Effect of prednisolone on serum and follicular fluid androgen concentrations in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in-vitro fertilization

Glucocorticoid supplementation during ovulation induction for assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing interest in glucocorticoid treatment during oocyte stimulation to treat infertility in women who have undergone Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of adjuvant glucocorticoid therapy on pregnancy outcomes in infertile women undergoing ART cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2022. To assess the efficacy and safety of additional glucocorticoid treatment during ovulation induction in women who underwent IVF or ICSI treatment, only randomized controlled trials were included.

RESULTS

Overall, glucocorticoid therapy during ovulation showed a nonsignificant effect of prednisolone improving the live birth rate (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [.75, 1.43], I² = .0%, p = .84), abortion rate (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [.62, 2.08], I² = 31%, p = .68), and implantation rate (OR = 1.1, 95% CI [.82, 1.5], I² = 8%, p = .52) of infertile women compared to the control group. The present meta-analysis revealed that the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle tended to increase after glucocorticoid treatment (OR = 1.29, 95% CI [1.02, 1.63], I² = 8%, p = .52).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggested that ovarian stimulation prednisolone therapy does not significantly improve clinical outcomes in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Although the results indicated that adjuvant glucocorticoid therapy during ovarian stimulation may increase the clinical pregnancy rate, subgroup analysis showed that it was affected by infertility factors, dose schedules, and length of treatment. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

BACKGROUND

The use of peri-implantation glucocorticoids has been advocated to improve embryo implantation during assistive reproductive technology (ART) cycles such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intrauterine environment by acting as immunomodulators to reduce the uterine natural killer (NK) cell count and activity, normalising the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glucocorticoids versus no glucocorticoids administered around the time of anticipated implantation in women undergoing IVF or ICSI.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group specialised register, CENTRAL (now also containing output from two trial registers and CINAHL), MEDLINE and Embase, on 20 December 2021, together with reference checking, contact with experts in the field and relevant conference proceedings to identify additional studies. This review is an update of the review first published in  2007 and last updated in 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of supplementary systemic administration of glucocorticoids in the peri-implantation period with a placebo or no glucocorticoids in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live birth rate and multiple pregnancy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs (2232 couples analysed). We are uncertain whether glucocorticoids improved live birth rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 2.71; 2 RCTs, n = 366; I² = 7%; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following no glucocorticoids/placebo is assumed to be 9%, the chance following glucocorticoids would be between 6% and 21%. We are also uncertain whether there was a difference between peri-implantation glucocorticoids on multiple pregnancy rates per couple (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.20; 4 RCTs, n = 504; I² = 53%; very low-certainty evidence). The I² of 53% may represent moderate statistical heterogeneity and results have to be interpreted with caution. With regard to pregnancy rates, we are uncertain whether there was a difference between ongoing pregnancy rates after glucocorticoids versus no glucocorticoids/placebo (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.76; 3 RCTs, n = 476; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical pregnancy rates after glucocorticoids versus no glucocorticoids/placebo (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.44; 13 RCTs, n = 1967; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of clinical pregnancy following no glucocorticoids/placebo is assumed to be 25%, the chance following glucocorticoids would be between 24% and 32%. Furthermore, we are also uncertain whether peri-implantation glucocorticoids influenced miscarriage rates per couple (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.87; 6 RCTs, n = 821; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence), the incidence of ectopic pregnancies per couple (OR 2.28, 95% CI 0.33 to 15.62; 3 RCTs, n = 320; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per couple (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.90; 3 RCTs, n = 370; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) compared to no glucocorticoids/placebo. The evidence was very low to low certainty: the main limitations were serious risk of bias due to poor reporting of study methods, and serious imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was insufficient evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in IVF/ICSI cycles influenced clinical outcomes. These findings were limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI.

Effect of low-dose dexamethasone on patients with elevated early follicular phase progesterone level and pregnancy outcomes in IVF-ET treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of low-dose dexamethasone on patients with elevated early follicular progesterone levels in IVF-ET treatment.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

In vitro fertilization (IVF) centre.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 459 patients undergoing a first IVF/ICSI cycle.

INTERVENTION(S)

If progesterone concentration exceeded 1.9 nmol/L on days 3-4 of ovarian stimulation, the patients in dexamethasone (DEX) group were treated with oral dexamethasone 0.75 mg/d, and the patients in control group received no extra treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The cumulative live-birth rate (per cycle started) in 2 years.

RESULTS

The total dose of gonadotropins (1987 ± 536 IU in DEX group vs 2135 ± 701 IU in control group, P = 0.009) and the serum concentrations of progesterone on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) day (3.1 ± 1.4 nmol/L in DEX group vs 4.0 ± 1.3 nmol/L in control group, P < 0.001) were both significantly lower in DEX group than that in control. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the number of oocytes, two pronuclear (2PN) embryos and clinical pregnancy rate. In addition, the cumulative live-birth rate was significantly higher in the DEX group than that in controls (70.0% vs 61.1%, P = 0.029, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.19).

CONCLUSION(S)

Progesterone secretion can be suppressed by dexamethasone, and dexamethasone may sensitize the ovary to gonadotropin stimulation in IVF treatment. In addition, the cumulative live-birth rate was significantly higher in the DEX group than in controls, and the obstetric and neonatal outcomes support the safety of DEX treatment in IVF.

Glucocorticoid supplementation during ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI

BACKGROUND

Ovarian response to stimulation during in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) plays an important role in determining live birth rates. Adjuvant treatments during ovarian stimulation that have different modes of action have been used to improve ovarian response to stimulation and outcome of IVF. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are a class of steroid hormones that have been used either alone or in combination with other stimulatory regimens in order to improve folliculogenesis and pregnancy rates. However, considerable uncertainty remains over whether administration of glucocorticoid during ovarian stimulation until oocyte recovery is superior to no glucocorticoid in improving live birth rates in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and effectiveness of systemic glucocorticoids during ovarian stimulation for IVF and ICSI cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Studies Online (CRSO), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to 10 October 2016. We handsearched reference lists of articles, trial registers and relevant conference proceedings and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant treatment with systemic glucocorticoids during ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI cycles versus no adjuvant treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted the data. Our primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and side-effects. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled the data using a fixed-effect model. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Four RCTs were included in the review (416 women). The trials compared glucocorticoid supplementation during IVF stimulation versus placebo. Two of the studies had data in a form that we could not enter into analysis, so results include data from only two trials (310) women. For the outcome of live birth, data were available for only 212 women, as the larger study had data available from only one study centre.One of the studies gave inadequate description of randomisation methods, but the other was at low risk of bias in all domains. The evidence was rated as low or very low quality for all outcomes, mainly due to imprecision, with low sample sizes and few events.There was insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any difference between the groups in live birth rate (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.58; 2 RCTs, n = 212, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence). Our findings suggest that if the chance of live birth with placebo is assumed to be 15%, the chance following supplementation would be between 7% and 31%. There was no conclusive evidence of a difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.90; 2 RCTs, n = 310, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence).The evidence suggests that if the chance of clinical pregnancy with placebo is assumed to be 24%, the chance following treatment with glucocorticoid supplementation would be between 23% and 47%. There was also insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any difference between the groups in multiple-pregnancy rate (OR 3.32 , 95% CI 0.12 to 91.60; 1 RCT , n = 20, very low-quality evidence) or miscarriage rate (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 18.57; 1 RCT, n = 20, very low-quality evidence). Neither of the studies reported OHSS or side-effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of glucocorticoid administration in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF/ICSI cycles (until the day of oocyte retrieval) is unclear due to the small number of studies and low event rates. Whilst glucocorticoids possible increase the clinical pregnancy rate, there may be little or no impact on live birth rate. More research is needed.

Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos?

In many clinics, good-quality embryos are selected for embryo transfer and cryopreservation at the cleavage stage, and poor-quality embryos are discarded. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine how many repeated IVF cycles could be avoided by culturing the cleavage stage poor-quality embryos to blastocyst stage and transferring them after vitrification and warming (604 IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection [IVF-ICSI] cycles were included). Poor-quality cleavage stage embryos not eligible for transfer or cryopreservation were cultured until day 5 or 6, and those developing to the blastocyst stage were vitrified. The rate of vitrified blastocysts and clinical pregnancy and delivery rate of the warmed blastocysts was evaluated. The effect of the extended culture on the cumulative delivery rate, and the number of avoided new treatment cycles was calculated. The surplus blastocysts resulted in clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and delivery rates of 24.6%, 27.3% and 17.2% respectively. The use of surplus blastocysts raised cumulative delivery rate from 43% to 47% and 53 repeated new cycles were avoided. This study shows that the cumulative delivery rate can be increased, and repeated IVF-ICSI treatments avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos, which otherwise would have been discarded.

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

BACKGROUND

In order to improve embryo implantation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intrauterine environment by acting as immunomodulators to reduce the uterine natural killer (NK) cell count and normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the administration of glucocorticoids around the time of implantation improved clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI when compared to no glucocorticoid administration.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (September 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (September 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (1976 to September 2011), CINAHL (1982 to September 2011) and Science Direct (1966 to September 2011) were searched. Reference lists of relevant articles and relevant conference proceedings were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the research question were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies (involving 1879 couples) were included. Three studies reported live birth rate and these did not identify a significant difference after pooling the (preliminary) results (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.19). With regard to pregnancy rates, there was also no evidence that glucocorticoids improved clinical outcome (13 RCTs; OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44). However, a subgroup analysis of 650 women undergoing IVF (6 RCTs) revealed a significantly higher pregnancy rate for women using glucocorticoids (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13). There were no significant differences in adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there was no clear evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in ART cycles significantly improved the clinical outcome. The use of glucocorticoids in a subgroup of women undergoing IVF (rather than ICSI) was associated with an improvement in pregnancy rates of borderline statistical significance and should be interpreted with care. These findings were limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids and cannot be extrapolated to women with autoantibodies, unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure. Further well designed randomised studies are required to elucidate the possible role of this therapy in well defined patient groups.

Derivation of 30 human embryonic stem cell lines--improving the quality

We have derived 30 human embryonic stem cell lines from supernumerary blastocysts in our laboratory. During the derivation process, we have studied new and safe method to establish good quality lines. All our human embryonic stem cell lines have been derived using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells. The 26 more recent lines were derived in a medium containing serum replacement instead of fetal calf serum. Mechanical isolation of the inner cell mass using flexible metal needles was used in deriving the 10 latest lines. The lines are karyotypically normal, but culture adaptation in two lines has been observed. Our human embryonic stem cell lines are banked, and they are available for researchers.

Effect of DHEA and metformin on corpus luteum in mice

We evaluated the effect of hyperandrogenism in ovaries with functional and regressing corpora lutea (CL) and the action of metformin in preventing these possible alterations using a mouse model. To obtain a CL functional for 9+/-1 days, immature female mice of the BALB/c strain were injected i.p. with 10 IU/mouse of pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin (PMSG). DHEA (60 mg/kg body weight s.c., 24 and 48 h prior to kill) decreased both serum progesterone (P) and estradiol (E(2)) levels and increased the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) from ovaries with functional CL (on day 5 after PMSG). It increased P and E(2) and the activities of SOD and catalase (CAT) and decreased lipoperoxidation of ovaries with regressing CL (on day 9 after PMSG). Treatment with DHEA did not affect the production of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) or PGE by ovaries with functional CL, whereas DHEA decreased PGF(2alpha) and increased PGE production by ovaries with regressing CL. Metformin (50 mg/kg body weight, orally) given together with DHEA restored E(2) levels from mice with ovaries with functional CL and serum P, PGF(2alpha) and PGE levels, and oxidative balance in mice with ovaries with regressing CL. Metformin alone was able to modulate serum P and E(2) levels, lipoperoxidation, SOD and CAT, and the 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide/(*)OH signal. These findings suggest that hyperandrogenism is able to induce or to rescue CL from luteolysis and metformin treatment is able to prevent these effects.

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

BACKGROUND

In order to improve embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, the use of glucocorticoids has been advocated. It has been proposed that glucocorticoids may improve the intra-uterine environment by acting as immuno modulators to reduce the uterine NK cell count, normalise the cytokine expression profile in the endometrium and by suppression of endometrial inflammation.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the administration of glucocorticoids around the time of implantation improves clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing IVF or ICSI, compared to no glucocorticoid administration.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (February 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (1976 to June 2006), CINAHL (1982 to June 2006) and Science Direct (1966 to June 2006) were searched. Reference lists of relevant articles and relevant conference proceedings were also hand searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the research question were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted relevant data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies (1759 couples) were included. Three studies reported live birth rate and these did not identify a significant difference after pooling the (preliminary) results (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.19). With regard to pregnancy rates, there was also no evidence that glucocorticoids improved clinical outcome (13 RCTs; OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44). However, a subgroup analysis of 650 women undergoing IVF (6 RCTs) revealed a significantly higher pregnancy rate for women using glucocorticoids (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13). There were no significant differences in adverse events, but these were poorly and inconsistently reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is no clear evidence that administration of peri-implantation glucocorticoids in ART cycles significantly improves clinical outcome. The use of glucocorticoids in women undergoing IVF (rather than ICSI) was associated with an improvement in pregnancy rates of borderline statistical significance. These findings are limited to the routine use of glucocorticoids and cannot be extrapolated to women with auto-antibodies, unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure. Further well designed randomised studies are required to elucidate the possible role of this therapy in well defined patient groups.

The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment

Clinical utilization of ovulation stimulation to facilitate the ability of a couple to conceive has not only provided a valuable therapeutic approach, but has also yielded extensive information on the physiology of ovarian follicular recruitment, endometrial receptivity and early embryo competency. One of the consequences of the use of fertility enhancing agents for ovarian stimulation has been the creation of a hyperestrogenic state, which may influence each of these parameters. Use of aromatase inhibitors reduces hyperestrogenism inevitably attained during ovarian stimulation. In addition, the adjunct use of aromatase inhibitors during ovarian stimulation reduces amount of gonadotropins required for optimum stimulation. The unique approach of reducing hyperestrogenism, as well as lowering amount of gonadotropins without affecting the number of mature ovarian follicles is an exciting strategy that could result in improvement in the treatment outcome by ameliorating the deleterious effects of the ovarian stimulation on follicular development, endometrial receptivity, as well as oocyte and embryo quality.

Gonadal antibodies interfering with female reproduction

While the involvement of anti-ovarian antibodies (AOAs) is highly likely, yet still controversial, in patients with patent premature ovarian failure (POF), it is even more difficult--for several reasons--to ascertain the clinical significance of these antibodies in patients without obvious ovarian failure. First, AOAs form a heterogeneous group of antibodies recognizing several different antigenic targets such as granulosa and thecal cells, zona pellucida, oocyte cytoplasm, corpus luteum, as well as gonadotrophins and their receptors. Second, the detection of AOAs in various clinical situations does not readily imply a causal relationship between these antibodies and impaired ovarian function. Third, diagnostic tools for detecting AOAs and their molecular targets have to be improved to yield more reliable data and allow a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of AOAs. Preliminary results with immunosuppressive therapy in selected AOA patients have been encouraging, but randomized trials have to be performed.

Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the implantation and pregnancy rates after cleavage stage embryo transfer (ET) with transfer of blastocyst-stage (days 5-6) embryos.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized trial at an assisted reproduction unit in a university hospital. Women with six or more follicles at the last ultrasound scan before oocyte aspiration were randomized for transfer of a maximum of two embryos after 2-3 days (n = 80) or after 5-6 days (n = 64) of culture. Embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates were evaluated. Statistical significance was tested with the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test.

RESULT(S)

No significant difference was observed in implantation rates (21.1% versus 20.9%, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rates (36.7% versus 32.5% respectively) after blastocyst and cleavage stage transfers for the two groups. The pregnancy rate among subjects who had at least one good quality embryo transferred was 37.5% per day 2-3 ET and 60% per day 5-6 ET.

CONCLUSION(S)

The overall implantation and pregnancy rates after embryo transfer at cleavage stage and at blastocyst stage transfer were not statistically different. Women who had at least one good quality blastocyst (n = 25) had a high pregnancy rate (60% per ET). Blastocyst transfer is a good alternative for couples with many good quality embryos on day 2 after insemination.

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of translation initiation factor 1A (eIF-1A) in human and mouse preimplantation embryos

Fluorescence-monitored real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to study steady state concentrations of translation initiation factor eIF-1A mRNA in mouse and human preimplantation embryos. Its expression in human embryos has not been described previously. Human oocytes, and 2-cell and 4-cell embryos all showed comparable total concentrations of eIF-1A RNA, indicating a gradual decrease in the average concentration per blastomere during these developmental stages. A 4-fold increase was observed in the 8-cell embryos. This concentration remained at the morula stage, followed by a 7- to 8-fold further increase at the blastocyst stage. Mouse preimplantation embryos already showed increased concentrations of eIF-1A RNA at the 2-cell stage. Thus, transcription levels of the eIF-1A gene are associated with embryonic gene activation (EGA) in both species. The method used, real time RT-PCR, proved to be sensitive enough to detect quantitative expression in single mouse blastomeres, the observed values for steady-state concentrations of mRNA in single blastomeres correlating well with the values for whole embryos. The possibility to study gene expression quantitatively in single blastomeres may be useful in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Embryo transfer by midwife or gynecologist: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Embryo transfer (ET) in assisted reproduction treatments has traditionally been performed by gynecologists in the Nordic countries. As gynecologists often have a busy schedule, midwives and nurses have become increasingly important in performing the treatment, providing subject information, ultrasound monitoring and assistance at ET. As part of the continuous development of our IVF treatment we have carried out a prospective randomized pilot study where either a midwife or a gynecologist has performed ET. The aim of this study was to see if a skilled IVF midwife could perform ET with similar results to a gynecologist.

METHODS

On the day of oocyte aspiration the subjects were randomized, by means of closed envelopes, for ET to be performed either by a midwife or a gynecologist. A total of 102 subjects were included in the study, 51 for ET by a skilled midwife and 51 by a gynecologist. There were no differences in the groups in respect to ET routine and catheters used.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in subject characteristics as regards age, method of pituitary down-regulation or proportion of IVF/ICSI cycles. Similar clinical pregnancy rates between ETs performed by midwives vs. gynecologists, 31% vs. 29%, respectively, were seen. Subject experience as judged by a questionnaire also showed high acceptance of ET by a midwife.

CONCLUSION

The results show that it is a feasible option to allow midwives to carry out ETs.

Poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation the role of adjuvant treatments

Poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation represents a clinical problem in in vitro fertilization practice. Women showing poor ovarian response are a heterogeneous group, many of whom have a reduced ovarian reserve and consequently a lower pregnancy potential. Various management strategies have been proposed to improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins, but these have met with limited success. Adjuvant treatments aim to potentiate the effect of exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone. In separate, randomized, placebo-controlled trials low-dose dexamethasone and aspirin have been shown to reduce the incidence of poor response in an initial stimulation cycle. Preliminary studies using pyridostigmine and L-arginine in established poor responders are encouraging but require confirmation in adequately powered studies. Evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the use of adjuvant growth hormone or growth hormone-releasing hormone in poor responders without overt growth hormone deficiency. The mechanisms of action of adjuvant treatments require further investigation.

Clinical outcome of treatment cycles using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for structural chromosomal abnormalities

OBJECTIVES

To explore oocyte recovery, embryo quality, the number of transferable embryos and pregnancy rate after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in patients with structural chromosomal aberrations.

METHODS

PGD was performed in seven couples with Robertsonian translocations (Rob), eight couples with reciprocal translocations (Rec), two couples with inversions and one couple with a deletion. A total of 43 treatment cycles were carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 14.2 oocytes per cycle were retrieved. Fertilisation and cleavage rates were 63% and 58%, respectively. Of the biopsied embryos 20% were transferable. Comparison of the Rob and Rec group revealed no significant differences in number of oocytes, fertilisation or cleavage rates. The number of transferable embryos after biopsy was significantly higher in the Rob group than in the Rec group. When embryo transfer (ET) was performed the pregnancy rate did not differ between the Rob and the Rec groups. Twenty-eight embryo transfers (one or two embryos) were carried out leading to eight clinical pregnancies (29% per ET): two twins, four singletons, one miscarriage and one ectopic pregnancy. All the children are carriers of balanced chromosomal aberrations.

CONCLUSION

An acceptable pregnancy rate can be achieved among couples with structural chromosomal abnormalities.

Low-dose dexamethasone augments the ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins leading to a reduction in cycle cancellation rate in a standard IVF programme

BACKGROUND

Cancellation of assisted conception cycles because of poor ovarian response to gonadotrophins is a significant problem in assisted reproduction. Various adjuvant treatments have been suggested to improve responsiveness. This study reports on the potential benefits of low dose dexamethasone.

METHODS

Patients <40 years of age were invited to participate in a twin centre prospective double blind randomized placebo controlled study. A total of 290 patients were recruited and computer randomized using sealed envelopes to receive either 1 mg dexamethasone (n = 145) or placebo tablets (n = 145) in addition to a standard long protocol gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue with gonadotrophin stimulation regime.

RESULTS

A significantly lower cancellation rate for poor ovarian response was observed in the dexamethasone group compared with controls (2.8 versus 12.4% respectively, P < 0.002). Further comparisons between the dexamethasone group and controls were made of median fertilization rates (60 versus 61% respectively, NS), implantation rates (16.3 versus 11.6% respectively, NS) and pregnancy rate per cycle started (26.9 versus 17.2%, NS). The benefit was apparent in patients both with polycystic and normal ovaries.

CONCLUSION

Low dose dexamethasone co-treatment reduces the incidence of poor ovarian response. It may increase clinical pregnancy rates and should be considered for inclusion in stimulation regimes to optimize ovarian response.