Is waiting for an endogenous luteinizing hormone surge and/or administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin of benefit in intrauterine insemination?

Intrauterine Insemination After Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Trigger or Luteinizing Hormone Surge: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the odds of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI) timed by ultrasound monitoring and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration compared with monitoring luteinizing hormone (LH) levels.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), ClinicalTrials.gov (National Institutes of Health), and the Cochrane Library (Wiley) from the inception until October 1, 2022. No language limitations were applied.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

After deduplication, 3,607 unique citations were subjected to blinded independent review by three investigators. Thirteen studies (five retrospective cohort, four cross-sectional, two randomized controlled trials, and two randomized crossover studies) that enrolled women undergoing natural cycle, oral medication (clomid or letrozole), or both for IUI were included in the final random-effects model meta-analysis. Methodologic quality of included studies was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data extraction was compiled by two authors, including publication information, hCG and LH monitoring guidelines, and pregnancy outcomes. No significant difference in odds of pregnancy between hCG administration and endogenous LH monitoring was observed (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.22, P=.53). Subgroup analysis of the five studies that included natural cycle IUI outcomes also showed no significant difference in odds of pregnancy between the two methods (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.46-1.69, P=.61). Finally, a subgroup analysis of 10 studies that included women who underwent ovarian stimulation with oral medications (clomid or letrozole) did not demonstrate a difference in odds of pregnancy between ultrasonography with hCG trigger and LH-timed IUI (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66-1.16, P=.32). Statistically significant heterogeneity was noted between studies.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed no difference between pregnancy outcomes between at-home LH monitoring and timed IUI.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021230520.

The Effect of Spontaneous LH Surges on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Letrozole-HMG IUI: A Retrospective Analysis of 6,285 Cycles

BACKGROUND

To date, no consensus has been reached on whether to wait for spontaneous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to occur or to trigger ovulation regardless of the presence of an LH surge for achieving higher success rate in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Therefore, we hope to investigate the effect of the presence of a spontaneous LH surge on pregnancy outcomes in letrozole-human menopausal gonadotropin (LE-HMG) IUI cycles.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 6,285 LE-HMG IUI cycles were included between January 2010 and May 2021. Cycles were categorized into three groups: the trigger + LH surge group, the trigger only group, and the LH surge only group. The primary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. A logistic regression analysis was performed to explore other risk factors affecting the clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in biochemical pregnancy rate (P =0.640), clinical pregnancy rate (P =0.702), ongoing pregnancy rate (P =0.842), and live birth rate (P =0.951) among the three groups. The binary logistic regression analysis also confirmed that the existence of an LH surge was not associated with clinical pregnancy. There was a difference in ectopic pregnancy rates (P =0.045), but logistic regression showed that the presence of a spontaneous LH surge has no association with ectopic pregnancy. Nonetheless, patients with lead follicles within 18.1-20.0 mm/20.1-22.0 mm and a long duration of LE treatment were less likely to get ectopic pregnant compared with patients with 14.1-16.0 mm lead follicles and shorter LE treatment (OR: 0.142, 95% CI: 0.023-0.891, P =0.037; OR: 0.142, 95% CI: 0.022-0.903, P =0.039; OR: 0.445, 95% CI: 0.235-0.840, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a spontaneous LH surge in triggered LE-HMG IUI cycles does not appear to improve pregnancy rates. Thus, we suggest that waiting for an LH surge to occur is not necessary in triggered LE-HMG IUI cycles.

Timing therapeutic donor inseminations in natural cycles: human chorionic gonadotrophin administration versus urinary LH monitoring

This cohort study assessed whether timing therapeutic donor sperm inseminations (TDI) in natural cycles (NC) using ultrasound monitoring and ovulation trigger with human chorionic gonadotrophin (US/HCG) improves cumulative live birth rates (LBR) compared with detection of LH surge with urinary kits (u-LH). It included 232 normo-ovulatory women aged ≤40 years, undergoing 538 TDI in NC between 2011 and 2014. In the u-LH group (113 women, 267 cycles), TDI was performed the day following a positive test. In the US/HCG group (119 women, 271 cycles), ovulation was triggered with HCG when a follicle ≥17 mm was noted, and TDI performed 36 h later. The first three cycles were analysed per patient. Groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. Cumulative LBR were comparable between u-LH and US/HCG groups (31.47% versus 23.11%, respectively) (log-rank test). A generalized estimating equation analysis was performed to compare outcomes per cycle. The LBR per started cycle was comparable between the u-LH and US/HCG groups (12.4% versus 9.2%, respectively). Cancellation rate was significantly higher with u-LH (19.1% versus 11.4%, P = 0.011), but did not impact overall outcomes. In conclusion, urinary LH monitoring is as effective as ultrasound monitoring and ovulation trigger with HCG in TDI performed in NC.

Intrauterine insemination with husband semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome

PURPOSE

The aim was to determine pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination (IUI) and its associated factors in a university assisted reproductive technique center in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 350 IUI cycles with ovarian stimulation by clomiphene citrate and/or gonadotropins was performed.

RESULTS

The overall pregnancy rate was 22% (77/350). Of the 77 pregnancies, 88.3% resulted in live birth, 7.8% in spontaneous abortion, 2.6% in blighted ovum and 1.3% were ectopic. Logistic regression analysis revealed three predictive variables as regards pregnancy: number of the treatment cycle (OR:3.5 CI:1.9 - 6.4 p:0.006), duration of infertility (OR:2.1 CI:1.2 - 3.7 p = 0.001) and age (OR:2.15 CI:1.1 - 4.4 p = 0.04). Pregnancy rate did not have any independent relation to sperm count, type of infertility, number and size of follicle and side of ovulatory ovary.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that clomiphene citrate and/or gonadotropins IUI is a convenient and useful treatment option in women with younger age ( <30 years) and fewer treatment cycles and fewer infertility duration (4 years).

Clomiphene citrate induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination: effect of timing of human chorionic gonadotropin injection in relation to the spontaneous LH surge on pregnancy rates

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal time for administration of human chorionic gonadotropin in clomiphene citrate induced intrauterine insemination cycles.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 171 consecutive cycles was performed. An increase in luteinizing hormone level >100% over the mean of the preceding two days was defined as luteinizing hormone surge. Human chorionic gonadotropin was given in preparation for intrauterine insemination based on the follicle size and estradiol level prior to surge in 85 cycles (Group A), with the spontaneous surge in 64 cycles (Group B) and not given in 22 cycles (Group C) due to high luteinizing hormone levels.

RESULTS

The overall pregnancy rate per cycle was 18.1% (31/171), 15.2% (Group A), 20.3% (Group B) and 22.7% (Group C), (p > 0.50).

CONCLUSION

Although there may be physiological reasons to propose that timing the human chorionic gonadotropin to the luteinizing hormone surge will improve the success rate, they were not demonstrated.

Human chorionic gonadotropin administration is associated with high pregnancy rates during ovarian stimulation and timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination

BACKGROUND

There are different factors that influence treatment outcome after ovarian stimulation and timed-intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI). After patient age, it has been suggested that timing of insemination in relation to ovulation is probably the most important variable affecting the success of treatment. The objective of this study is to study the value of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and occurrence of luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in timing insemination on the treatment outcome after follicular monitoring with timed-intercourse or intrauterine insemination, with or without ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 2000 consecutive completed treatment cycles (637 timed-intercourse and 1363 intrauterine insemination cycles). Stimulation protocols included clomiphene alone or with FSH injection, letrozole (an aromatase inhibitor) alone or with FSH, and FSH alone. LH-surge was defined as an increase in LH level > or =200% over mean of preceding two days. When given, hCG was administered at a dose of 10,000 IU. The main outcome was clinical pregnancy rate per cycle.

RESULTS

Higher pregnancy rates occurred in cycles in which hCG was given. Occurrence of an LH-surge was associated with a higher pregnancy rate with clomiphene treatment, but a lower pregnancy rate with FSH treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

hCG administration is associated with a favorable outcome during ovarian stimulation. Awaiting occurrence of LH-surge is associated with a better outcome with CC but not with FSH treatment.