Quantifying and Classifying Physical Resilience Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

Fatigue and perceived energy in a sample of older adults over 10 years: A resting state functional connectivity study of neural correlates

PURPOSE

Declining energy and increasing fatigue, common in older age, predict neurodegenerative conditions, but their neural substrates are not known. We examined brain resting state connectivity in relation to declining self-reported energy levels (SEL) and occurrence of fatigue over time.

METHODS

We examined resting-state functional MRI in 272 community dwelling older adults participating in the Health Aging and Body Composition Study (mean age 83 years; 57.4 % female; 40.8 % Black) with measures of fatigue and SEL collected at regular intervals over the prior ten years. Functional connectivity (FC) between cortex and striatum was examined separately for sensorimotor, executive, and limbic functional subregions. Logistic regression tested the association of FC in each network with prior fatigue state (reporting fatigue at least once or never reporting fatigue), and with SEL decline (divided into stable or declining SEL groups) and adjusted for demographic, physical function, mood, cognition, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Higher cortico-striatal FC in the right limbic network was associated with lower odds of reporting fatigue (better) at least once during the study period (adjusted odds ratio [95 % confidence interval], p-value: (0.747 [0.582, 0.955], 0.020), independent of SEL. Higher cortico-striatal FC in the right executive network was associated with higher odds of declining SEL (worse) during the study period (adjusted odds ratio [95 % confidence interval], p-value: (1.31 [1.01, 1.69], 0.041), independent of fatigue. Associations with other networks were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of older adults, the cortico-striatal functional connectivity of declining SEL appears distinct from that underlying fatigue. Studies to further assess the neural correlates of energy and fatigue, and their independent contribution to neurodegenerative conditions are warranted.

Discordant Biological and Chronological Age: Implications for Cognitive Decline and Frailty

BACKGROUND

Older adults with discordant biological and chronological ages (BA and CA) may vary in cognitive and physical function from those with concordant BA and CA.

METHODS

To make our approach clinically accessible, we created easy-to-interpret participant groups in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study (N = 2 458, 52% female participants, 65% White participants, age: 73.5 ± 2.8) based on medians of CA, and a previously validated BA index comprised of readily available clinical tests. Joint models estimated associations of BA-CA group with cognition (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination [3MS] and Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]) and frailty over 10 years.

RESULTS

The sample included the following: 32%, Young group (BA and CA < median); 21%, Prematurely Aging group (BA ≥ median, CA < median), 27%, Old group (BA and CA ≥ median), and 20%, Resilient group (BA < median, CA ≥ median). In education-adjusted models of cognition, among those with CA < median, the Prematurely Aging group performed worse than the Young at baseline (3MS and DSST p < .0001), but among those with CA ≥ median, the Resilient group did not outperform the Old group (3MS p = .31; DSST p = .25). For frailty, the Prematurely Aging group performed worse than the Young group at baseline (p = .0001), and the Resilient group outperformed the Old group (p = .003). For all outcomes, groups did not differ on change over time based on the same pairwise comparisons (p ≥ .40).

CONCLUSIONS

Discordant BA and CA identify groups who have greater cognitive and physical functional decline or are more protected than their CA would suggest. This information can be used for risk stratification.

Assessment of Physical Resilience Using Residual Methods and Its Association With Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults

Background and Objectives

Physical resilience (PR) is recognized as the ability to recover from the adverse effects of a stressor. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to optimally measure PR in older adults in general. We aimed to measure PR using residuals from regression analyses and investigated its association with adverse outcomes in older adults.

Research Design and Methods

A total of 6 508 older adults were included from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, which was a population-based prospective cohort study. PR was assessed using residual methods from a linear model regressing the short physical performance battery on clinical diseases, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and health condition. Adverse outcomes included all-cause mortality, falls, and overnight hospitalization.

Results

The mean age was 77.48 (7.84) years. Increased PR was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.87). Compared to participants with reduced PR, those with normal PR had a lower risk for mortality (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.46-0.56). Specifically, restricted cubic spline regression revealed a dose-response relationship between PR and all-cause mortality (p-overall < .0001, p-nonlinear = .011). Additionally, we also found significant associations of increased PR with lower risks of falls (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99) and overnight hospitalization (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00).

Discussion and Implications

PR, measured by residual methods, was robustly and independently associated with all-cause mortality, falls, and overnight hospitalization. Our findings provide evidence that this approach may be a simple and feasible strategy to assess PR.

Physical resilience in older adults: Potential use in promoting healthy aging

Physical resilience is a dynamic concept referring to the physiological response when the body is exposed to stressors. The level of physical resilience is the sum of underlying physiological reserves. Moreover, it may not only be determined by age, genetics, or exposure to a variety of diseases, but is also closely related to the psychological, social, and environmental factors of an individual. This paper summarizes our present understanding of the relationship between physical resilience and other concepts closely related to it. Furthermore, we illustrate the current research progress on physical resilience models and clinical resilience assessment. Besides, this paper intends to present a better understanding of physical resilience and its use in treatment decision-making, personalized diagnosis and disease management, and prevention and rehabilitation strategies.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)

Background

Physical resilience is known to minimize the adverse outcomes of health stressors for older people. However, validated instruments that assess physical resilience in older adults are rare. Therefore, we aimed to validate the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) to fill the literature gap.

Methods

Content analysis with content validity was first carried out to generate relevant items assessing physical resilience for older adults, and 19 items were developed. Psychometric evaluation of the 19 items was then tested on 200 older adults (mean [SD] age = 76.4 [6.6] years; 51.0% women) for item properties, factor structure, item fit, internal consistency, criterion-related validity, and known-group validity.

Results

All 19 items had satisfactory item properties, as they were normally distributed (skewness = -1.03 to 0.38; kurtosis = -1.05 to 0.32). However, two items were removed due to substantial ceiling effects. The retained 17 items were embedded in three factors as suggested by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results. All items except one had satisfactory item fit statistics in Rasch model; thus, the unidimensionality was supported for the three factors on 16 items. The retained 16 items showed promising properties in known-group validity, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency (α = 0.94).

Conclusions

The 16-item PRIFOR exhibits good psychometric properties. Using this instrument to measure physical resilience would be beneficial to identify factors that could protect older people from negative health consequence. With the use of the PRIFOR, intervention effects could also be evaluated. It is helpful to strengthen resilience and thereby facilitate successful aging.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02918-7.

Predictive Validity of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR)

This study aimed at evaluating the predictive ability of the Physical Resilience Instrument for Older Adults (PRIFOR) for the recovery of frailty, activity of daily living (ADL), and quality of life in older adults suffering from acute health stressors. The longitudinal study was adopted and patients aged 65 and older with Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores between 4 and 6 were included. The PRIFOR was used to assess physical resilience at baseline. Katz ADL, CFS and EuroQoL 5-dimension Questionnaire (EQ5D) scores were all assessed at baseline and one month after discharge. The mean age of the 192 participants was 76.29 ± 6.53 years, and 50.5% were female. After adjusting for the baseline condition, the PRIFOR was only significantly associated with the CFS (β=-0.183, p<0.001) at one month after discharge. Our study results provide evidence of the predictive capacity of the PRIFOR for recovery from frailty.

Decline in biological resilience as key manifestation of aging: Potential mechanisms and role in health and longevity

Decline in biological resilience (ability to recover) is a key manifestation of aging that contributes to increase in vulnerability to death with age eventually limiting longevity even in people without major chronic diseases. Understanding the mechanisms of this decline is essential for developing efficient anti-aging and pro-longevity interventions. In this paper we discuss: a) mechanisms of the decline in resilience with age, and aging components that contribute to this decline, including depletion of body reserves, imperfect repair mechanisms, and slowdown of physiological processes and responses with age; b) anti-aging interventions that may improve resilience or attenuate its decline; c) biomarkers of resilience available in human and experimental studies; and d) genetic factors that could influence resilience. There are open questions about optimal anti-aging interventions that would oppose the decline in resilience along with extending longevity limits. However, the area develops quickly, and prospects are exciting.