examines heteroduplex-patch-strand polarity using phage λ and the λdv plasmid as DNA substrates recombined via the E. coli RecBCD system in vivo. These DNAs are mutant for λ recombination functions, including orf and rap, which were functional in previous studies. Heteroduplexes are isolated, separated on polyacrylamide gels, and quantified using Southern blots for heteroduplex analysis. This method reveals that heteroduplexes are still found in either 5′ or 3′ DNA strands in approximately equal amounts, even in the absence of orf and rap. Also observed is an independence of the RuvC Holliday-junction endonuclease on patch formation, and a slight but statistically significant alteration of patch polarity by recD mutation.

Conclusions/Significance

These results indicate that orf and rap did not contribute to the presence of patches, and imply that patches occurring in both DNA strands reflects the molecular mechanism of recombination in E. coli. Most importantly, the lack of a requirement for RuvC implies that endonucleolytic resolution of Holliday junctions is not necessary for heteroduplex-patch formation, contrary to predictions of all of the major previous models. This implies that patches are not an alternative resolution of the same intermediate that produces splices, and do not bear on models for splice formation. We consider two mechanisms that use DNA replication instead of endonucleolytic resolution for formation of heteroduplex patches in either DNA strand: synthesis-dependent-strand annealing and a strand-assimilation mechanism.

Chi hotspot activity in Escherichia coli without RecBCD exonuclease activity: implications for the mechanism of recombination

The major pathway of genetic recombination and DNA break repair in Escherichia coli requires RecBCD enzyme, a complex nuclease and DNA helicase regulated by Chi sites (5'-GCTGGTGG-3'). During its unwinding of DNA containing Chi, purified RecBCD enzyme has two alternative nucleolytic reactions, depending on the reaction conditions: simple nicking of the Chi-containing strand at Chi or switching of nucleolytic degradation from the Chi-containing strand to its complement at Chi. We describe a set of recC mutants with a novel intracellular phenotype: retention of Chi hotspot activity in genetic crosses but loss of detectable nucleolytic degradation as judged by the growth of mutant T4 and lambda phages and by assay of cell-free extracts. We conclude that RecBCD enzyme's nucleolytic degradation of DNA is not necessary for intracellular Chi hotspot activity and that nicking of DNA by RecBCD enzyme at Chi is sufficient. We discuss the bearing of these results on current models of RecBCD pathway recombination.

NinR- and red-mediated phage-prophage marker rescue recombination in Escherichia coli: recovery of a nonhomologous immlambda DNA segment by infecting lambdaimm434 phages

We examined the requirement of lambda recombination functions for marker rescue of cryptic prophage genes within the Escherichia coli chromosome. We infected lysogenic host cells with lambdaimm434 phages and selected for recombinant immlambda phages that had exchanged the imm434 region of the infecting phage for the heterologous 2.6-kb immlambda region from the prophage. Phage-encoded activity, provided by either Red or NinR functions, was required for the substitution. Red(-) phages with DeltaNinR, internal NinR deletions of rap-ninH, or orf-ninC were 117-, 12-, and 5-fold reduced for immlambda rescue in a Rec(+) host, suggesting the participation of several NinR activities. RecA was essential for NinR-dependent immlambda rescue, but had slight influence on Red-dependent rescue. The host recombination activities RecBCD, RecJ, and RecQ participated in NinR-dependent recombination while they served to inhibit Red-mediated immlambda rescue. The opposite effects of several host functions toward NinR- and Red-dependent immlambda rescue explains why the independent pathways were not additive in a Rec(+) host and why the NinR-dependent pathway appeared dominant. We measured the influence of the host recombination functions and DnaB on the appearance of orilambda-dependent replication initiation and whether orilambda replication initiation was required for immlambda marker rescue.

Gene products encoded in the ninR region of phage lambda participate in Red-mediated recombination

BACKGROUND

The ninR region of phage lambda contains two recombination genes, orf (ninB) and rap (ninG), that were previously shown to have roles when the RecF and RecBCD recombination pathways of E. coli, respectively, operate on phage lambda.

RESULTS

When lambda DNA replication is blocked, recombination is focused at the termini of the virion chromosome. Deletion of the ninR region of lambda decreases the sharpness of the focusing without diminishing the overall rate of recombination. The phenotype is accounted for in large part by the deletion of rap and of orf. Mutation of the recJ gene of the host partially suppresses the Rap- phenotype.

CONCLUSION

ninR functions Orf and Rap participate in Red recombination, the primary pathway operating when wild-type lambda grows lytically in rec+ cells. The ability of recJ mutation to suppress the Rap- phenotype indicates that RecJ exonuclease can participate in Red-mediated recombination, at least in the absence of Rap function. A model is presented for Red-mediated RecA-dependent recombination that includes these newly identified participants.

Homologous recombination near and far from DNA breaks: alternative roles and contrasting views

Double-strand breaks and other lesions in DNA can stimulate homologous genetic recombination in two quite different ways: by promoting recombination near the break (roughly within a kb) or far from the break. Recent emphasis on the repair aspect of recombination has focused attention on DNA interactions and recombination near breaks. Here I review evidence for recombination far from DNA breaks in bacteria and fungi and discuss mechanisms by which this can occur. These mechanisms include entry of a traveling entity ("recombination machine") at a break, formation of long heteroduplex DNA, priming of DNA replication by a broken end, and induction of recombination potential in trans. Special emphasis is placed on contrasting views of how the RecBCD enzyme of Escherichia coli promotes recombination far (tens of kb) from a double-strand break. The occurrence of recombination far from DNA breaks and of correlated recombination events far apart suggests that "action at a distance" during recombination is a widespread feature among diverse organisms.

Double-strand-break repair recombination in Escherichia coli: physical evidence for a DNA replication mechanism in vivo

DNA double-strand-break repair (DSBR) is, in many organisms, accomplished by homologous recombination. In Escherichia coli DSBR was thought to result from breakage and reunion of parental DNA molecules, assisted by known endonucleases, the Holliday junction resolvases. Under special circumstances, for example, SOS induction, recombination forks were proposed to initiate replication. We provide physical evidence that this is a major alternative mechanism in which replication copies information from one chromosome to another generating recombinant chromosomes in normal cells in vivo. This alternative mechanism can occur independently of known Holliday junction cleaving proteins, requires DNA polymerase III, and produces recombined DNA molecules that carry newly replicated DNA. The replicational mechanism underlies about half the recombination of linear DNA in E. coli; the other half occurs by breakage and reunion, which we show requires resolvases, and is replication-independent. The data also indicate that accumulation of recombination intermediates promotes replication dramatically.

Recombination in phage lambda: one geneticist's historical perspective

Several features of bacteriophage lambda suit it for the study of genetic recombination. Central among them are those that make it possible to correlate inheritance of DNA with the inheritance of information encoded by DNA through density-label equilibrium centrifugation. Such studies have revealed relationships between DNA replication and recombination, have identified roles for double-strand breaks in the initiation of recombination, and have elucidated the role of the recombination-stimulating sequence, chi.

lambda Rap protein is a structure-specific endonuclease involved in phage recombination

Bacteriophage lambda encodes a number of genes involved in the recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks. The product of one of these genes, rap, has been purified. Truncated Rap proteins that copurify with the full-length form are derived, at least in part, from a rho-dependent transcription terminator located within its coding sequence. Full-length and certain truncated Rap polypeptides bind preferentially to branched DNA substrates, including synthetic Holliday junctions and D-loops. In the presence of manganese ions, Rap acts as an endonuclease that cleaves at the branch point of Holliday and D-loop substrates. It shows no obvious sequence preference or symmetry of cleavage on a Holliday junction. The biochemical analysis of Rap gives an insight into how recombinants could be generated by the nicking of a D-loop without the formation of a classical Holliday junction.

In vivo packaging of bacteriophage lambda monomeric chromosomes

There is an apparent paradox between the reported requirements for lambda DNA packaging in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, DNA concatemers are required for packaging. On the other hand, in vitro, packaging extracts can encapsidate either linear or circular monomeric lambda DNA. Perhaps cellular nucleases restrict the in vivo ability of monomers to package by degrading a free double chain end present as an intermediate in the packaging reaction. Consistent with this hypothesis, enhanced packaging of monomers was found in an ExoV- host. No additional enhancement was noted in a host also mutant for sbcB and sbcC. We isolated a mutant phage for which in vivo packaging of monomeric lambda chromosomes is increased about 10(3)-fold. The responsible mutation (plm1 for packages lambda monomers) was mapped to cro, sequenced, and found to cause a change from Ala29 to Ser in the alpha3 helix of Cro's DNA binding domain. Density transfer experiments showed that packaging of both plm1 and wild-type lambda was aided by allowing some DNA synthesis. However, the packaged chromosomes had not themselves undergone a full round of replication and therefore were not part of a canonical concatemer made by replication. Other tests showed that packaged phage had not been part of concatemers made by recombination or by annealing at cos. Our results with wild-type lambda also favor models in which two cos sites are needed for packaging, but these sites need not be in cis. In lambda plm1, replication intermediates may serve as substrates for encapsidation.

Orientation dependence in homologous recombination

Homologous recombination was investigated in Escherichia coli with two plasmids, each carrying the homologous region (two defective neo genes, one with an amino-end deletion and the other with a carboxyl-end deletion) in either direct or inverted orientation. Recombination efficiency was measured in recBC sbcBC and recBC sbcA strains in three ways. First, we measured the frequency of cells carrying neo+ recombinant plasmids in stationary phase. Recombination between direct repeats was much more frequent than between inverted repeats in the recBC sbcBC strain but was equally frequent in the two substrates in the recBC sbcA strain. Second, the fluctuation test was used to exclude bias by a rate difference between the recombinant and parental plasmids and led to the same conclusion. Third, direct selection for recombinants just after transformation with or without substrate double-strand breaks yielded essentially the same results. Double-strand breaks elevated recombination in both the strains and in both substrates. These results are consistent with our previous findings that the major route of recombination in recBC sbcBC strains generates only one recombinant DNA from two DNAs and in recBC sbcA strains generates two recombinant DNAs from two DNAs.