1
|
Keukens A, Veth VB, Regis M, Mijatovic V, Bongers MY, Coppus SFPJ, Maas JWM. The effect of surgery or medication on pain and quality of life in women with endometrioma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 293:95-105. [PMID: 38134610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
For patients with endometrioma it is unclear what treatment: surgery and/or medication, is more effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life (QoL). This systematic review and meta- analysis aimed to provide an overview of the existing evidence on the effects of surgery and/or medication (i.e. analgesics and/or hormonal medication) on pain and QoL. A search through CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was conducted. The study population had to be women treated for endometrioma. Retrospective or prospective studies reporting about QoL and/or the following types of pain were reviewed: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and pain that was not well defined in the included article (referred to as pain). We performed a meta-analysis on mean visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and proportions of patients experiencing different types of pain over time. QoL was described narratively. Out of 11.515 articles, 76 studies including 7148 patients were included for the systematic review. The meta-analysis consisted of 52 studies including 4556 patients. No studies compared medication with surgery. And there were no studies on analgesics. Meta-analysis showed that surgery and/or medication often reduced VAS scores and proportions of all types of pain over time. Surgery and medication combined seems more effective in reducing VAS scores of pain compared to surgery alone, but not to medication alone (estimated mean difference = 0.17, p < 0.0001 and -0.98, p = 0.0339). QoL improved after medication (follow up ≤ 12 months) and QoL was unchanged or worsened after surgery and medication combined (follow up ≤ 24 months). However, these were results from a total of 5 studies. Both surgery and medication reduce endometriosis-related pain in patients with endometrioma. However, there is lack of uniform, good quality data comparing surgery with medication to draw firm conclusions. For better-informed treatment decisions, further studies including a standardized core-outcome set at fixed follow-up times, are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Keukens
- Department of Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands.
| | - V B Veth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Regis
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Zaale, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - V Mijatovic
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Academic Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Department of Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S F P J Coppus
- Department of Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Maas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, the Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Del Forno S, Orsini B, Verrelli L, Caroli M, Aru AC, Lenzi J, Raimondo D, Arena A, Borghese G, Paradisi R, Meriggiola MC, Seracchioli R, Casadio P. Dienogest alone or dienogest combined with estrogens in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, that is the question. A retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:1341-1349. [PMID: 37433947 PMCID: PMC10435622 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07125-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE to compare the effects of Dienogest 2 mg (D) alone or combined with estrogens (D + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg, D + EE; D + estradiol valerate 1-3 mg, D + EV) in terms of symptoms and endometriotic lesions variations. METHODS This retrospective study included symptomatic patients in reproductive age with ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas. Medical therapy for at least 12 months with D, D + EE or D + EV was required. Women were evaluated at baseline visit (V1) and after 6 (V2) and 12 months (V3) of therapy. RESULTS 297 patients were enrolled (156 in the D group, 58 in the D + EE group, 83 in the D + EV group). Medical treatment leaded to a significant reduction in size of endometriomas after 12 months, with no differences between the three groups. When comparing D and D + EE/D + EV groups, a significant decrease of dysmenorrhea was detected in the D group than in D + EE/D + EV group. Conversely, the reduction of dysuria was more significative in the D + EE/D + EV groups rather than in the D group. Regarding tolerability, treatment associated side effects were reported by 16.2% patients. The most frequent one was uterine bleeding/spotting, significantly higher in the D + EV group. CONCLUSION Dienogest alone or associated with estrogens (EE/EV) seems to be equally effective in reducing endometriotic lesions mean diameter. The reduction of dysmenorrhea was more significative when D was administered alone, while dysuria seems to improve more when D is associated with estrogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Del Forno
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Benedetta Orsini
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Verrelli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martina Caroli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Modena, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Aru
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Arena
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Borghese
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Paradisi
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Meriggiola
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|