Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania: was it a fair process?

Assessing equity and efficiency of health financing towards universal health coverage between regions in Tanzania

Equity and efficiency in health financing are intermediate universal health coverage (UHC) objectives. While there is growing attention to monitoring these goals at the national level, subnational assessment is also needed to uncover potential divergences across subnational units. We assessed whether health funds were allocated or contributed equitably and spent efficiently across 26 regions in Tanzania in 2017/18 for four sources of funding. Government and donor health basket fund (HBF) expenditure data were obtained from government authorities. Household contributions to health insurance and out-of-pocket payments were obtained from the national household budget survey. We used the Kakwani index (KI) to measure regional funding equity, whereby regional GDP per capita measured regional economic status. Efficiency analysis included four financing inputs and two UHC outputs (maternal health service coverage and financial protection indices). Data envelopment analysis estimated efficiency scores. There was substantial variation in per capita regional funding, especially in insurance contributions (TZS 473-13,520), and service coverage performance (49-86.3%). There was less variation in per capita HBF spending (TZS 1294-2394) and financial protection (93.5-99.4%). Government spending (KI: -0.047, p = 0.348) was proportional to regional economic status; but HBF spending (KI: -0.195, p < 0.001) was significantly progressive (equitably distributed), being targeted to regions with high economic need (poor). The burden of contributing to social health insurance (NHIF) was proportional (KI: 0.058, p = 0.613), while the burden of paying for community-based insurance (CHF, KI: -0.152, p=0.012) and out-of-pocket payments (KI: -0.187, p=0.005) was higher among the poor (regressive). The average efficiency score across regions was 90%, indicating that 90% of financial resources were used optimally, while 10% were wasted or underutilised. Tanzania should continue mobilising domestic resources for health towards UHC, and reduce reliance on inequitable out-of-pocket payments and community-based health insurance. Policymakers must enhance resource allocation formulas, public financial management, and sub-national resource tracking to improve equity and efficiency in resource use.

Policymakers' perspective on the importance of procedural fairness to implement and sustain health financing reforms

Fair process is instrumental to implementing and sustaining health financing reforms. Ensuring a fair process during the design and adoption phases can garner political capital and secure a sense of citizens' ownership. This will prove useful when reforms are contested before benefits are yet to be fully materialized. Since many well devised health financing reforms are vulnerable to being dismantled after a few years of being launched, fair process should play a more strategic role in the implementation and evaluation phases when policies get challenged and reformulated to reflect the changing political and socioeconomic landscapes and to better manage early evidence on performance.