IVF, from the past to the future: the inheritance of the Capri Workshop Group

Unlocking the Potential of Assisted Hatching in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Narrative Review

The present study is set in the broad field of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and examines various procedures under assisted hatching (AH). It also reviews their effects on implantation success rates. The primary emphasis is on explaining who has benefited and how many have benefited from these interventions. The most important factor determining the success rate of ART is implantation. To increase these rates, we use AH in our clinics to enhance each embryo's chances at life and substantially improve overall results. This comprehensive review includes various approaches, such as chemical-based measures (such as applying Tyrode's solution) and mechanical techniques (such as zona drilling and partial zona dissection). The individual techniques are carefully scrutinized, considering their mechanical detailing, methods of applying therapeutic effects, and the appropriateness of matching present social circumstances. The review begins by analyzing the basic nature of AH as a medium for embryo implantation and then focuses on how this detailed view reveals the advantages and drawbacks of various methods. Moreover, the articles discuss improvements in AH technology and many of the most modern technological developments that can help fine-tune ART issues. A major problem with these methodologies is that they involve serious risks and legal complications. However, a broad assessment of these topics allows us to understand their impact on fertility treatments. This review is written as a guidebook for physicians and researchers working in reproductive medicine. It compiles all current knowledge, providing literature to build on successes that will make breakthroughs possible in ART. Indeed, this is a valuable reference for guiding us in navigating complex AH procedures. It advances ARTs step by step toward perfection.

Clinical and laboratory key performance indicators in IVF: A consensus between the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) and the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR)

PURPOSE

Infertility is increasing worldwide, and many couples seek IVF. Clinical management and laboratory work are fundamental in the IVF journey. Therefore, the definition of reliable key performance indicators (KPIs) based on clinical and laboratory parameters, is essential for internal quality control (IQC). Laboratory performance indicators have been identified and a first attempt to also determine clinical ones has been recently published. However, more detailed indicators are required.

METHODS

An Italian group of experts in Reproductive Medicine from both public and private clinics on behalf of SIFES-MR and SIERR was established to define IVF indicators to monitor clinical performance.

RESULTS

The working group built a consensus on a list of KPIs, performance indicators (PIs) and recommendation indicators (RIs). When deemed necessary, the reference population was stratified by woman age, response to ovarian stimulation and adoption of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Each indicator was scored with a value from 1 to 5 and a weighted average formula - considering all the suggested parameters-was defined. This formula generates a center performance score, indicating low, average, good, or excellent performance.

CONCLUSION

This study is intended to provide KPIs, PIs and RIs that encompass several essential aspects of a modern IVF clinic, including quality control and constant monitoring of clinical and embryological features. These indicators could be used to assess the quality of each center with the aim of improving efficacy and efficiency in IVF.

Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction

Sperm selection in the female reproductive tract (FRT) is sophisticated. Only about 1,000 sperm out of millions in an ejaculate reach the fallopian tube and thus have a chance of fertilizing an oocyte. In assisted reproduction techniques, sperm are usually selected using their density or motility, characteristics that do not reflect their fertilization competence and, therefore, might result in failure to fertilize the oocyte. Although sperm processing in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) bypasses many of the selection processes in the FRT, selection by the cumulus mass and the zona pellucida remain intact. By contrast, the direct injection of a sperm into an oocyte in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) bypasses all natural selection barriers and, therefore, increases the risk of transferring paternal defects such as fragmented DNA and genomic abnormalities in sperm to the resulting child. Research into surrogate markers of fertilization potential and into simulating the natural sperm selection processes has progressed. However, methods of sperm isolation - such as hyaluronic acid-based selection and microfluidic isolation based on sperm tactic responses - use only one or two parameters and are not comparable with the multistep sperm selection processes naturally occurring within the FRT. Fertilization-competent sperm require a panel of molecules, including zona pellucida-binding proteins and ion channel proteins, that enable them to progress through the FRT to achieve fertilization. The optimal artificial sperm selection method will, therefore, probably need to use a multiparameter tool that incorporates the molecular signature of sperm with high fertilization potential, and their responses to external cues, within a microfluidic system that can replicate the physiological processes of the FRT in vitro.

The Gender Gap in the Diagnostic-Therapeutic Journey of the Infertile Couple

Medical procreation impairs both the biological and psychological lives of couples. However, male and female attitudes to infertility are different and require a different approach during the IVF journey. Thus, the gender impact assessment (GIA) method was used to analyse original studies present in the literature. We found some gender-related differences and, subsequently, possible outcomes of intervention to improve healthy reproduction management and prevent infertility. In particular, it became apparent that there was the need for an in-depth male infertility assessment and a gender-specific follow-up.