Complex organization of promoter and enhancer elements regulate the tissue- and developmental stage-specific expression of the Drosophila melanogaster Gld gene

Enhancer trap infidelity in Drosophila optomotor-blind

Reporter gene activity in enhancer trap lines is often implicitly assumed to mirror quite faithfully the endogenous expression of the "trapped" gene, even though there are numerous examples of enhancer trap infidelity. optomotor-blind (omb) is a 160 kb gene in which 16 independent P-element enhancer trap insertions of three different types have been mapped in a range of more than 60 kb. We have determined the expression pattern of these elements in wing, eye-antennal and leg imaginal discs as well as in the pupal tergites. We noted that one pGawB insertion (omb (P4) ) selectively failed to report parts of the omb pattern even though the missing pattern elements were apparent in all other 15 lines. We ruled out that omb (P4) was defective in the Gal4 promoter region or had inactivated genomic enhancers in the integration process. We propose that the Gal4 reporter gene in pGawB may be sensitive to orientation or promoter proximity effects.

The genetics of Drosophila transgenics

In Drosophila, the genetic approach is still the method of choice for answering fundamental questions on cell biology, signal transduction, development, physiology and behavior. In this approach, a gene's function is ascertained by altering either the amount or quality of the gene product, and then observing the consequences. The genetic approach is itself polymorphous, encompassing new and more complex techniques that typically employ the growing collections of transgenes. The keystone of these modern Drosophila transgenic techniques has been the Gal4 binary system. Recently, several new techniques have modified this binary system to offer greater control over the timing, tissue specificity and magnitude of gene expression. Additionally, the advances in post-transcriptional gene silencing, or RNAi, have greatly expanded the ability to knockdown almost any gene's function. Regardless of the growing experimental intricacy, the application of these advances to modify gene activity still obeys the fundamental principles of genetic analysis. Several of these transgenic techniques, which offer more precise control over a gene's activity, will be reviewed here with a discussion on how they may be used for determining a gene's function.

Genomic domains and regulatory elements operating at the domain level

The sequencing of the complete genomes of several organisms, including humans, has so far not contributed much to our understanding of the mechanisms regulating gene expression in the course of realization of developmental programs. In this so-called "postgenomic" era, we still do not understand how (if at all) the long-range organization of the genome is related to its function. The domain hypothesis of the eukaryotic genome organization postulates that the genome is subdivided into a number of semiindependent functional units (domains) that may include one or several functionally related genes, with these domains having well-defined borders, and operate under the control of special (domain-level) regulatory systems. This hypothesis was extensively discussed in the literature over the past 15 years. Yet it is still unclear whether the hypothesis is valid or not. There is evidence both supporting and questioning this hypothesis. The most conclusive data supporting the domain hypothesis come from studies of avian and mammalian beta-globin domains. In this review we will critically discuss the present state of the studies on these and other genomic domains, paying special attention to the domain-level regulatory systems known as locus control regions (LCRs). Based on this discussion, we will try to reevaluate the domain hypothesis of the organization of the eukaryotic genome.

Glucose dehydrogenase is required for normal sperm storage and utilization in femaleDrosophila melanogaster

Female sperm storage is a key factor for reproductive success in a variety of organisms, including Drosophila melanogaster. The spermathecae,one of the Drosophila sperm storage organs, has been suggested as a long-term storage organ because its secreted substances may enhance the quality of sperm storage. Glucose dehydrogenase (GLD) is widely expressed and secreted in the spermathecal ducts among species of the genus Drosophila. This highly conserved expression pattern suggests that this enzyme might have an important role in female fertility. Here, we examine the function of GLD in sperm storage and utilization using Gld-null mutant females. The absence of GLD reduced the amount of sperm stored in the spermathecae and led to a highly asymmetrical sperm distribution in the two spermathecal capsules of the mutant females. The storage defect was especially severe when the mutant females were crossed to a Gld-mutant male that had previously mated a few hours before the experimental cross. Under this mating condition, the mutant females stored in the spermathecae only one-third of the sperm amount of the wild-type control females. In addition, the mutant females used stored sperm at a slower rate over a longer period compared with wild-type females. Thus, our results indicate that GLD facilitates both sperm uptake and release through the spermathecal ducts.

Nucleotide polymorphism in the Est6 promoter, which is widespread in derived populations of Drosophila melanogaster, changes the level of Esterase 6 expressed in the male ejaculatory duct

Previous analysis of an Australian population of D. melanogaster revealed two predominant Est6 promoter haplotypes, P1 and P7. These haplotypes, which differ at 14 sites over a 325-bp region, are associated with a 15-20% difference in male EST6 activity. Here we show that the P1/P7 sequence difference causes the male activity variation by recreating the activity difference among >60 independently transformed lines containing representative P1 or P7 promoter alleles fused to an identical Est6 coding region. Furthermore we find that the whole fly difference reflects about a twofold difference in EST6 activity in the anterior sperm ejaculatory duct. EST6 activity variation in this tissue is known to affect reproductive fitness. Using a combination of RFLP analysis and DNA sequencing, we show that P1 and P7 are predominant in six populations from America, Asia, and Australia, albeit less frequent in a population from the presumptively ancestral east African range of the species. The sequence data show significant departures from neutral expectations for the derived American and Australian populations but not the presumptively ancestral Zimbabwean population. Thus the P1/P7 difference could be a major source of adaptively significant EST6 activity variation through much of the now cosmopolitan range of D. melanogaster.