Balancing sufficiency and impact in reporting standards for mass spectrometry imaging experiments

Advancing rare cancer research by MALDI mass spectrometry imaging: Applications, challenges, and future perspectives in sarcoma

MALDI mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI imaging) uniquely advances cancer research, by measuring spatial distribution of endogenous and exogenous molecules directly from tissue sections. These molecular maps provide valuable insights into basic and translational cancer research, including tumor biology, tumor microenvironment, biomarker identification, drug treatment, and patient stratification. Despite its advantages, MALDI imaging is underutilized in studying rare cancers. Sarcomas, a group of malignant mesenchymal tumors, pose unique challenges in medical research due to their complex heterogeneity and low incidence, resulting in understudied subtypes with suboptimal management and outcomes. In this review, we explore the applicability of MALDI imaging in sarcoma research, showcasing its value in understanding this highly heterogeneous and challenging rare cancer. We summarize all MALDI imaging studies in sarcoma to date, highlight their impact on key research fields, including molecular signatures, cancer heterogeneity, and drug studies. We address specific challenges encountered when employing MALDI imaging for sarcomas, and propose solutions, such as using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, and multiplexed experiments, and considerations for multi-site studies and digital data sharing practices. Through this review, we aim to spark collaboration between MALDI imaging researchers and clinical colleagues, to deploy the unique capabilities of MALDI imaging in the context of sarcoma.

A Galaxy of informatics resources for MS-based proteomics

INTRODUCTION

Continuous advances in mass spectrometry (MS) technologies have enabled deeper and more reproducible proteome characterization and a better understanding of biological systems when integrated with other 'omics data. Bioinformatic resources meeting the analysis requirements of increasingly complex MS-based proteomic data and associated multi-omic data are critically needed. These requirements included availability of software that would span diverse types of analyses, scalability for large-scale, compute-intensive applications, and mechanisms to ease adoption of the software.

AREAS COVERED

The Galaxy ecosystem meets these requirements by offering a multitude of open-source tools for MS-based proteomics analyses and applications, all in an adaptable, scalable, and accessible computing environment. A thriving global community maintains these software and associated training resources to empower researcher-driven analyses.

EXPERT OPINION

The community-supported Galaxy ecosystem remains a crucial contributor to basic biological and clinical studies using MS-based proteomics. In addition to the current status of Galaxy-based resources, we describe ongoing developments for meeting emerging challenges in MS-based proteomic informatics. We hope this review will catalyze increased use of Galaxy by researchers employing MS-based proteomics and inspire software developers to join the community and implement new tools, workflows, and associated training content that will add further value to this already rich ecosystem.

Next Generation Digital Pathology: Emerging Trends and Measurement Challenges for Molecular Pathology

Digital pathology is revolutionising the analysis of histological features and is becoming more and more widespread in both the clinic and research. Molecular pathology extends the tissue morphology information provided by conventional histopathology by providing spatially resolved molecular information to complement the structural information provided by histopathology. The multidimensional nature of the molecular data poses significant challenge for data processing, mining, and analysis. One of the key challenges faced by new and existing pathology practitioners is how to choose the most suitable molecular pathology technique for a given diagnosis. By providing a comparison of different methods, this narrative review aims to introduce the field of molecular pathology, providing a high-level overview of many different methods. Since each pixel of an image contains a wealth of molecular information, data processing in molecular pathology is more complex. The key data processing steps and variables, and their effect on the data, are also discussed.

What are we imaging? Software tools and experimental strategies for annotation and identification of small molecules in mass spectrometry imaging

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has become a widespread analytical technique to perform nonlabeled spatial molecular identification. The Achilles' heel of MSI is the annotation and identification of molecular species due to intrinsic limitations of the technique (lack of chromatographic separation and the difficulty to apply tandem MS). Successful strategies to perform annotation and identification combine extra analytical steps, like using orthogonal analytical techniques to identify compounds; with algorithms that integrate the spectral and spatial information. In this review, we discuss different experimental strategies and bioinformatics tools to annotate and identify compounds in MSI experiments. We target strategies and tools for small molecule applications, such as lipidomics and metabolomics. First, we explain how sample preparation and the acquisition process influences annotation and identification, from sample preservation to the use of orthogonal techniques. Then, we review twelve software tools for annotation and identification in MSI. Finally, we offer perspectives on two current needs of the MSI community: the adaptation of guidelines for communicating confidence levels in identifications; and the creation of a standard format to store and exchange annotations and identifications in MSI.

Novel technical developments in mass spectrometry imaging in 2020: A mini review

The applicability of mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has exponentially increased with the improvement of sample preparation, instrumentation (spatial resolution) and data analysis. The number of MSI publications listed in PubMed continues to grow with 378 published articles in 2020-2021. Initially, MSI was just sensitive enough to identify molecular features correlating with distinct tissue regions, similar to the resolution achieved by visual inspection after standard immunohistochemical staining. Although the spatial resolution was limited compared with other imaging modalities, the molecular intensity mapping added a new exciting capability. Over the past decade, significant improvements in every step of the workflow and most importantly in instrumentation were made, which now enables the molecular analysis at a cellular and even subcellular level. Here, we summarize the latest developments in MSI, with a focus on the latest approaches for tissue-based imaging described in 2020.

Considerations for MALDI-Based Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging Studies

Significant advances in mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) have pushed the boundaries in obtaining spatial information and quantification in biological samples. Quantitative MSI (qMSI) has typically been challenging to achieve because of matrix and tissue heterogeneity, inefficient analyte extraction, and ion suppression effects, but recent studies have demonstrated approaches to obtain highly robust methods and reproducible results. In this perspective, we share our insights into sample preparation, how the choice of matrix influences sensitivity, construction of calibration curves, signal normalization, and visualization of MSI data. We hope that by articulating these guidelines that qMSI can be routinely conducted while retaining the analytical merits of other mass spectrometry modalities.

Accessible and reproducible mass spectrometry imaging data analysis in Galaxy

BACKGROUND

Mass spectrometry imaging is increasingly used in biological and translational research because it has the ability to determine the spatial distribution of hundreds of analytes in a sample. Being at the interface of proteomics/metabolomics and imaging, the acquired datasets are large and complex and often analyzed with proprietary software or in-house scripts, which hinders reproducibility. Open source software solutions that enable reproducible data analysis often require programming skills and are therefore not accessible to many mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) researchers.

FINDINGS

We have integrated 18 dedicated mass spectrometry imaging tools into the Galaxy framework to allow accessible, reproducible, and transparent data analysis. Our tools are based on Cardinal, MALDIquant, and scikit-image and enable all major MSI analysis steps such as quality control, visualization, preprocessing, statistical analysis, and image co-registration. Furthermore, we created hands-on training material for use cases in proteomics and metabolomics. To demonstrate the utility of our tools, we re-analyzed a publicly available N-linked glycan imaging dataset. By providing the entire analysis history online, we highlight how the Galaxy framework fosters transparent and reproducible research.

CONCLUSION

The Galaxy framework has emerged as a powerful analysis platform for the analysis of MSI data with ease of use and access, together with high levels of reproducibility and transparency.

Egg White as a Quality Control in Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MSI)

The strength of MALDI-MSI is to analyze and visualize spatial intensities of molecular features from an intact tissue. The distribution of the intensities can then be visualized within a single tissue section or compared in between sections, acquired consecutively. This method can be reliably used to reveal physiological structures and has the potential to identify molecular details, which correlate with biological outcomes. MALDI-MSI implementation in clinical laboratories requires the ability to ensure method quality and validation to meet diagnostic expectations. To be able to get consistent qualitative and quantitative results, standardized sample preparation and data acquisition are of highest priority. We have previously shown that the deposition of internal standards onto the tissue section during sample preparation can be used to improve the mass accuracy of monitored m/z features across the sample. Here, we present the use of external and internal controls for the quality check of sample preparation and data acquisition, which is particularly relevant when either many spectra are acquired during a single MALDI-MSI experiment or data from independent experiments are processed together. To monitor detector performance and sample preparation, we use egg white as an external control for peptide and N-glycan MALDI-MSI throughout the experiment. We have also identified endogenous peptides from cytoskeletal proteins, which can be reliably monitored in gynecological tissue samples. Lastly, we summarize our standard quality control workflow designed to produce reliable and comparable MALDI-MSI data from single sections and tissue microarrays (TMAs).

Multicenter Validation Study of Quantitative Imaging Mass Spectrometry

The aim of this study was to assess potential sources of variability in quantitative imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) across multiple sites, analysts, and instruments. A sample from rat liver perfused with clozapine was distributed to three sites for analysis by three analysts using a predefined protocol to standardize the sample preparation, acquisition, and data analysis parameters. In addition, two commonly used approaches to IMS quantification, the mimetic tissue model and dilution series, were used to quantify clozapine and its major metabolite norclozapine in isolated perfused rat liver. The quantification was evaluated in terms of precision and accuracy with comparison to liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The results of this study showed that, across three analysts with six replicates each, both quantitative IMS methods achieved relative standard deviations in the low teens and accuracies of around 80% compared to LC-MS/MS quantification of adjacent tissue sections. The utility of a homogeneously coated stable-isotopically labeled standard (SIL) for normalization was appraised in terms of its potential to improve precision and accuracy of quantification as well as qualitatively reduce variability in the sample tissue images. SIL normalization had a larger influence on the dilution series, where the use of the internal standard was necessary to achieve accuracy and precision comparable to the non-normalized mimetic tissue model data. Normalization to the internal standard appeared most effective when the intensity ratio of the analyte to internal standard was approximately one, and thus precludes this method as a universal normalization approach for all ions in the acquisition.