1
|
Rotundo JL, Marshall R, McCormick R, Truong SK, Styles D, Gerde JA, Gonzalez-Escobar E, Carmo-Silva E, Janes-Bassett V, Logue J, Annicchiarico P, de Visser C, Dind A, Dodd IC, Dye L, Long SP, Lopes MS, Pannecoucque J, Reckling M, Rushton J, Schmid N, Shield I, Signor M, Messina CD, Rufino MC. European soybean to benefit people and the environment. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7612. [PMID: 38556523 PMCID: PMC10982307 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57522-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Europe imports large amounts of soybean that are predominantly used for livestock feed, mainly sourced from Brazil, USA and Argentina. In addition, the demand for GM-free soybean for human consumption is project to increase. Soybean has higher protein quality and digestibility than other legumes, along with high concentrations of isoflavones, phytosterols and minerals that enhance the nutritional value as a human food ingredient. Here, we examine the potential to increase soybean production across Europe for livestock feed and direct human consumption, and review possible effects on the environment and human health. Simulations and field data indicate rainfed soybean yields of 3.1 ± 1.2 t ha-1 from southern UK through to southern Europe (compared to a 3.5 t ha-1 average from North America). Drought-prone southern regions and cooler northern regions require breeding to incorporate stress-tolerance traits. Literature synthesized in this work evidenced soybean properties important to human nutrition, health, and traits related to food processing compared to alternative protein sources. While acknowledging the uncertainties inherent in any modelling exercise, our findings suggest that further integrating soybean into European agriculture could reduce GHG emissions by 37-291 Mt CO2e year-1 and fertiliser N use by 0.6-1.2 Mt year-1, concurrently improving human health and nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L Rotundo
- Corteva Agriscience, Seville, Spain.
- Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, USA.
| | - Rachel Marshall
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - David Styles
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jose A Gerde
- Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, UNR, CONICET, Zavalla, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Logue
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Chris de Visser
- Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alice Dind
- Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland
| | - Ian C Dodd
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Louise Dye
- School of Psychology and Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen P Long
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- Departments of Crop Sciences and of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA
| | - Marta S Lopes
- Sustainable Field Crops, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Lleida, Spain
| | - Joke Pannecoucque
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Moritz Reckling
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
- Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Rushton
- Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nathaniel Schmid
- Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland
| | | | - Marco Signor
- Regional Agency for Rural Development (ERSA), Gorizia, Italy
| | | | - Mariana C Rufino
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
- School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGrath JM, Siebers MH, Fu P, Long SP, Bernacchi CJ. To have value, comparisons of high-throughput phenotyping methods need statistical tests of bias and variance. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2024; 14:1325221. [PMID: 38312358 PMCID: PMC10835710 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1325221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
The gap between genomics and phenomics is narrowing. The rate at which it is narrowing, however, is being slowed by improper statistical comparison of methods. Quantification using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) is commonly used to assess method quality, but it is an often misleading statistic for this purpose as it is unable to provide information about the relative quality of two methods. Using r can both erroneously discount methods that are inherently more precise and validate methods that are less accurate. These errors occur because of logical flaws inherent in the use of r when comparing methods, not as a problem of limited sample size or the unavoidable possibility of a type I error. A popular alternative to using r is to measure the limits of agreement (LOA). However both r and LOA fail to identify which instrument is more or less variable than the other and can lead to incorrect conclusions about method quality. An alternative approach, comparing variances of methods, requires repeated measurements of the same subject, but avoids incorrect conclusions. Variance comparison is arguably the most important component of method validation and, thus, when repeated measurements are possible, variance comparison provides considerable value to these studies. Statistical tests to compare variances presented here are well established, easy to interpret and ubiquitously available. The widespread use of r has potentially led to numerous incorrect conclusions about method quality, hampering development, and the approach described here would be useful to advance high throughput phenotyping methods but can also extend into any branch of science. The adoption of the statistical techniques outlined in this paper will help speed the adoption of new high throughput phenotyping techniques by indicating when one should reject a new method, outright replace an old method or conditionally use a new method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. McGrath
- Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Urbana, IL, United States
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Matthew H. Siebers
- Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Urbana, IL, United States
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Peng Fu
- Center for Advanced Agriculture and Sustainability, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, PA, United States
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Stephen P. Long
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| | - Carl J. Bernacchi
- Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Urbana, IL, United States
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
- Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferguson JN, Jithesh T, Lawson T, Kromdijk J. Excised leaves show limited and species-specific effects on photosynthetic parameters across crop functional types. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY 2023; 74:6662-6676. [PMID: 37565685 PMCID: PMC10662226 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Photosynthesis is increasingly becoming a recognized target for crop improvement. Phenotyping photosynthesis-related traits on field-grown material is a key bottleneck to progress here due to logistical barriers and short measurement days. Many studies attempt to overcome these challenges by phenotyping excised leaf material in the laboratory. To date there are no demonstrated examples of the representative nature of photosynthesis measurements performed on excised leaves relative to attached leaves in crops. Here, we tested whether standardized leaf excision on the day prior to phenotyping affected a range of common photosynthesis-related traits across crop functional types using tomato (C3 dicot), barley (C3 monocot), and maize (C4 monocot). Potentially constraining aspects of leaf physiology that could be predicted to impair photosynthesis in excised leaves, namely leaf water potential and abscisic acid accumulation, were not different between attached and excised leaves. We also observed non-significant differences in spectral reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence traits between the treatments across the three species. However, we did observe some significant differences between traits associated with gas exchange and photosynthetic capacity across all three species. This study represents a useful reference for those who perform measurements of this nature and the differences reported should be considered in associated experimental design and statistical analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John N Ferguson
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 3EA, UK
- School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK
| | - Tamanna Jithesh
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Tracy Lawson
- School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK
| | - Johannes Kromdijk
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 3EA, UK
- Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krause MD, Piepho HP, Dias KOG, Singh AK, Beavis WD. Models to estimate genetic gain of soybean seed yield from annual multi-environment field trials. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2023; 136:252. [PMID: 37987845 PMCID: PMC10663270 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-023-04470-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE Simulations demonstrated that estimates of realized genetic gain from linear mixed models using regional trials are biased to some degree. Thus, we recommend multiple selected models to obtain a range of reasonable estimates. Genetic improvements of discrete characteristics are obvious and easy to demonstrate, while quantitative traits require reliable and accurate methods to disentangle the confounding genetic and non-genetic components. Stochastic simulations of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] breeding programs were performed to evaluate linear mixed models to estimate the realized genetic gain (RGG) from annual multi-environment trials (MET). True breeding values were simulated under an infinitesimal model to represent the genetic contributions to soybean seed yield under various MET conditions. Estimators were evaluated using objective criteria of bias and linearity. Covariance modeling and direct versus indirect estimation-based models resulted in a substantial range of estimated values, all of which were biased to some degree. Although no models produced unbiased estimates, the three best-performing models resulted in an average bias of [Formula: see text] kg/ha[Formula: see text]/yr[Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] bu/ac[Formula: see text]/yr[Formula: see text]). Rather than relying on a single model to estimate RGG, we recommend the application of several models with minimal and directional bias. Further, based on the parameters used in the simulations, we do not think it is appropriate to use any single model to compare breeding programs or quantify the efficiency of proposed new breeding strategies. Lastly, for public soybean programs breeding for maturity groups II and III in North America, the estimated RGG values ranged from 18.16 to 39.68 kg/ha[Formula: see text]/yr[Formula: see text] (0.27-0.59 bu/ac[Formula: see text]/yr[Formula: see text]) from 1989 to 2019. These results provide strong evidence that public breeders have significantly improved soybean germplasm for seed yield in the primary production areas of North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kaio O G Dias
- Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil
| | - Asheesh K Singh
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sinclair T, Specht J, Cassman K, Purcell L, Rufty T. Comment on "Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection". Science 2023; 379:eade8506. [PMID: 36821665 DOI: 10.1126/science.ade8506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
De Souza et al. (Research Articles, 19 Aug 2022, adc9831) recently claimed major soybean yield increases resulting from transformation of the nonphotochemical quenching mechanism of photosynthesis. However, there is little basis for the premise that such a transformation would result in yield increase. The field experiment was flawed and does not provide evidence for increases in crop yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Specht
- Dep Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
| | - Kenneth Cassman
- Dep Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
| | - Larry Purcell
- Crop Science Research Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
| | - Thomas Rufty
- Crop and Soil Sciences Dep, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carley CN, Zubrod MJ, Dutta S, Singh AK. Using machine learning enabled phenotyping to characterize nodulation in three early vegetative stages in soybean. CROP SCIENCE 2023; 63:204-226. [PMID: 37503354 PMCID: PMC10369931 DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
The symbiotic relationship between soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] roots and bacteria (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) lead to the development of nodules, important legume root structures where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into bio-available ammonia (NH3) for plant growth and development. With the recent development of the Soybean Nodule Acquisition Pipeline (SNAP), nodules can more easily be quantified and evaluated for genetic diversity and growth patterns across unique soybean root system architectures. We explored six diverse soybean genotypes across three field year combinations in three early vegetative stages of development and report the unique relationships between soybean nodules in the taproot and non-taproot growth zones of diverse root system architectures of these genotypes. We found unique growth patterns in the nodules of taproots showing genotypic differences in how nodules grew in count, size, and total nodule area per genotype compared to non-taproot nodules. We propose that nodulation should be defined as a function of both nodule count and individual nodule area resulting in a total nodule area per root or growth regions of the root. We also report on the relationships between the nodules and total nitrogen in the seed at maturity, finding a strong correlation between the taproot nodules and final seed nitrogen at maturity. The applications of these findings could lead to an enhanced understanding of the plant-Bradyrhizobium relationship and exploring these relationships could lead to leveraging greater nitrogen use efficiency and nodulation carbon to nitrogen production efficiency across the soybean germplasm.
Collapse
|