Effects of Physical and Cognitive Training on Falls and Concern about Falling in Older Adults: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

BACKGROUND

Older adults are at increased risk of both falls and fall-related injuries. Falls have multiple causes and many interventions exist to try and prevent them, including educational and psychological interventions. Educational interventions aim to increase older people's understanding of what they can do to prevent falls and psychological interventions can aim to improve confidence/motivation to engage in activities that may prevent falls. This review is an update of previous evidence to focus on educational and psychological interventions for falls prevention in community-dwelling older people.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of psychological interventions (such as cognitive behavioural therapy; with or without an education component) and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and two trials registries to June 2023. We also screened reference lists and conducted forward-citation searching.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of community-dwelling people aged 60 years and older exploring the effectiveness of psychological interventions (such as cognitive behavioural therapy) or educational interventions (or both) aiming to prevent falls.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome was rate of falls. We also explored: number of people falling; people with fall-related fractures; people with falls that required medical attention; people with fall-related hospital admission; fall-related psychological outcomes (i.e. concerns about falling); health-related quality of life; and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 37 studies (six on cognitive behavioural interventions; three on motivational interviewing; three on other psychological interventions; nine on multifactorial (personalised) education; 12 on multiple topic education; two on single topic education; one with unclear education type; and one psychological plus educational intervention). Studies randomised 17,478 participants (71% women; mean age 73 years). Most studies were at high or unclear risk of bias for one or more domains. Cognitive behavioural interventions Cognitive behavioural interventions make little to no difference to the number of fallers (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 1.02; 4 studies, 1286 participants; low-certainty evidence), and there was a slight reduction in concerns about falling (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.19; 3 studies, 1132 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain or missing about the effect of cognitive behavioural interventions on other outcomes. Motivational interviewing The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of motivational interviewing on rate of falls, number of fallers, and fall-related psychological outcomes. No evidence is available on the effects of motivational interviewing on people experiencing fall-related fractures, falls requiring medical attention, fall-related hospital admission, or adverse events. Other psychological interventions The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of health coaching on rate of falls, number of fallers, people sustaining a fall-related fracture, or fall-related hospital admission; the effect of other psychological interventions on these outcomes was not measured. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of health coaching, guided imagery, and mental practice on fall-related psychological outcomes. The effect of other psychological interventions on falls needing medical attention or adverse events was not measured. Multifactorial education Multifactorial (personalised) education makes little to no difference to the rate of falls (rate ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.17; 2 studies, 777 participants; low-certainty evidence). The effect of multifactorial education on people experiencing fall-related fractures was very imprecise (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.48; 2 studies, 510 participants; low-certainty evidence), and the evidence is very uncertain about its effect on the number of fallers. There was no evidence for other outcomes. Multiple component education Multiple component education may improve fall-related psychological outcomes (MD -2.94, 95% CI -4.41 to -1.48; 1 study, 459 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the evidence is very uncertain about its effect on all other outcomes. Single topic education The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of single-topic education on rate of falls, number of fallers, and people experiencing fall-related fractures. There was no evidence for other outcomes. Psychological plus educational interventions Motivational interviewing/coaching combined with multifactorial (personalised) education likely reduces the rate of falls (although the size of this effect is not clear; rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99; 1 study, 430 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but makes little to no difference to the number of fallers (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.13; 1 study, 430 participants; high-certainty evidence). It probably makes little to no difference to falls-related psychological outcomes (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.81 to 0.41; 1 study, 353 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no adverse events detected (1 study, 430 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence for psychological plus educational intervention on other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that a combined psychological and educational intervention likely reduces the rate of falls (but not fallers), without affecting adverse events. Overall, the evidence for individual psychological interventions or delivering education alone is of low or very-low certainty; future research may change our confidence and understanding of the effects. Cognitive behavioural interventions may improve concerns about falling slightly, but this may not help reduce the number of people who fall. Certain types of education (i.e. multiple component education) may also help reduce concerns about falling, but not necessarily reduce the number of falls. Future research should adhere to reporting standards for describing the interventions used and explore how these interventions may work, to better understand what could best work for whom in what situation. There is a particular dearth of evidence for low- to middle-income countries.

Effects of Dalcroze Eurhythmics Exercise Versus Multicomponent Exercise on Physical and Cognitive Function, and Falls in Older Adults: The EPHYCOS Randomized Controlled Trial

Currently, robust evidence is lacking to support one exercise type over another in the prevention of physical and cognitive decline and falls among older adults, primarily because of the lack of comparative trials of proven interventions. Therefore, a 12-month randomized, single-blind, comparative effectiveness trial is conducted, in which 142 older adults at high risk for falls are randomized (1:1) to receive an evidence-based Dalcroze Eurhythmics (DE) exercise program (once weekly, group-based) or an evidence-based multicomponent (MULTI) exercise program incorporating balance, functional, and strength training activities (twice weekly, group- and home-based), for 12 months. The primary outcome is gait variability under dual-task at 12 months. At 12 months, the DE group has significant improvements compared with MULTI group on gait under both dual-task (adjusted β for stride variability: -2.3, 95%CI, -3.1 to -1.4; p < 0.001) and single-task, and on a variety of secondary physical and cognitive/executive function outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio for falls is 0.58 (95%CI, 0.37 to 0.93) for the DE group compared with MULTI group. In conclusion, DE exercise is more effective than MULTI exercise in improving physical and cognitive function and reducing falls in older adults. The mechanisms underlying DE exercise-induced benefits remain to be fully elucidated.

Effect of combined physical and cognitive intervention on fear of falling in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Fear of falling (FOF) is common among older adults. Currently, physical exercise, cognitive intervention, and combined physical and cognitive intervention have been proven to be effective interventions. However, whether combined interventions can provide additional benefits than single interventions remains unclear. Thus, the systematic and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the immediate and retention effects of combined physical and cognitive interventions, in comparison with a single intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of combined interventions on FOF in older adults were searched using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to March 20, 2023. The risk of bias in included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Two independent researchers extracted the data using predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

31 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. For the immediate post-intervention effect, the combined intervention was more effective than the blank/placebo/conventional intervention and the single cognitive intervention, while no additional effect was observed compared with the single physical intervention. Moreover, no additional follow-up retention effects were found when comparing the combined intervention with the single intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined interventions had positive immediate effects on FOF in older adults, compared with single cognitive intervention, while combined interventions had a similar effect as a single physical intervention. More well-designed studies are required to explore the additional benefits of combined interventions compared with a single intervention and to investigate the follow-up effects of combined interventions.

Effect of a multicomponent exercise program and cognitive stimulation (VIVIFRAIL-COGN) on falls in frail community older persons with high risk of falls: study protocol for a randomized multicenter control trial

BACKGROUND

Falls represent important drivers of intrinsic capacity losses, functional limitations and reduced quality of life in the growing older adult's population, especially among those presenting with frailty. Despite exercise- and cognitive training-based interventions have shown effectiveness for reducing fall rates, evidence around their putative cumulative effects on falls and fall-related complications (such as fractures, reduced quality of life and functional limitations) in frail individuals remains scarce. The main aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness program combining an individualized exercise program and an executive function-based cognitive training (VIVIFRAIL-COGN) compared to usual care in the prevention of falls and fall-related outcomes over a 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

This study is designed as a four-center randomized clinical trial with a 12-week intervention period and an additional 1-year follow-up. Three hundred twenty frail or pre-frail (≥ 1 criteria of the Frailty Phenotype) older adults (≥ 75 years) with high risk of falling (defined by fall history and gait performance) will be recruited in the Falls Units of the participating centers. They will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The IG will participate in a home-based intervention combining the individualized Vivifrail multicomponent (aerobic, resistance, gait and balance and flexibility) exercise program and a personalized executive function-based cognitive training (VIVIFRAIL-COGN). The CG group will receive usual care delivered in the Falls Units, including the Otago Exercise Program. Primary outcome will be the incidence of falls (event rate/year) and will be ascertained by self-report during three visits (at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks) and telephone-based contacts at 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization. Secondarily, effects on measures of physical and cognitive function, quality of life, nutritional, muscle quality and psychological status will be evaluated.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide new evidence about the effectiveness of an individualized multidomain intervention by studying the effect of additive effects of cognitive training and physical exercise to prevent falls in older frail persons with high risk of falling. Compared to usual care, the combined intervention is expected to show additive effects in the reduction of the incidence of falls and associated adverse outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04911179 02/06/2021.