1
|
Ishola OD, Holcombe SJ, Ferrand A, Ajijola L, Anieto NN, Igharo V. What Underlies State Government Performance in Scaling Family Planning Programming? A Study of The Challenge Initiative State Partnerships in Nigeria. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2024; 12:e2200228. [PMID: 38621820 PMCID: PMC11111101 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Relatively few studies rigorously examine the factors associated with health systems strengthening and scaling of interventions at subnational government levels. We aim to examine how The Challenge Initiative (TCI) coaches subnational (state government) actors to scale proven family planning and adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health approaches rapidly and sustainably through public health systems to respond to unmet need among the urban poor. METHODS This mixed-methods comparative case study draws on 32 semistructured interviews with subnational government leaders and managers, nongovernmental organization leaders, and TCI Nigeria staff, triangulated with project records and government health management information system (HMIS) data. Adapting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we contrast experience across 2 higher-performing states and 1 lower-performing state (identified through HMIS data and selected health systems strengthening criteria from 13 states) to identify modifiable factors linked with successful adoption and implementation of interventions and note lessons for supporting scale-up. RESULTS Informants reported that several TCI strategies overlapping with CFIR were critical to states' successful adoption and sustainment of interventions, most prominently external champions' contributions and strengthened state planning and coordination, especially in higher-performing states. Government stakeholders institutionalized new interventions through their annual operational plans. Higher-performing states incorporated mutually reinforcing interventions (including service delivery, demand generation, and advocacy). Although informants generally expressed confidence that newly introduced service delivery interventions would be sustained beyond donor support, they had concerns about government financing of demand-side social and behavior change work. CONCLUSION As political and managerial factors, even more than technical factors, were most linked with successful adoption and scale-up, these processes and systems should be assessed and prioritized from the start. Government leaders, TCI coaches, and other stakeholders can use these findings to shape similar initiatives to sustainably scale social service interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwayemisi Denike Ishola
- The Challenge Initiative, Nigeria Hub, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Abuja, Nigeria.
| | - Sarah Jane Holcombe
- The Challenge Initiative, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrea Ferrand
- The Challenge Initiative, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lekan Ajijola
- The Challenge Initiative, Nigeria Hub, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Nneoma Nonyelum Anieto
- The Challenge Initiative, Nigeria Hub, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Victor Igharo
- The Challenge Initiative, Nigeria Hub, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Breneol S, Curran JA, Marten R, Minocha K, Johnson C, Wong H, Langlois EV, Wozney L, Vélez CM, Cassidy C, Juvekar S, Rothfus M, Aziato L, Keeping-Burke L, Adjorlolo S, Patiño-Lugo DF. Strategies to adapt and implement health system guidelines and recommendations: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:64. [PMID: 35706039 PMCID: PMC9202131 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based health system guidelines are pivotal tools to help outline the important financial, policy and service components recommended to achieve a sustainable and resilient health system. However, not all guidelines are readily translatable into practice and/or policy without effective and tailored implementation and adaptation techniques. This scoping review mapped the evidence related to the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, LILACS (VHL Regional Portal), and Web of Science databases in late August 2020. We also searched sources of grey literature and reference lists of potentially relevant reviews. All findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS A total of 41 studies were included in the final set of papers. Common strategies were identified for adapting and implementing health system guidelines, related barriers and enablers, and indicators of success. The most common types of implementation strategies included education, clinical supervision, training and the formation of advisory groups. A paucity of reported information was also identified related to adaptation initiatives. Barriers to and enablers of implementation and adaptation were reported across studies, including the need for financial sustainability. Common approaches to evaluation were identified and included outcomes of interest at both the patient and health system level. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this review suggest several themes in the literature and identify a need for future research to strengthen the evidence base for improving the implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. The findings can serve as a future resource for researchers seeking to evaluate implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines. Our findings also suggest that more effort may be required across research, policy and practice sectors to support the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines to local contexts and health system arrangements in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Breneol
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
| | - Robert Marten
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kirti Minocha
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Catie Johnson
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Helen Wong
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lori Wozney
- Nova Scotia Health Authority Policy and Planning, Dartmouth, Canada
| | - C Marcela Vélez
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Christine Cassidy
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Sanjay Juvekar
- Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
| | - Melissa Rothfus
- W.K. Kellogg Health Science Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lydia Aziato
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Lisa Keeping-Burke
- Department of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, St. John, Canada
| | - Samuel Adjorlolo
- Department of Mental Health Nursing, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elsey H, Al Azdi Z, Regmi S, Baral S, Fatima R, Fieroze F, Huque R, Karki J, Khan DM, Khan A, Khan Z, Li J, Noor M, Arjyal A, Shrestha P, Ullah S, Siddiqi K. Scaling up tobacco cessation within TB programmes: findings from a multi-country, mixed-methods implementation study. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:43. [PMID: 35436896 PMCID: PMC9014631 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00842-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brief behavioural support can effectively help tuberculosis (TB) patients quit smoking and improve their outcomes. In collaboration with TB programmes in Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan, we evaluated the implementation and scale-up of cessation support using four strategies: (1) brief tobacco cessation intervention, (2) integration of tobacco cessation within routine training, (3) inclusion of tobacco indicators in routine records and (4) embedding research within TB programmes. METHODS We used mixed methods of observation, interviews, questionnaires and routine data. We aimed to understand the extent and facilitators of vertical scale-up (institutionalization) within 59 health facility learning sites in Pakistan, 18 in Nepal and 15 in Bangladesh, and horizontal scale-up (increased coverage beyond learning sites). We observed training and surveyed all 169 TB health workers who were trained, in order to measure changes in their confidence in delivering cessation support. Routine TB data from the learning sites were analysed to assess intervention delivery and use of TB forms revised to report smoking status and cessation support provided. A purposive sample of TB health workers, managers and policy-makers were interviewed (Bangladesh n = 12; Nepal n = 13; Pakistan n = 19). Costs of scale-up were estimated using activity-based cost analysis. RESULTS Routine data indicated that health workers in learning sites asked all TB patients about tobacco use and offered them cessation support. Qualitative data showed use of intervention materials, often with adaptation and partial implementation in busy clinics. Short (1-2 hours) training integrated within existing programmes increased mean confidence in delivering cessation support by 17% (95% CI: 14-20%). A focus on health system changes (reporting, training, supervision) facilitated vertical scale-up. Dissemination of materials beyond learning sites and changes to national reporting forms and training indicated a degree of horizontal scale-up. Embedding research within TB health systems was crucial for horizontal scale-up and required the dynamic use of tactics including alliance-building, engagement in the wider policy process, use of insider researchers and a deep understanding of health system actors and processes. CONCLUSIONS System-level changes within TB programmes may facilitate routine delivery of cessation support to TB patients. These strategies are inexpensive, and with concerted efforts from TB programmes and donors, tobacco cessation can be institutionalized at scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Elsey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, Y010 5DD, UK.
| | - Zunayed Al Azdi
- ARK Foundation, Suite C-3, C-4, House # 06, Road # 109, Gulshan-2, Bangladesh
| | | | - Sushil Baral
- HERDi, Prasuti Griha Marg, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | - Razia Fatima
- Common Management Unit (TB, HIV/AIDS & Malaria), Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Fariza Fieroze
- ARK Foundation, Suite C-3, C-4, House # 06, Road # 109, Gulshan-2, Bangladesh
| | - Rumana Huque
- ARK Foundation, Suite C-3, C-4, House # 06, Road # 109, Gulshan-2, Bangladesh
| | - Jiban Karki
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, Y010 5DD, UK
| | | | - Amina Khan
- The Initiative, Orange Grove Farm, Main Korung Road, Malpur, Bani Gala, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Zohaib Khan
- Khyber Medical University, F1 Phase-6 Rd, Phase 5 Hayatabad, Peshawar, 25100, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
| | - Jinshuo Li
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, Y010 5DD, UK
| | - Maryam Noor
- The Initiative, Orange Grove Farm, Main Korung Road, Malpur, Bani Gala, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Safat Ullah
- Khyber Medical University, F1 Phase-6 Rd, Phase 5 Hayatabad, Peshawar, 25100, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
| | - Kamran Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, Y010 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, Lowery J. Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implement Sci 2022; 17:7. [PMID: 35065675 PMCID: PMC8783408 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The challenges of implementing evidence-based innovations (EBIs) are widely recognized among practitioners and researchers. Context, broadly defined as everything outside the EBI, includes the dynamic and diverse array of forces working for or against implementation efforts. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most widely used frameworks to guide assessment of contextual determinants of implementation. The original 2009 article invited critique in recognition for the need for the framework to evolve. As implementation science has matured, gaps in the CFIR have been identified and updates are needed. Our team is developing the CFIR 2.0 based on a literature review and follow-up survey with authors. We propose an Outcomes Addendum to the CFIR to address recommendations from these sources to include outcomes in the framework. MAIN TEXT We conducted a literature review and surveyed corresponding authors of included articles to identify recommendations for the CFIR. There were recommendations to add both implementation and innovation outcomes from these sources. Based on these recommendations, we make conceptual distinctions between (1) anticipated implementation outcomes and actual implementation outcomes, (2) implementation outcomes and innovation outcomes, and (3) CFIR-based implementation determinants and innovation determinants. CONCLUSION An Outcomes Addendum to the CFIR is proposed. Our goal is to offer clear conceptual distinctions between types of outcomes for use with the CFIR, and perhaps other determinant implementation frameworks as well. These distinctions can help bring clarity as researchers consider which outcomes are most appropriate to evaluate in their research. We hope that sharing this in advance will generate feedback and debate about the merits of our proposed addendum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Damschroder
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| | - Caitlin M Reardon
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Marilla A Opra Widerquist
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Julie Lowery
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leeman J, Boisson A, Go V. Scaling Up Public Health Interventions: Engaging Partners Across Multiple Levels. Annu Rev Public Health 2021; 43:155-171. [PMID: 34724390 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-113438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Advancing the science of intervention scale-up is essential to increasing the impact of effective interventions at the regional and national levels. In contrast with work in high-income countries (HICs), where scale-up research has been limited, researchers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have conducted numerous studies on the regional and national scale-up of interventions. In this article, we review the state of the science on intervention scale-up in both HICs and LMICs. We provide an introduction to the elements of scale-up followed by a description of the scale-up process, with an illustrative case study from our own research. We then present findings from a scoping review comparing scale-up studies in LMIC and HIC settings. We conclude with lessons learned and recommendations for improving scale-up research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 43 is April 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Alix Boisson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Vivian Go
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;
| |
Collapse
|