Examining the influence of budget execution processes on the efficiency of county health systems in Kenya

Financing immunisation in Kenya: examining bottlenecks in health sector planning and budgeting at the decentralised level

BACKGROUND

Decentralisation has increasingly been adopted by countries as an important health sector reform aimed at increasing community participation in decision making while enhancing swift response at decentralised levels, to accelerate the attainment of health system goals. Kenya adopted a devolved system of government where health services delivery became a function of the 47 semi-autonomous county governments with planning and budgeting functions practised at both levels of government. This study sought to explore challenges facing health sector planning and budgeting and how they affect immunisation service delivery at the county level.

METHODS

Data were collected through 77 in-depth interviews of senior county department of health officials across 15 counties in Kenya. We applied an inductive thematic approach in analysing the qualitative data using NVIVO software.

FINDINGS

The study found a lack of alignment between planning and budgeting processes, with planning being more inclusive compared to budgeting. Inadequate capacity in conducting planning and budgeting and political interference were reported to hinder the processes. Limited budget allocations and delayed and untimely disbursement of funds were reported to affect execution of health and immunisation budgets. Low prioritisation of preventive health interventions like immunisation due to their perceived intangibility influenced resource allocation to the programs.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for effective strategies to align planning and budgeting processes, increased technical support to counties to enhance the requisite capacity, and efforts to improve budget execution to improve budget credibility. Counties should plan to increase their funding commitment toward immunisation to ensure sustainability of the program as Kenya transitions from GAVI support.

Evaluating the effects, implementation experience and political economy of primary healthcare facility autonomy reforms within counties in Kenya: a mixed methods study protocol

Introduction

There is a growing emphasis on improving primary health care services and granting frontline service providers more decision-making autonomy. In October 2023, Kenya enacted legislation mandating nationwide facility autonomy. There is limited understanding of the effects of health facility autonomy on primary health care (PHC) facilities performance. It is recognized that stakeholder interests influence reforms, and gender plays a critical role in access to health and its outcomes. This protocol outlines the methods for a study that plans to evaluate the effects, implementation experience, political economy, and gendered effects of health facility autonomy reforms in Kenya.

Methods and Analysis

The research will use a before-and-after quasi-experimental study design to measure the effects of the reform on service readiness and service utilization, and a cross-sectional qualitative study to explore the implementation experience, political economy, and gendered effects of these reforms. Data to measure the effects of autonomy will be collected from a sample of 80 health facilities and 1600 clients per study arm. Qualitative interviews will involve approximately 83 facility managers and policymakers at the county level, distributed across intervening (36), and planning to intervene (36) counties. Additionally, 11 interviews will be conducted at the national level with representatives from the Ministry of Health, the National Treasury, the Controller of Budget, the Council of Governors, the Auditor General, and development partners. Given the uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the reforms, this study proposes two secondary designs in the event our primary design is not feasible - a cross-sectional study, and a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design. The study will use a difference-in-difference analysis for the quantitative component to evaluate the effects of the reforms, while using thematic analysis for the qualitative component to evaluate the political economy and the implementation experience of the reforms.

Ethics and Dissemination

This study was approved by the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/294/4708) and the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI/P/23/28111). We plan to disseminate the findings through publications, policy briefs and dissemination workshops.

Unsalaried health workers in Sierra Leone: a scoping review of the literature to establish their impact on healthcare delivery

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates a 10 million health worker shortage by 2030. Despite this shortage, some low-income African countries paradoxically struggle with health worker surpluses. Technically, these health workers are needed to meet the minimum health worker-population ratio, but insufficient job opportunities in the public and private sector leaves available health workers unemployed. This results in emigration and un- or underemployment, as few countries have policies or plans in place to absorb this excess capacity. Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea have taken a different approach; health authorities and/or public hospitals 'recruit' medical and nursing graduates on an unsalaried basis, promising eventual paid public employment. 50% Sierra Leone's health workforce is currently unsalaried. This scoping review examines the existing evidence on Sierra Leone's unsalaried health workers (UHWs) to establish what impact they have on the equitable delivery of care.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science were searched to identify relevant literature. Grey literature (reports) and Ministry of Health and Sanitation policy documents were also included.

RESULTS

36 texts, containing UHW related data, met the inclusion criteria. The findings divide into two categories and nine sub-categories: Charging for care and medicines that should be free; Trust and mistrust; Accountability; Informal provision of care, Private practice and lack of regulation. Over-production of health workers; UHW issues within policy and strategy; Lack of personnel data undermines MoHS planning; Health sector finance.

CONCLUSION

Sierra Leone's example demonstrates that UHWs undermine equitable access to healthcare, if they resort to employing a range of coping strategies to survive financially, which some do. Their impact is wide ranging and will undermine Sierra Leone's efforts to achieve Universal Health Coverage if unaddressed. These findings are relevant to other LICs with similar health worker surpluses.