Is there a risk of prion disease after the administration of urinary-derived gonadotrophins?

Safety of drugs used in assisted reproduction techniques

Infertility may affect one in six couples; however, the development of the assisted reproduction technique (ART) created the opportunity for a large proportion of the infertile population to bear children. Pharmacological agents are routinely used in ART, and new ones are introduced regularly, with the aim of retrieving multiple oocytes to increase the prospect of pregnancy. The combinations of drugs that are used have specific adverse effects, but it is mostly the combined action of more than one agent that causes the greatest concern. The matter is complicated by the suspicion that some techniques in ART, for example intracytoplasmic sperm injection for severe male infertility problems (including azoospermia), may also contribute to the increase in adverse effects, especially congenital malformation. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. It may give rise to a short period of estradiol withdrawal symptoms and it may also lead to luteal phase deficiency. Similarly GnRHa antagonists, which have been recently introduced to control ovarian hyperstimulation, can lead to luteal phase deficiency and may cause some local injection site reactions. The more pure form of gonadotropin leads to less local injection site reactions and their main adverse effects are associated with the consequences of multiple ovulations. It has been proposed that gonadotropins may be a factor in the increasing risk of ovarian cancer and possibly breast cancer, but this has not been substantiated. Prion infection is another potential hazard, although no cases have been reported. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a well recognised complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ART. It is usually a result of recruitment of a large number of ovarian follicles. Efforts to minimise the incidence of this syndrome and its severity are now well developed. Congenital malformations are another possible adverse effect of fertility drugs, but it is more probable that the increase in congenital abnormality that is reported in ART is because of the population studied, i.e. patients already at high risk of congenital malformation, rather than the fertility drugs used or the technique employed. High order multiple pregnancy and its sequela is a well established complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. This could be a result of multiple ovulations or more than one embryo replacement. Reducing the number of embryos transferred can reduce this more serious adverse effect for expectant mothers and for children conceived from ART.

Consensus statement on the bio-safety of urinary-derived gonadotrophins with respect to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

Human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) encompass a group of rare neurodegenerative diseases. In April 2004, a group of international experts and regulators met in Buenos Aires, Argentina, to review the safety and to reach consensus on the use of urinary-derived gonadotrophins with respect to TSE. Iatrogenic transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) from pituitary-derived gonadotrophins has been reported, no infectivity in urine has been demonstrated, and no definite cases of transmission via urine have been reported. It is currently not possible to monitor donor urine or finished product for the presence of prions. Therefore the assessment of risk has to be based on the likelihood of infection in urine, the source of the urine, and the capacity of the manufacturing process to remove any adventitious infection. Urine for the production of medicinal products should be obtained from sources that minimize the possible presence of materials derived from subjects suffering from human TSE. As no strong evidence for TSE infectivity in urine exists, it can be concluded that the risk of disease-generating prions and TSE infectivity being present in donor urine is low. Current evidence indicates that, with respect to the risk of TSE infection, urinary-derived gonadotrophins appear to be safe.

Gonadotrophins in ovulation induction

For anovulatory women who fail to ovulate or conceive with clomiphene citrate, gonadotrophin ovulation induction has been the conventional second-line therapy. The aim of treatment is to achieve monofollicular development and ovulation. This differs fundamentally from the aim of ovarian stimulation for IVF, in which multiple follicular development is the goal. The small therapeutic window of ovulation induction requires a rigorous approach to monitoring, and willingness to cancel the cycle when multiple follicle development occurs. The two most widely used approaches are the low-dose step-up and the step-down protocols. While the latter more closely mimics the normo-ovulatory cycle, outcomes are similar. For safety reasons, the step-down protocol has not been widely adopted. The principle risks of ovulation induction are ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy. There is a need to individualize treatment if outcomes are to be optimized. The role of adjuvant therapies remains unclear. However, prediction models based on initial screening parameters enable the optimal dose of FSH to be determined, and the identification of patients with a poor prognosis for successful treatment.

IgG antibodies against bovine serum albumin in humans--their prevalence and response to exposure to bovine serum albumin

Human exposure to bovine serum albumin (BSA) is very common and occurs through dietary and medicinal routes. Although great effort has been made to reduce exposure to BSA in pharmaceuticals to eliminate the threat of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, less attention has been given to assessing the human immune response after exposure to BSA. A sensitive quantitative radioimmunoassay was therefore developed to measure anti-BSA IgG antibodies in healthy subjects and in cancer patients participating in a randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial where they were exposed to BSA as an intrathoracic surgical sealant during pneumonectomy. Anti-BSA antibodies were detected in 55% of 60 healthy blood donors and 51% of 83 patients before lung cancer resection. The median antibody levels were the same in both cohorts; 0.086 microg/mL (range 0.016-19.5 microg/mL) for health blood donors and 0.062 microg/mL (range 0.009-44 microg/mL) for cancer patients. Six months after exposure of the cancer patients to BSA, the percentage of patients with anti-BSA antibody rose to 96% and the median antibody level rose to 19 microg/mL (range 0.009-258 microg/mL). Placebo-treated cancer patients showed no significant increase in the percentage of patients with anti-BSA antibody (41%) or the median antibody level (0.047 microg/mL; range 0.008-1.58) over 6 months. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of anti-BSA antibody. Elevated levels of anti-BSA antibody were not associated with any detectable clinical events in either the healthy blood donors or the cancer patients.