Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania: was it a fair process?

Patient's willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania

Globally, achieving universal health coverage remains significant challenge. Health insurance coverage in low- and middle-income countries is still low with only a few African countries managed to reach 50% coverage. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for medication and various versions of the improved Community Health Insurance Fund (iCHF) in Tanzania. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in all hospitals, health centres, and eight randomly sampled dispensaries, sampling participant from the queue, one out of every three patient based on their order of entry into consultation room, and interviewed 1,748 patients in Kilombero and Same districts in Tanzania. We used multi-stage Contingent Valuation Methods exploring data collected during client exit interviews. We employed a random utility model and estimated WTP through an ordered logit model. The independent variables were; patient's gender, age, marital status, education, employment status, Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) status, health insurance status, and the type of healthcare facility level. Our findings revealed that most patients exhibited a WTP of an amount equivalent to the current iCHF premiums and would also be willing to pay for an augmented iCHF premium inclusive of additional medication coverage. Upon adjusting for demographic characteristics, we observed that patients enrolled in an insurance program or benefiting from user fee waivers demonstrated a lower WTP for medication, while those with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and seeking care in private facilities exhibited a higher WTP. Furthermore, patients with a secondary education level or above generally displayed higher WTP for premiums. Conversely, patients enrolled in private insurance and availing user fee waivers, along with those accessing care in public facilities, demonstrated a lowered WTP for iCHF premiums. These results highlight the need for targeted interventions to address systemic deficiencies and improve access to medicines. Our conclusions is that policies considering NCD status, education levels and income status are important when designing health insurance schemes for the informal sector in Tanzania, with the goal of increasing uptake of CHF.

Assessing equity and efficiency of health financing towards universal health coverage between regions in Tanzania

Equity and efficiency in health financing are intermediate universal health coverage (UHC) objectives. While there is growing attention to monitoring these goals at the national level, subnational assessment is also needed to uncover potential divergences across subnational units. We assessed whether health funds were allocated or contributed equitably and spent efficiently across 26 regions in Tanzania in 2017/18 for four sources of funding. Government and donor health basket fund (HBF) expenditure data were obtained from government authorities. Household contributions to health insurance and out-of-pocket payments were obtained from the national household budget survey. We used the Kakwani index (KI) to measure regional funding equity, whereby regional GDP per capita measured regional economic status. Efficiency analysis included four financing inputs and two UHC outputs (maternal health service coverage and financial protection indices). Data envelopment analysis estimated efficiency scores. There was substantial variation in per capita regional funding, especially in insurance contributions (TZS 473-13,520), and service coverage performance (49-86.3%). There was less variation in per capita HBF spending (TZS 1294-2394) and financial protection (93.5-99.4%). Government spending (KI: -0.047, p = 0.348) was proportional to regional economic status; but HBF spending (KI: -0.195, p < 0.001) was significantly progressive (equitably distributed), being targeted to regions with high economic need (poor). The burden of contributing to social health insurance (NHIF) was proportional (KI: 0.058, p = 0.613), while the burden of paying for community-based insurance (CHF, KI: -0.152, p=0.012) and out-of-pocket payments (KI: -0.187, p=0.005) was higher among the poor (regressive). The average efficiency score across regions was 90%, indicating that 90% of financial resources were used optimally, while 10% were wasted or underutilised. Tanzania should continue mobilising domestic resources for health towards UHC, and reduce reliance on inequitable out-of-pocket payments and community-based health insurance. Policymakers must enhance resource allocation formulas, public financial management, and sub-national resource tracking to improve equity and efficiency in resource use.

Policymakers' perspective on the importance of procedural fairness to implement and sustain health financing reforms

Fair process is instrumental to implementing and sustaining health financing reforms. Ensuring a fair process during the design and adoption phases can garner political capital and secure a sense of citizens' ownership. This will prove useful when reforms are contested before benefits are yet to be fully materialized. Since many well devised health financing reforms are vulnerable to being dismantled after a few years of being launched, fair process should play a more strategic role in the implementation and evaluation phases when policies get challenged and reformulated to reflect the changing political and socioeconomic landscapes and to better manage early evidence on performance.