Characterization of a male-predominant antisense transcript underexpressed in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis

Gene expression divergence and the origin of hybrid dysfunctions

Hybrids between closely related species are often sterile or inviable as a consequence of failed interactions between alleles from the different species. Most genetic studies have focused on localizing the alleles associated with these failed interactions, but the mechanistic/biochemical nature of the failed interactions is poorly understood. This review discusses recent studies that may contribute to our understanding of these failed interactions. We focus on the possible contribution of failures in gene expression as an important contributor to hybrid dysfunctions. Although regulatory pathways that share elements in highly divergent taxa may contribute to hybrid dysfunction, various studies suggest that misexpression may be disproportionately great in regulatory pathways containing rapidly evolving, particularly male-biased, genes. We describe three systems that have been analyzed recently with respect to global patterns of gene expression in hybrids versus pure species, each in Drosophila. These studies reveal that quantitative misexpression of genes is associated with hybrid dysfunction. Misexpression of genes has been documented in sterile hybrids relative to pure species, and variation in upstream factors may sometimes cause the over- or under-expression of genes resulting in hybrid sterility or inviability. Studying patterns of evolution between species in regulatory pathways, such as spermatogenesis, should help in identifying which genes are more likely to be contributors to hybrid dysfunction. Ultimately, we hope more functional genetic studies will complement our understanding of the genetic disruptions leading to hybrid dysfunctions and their role in the origin of species.

Speciation in the New Millennium: What's Left to Know?

The last few decades have seen a surge of interest in speciation, the genetic changes underlying it, and the evolutionary forces driving it. As with most disciplines, however, the nature of the questions addressed has changed with time. Many studies from the 1980s and 1990s often asked questions about whether certain processeseveroccur in nature (e.g., speciation with gene flow). Since that time, case studies have provided evidence that nearly all evolutionary processes thought to be involved in speciation have occurred at least once. As a result, we are now in a new era where the "big questions" must go beyond demonstrations that a phenomenon has happened at least once. Here we discuss a few open questions in speciation—questions that we feel are not only exciting but tractable. We focus our discussion most sharply on recent studies inDrosophilaand related species, the area of our expertise. However, we also emphasize the importance of broad taxonomic meta-analyses testing the importance or frequency of various processes thought to cause speciation.