'How I Can Help Me': Self-Care Priorities and Structural Pressures Among Black Older Adults With Diabetes

Managing Complexity: Black Older Adults With Multimorbidity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Black older adults have higher rates of multimorbidity and receive less effective multimorbidity support than their white counterparts. Yet little is known about the experiences of Black older adults with multimorbidity that may be at the heart of those disparities and which are central to interventions and improving care for this population. In this study, we aimed to conceptualize the multimorbidity management (MM) experience for Black older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

As part of a larger study on Black older adults' multimorbidity and physician empathy, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 30 Black older adults living in a large midwestern city in the United States aged 65 years and older with self-reported multimorbidity. We used grounded theory analysis to distill findings into a core conceptual category as well as component domains and dimensions.

RESULTS

"Managing complexity" emerged as the core category to describe MM in our sample. Managing complexity included domains of "social context," "daily logistics," "care time," and "care roles."

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We discuss how managing complexity is distinct from patient complexity and how it is related to cumulative inequality and precarity. Study findings have potential implications for intervention around provider education and empathy as well as for enabling agency of Black older adults with MM.

Implementing CAPABLE With Care Partners Through an Area Agency on Aging: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) is an evidence-based intervention to promote aging in place. Although CAPABLE has been implemented in more than 40 community sites, wide variation in implementation exists. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study sought to determine key barriers and facilitators that may influence CAPABLE implementation with older adult and care partner dyads through an area agency on aging (AAA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A formative evaluation was completed using qualitative data from the pilot of a Hybrid Trial Type 1 study implementing CAPABLE in an AAA. Multiple sources of data were collected, including 2 focus groups, field notes, a tracking log, and meetings with CAPABLE interventionists. Data were analyzed using a framework method and validated through a negative case analysis approach in NVivo 12 Pro.

RESULTS

Fourteen dyads enrolled in the pilot and 6 completed the CAPABLE intervention. Key themes aligned with 10 constructs from 5 domains of the CFIR. Facilitators included adaptability of the intervention, cost, networks and communication, and knowledge and belief of individuals. Barriers included intervention complexity, client needs and resources, and executing the planned process.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Results enhance understanding of contextual factors that can influence the implementation of CAPABLE with care partners. Strategies to overcome barriers include simplifying recruitment materials and targeting older adults with recent onset of disability. The CFIR is a valuable resource for planning and evaluation of the implementation of evidence-based interventions to promote aging in place.