GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final follicular maturation: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study

Impact of GnRH agonist trigger on subsequent follicular phase length in ART cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the use of GnRH agonist trigger versus hCG trigger affect the length of the subsequent follicular phase in women?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study analyzing 196 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with freeze-all for PGT-M at a university-affiliated fertility center; 132 received GnRH agonist trigger, and 64 received hCG trigger.

RESULTS

The GnRH agonist group demonstrated a significantly longer subsequent follicular phase compared to the hCG group (18.98 ± 3.54 vs. 16.06 ± 3.13 days, P < .001), with extended follicular phase occurring in 90.2% versus 60.9% of cycles (P < .001). Both groups had comparable antral follicle counts (14.52 ± 7.71 vs. 13.00 ± 15.36, P = .748). Multiple regression analysis identified GnRH agonist trigger as a significant independent predictor of subsequent follicular phase length (coefficient = 4.552, 95% CI: 3.058-6.045, P < .001), along with BMI (coefficient = 0.188, 95% CI: 0.019-0.357, P = .030). The model explained 31.4% of the variance in follicular phase length (F = 7.516, P < .001). After adjusting for confounding variables, pregnancy rates were comparable between groups (OR = 1.763, 95% CI: 0.798-3.505, P = .173).

CONCLUSIONS

The GnRH agonist trigger prolongs the subsequent follicular phase compared to the hCG trigger without compromising pregnancy rates. BMI showed a statistically significant but modest association with follicular phase length that requires further validation. These findings have important implications for optimizing the timing of frozen embryo transfer in subsequent cycles and may facilitate more personalized monitoring protocols.

Comparative analysis of hCG and dual-trigger protocols in IVF for advanced maternal age women: a single‑center retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and dual-trigger (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist [GnRH-a] and hCG) protocols in terms of cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and other pregnancy outcomes among advanced-age women.

METHODS

We enrolled 801 women aged ≥ 35 years who were experiencing infertility and beginning their first in vitro fertilization cycle at a tertiary academic medical institution between August 2015 and June 2023. Among these, 115 and 686 women used the dual-trigger and hCG methods. Propensity score matching was employed to account for confounding variables. The main outcomes evaluated were CLBR and time to live birth (TTLB).

RESULTS

The CLBR did not differ significantly between the hCG and dual-trigger groups (29.86% vs. 26.09%, P = 0.44), whereas the TTLBs of both groups were similar (9.60 vs. 10.14 months, P = 0.72). CLBR results were similar for both groups, according to a Kaplan-Meier analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.43; P = 0.82). After a multiple Cox proportional hazards model was established, the CLBR of the hCG group remained comparable with that of the dual-trigger group (HR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.53-4.11; P = 0.39). The subgroup analysis also showed similar findings.

CONCLUSION

Considering the higher fertilization rate and shorter TTLB, the dual-trigger protocol may be more suitable than the hCG trigger protocol.

Triggering oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization treatment in healthy responders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, dual, and double triggers in predicted healthy responders undergoing ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization.

DESIGN

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinical trial registries, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to December 2023.

STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS

Twelve high-integrity RCTs comprising 1,931 women were included, which compared hCG trigger with GnRH agonist trigger, dual trigger, and double trigger. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 16.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Key outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), live birth rates (LBR), number of oocytes, number of mature oocytes, miscarriage rates, and rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

RESULTS

The network meta-analysis for CPR were risk ratio (RR), 1.13; (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.60) for hCG vs. GnRH agonist trigger, RR, 1.23 (95% CI, 0.92-1.65) for hCG vs. dual trigger, RR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.21-0.69) for hCG vs. double trigger, RR, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.70-1.70) for GnRH agonist vs. dual trigger and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.17-0.67) for GnRH agonist vs. double trigger, and RR, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.60) for double vs. dual trigger. Dual trigger demonstrated the highest Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (85.1%), indicating superior efficacy for CPR. For LBR, although connectivity was limited, the RR was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.00-1.70) for dual vs. hCG trigger, and RR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.05-2.43) for dual vs. GnRH agonist trigger. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates were significantly lower with the GnRH agonist compared with hCG trigger (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.19-1.75). There were no RCTs reporting ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rates with the use of dual or double trigger. No significant differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, or miscarriage rates among the trigger protocols.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The findings indicate that there is no evidence to suggest that using GnRH agonist, dual, or double protocols is superior to hCG trigger in improving CPR. Although LBR may benefit from dual trigger, results are limited by available RCTs. Larger, multicenter trials are needed for further evaluation of LBR and understanding of long-term outcomes.

Triggering final follicular maturation for IVF cycles

As part of a conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, final follicular maturation is usually triggered by a single bolus dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). COH, which combines GnRH antagonist co-treatment with GnRH agonist(GnRHa) trigger, is often used in attempts to eliminate severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and to improve oocyte/embryo yield and quality. Recently, the combination of GnRHa, with hCG trigger has also been implemented into clinical practice. Here, we analyze and discuss published studies on various ways of triggering final follicular maturation, seeking to elucidate the appropriateness of each approach for specific patient subgroups.

Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection significantly improves blastocyst yield and quality in IVF patients

This study evaluated the effectiveness of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in improving ovarian response and embryo quality in IVF patients with poor embryo quality in previous controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles. 74 patients participated, with 30 in the control group and 44 in the PRP group. PRP was injected during the follicular phase for the PRP group. The control group completed two COH cycles, while the PRP group underwent COH cycles before and after the PRP injection. In the first COH cycle, there were no significant differences between groups. However, in the second COH cycle, the PRP group showed significant improvements: the number of fertilized oocytes increased (5.2 ± 3.6 vs. 3.3 ± 3.5, p = 0.011), total blastocysts (1.7 ± 1.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.0001) and good quality blastocysts (0.6 ± 0.8 vs. 0 ± 0.2, P < 0.0001). The total blastocyst rate (35 ± 31% vs. 13 ± 24%, p = 0.001) and good quality blastocyst rate (14 ± 22% vs. 1 ± 3%, p < 0.0001) were also higher in the PRP group. The most notable benefits occurred when COH was conducted one to two months post-PRP injection.

The quality of human eggs and its pre-IVF incubation

Background

Multi-factors influence the success rate of infertility treatments, and one of the important points is to obtain good quality eggs.

Methods

Based on the literatures and unpublished data, the factors affecting egg quality were summarized.

Main Findings Results

Egg quality is an important determinant in successful infertility treatment. In addition to maternal age, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols also play a key role in affecting the quality of the egg. After egg retrieval, the insemination occurs 3-6 h after collection, with a pre-IVF incubation time by in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (39-42 h post-HCG injection). The pre-IVF incubation refers to the short period time of 3 to 6 h after oocyte retrieval and before the insemination by IVF or ICSI. The pre-IVF incubation of collected eggs in the designed culture medium improves egg quality in terms of maturation and early embryonic development.

Conclusions

Pre-IVF incubation of the collected eggs contributes to the improvement of the quality of eggs; therefore, it may increase subsequent pregnancy and implantation rates following embryo transfer.

Influencing factors and effects of low oocyte retrieval in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in-vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To investigate influencing factors and effects of low oocyte retrieval in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

In total, 720 patients with PCOS undergoing IVF were enrolled in this retrospective study from January 2017 to December 2022. The oocyte retrieval rate (ORR) was defined as the ratio of the number of oocytes retrieved to the number of follicles ≥ 12 mm in diameter on the trigger day. Using 1 standard deviation from the mean ORR as the boundary value, patients were divided into low and normal ORR groups. Patient characteristics, stimulation protocols, serum hormone levels, oocyte maturity, embryo developmental quality, and pregnancy outcomes of fresh transfer cycles were analysed.

RESULTS

ORR ranged from 0.06 to 2.69, with a mean value of 1.02. Compared with the normal ORR group (ORR ≥ 0.65), patients in the low ORR group (ORR < 0.65) had a higher body mass index; higher antral follicle count (AFC); more days of gonadotrophin stimulation; and lower serum oestradiol (E2) level, lower progesterone level and lower E2 level/follicle (≥12 mm) on the trigger day. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed AFC [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.05, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0120-1.0940], E2 level/follicle (≥12 mm) (aOR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.9888-0.9972) and progesterone level (aOR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.2402-0.6649) on the trigger day were significantly associated with low ORR. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses revealed that serum E2 level/follicle (≥12 mm) had an area under the curve of 0.7036 (95 % CI 0.65-0.76; p < 0.01). The cut-off value was 169.2 pg/ml, with sensitivity of 65 % and specificity of 65 %, for predicting low ORR. Low ORR was associated with fewer top-quality embryos and more cycles with no embryos available for transfer. The rates of metaphase II oocytes, top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy and live birth did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Serum E2 level/follicle (≥12 mm) on the trigger day may be used as a predictive factor for low ORR in patients with PCOS. Low ORR may not affect oocyte and embryo developmental potential under appropriate ovarian stimulation management, but likely increases the risk of no embryos being available for transfer.

Dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger for blastocyst quality and cumulative live birth

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the number of euploid blastocysts and cumulative live birth rate (LBR) between dual and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggers in poor and normal ovarian responders undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was enrolled from July 2018 to December 2021 and followed up until June 2024 at a single reproductive medical center. Overall, 1040 in vitro fertilization (IVF)-PGT and 784 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were assessed. Dual (triptorelin acetate 0.2 mg and recombinant hCG [rhCG] 250 µg) or hCG (rhCG 250 µg) trigger was used for oocyte maturation in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and PGT cycles. We assessed the embryo outcomes and FET cumulative pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of oocytes retrieved (10.17 ± 5.22 vs 10.27 ± 5.14, P = 0.789), MII oocytes (8.24 ± 4.26 vs 8.28 ± 4.05, P = 0.888), blastocysts (2.16 ± 1.50 vs 2.12 ± 1.49, P = 0.729), euploid blastocysts (1.06 ± 1.14 vs 1.09 ± 1.23, P = 0.726), and the rate of cumulative LBR (24.9% vs 24.9%, P = 1.000) in the dual trigger group were comparable with those in the hCG group. The trigger method was not correlated with higher LBR based on logistic regression analysis (odds ratio[OR] = 1.040 [0.778-1.392], P = 0.790).

CONCLUSION

For poor and normal ovarian responders, the dual trigger, compared with the hCG trigger, did not improve the PGT embryo outcomes and FET cumulative pregnancy outcomes.

Dual trigger or hCG alone: A retrospective analysis on patients with diminished ovarian reserve under in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment

OBJECTIVE

With remarkable deficiency in both oocyte stock and competence, the prognosis of IVF-ET in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is obstinately poor, underscoring warranted optimization to current procedures. We compared the efficacy of dual-trigger (hCG plus GnRH-a) and hCG alone on the outcomes for DOR patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 381 couples and 857 controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles, and 222 couples and 366 frozen embryo transfer (FET) ones were included. The intermediate outcomes during oocyte retrieval and in vitro culture were compared based on COS dataset, while outcomes after embryo transfer analyzed based on FET dataset. The marginal effect of all study factors and covariates were evaluated with a cluster-weighted GEE model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Neither the intermediate nor implantation outcomes were improved by dual-trigger. The OR values were 1.08 (95 % CI: 0.41-2.78) for retrieval cancellation, 1.33 (95 % CI: 0.89-2.00) for oocyte harvest, 1.04(95 %CI: 0.94-1.15) for viable embryo and 1.03(95 %CI: 0.88-1.19) for top-quality embryo. Similarly, the ORs were 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.62-1.30) for implantation and 0.97 (95 %CI: 0.56-1.69) for clinical pregnancy. This equivalence remained unchanged after adjusting for the covariates such as age, BMI, controlled ovarian stimulation protocols, etc. Thus, dual-trigger cannot provide significant advantage over hCG in related to immediate or clinical outcomes of IVF-ET treatments in DOR patients.

Increasing dominant follicular proportion was associated with adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes in low-prognosis women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the correlation between different dominant follicle proportions (DFPs) and outcomes of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) among patients classified under POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, who underwent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols. Additionally, it sought to determine the optimal DFP threshold for trigger timing.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients classified under POSEIDON Groups 3 (n = 593) and 4 (n = 563) who underwent GnRH-ant protocols for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) between 2016 and 2022. These patients were categorized into two groups based on their DFPs, defined as the ratio of ≥ 18-mm dominant follicles to ≥ 12-mm follicles on the trigger day (DFP ≤ 40% and DFP ≥ 40%). Statistical analyses, including restricted cubic spline (RCS) and multivariate logistic regression, were employed to assess the relationship between DFP and IVF/ICSI outcomes.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of patients were similar across groups. In POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, DFP > 40 was associated with a significant decrease in the number (No.) of oocytes retrieved, cleaved embryos, and available embryos. Moreover, following the GnRH-ant cycle, the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh embryo transfer (ET) were notably reduced in the DFP > 40 group compared with the DFP ≤ 40 group, whereas no significant differences were observed in the pregnancy outcomes of the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) between the groups. In POSEIDON Group 3, the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLRB) were significantly higher in the DFP ≤ 40 subgroup than in the DFP > 40 subgroup, with a notable decrease in CLRB observed with increasing DFP levels. However, in POSEIDON Group 4, no significant differences in CCPR and CLRB were found between the groups. Logistic regression analysis identified age and the No. of oocytes retrieved as pivotal factors influencing CLRB in Group 4.

CONCLUSION

For patients in POSEIDON Group 3, maintaining a DFP ≤ 40 mm is crucial to achieve optimal laboratory and pregnancy outcomes by avoiding delayed triggering. However, for patients in POSEIDON Group 4, age remains a critical factor influencing CLRB regardless of DFP, although a higher No. of oocytes retrieved and available embryos with DFP ≤ 40 is beneficial.

GnRH agonist-only trigger, compared to dual trigger, reduces oocyte retrieval rate in high responders without affecting cumulative live birth rate

Introduction

This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

Materials and methods

A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR.

Results

We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group.

Conclusion

GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.

Reproductive Outcomes of Dual Trigger versus hCG Alone in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization with Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycles

Aim

To investigate the effect of the triggering method on the results of fresh embryo transfer in patients who underwent gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles.

Methods

The study was conducted retrospectively at a university-based tertiary reproductive center. The sample consisted of a total of 295 patients, of whom 111 were in the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger group and 184 were in the dual trigger group. The main outcome measure of this study was the live birth rate, and secondary outcomes were the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and good-quality embryo rate.

Results

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the dual and hCG trigger groups. The results also indicated statistically nonsignificant differences between the two groups in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved (p > 0.05), the number of mature oocytes (p > 0.05), and the fertilization rate (p > 0.05). The number of good-quality embryos (p=0.002) was higher in the dual trigger group compared with the hCG trigger group. However, the rates of clinical pregnancy and live births did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Although the number of total and high-quality embryos obtained was higher in the dual trigger group, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pregnancy outcomes. The fresh embryo transfer yielded similar rates of implantation and live births in both trigger groups.

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG (double trigger) for final oocyte maturation increases the number of top-quality embryos in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

The utilization of a double trigger, involving the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation, is emerging as a novel approach in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). This protocol involves administering GnRH-a and hCG 40 and 34 h prior to ovum pick-up (OPU), respectively. This treatment modality has been implemented in patients with low/poor oocytes yield. This study aimed to determine whether the double trigger could improve the number of top-quality embryos (TQEs) in patients with fewer than three TQEs.

METHODS

The stimulation characteristics of 35 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analyzed. These cycles were triggered by the combination of hCG and GnRHa (double trigger cycles) and compared to the same patients' previous IVF attempt, which utilized the hCG trigger (hCG trigger control cycles). The analysis involved cases who were admitted to our reproductive center between January 2018 and December 2022. In the hCG trigger control cycles, all 35 patients had fewer than three TQEs.

RESULTS

Patients who received the double trigger cycles yielded a significantly higher number of 2PN cleavage embryos (3.54 ± 3.37 vs. 2.11 ± 2.15, P = 0.025), TQEs ( 2.23 ± 2.05 vs. 0.89 ± 0.99, P < 0.001), and a simultaneously higher proportion of the number of cleavage stage embryos (53.87% ± 31.38% vs. 39.80% ± 29.60%, P = 0.043), 2PN cleavage stage embryos (43.89% ± 33.01% vs. 27.22% ± 27.13%, P = 0.014), and TQEs (27.05% ± 26.26% vs. 14.19% ± 19.76%, P = 0.019) to the number of oocytes retrieved compared with the hCG trigger control cycles, respectively. The double trigger cycles achieved higher rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy (20.00% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.031), cumulative persistent pregnancy (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and cumulative live birth (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) per stimulation cycle compared with the hCG trigger control cycles.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger) may be suggested as a valuable new regimen for treating patients with low TQE yield in previous hCG trigger IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in women with normal ovarian response to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol using different trigger methods: a single-center retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

PURPOSE

To investigate whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with normal ovarian response (NOR).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, data of 404 NOR patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) from 2018 to 2022 were studied. Patients were divided into HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group according to trigger methods. After confounding factors were controlled by propensity score matching, 67 cases were included in HCG group and HCG plus GnRH-a group, respectively, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed. Basal data, ovarian stimulation, embryological data and pregnancy outcomes were compared. The effect of trigger methods on pregnancy outcomes was analyzed by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant differences in embryological data, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET, number of fresh embryos transferred and total number of embryos transferred after one cycle of oocyte retrieval. While, cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was better in the dual-trigger group than in the HCG group. The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the trigger methods had an independent influence on embryo implantation and cumulative live birth.

CONCLUSIONS

During IVF/ICSI, dual-trigger could potentially play a role in improving oocyte quality, ensuring embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate of ET and cumulative live birth rate at the end of one ovum pick-up (OPU) cycle, and reducing the physical, temporal and financial negative consequences due to repeated OPU cycle.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger therapy with GnRH agonist and hCG versus hCG trigger in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is one of the obstacles affecting the reproductive outcomes of patients receiving assisted reproductive therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether dual trigger, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), can improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with DOR undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using mild stimulation protocols.

METHODS

A total of 734 patients with DOR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into a recombinant hCG trigger group and a dual trigger group (hCG combined with GnRHa) according to the different trigger drugs used. The main outcome measures included the number of oocytes retrieved, the fertilization rate, the number of transferable embryos, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate, the live birth rate (LBR), and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Generalized linear model and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors.

RESULTS

There were 337 cycles with a single hCG trigger and 397 cycles with dual trigger. The dual trigger group demonstrated significantly higher numbers of retrieved oocytes [3.60 vs. 2.39, adjusted β = 0.538 (0.221-0.855)], fertilized oocytes [2.55 vs. 1.94, adjusted β = 0.277 (0.031-0.523)] and transferable embryos [1.22 vs. 0.95, adjusted β = 0.162 (-0.005-0.329)] than did the hCG trigger group, whereas no significant difference in the fertilization rate was observed between the two groups. Moreover, the embryo transfer cancellation rate (35.5% vs. 43.9%) was obviously lower in the dual trigger group. Among the fresh embryo transfer cycles, the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate were similar between the two groups. After controlling for potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the number of oocytes retrieved but had no significant impact on the CLBR.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual triggering of final oocyte maturation with hCG combined with GnRHa can significantly increase the number of oocytes retrieved in patients with DOR but has no improvement effect on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate or LBR of fresh cycles or on the CLBR.

Does dual oocyte retrieval with continuous FSH administration increase the number of mature oocytes in low responders? An open-label randomized controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an increase in the total number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes between a conventional ovarian stimulation (OS) and a double uninterrupted stimulation?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There is no increase in the total number of MII oocytes when comparing one conventional OS to a continuous stimulation with double oocyte aspiration.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Based on the concept of multiple follicular waves, the combination of two stimulations in the same ovarian cycle has gained interest in patients with a low ovarian reserve. This so-called dual stimulation approach is usually characterized by a discontinuation of FSH administration for ∼5 days and appears to have a favourable impact on the number of retrieved oocytes without affecting the embryo quality or ploidy status. The outcomes of dual uninterrupted OS have not yet been studied.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) with superiority design, performed in a single tertiary centre. Subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups between October 2019 and September 2021. All patients underwent a conventional stimulation with recombinant FSH. When two or more follicles of 17 mm were present, the final inclusion criterion was assessed; randomization occurred only in the presence of ≤9 follicles of ≥11 mm. In Group A, ovulation was triggered with hCG, and oocyte retrieval (OR) was performed 34-36 h later, followed by a fresh single or double embryo transfer (SET or DET) on Day 3/5. In Group B, ovulation was triggered with GnRH agonist, followed by another OS, without discontinuation of the FSH administration. In the presence of one or more follicles of ≥17 mm, the second stimulation was completed with hCG. A freeze-all strategy (Day 3/5) was applied for both retrievals, followed by transfer of one or two embryos in an artificially prepared frozen-thawed cycle. In the absence of one or more follicles of ≥17 mm after 13 additional days of stimulation, the second cycle was cancelled. All ORs were executed by a senior fertility specialist who was blinded for the first treatment, and all follicles >10 mm were aspirated, according to routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was the total number of MII oocytes. Patients were followed up until all embryos were transferred, or until live birth was achieved. Other secondary outcomes included the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), the number of good quality embryos (Day 3/5), the ongoing pregnancy rate, and gonadotropin consumption.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients between 25 and 40 years old, with an anti-Müllerian hormone level of ≤1.5 ng/ml, antral follicle count of ≤6, or ≤5 oocytes after a previous stimulation, were included. At the start, 70 patients were eligible for participation in the trial, of whom 48 patients fulfilled the final inclusion criterium and were randomized. After drop-out of two patients, 23 patients were randomized to a single round of OS (Group A), and 23 patients were randomized to two uninterrupted rounds of OS (Group B).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. The cumulative number of COCs and MII oocytes after completion of the second OR was similar in Group A and Group B [5.3 ± 2.7 versus 5.3 ± 3.0 (P = 0.95); 4.1 ± 2.4 versus 4.3 ± 2.7 (P = 0.77)]. Likewise, a comparable number of excellent and good quality embryos was available on Day 3 (3.0 ± 2.0 versus 2.7 ± 2.0; P = 0.63). In Group B, the cancellation rate due to insufficient response to the second round of stimulation was 39.1% (9/23). When focusing on the first stimulation in both groups, there were no significant differences regarding basal FSH, gonadotropin consumption, and the number of preovulatory follicles. After the first OR, the mean number of COC and MII oocytes was significantly higher in Group A (who had hCG triggering), compared to Group B (who had GnRH agonist triggering) [5.3 ± 2.7 versus 3.3 ± 2.2; difference 95% CI (0.54 to 3.45), P = 0.004 and 4.1 ± 2.4 versus 3.0 ± 2.2; difference 95% CI (-0.15 to 2.6), P = 0.05, respectively]. Likewise, the number of excellent and good quality embryos on Day 3 was significantly higher (3.0 ± 2.0 versus 1.9 ± 1.7; P = 0.02) in Group A.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was powered to demonstrate superiority for the number of MII oocytes after dual stimulation. Investigating the impact of dual stimulation on pregnancy rates would have required a larger sample size. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in embryo vitrification and transfer policies precluded a correct comparison of embryologic outcomes between both groups.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first RCT investigating the role of continuous stimulation with double aspiration in low responders. Our results show no statistically significant differences in the cumulative number of MII oocytes between one conventional stimulation with fresh ET and two consecutive stimulations with a freeze-only approach. Furthermore, the observed suboptimal oocyte yield after agonist ovulation triggering in low responders in the dual uninterrupted OS group is a reason for concern and further scrutiny, given that previous RCTs have shown similar outcomes in normal and high responders after hCG and GnRH agonist triggers.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported in part by a research grant from Organon. H.T. received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, Cook, Goodlife, and Ferring. L.B. received fees for lectures from Merck & Organon and support for attending ESHRE 2023. M.D.V. reports fees for lectures from Ferring, Merck, Organon, IBSA, Gedeon Richter, and Cooper Surgical and support for attending ASRM 2023. S.M. received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck. C.B. was on the Advisory board and received consulting fees from Theramex and received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03846544.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

19 February 2019.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

28 October 2019.

Cycle outcomes of dual trigger (GnRH agonist+hCG) versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger alone in POSEDION group 3-4 poor-responders and normo-responders: A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Recently, dual trigger was proposed in an attempt to improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes in poor and normo-responder patients (PR and NR, respectively). The study's aim was to compare cycle outcomes of dual trigger versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger in NRs and POSEIDON group 3/4 (PG 3/4) PRs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial included PG 3/4 PRs and NRs undergoing IVF using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. PRs and NRs were divided into two subgroups: (1) study groups in both arms received dual trigger and (2) control groups received only HCG.

RESULTS

Two-hundred twenty-five women participated in the study. The mean patient age was significantly higher in the dual trigger group versus the HCG trigger group in PG 3/4 PRs. The number of retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes and the number of patients with good quality embryos were comparable between groups and live birth rates (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) were significantly higher in the HCG group versus the dual trigger group in PG3/4 PRs (39.2% versus 19.2%; p = 0.026). NR dual trigger and HCG trigger groups were comparable in terms of patient age and LBR per ET did not significantly differ between these groups. The number of patients with good quality embryos was significantly higher in the dual trigger group versus the HCG group in NRs CONCLUSION: Dual trigger does not seem to add additional benefits in terms of live birth rates in PG3/4 PRs and NRs. Nonetheless, considering the age difference and lack of homogenity in the number and day of embryos transferred in PG 3/4 PRs, major conclusion that can be drawn from the study is that dual trigger is not systematically useful even in poor responders since the number of mature oocytes is comparable between groups. Larger scale studies are required for additional potential implications.

A reappraisal of ovarian stimulation strategies used in assisted reproductive technology

Ovarian stimulation is a fundamental step in assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the intention of inducing ovarian follicle development prior to timed intercourse or intra-uterine insemination and facilitating the retrieval of multiple oocytes during a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. The basis of ovarian stimulation includes the administration of exogenous gonadotropins, with or without pre-treatment with oral hormonal therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist is given in addition to the gonadotropins to prevent a premature rise of endogenous luteinizing hormone that would in turn lead to premature ovulation. With the advancement in technology, various stimulation protocols have been devised to cater for different patient needs. However, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and its serious complications may occur following ovarian stimulation. It is also evident that suboptimal ovarian stimulation strategies may have a negative impact on oogenesis, embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and reproductive outcomes over recent years. This review describes the various forms of pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation and stimulation protocols, and aims to provide clinicians with the latest available evidence.

Triggering of ovulation for GnRH-antagonist cycles in normal and low ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review andmeta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated whether dual triggering [a combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] of final oocyte maturation can improve the number of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancy rate in low or normal responders undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using a GnRH-antagonist protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

Studies up to October 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR), and continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature [metaphase II (MII)] oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate; other IVF outcomes were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies were identified, and 898 patients were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the number of oocytes retrieved [WMD = 1.38 (95% CI 0.47-2.28), I2 = 66%, p = 0.003, low evidence], number of MII oocytes [WMD = 0.7 (95% CI 0.35-1.05), I2 = 42%, p < 0.0001, moderate evidence], number of embryos [WMD = 0.68 (95% CI 0.07-1.3), I2 = 67%, p = 0.03, low evidence] and number of good-quality embryos [WMD = 1.14 (95% CI 0.35-1.93), I2 = 0%, p = 0.005, moderate evidence] in the dual trigger group were significantly higher than in the hCG trigger group. The results of the ovarian response subgroup analysis showed significant differences in all of these outcomes in normal responders, and no differences in any of the outcomes in low responders, except for the number of MII oocytes. In low responders, clinical pregnancy rates may be improved in the dual trigger group [RR = 2.2 (95% CI 1.05-4.61), I2 = 28%, p = 0.04, low evidence].

CONCLUSION

Dual triggering by GnRH agonist and hCG improved oocyte maturity and embryo grading for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering for final oocyte maturation may improve clinical pregnancy rates in low responders.

Beyond the Umbrella: A Systematic Review of the Interventions for the Prevention of and Reduction in the Incidence and Severity of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Who Undergo In Vitro Fertilization Treatments

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the main severe complication of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The aim of the current study was to identify the interventions for the prevention of and reduction in the incidence and severity of OHSS in patients who undergo IVF not included in systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and assess and grade their efficacy and evidence base. The best available evidence for each specific intervention was identified, analyzed in terms of safety/efficacy ratio and risk of bias, and graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) hierarchy of evidence. A total of 15 interventions to prevent OHSS were included in the final analysis. In the IVF population not at a high risk for OHSS, follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation may reduce the incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS. In high-risk patients, inositol pretreatment, ovulation triggering with low doses of urinary hCG, and the luteal phase administration of a GnRH antagonist may reduce OHSS risk. In conclusion, even if not supported by systematic reviews with homogeneity of the RCTs, several treatments/strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of OHSS have been shown to be promising.

Cumulative pregnancy rate via multiple fresh or frozen embryo transfers in women with current, resected, or recurred endometrioma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the cumulative pregnancy rate (PR) via multiple fresh or frozen embryo transfers (ET) in women with current, resected, or recurred endometrioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IVF data including oocyte pick-up (OPU) and fresh or frozen ET in women with current (37 women; 56 OPU, 18 fresh and 14 frozen ET), resected (24 women; 50 OPU, 17 fresh and 42 frozen ET), or recurred endometrioma (28 women; 49 OPU, 22 fresh and 24 frozen ET) were obtained. All cycles were performed from 2015 to 2022 in a single university hospital.

RESULTS

The median serum AMH level (ng/mL) was 1.44, 1.47, and 0.98, respectively. The number of total or mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, cleavage embryos at day-3, and top-quality embryos at day-3 were all similar in the three groups. Cycles with no oocyte occurred in 2 (3.6%), 1 (2%), and 3 cycles (6.1%), respectively. Freeze-all was performed in 46.3%, 59.2%, and 47.8% of the cycles, respectively (p > 0.05). The cumulative clinical PR per total ET (43.8%, 25.4%, and 21.7%), per OPU (25%, 30%, and 20.4%), and per woman (37.8%, 62.5%, and 35.7%) were all similar in the three groups. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate per total ET, per OPU, and per woman were also similar in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Similarity in ovarian reserve, number of oocytes, number of embryos, cumulative clinical PR, and live birth in the three endometriosis groups indicates that the IVF outcomes in the 'recurrent endometrioma' group are not inferior to 'current' or 'resected' group.

In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes With a Dual Trigger in Normoresponders in Antagonist Cycles

Objectives To evaluate whether the dual trigger of ovulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and the standard dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (dual trigger) is better than hCG alone in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients who responded well to ovarian stimulation. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, 5593 antagonist cycles of patients were reviewed. This study included women who had an antral follicle count of 5 or more and exhibited a normoresponse to ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol, as determined by the follicular output rate (FORT). The primary outcome indicators consisted of the quantities of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome markers included live birth rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and continued pregnancy rates. Results A total of 1244 normoresponder women who met the inclusion criteria were identified from the scanned files and subsequently enrolled in the GnRH antagonist protocol. A total of 383 cycles were observed in the group that was given the standard hCG trigger while 861 cycles were observed in the group that was given the dual trigger. The number of mature oocytes and top-quality embryos was significantly higher in the dual trigger group. The maturation rate in the hCG group was 74.8% while it was 76.9% in the dual trigger group (p=0.018). The dual trigger group exhibited an ongoing pregnancy rate of 37.6%, whereas the hCG group had a rate of 30.1% (p = 0.02). The dual trigger group exhibited a slightly higher live birth rate (34.3% vs 29.2%, p = 0.11), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Dual trigger of ovulation was superior to hCG alone in terms of the number of mature oocytes yielded, top quality of embryos, maturation rates, and ongoing pregnancy in IVF cycles of normoresponders having ovarian stimulation on the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Dual trigger improves the pregnancy rate in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles compared with the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

PROPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the implementation of a "dual trigger" approach, utilizing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF), leads to improved pregnancy outcomes compared to the conventional hCG trigger alone. Previous meta-analyses have not provided sufficient evidence to support the superiority of the dual trigger over the hCG trigger in fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials were conducted to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the dual trigger on pregnancy outcomes in fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. We searched the Medline and Embase databases for articles up to 2023 by using search terms: "dual trigger," "GnRHa," "hCG," "IVF." Eligible RCTs comparing the dual trigger with the hCG trigger were included. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per cycle. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, CPR, miscarriage rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate per started cycle We compared the oocyte maturation and pregnancy outcomes in the dual trigger and hCG trigger groups. In patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET, we also conducted a subgroup analysis to evaluate whether dual trigger improves the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR).

RESULTS

We included 10 randomised studies, with 825 participants in the dual trigger group and 813 in the hCG trigger group. Compared with the hCG trigger, dual trigger was associated with a significant increase in the LBR per cycle (odds ratio (OR) = 1.61[1.16, 2.25]), number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [MD] = 1.05 [0.43, 1.68]), number of mature oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.82 [0. 84, 1.16]), and CPR (OR = 1.48 [1.08, 2.01]). Subgroup analyses revealed that dual trigger was associated with a significantly increased CPR in patients who received fresh ET (OR = 1.68 [1.14, 2.48]). By contrast, the dual trigger was not associated with an increased CPR in the patient group with frozen-thawed ET (OR = 1.15 [0.64, 2.08]).

CONCLUSION

The dual trigger was associated with a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature oocytes, CPR, and LBR in IVF than the hCG trigger. The beneficial effect for fresh ET cycles compared with frozen-thawed ET might be associated with increased endometrial receptivity.

RELEVANCE

After dual trigger, delaying ET due to the concern of endometrial receptivity might not be needed.

Changing clinical significance of oocyte maturity grades with advancing female age advances precision medicine in IVF

In current IVF practice, metaphase-2 (M2) oocytes are considered most efficient in producing good quality embryos. Maximizing their number at all ages is standard clinical practice, while immature germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes are mostly automatically discarded. We present preliminary evidence that oocyte maturity grades with advancing age significantly change in their abilities to produce good quality embryos, with M2 oocytes significantly declining, GV oocytes improving, and M1 oocytes staying the same. These data contradict the over-40-year-old dogma that oocyte grades functionally do not change with advancing age, supporting potential changes to current IVF practice: (1) Stimulation protocols and timing of oocyte retrieval can be adjusted to a patient's age and ovarian function. (2) In older and younger women with prematurely aging ovaries, GV oocytes may no longer be automatically discarded. (3) In some infertile women, rescue in vitro maturation of immature oocytes may delay the need for third-party egg donation.

Advances in the study of genetic factors and clinical interventions for fertilization failure

Fertilization failure refers to the failure in the pronucleus formation, evaluating 16-18 h post in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. It can be caused by sperm, oocytes, and sperm-oocyte interaction and lead to great financial and physical stress to the patients. Recent advancements in genetics, molecular biology, and clinical-assisted reproductive technology have greatly enhanced research into the causes and treatment of fertilization failure. Here, we review the causes that have been reported to lead to fertilization failure in fertilization processes, including the sperm acrosome reaction, penetration of the cumulus and zona pellucida, recognition and fusion of the sperm and oocyte membranes, oocyte activation, and pronucleus formation. Additionally, we summarize the progress of corresponding treatment methods of fertilization failure. This review will provide the latest research advances in the genetic aspects of fertilization failure and will benefit both researchers and clinical practitioners in reproduction and genetics.

Female BMI and Body Weight Is Not Associated with Oocyte Yield and Maturation in hCG, Agonist or Dual Trigger Cycles: A Large Observational Study including 5000 Cycles

BACKGROUND

Triggering final oocyte maturation is a key step of ovarian stimulation. Although previous studies demonstrated a negative association between female BMI and serum hCG levels, little evidence is available regarding the association between oocyte yield and patients' BMI. The scope of the current study was to examine whether the efficiency of the r-hCG and triptorelin to trigger final oocyte maturation may be associated with patients' BMI or weight.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study including 5190 ovarian stimulation cycles performed between January 2019 and September 2022 in the Reproductive Medicine Department of Dexeus University Hospital. Cycles were analyzed according to the type of trigger (triptorelin vs. r-hCG vs. dual). The primary outcome measures were oocyte maturation rate (MII/oocytes) and FOI (oocytes/AFC); secondary outcomes were oocyte and MII yield.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for confounding factors, demonstrated that BMI was not associated with oocyte maturation rate (OR: 1.00 [95%CI: 0.99; 1.01]), FOI (Beta 0.52 [95%CI: -0.49; 1.54]), number of oocytes (Beta 0.02 [95%CI: -0.08; 0.13]) or MIIs (Beta 0.01 [95%CI: -0.08; 0.10]) retrieved. Similarly, all analyses conducted considering patients' weight failed to reveal any association.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that, independent of the type of trigger, patients' BMI and weight are not associated with oocyte yield, maturation, or FOI.

Effects of high-altitude hypoxia on embryonic developmental potential in women undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures

PURPOSE

In this study we examined the effects of long-term adaptation to hypoxia on embryonic developmental potential of oocytes collected from women who underwent IVF/ICSI procedures.

METHODS

We selected young infertile women who lived in a low-altitude normoxic environment (n = 80, altitude < 500 m) or high-altitude hypoxic environment (n = 100, altitude > 2500 m) for a lengthy period of time and who planned to undergo IVF/ICSI procedures. We then determined the baseline reproductive hormone levels, gonadotropin (Gn) dose and Gn treatment duration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, normal fertilization rate, day (D3) embryo-formation rate, blastocyst formation rate, good-quality formation rate, D5 blastocyst formation rate, and D6 blastocyst formation rate between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the low-altitude normoxic group, the various reproductive hormone markers of women in the high-altitude hypoxia group were lower, with LH and T levels significantly reduced (P < 0.05) at 72.29 and 72.44% of the normoxic group, respectively (normoxic group vs. hypoxic group, 5.24 ± 1.61 vs. 3.79 ± 1.21; 0.61 ± 0.18 vs. 0.42 ± 0.15; P < 0.05). During ovarian hyperstimulation, a greater Gn dose and longer Gn treatment duration were required for the hypoxic group to complete COH (normoxic group vs. hypoxic group, 2152.08 IU ± 52.76 vs. 2622.09 IU ± 123.28; 9.96 days ± 1.27 vs. 11.54 days ± 1.34, respectively; P < 0.05). The fertilization, cleavage, and D3 embryo-formation rates tended to be higher in the normoxic group than in the hypoxic group (P > 0.05); while the normal fertilization rate tended to lower than in the hypoxic group (P > 0.05). When we conducted an analysis of blastocyst formation rates at different timepoints, we ascertained that the blastocyst formation rate, usable blastocyst rate, and good-quality blastocyst rate of the hypoxic group were all lower than in the normoxic group, with the difference in usable blastocyst rate the most highly significant (normoxic group vs. hypoxic group, 75.31 ± 5.53 vs. 56.04 ± 6.10%, respectively; P < 0.05). In addition, the D5 and D6 blastocyst-formation rates in the normoxic group were slightly higher than in the hypoxic group, revealing that not only were fewer blastocysts formed in the hypoxic group but that there was also a delay in blastocyst formation.

CONCLUSION

In young women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, long-term hypoxic adaptation required augmented Gn dose and Gn treatment duration during COH, and blastocyst developmental potential was also attenuated.

Comparison of an HCG-only trigger versus dual trigger for final oocyte maturation in a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there any difference in clinical outcomes between a human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)-only trigger and a dual trigger combining gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and HCG in a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol?

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included women younger than 40 years old with a normal ovarian reserve who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment with a PPOS protocol. Participants were allocated to two groups according to the triggering medicines. The clinical outcomes were compared, with cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) being the primary outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 1066 women were included, 565 in the HCG-only group and 501 in the dual trigger group. Demographic parameters were comparable between the groups. Fewer oocytes were retrieved in the HCG-only trigger group (dual trigger 12.56 ± 7.12 versus HCG-only trigger 11.62 ± 6.02, P = 0.020). No significant difference was observed in the numbers of two-pronuclear embryos (7.12 ± 4.90 versus 6.76 ± 4.45, P = 0.208) and high-quality embryos (4.01 ± 3.70 versus 3.96 ± 3.32, P = 0.815). The CLBR after one complete cycle was also similar (40.72% versus 43.72%, P = 0.354). Multivariate logistic analysis confirmed that the trigger method had no association with CLBR (odds ratio [OR] 0.763, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.578-1.005, P = 0.055) in the PPOS-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the HCG-only trigger group, comparable embryological and clinical outcomes were achieved, although more oocytes were retrieved in the dual trigger group. This suggests that there may be no extra benefit from dual triggering, and that it should not be recommended for routine use in the general population undergoing PPOS protocols.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

Background

Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study.

Results

There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.97, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

GnRH agonist-triggering ovulation in women with advanced age

This study evaluates the effect of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger for ovulation induction among women with advanced maternal age (AMA). This is a retrospective study performed at a single assisted reproductive technology centre, 2012 to 2020. A total of 306 patients with 515 IVF cycles who were triggered with GnRHa for Ovum Pick Up (OPU), were divided into two groups according to maternal age: age ≥ 40 and age < 40. The groups were compared for demographics, stimulation parameters of IVF treatment and IVF treatment outcomes. The patients in the age < 40 group were approximately 10 years younger than the patients in the age ≥ 40 group (31 ± 5.4 vs. 41.5 ± 1.3 years, p < 0.001). The age ≥ 40 group had significantly higher mean E2/retrieved oocytes ratio, compared to the age < 40 group (310.3 ± 200.6 pg/ml vs. 239 ± 168.2 pg/ml, p = 0.003), and a lower mean MII/retrieved oocyte (35 ± 37.8 vs. 43.4 ± 35.9, p = 0.05, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis for E2/retrieved oocytes demonstrated that age < 40 and total dose of gonadotropins were significant variables. In conclusion, GnRHa for ovulation triggering in high responder patients prior to OPU appears to be a good option for AMA. However, this population is characterized by different parameters of ovarian response that require further evaluation.

The in-vitro effect of gonadotropins' type and combination on Granulosa cells gene expressions

OBJECTIVE

Nowadays, different modes and timing of GnRH-agonist combined with hCG trigger, for final follicular maturation, have been described. While LH + FSH are the naturally occurring final follicular maturation trigger, hCG is commonly use during stimulated cycle, and recently the introduction of the Dual/Double trigger combines LH + FSH + hCG. In the present study we aim to investigate the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of reproduction-related genes in human granulosa cells (GCs) exposed to the aforementioned different types and combinations of gonadotropins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mural GCs were obtained from follicular fluid aspirated during IVF protocol. GCs were seeded in culture for 4 days with daily medium exchange followed by administration of either hCG (1 U/ml); FSH (1 U/ml) and LH (8 U/ml); or hCG (1 U/ml) and FSH (1 U/ml) and LH (8 U/ml) for 16 h. mRNA was purified from harvested GCs and gene expression was quantitative by qPCR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The expression of genes related to steroidogenesis (StAR/ CYP19) and oocyte maturation (COX2/Amphiregulin) in cultured GCs.

RESULTS

The Dual/Double trigger (LH + FSH + hCG) showed higher activation of steroidogenesis (StAR/CYP19) and maturation (COX2/Amphiregulin) as compared to the naturally occurring trigger (LH + FSH) and the hCG triggers. Moreover, while the naturally occurring trigger (LH + FSH) activated maturation significantly and more intensely than the hCG trigger, no in between group differences were observed with regards to steroidogenic related genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are in agreement with clinical experience, demonstrating the superiority of the double/dual (LH + FSH + hCG) trigger over the naturally occurring and the hCG triggers.

Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin improves live birth rates in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 expected poor responders

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dual triggering with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on outcomes of fresh embryo transfers following gonadotropin antagonist cycles in POSEIDON group 3 and group 4 low prognosis women and to compare the outcomes with hCG-only triggering.

METHODS

This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of patients with expected poor ovarian response (POSEIDON group 3 and 4) that underwent fresh embryo transfers following in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with either dual triggering or hCG-only triggering between January 2010 and April 2020. A total of 1068 women that underwent dual triggering and 1931 that underwent hCG-only triggering were included in the study.

RESULTS

Number of retrieved oocytes, M2 oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, obtained 2PN embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rates were found significantly higher in dual-triggering group in comparison to hCG-only group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.02, p < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dual trigger with concomitant injections of GnRH agonist and hCG in GnRH antagonist cycles appears to improve IVF outcomes, increase quality of embryos, reduce miscarriage rates and consequently increase live birth delivery rates in POSEIDON groups 3/4 poor responders.

Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective

Controlled ovarian stimulation has been an integral part of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment cycles. Availability of different gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for prevention of premature rise of leutinising hormone during follicular phase offer an opportunity to utilise them for a successful outcome in women with different subsets of ovarian response. Further, use of GnRH agonist as an alternative for human chorionic gonadotropin improves safety of ovarian stimulation in hyper-responders. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols have emerged as an alternative to conventional protocols in the recent years. Individualisation plays an important role in improving safety of IVF in hyper-responders while efforts continue to improve efficacy in poor responders. Some of the follicular and peri-ovulatory phase interventions may be associated with negative impact on the luteal phase and segmentalisation of the treatment with frozen embryo transfer may be an effective strategy in such a clinical scenario. This narrative review looks at the available evidence on various aspects of ovarian stimulation strategies and their consequences. In addition, it provides a concise summary of the evidence that has emerged from India on various aspects of ovarian stimulation.

Effect of dual trigger on reproductive outcome in low responders: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Poor ovarian responders (PORs) pose a great challenge for fertility clinics worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine whether 'dual trigger' consisting of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is beneficial or not regarding implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate for POR.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or version 2 (NOS) of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB2) independently by two authors. Furthermore, RevMan version 5.4 was used to analyze the extracted data and to create an inverse-weighted summary-odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

A total of 1390 studies were screened. Seven studies containing a total of 2474 POR were included. The pooled meta-analysis revealed a 1.62-fold increase in clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.62 [1.00, 2.62], p = .05) and a 2.65-fold increase in live birth rate (OR = 2.65 [1.66, 4.24], p < .0001) in the dual trigger group compared to hCG trigger. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups regarding implantation rate (OR = 1.14 [0.93, 1.39], p = .21).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of this study indicates that dual trigger as finale oocyte maturation is advantageous compared to hCG trigger among POR. However, large-scale, high-quality, randomized controlled trials (RCT) are required to confirm this conclusion and fully address the magnitude of this effect.

The novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist relugolix is a new option for controlled ovarian stimulation cycles

Purpose

Relugolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHant), which was first introduced in 2019. This study investigated the effects of the conventional injectable GnRHant formulation and this new oral GnRHant formulation on controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles.

Methods

Relugolix was administered in 126 cycles and conventional GnRHant injection was administered in 658 cycles (controls). The follicle stimulation was performed by an antagonist method, and for final oocyte maturation, recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rHCG), or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), or both (dual trigger) were selected. The number of retrieved oocytes was counted and then they were evaluated for subsequent development up to cleavage stage.

Results

The number of retrieved oocytes which was the primary outcome of this research was affected by the combination of GnRHant type and the final oocyte maturation agent. The combination of relugolix and a GnRHa trigger showed a significantly lower number of retrieved oocytes (p < 0.001) than the other combinations.

Conclusions

Relugolix is a new option for COS cycles, but should be carefully combined with the final maturation agent.

Clinical trial approval

This study was conducted after approval by the Medical Corporation Sankeikai Institutional Ethics Committee (approval number: 2019-34).

Early Serum Progesterone Measurement on 9th Day after Oocyte Retrieval can be used as a Predictor of Fresh Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle Success

BACKGROUND: In intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) infertility treatment cycles, measuring serum Progesterone level at day 9 after oocyte retrieval could be used as a predictor of success. METHODS: Sixty-nine women were prospectively included in this study, treated with fresh embryo transfer ICSI cycles. Progesterone analyses were performed on the day of oocyte pick up (day 0) at serum and follicular fluid, then re-assessment at serum on day 9 after oocyte retrieval. The data were compared to evaluate the correlation among hormones measured on day 0 and day 9 with pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Pregnancy rate of Iraqi women was 22% (n = 15), mean serum progesterone on day 9 among pregnant ladies was (mean ± SD, 39.5 ± 13.0) which was significantly higher than that who failed to get pregnant (mean 23.2 ± 11, p = 0.001), then after adjustment of the baseline readings (day 0) estimated mean = 11.1. The differences were still significant, receiver operating characteristic curve area showed that serum Progesterone on day 9 after pick up can differentiate correctly between those who will conceive and those who will not, with a sensitivity = 0.933 and specificity = 0.519, at cut off point = 22.33 and above, (Area under the curve = 0.822, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Serum progesterone on day 9 could be one of the predictors of endometrial receptivity and pregnancy, which is actually of great value for both doctors and patients during that stressful period till the date of confirmation, which might negatively affect treatment outcome, as well as the psychosocial and pharmacological impact of medication and limited activity for a failed one.

Clinical Pregnancy and Incidence of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in High Ovarian Responders Receiving Different Doses of hCG Supplementation in a GnRH-Agonist Trigger Protocol

Objective

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a side effect of the exogenous human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) hormones used to trigger oocyte maturation. High ovarian responders represent a population with a higher risk of OHSS and are characterized by an exaggerated response to gonadotropin administration. In this study, we compared clinical pregnancy and incidence of OHSS in high ovarian responders receiving different doses of hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol.

Methods

A total of 205 high ovarian responders who were to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were recruited and randomly assigned to receive different doses of hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol: GnRH-a (n = 42), GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG (n = 49), GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG (n = 54), and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG (n = 60) groups.

Results

The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had more oocytes retrieved, embryos, high-quality embryos, and a higher rate of high-quality embryos than the GnRH-a group (p < 0.05). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG group demonstrated more oocytes retrieved, embryos, high-quality embryos, and a higher rate of high-quality embryos than the GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups (p < 0.05). No moderate and severe OHSS cases occurred in the GnRH-a and GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG groups. The incidence rate of moderate and severe OHSS was remarkably lower in the GnRH-a group and GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG groups than in the GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups (p < 0.05). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had a higher clinical pregnancy rate than the GnRH-a group, showing no significant difference (p > 0.05). The GnRH-a + 1000 IU hCG, GnRH-a + 2000 IU hCG, and GnRH-a + 3000 IU hCG groups had a lower abortion rate than the GnRH-a group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Based on the data obtained from this prospective study, we recommend 1000 IU hCG supplementation in a GnRH-agonist trigger protocol for high ovarian responders during IVF/ICSI cycles considering a higher rate of high-quality embryos, a lower incidence rate of moderate and severe OHSS, and a lower abortion rate.

Dual trigger with the combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose of human chorionic gonadotropin improves in vitro fertilisation outcomes in poor ovarian responders

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the dual trigger with the combination of GnRH agonist and standard dose of recombinant hCG on IVF outcomes in poor ovarian responders with GnRH antagonist protocol. 1283 cycles of 1010 poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria were retrospectively analysed in terms of final oocyte maturation: dual trigger group (250 μg hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin) or standard group (250 μg hCG). Primary outcome measures were the number of retrieved and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates.The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and the top-quality embryos transferred were significantly higher in the dual trigger group (p < .001). Fertilisation rates (73.6% vs 69.6%, p = .009), implantation rates (18.7% vs 14.6, p = .039), clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (27.5% vs. 19.9%, p = .010) and live birth rate per embryo transfer (21.6% vs. 14.9%, p = .011) were also significantly higher in the dual trigger group as compared to the hCG trigger group. The usage of dual trigger with a GnRH agonist and a standard dosage of hCG could improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Dual trigger with standard dose of hCG has been the subject of trials in normal responders to optimise IVF outcomes. The results of these studies showed significant improvements in implantation and pregnancy rates with an increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved. As a result, dual trigger has become a popular ovulation trigger option in GnRH antagonist cycles.What do the results of this study add? There is limited data about the use of dual trigger in poor ovarian responders (PORs). According to our study, increasing the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, the number of fertilised oocytes, the number of transferred embryos and top quality embryos transferred by using dual trigger in patients with PORs have a positive impact on pregnancy outcomes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings implies potential advantages of dual trigger usage for improving IVF outcomes in PORs. With large sample sized prospective randomised trials, dual trigger with combination of GnRHa and a standard dose of hCG might replace the traditional ovulation trigger with hCG in PORs.

Dual trigger protocol is an effective in vitro fertilization strategy in both normal and high responders without compromising pregnancy outcomes in fresh cycles

Objective

To study the birth rates of normal vs. high responders after dual trigger of final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in which ovarian stimulation was achieved by a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

University hospital.

Patient(s)

In women <35 years of age, 290 fresh IVF cycles using the dual trigger protocol with day 5 embryo transfers from January 2013 to July 2018 were included. Cycles excluded were those with preimplantation genetic testing, gestational carriers, donor oocytes, and fertility preservation.

Intervention(s)

IVF with dual trigger.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate.

Result(s)

Comparing normal responders, defined as <30 oocytes retrieved, and high responders, defined as ≥30 oocytes retrieved, the clinical pregnancy rates (67.0% vs. 69.3%, respectively) and live birth rates (60.5% vs. 60.0%, respectively) were not significantly different. No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were reported in either group.

Conclusion(s)

Ovarian stimulation by a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol followed by dual trigger yields comparable outcomes between normal and high responders in fresh IVF cycles.

Influence of Bushen Tiaochong Cycle Therapy on Th1/Th2 Deviation, Sex Hormone Level, and Pregnancy Outcome of Alloimmune Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the influence of Bushen Tiaochong cycle therapy on Th1/Th2 deviation, sex hormone level, and pregnancy outcome of alloimmune recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).

METHODS

From August 2018 to April 2020, 130 patients with alloimmune RSA who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into the control group (n = 65) and the study group (n = 65). The former received lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT), and the latter received Bushen Tiaochong cycle therapy on the basis of LIT. The treatment ended at 12 w of pregnancy. The total score of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes, Th1 cytokine (IL-2), Th2 cytokine (IL-10), and related hormones (chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and progesterone (P)) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The positive rate of blocking antibody (BA), pregnancy success rate, and preterm birth rate were counted.

RESULT

After treatment, the total score of TCM syndromes, IL-2 level, and Th1/Th2 ratio in the two groups decreased significantly, while the levels of IL-10, hCG, and P increased significantly, and the study group improved significantly compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The positive rate of BA and pregnancy success rate in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the preterm birth rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of routine western medicine treatment, a combined application of Bushen Tiaochong cycle therapy can significantly improve the Th1/Th2 deviation, serum sex hormone level, and pregnancy outcome in patients with alloimmune RSA.

Luteinising hormone-based protocol versus traditional flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response: study protocol for a non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Many patients demonstrate an insufficient endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) concentration during ovarian stimulation. With traditional fixed or flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols, antagonist administration may further reduce LH activity. Previously, we proved that LH can be used as an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist. Patients with a persistently low LH concentration during ovarian stimulation may not require antagonists, whereas antagonist administration can affect reproductive outcomes. To further explore this hypothesis, we designed a randomised clinical trial to compare the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol with traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study was a multicentre, parallel, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study. The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The study aimed to prove the non-inferiority of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle with an LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Secondary endpoints were the high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cancellation rate. Differences in cost-effectiveness and adverse events were evaluated. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in women with normal ovarian response was 70%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 14% (one-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 338 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% drop-out rate, the total number of patients required was 372.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang hospital. All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800018077.

Outcomes comparison of IVF/ICSI among different trigger methods for final oocyte maturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

During the in vitro fertilization treatment, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is routinely used as a substitute for the natural endogenous LH surge during the final stage of oocyte maturation. However, it does not provide the FSH surge observed in the mid-cycle of the natural cycle. To date, whether the FSH surge can improve oocyte quality and pregnancy outcomes remains unknown. Randomized controlled trials comparing the following four trigger methods to conventional hCG were examined: GnRH agonist (GnRHa), kisspeptin, GnRHa plus hCG (dual trigger), and FSH plus hCG (FSH co-trigger). The results showed that the use of dual triggers was associated with a significantly higher number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.625, 95% CI 0.684-2.565), retrieved mature oocytes (WMD 0.986, 95% CI 0.426-1.545) and fertilized (2PN) oocytes (WMD 0.792, 95% CI 0.083-1.501), compared with the use of hCG. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pregnancy rate. The FSH co-trigger resulted in significantly higher rates of 2PN oocytes retrieved than the hCG trigger (WMD 0.077, 95% CI 0.028-0.126). Notably, the risk of OHSS did not differ among the three treatment groups compared to that of the hCG group. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020194201).

GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for follicular maturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, final follicular maturation is triggered by a single bolus of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This acts as a surrogate to the naturally occurring luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to induce luteinization of the granulosa cells, resumption of meiosis and final oocyte maturation. More recently, a bolus of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in combination with hCG (dual trigger) has been suggested as an alternative regimen to achieve final follicular maturation.

METHODS

This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the effect of dual trigger versus hCG trigger for follicular maturation on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per started cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 1048 participants were included in the analysis, with 519 in the dual trigger group and 529 in the hCG trigger group. Dual trigger treatment was associated with a significantly higher LBR per started cycle compared with the hCG trigger treatment (risk ratio (RR) = 1.37 [1.07, 1.76], I² = 0%, moderate evidence). There was a trend towards an increase in both ongoing pregnancy rate (RR = 1.34 [0.96, 1.89], I² = 0%, low evidence) and implantation rate (RR = 1.31 [0.90, 1.91], I² = 76%, low evidence) with dual trigger treatment compared with hCG trigger treatment. Dual trigger treatment was associated with a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.29 [1.10, 1.52], I² = 13%, low evidence), number of oocytes collected (mean difference (MD) = 1.52 [0.59, 2.46), I² = 53%, low evidence), number of mature oocytes collected (MD = 1.01 [0.43, 1.58], I² = 18%, low evidence), number of fertilized oocytes (MD = 0.73 [0.16, 1.30], I² = 7%, low evidence) and significantly more usable embryos (MD = 0.90 [0.42, 1.38], I² = 0%, low evidence).

CONCLUSION

Dual trigger treatment with GnRH agonist and HCG is associated with an increased live birth rate compared with conventional hCG trigger.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42020204452 .

Does gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist cause luteolysis by inducing apoptosis of the human granulosa-luteal cells?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluates the effect of different modes of final follicular maturation triggering on the degree of apoptosis of granulosa cells (GCs) and the potential effect on progesterone secretion.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF who received hCG, GnRH agonist, or dual trigger for final follicular maturation were included in the study. Granulosa cells were obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. The proportion of apoptotic cells was evaluated via TUNEL and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The proportion of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist-alone group compared to hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (13.5 ± 1.5% vs. 7.8% ± 1.8 vs. 10.1% ± 2, respectively, P < 0.01). Moreover, the expression of active-caspase-3 was also significantly increased in the GnRH agonist-alone group compared with the hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (15.5% ± 2.9 vs. 8.4% ± 1.6 vs. 12.7% ± 2.6, respectively, P < 0.01). The progesterone levels measured in the granulosa-luteal cell culture medium after 24 h of incubation were similar between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The levels of apoptosis are increased after GnRH agonist/dual trigger. The increased apoptosis might be one of the culprit of the subsequent premature demise of the corpus luteum post GnRH agonist trigger.

How far is too far? Does time interval between GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles matter?

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is a suitable time interval between the last GnRH antagonist exposure and GnRH agonist (GnRHa) triggering for final follicular maturation?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study including 413 patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycles in which GnRHa trigger was used, either solely or as a dual trigger. The primary outcome measure was the follicle/mature oocyte ratio. Cycles were analysed according to the time interval between the last GnRH antagonist exposure and the GnRHa triggering: Group 1 included patients with a 12-14 h interval; Group 2: 7-10 h interval; Group 3: 5-6 h interval and Group 4: 2-4 h interval. LH concentration was measured 11-13 h post-GnRHa injection.

RESULTS

Median LH value was 65 IU/l. There was a weak but significant correlation between basal LH and the LH surge (R² = 0.137, P < 0.001). Although square root LH values differed significantly between study groups (P < 0.001; higher in Groups 2 and 3), the follicle/mature oocyte ratio was not different across the four antagonist-agonist interval groups and no correlation was detected between the post-trigger LH concentration and the follicle/oocyte ratio (R² = 0.011). In a model integrating age, day 3 FSH concentration, maximal oestradiol and body mass index along with the study groups, none of these factors was significantly related to the follicle/mature oocyte outcome ratio. Insufficient surge (LH < 15 IU/l) occurred in 14 (3.4%) cases. Rates of insufficient LH surge did not differ significantly between the groups (2.4%, 3.2%, 3.4% and 7.1% in Groups 1 to 4, respectively; P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

LH concentrations post-GnRHa trigger differ in regard to antagonist-agonist intervals, but the follicle/mature oocyte ratio achieved was not affected.

Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus

BACKGROUND

A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate global expert opinions on key aspects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment.

METHODS

Ten experts plus the Scientific Coordinator discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 35 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%.

RESULTS

Eighteen statements were developed. All statements reached consensus and the most relevant are summarised here. (1) Follicular development and stimulation with gonadotropins (n = 9 statements): Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) alone is sufficient for follicular development in normogonadotropic patients aged <35 years. Oocyte number and live birth rate are strongly correlated; there is a positive linear correlation with cumulative live birth rate. Different r-hFSH preparations have identical polypeptide chains but different glycosylation patterns, affecting the biospecific activity of r-hFSH. r-hFSH plus recombinant human LH (r-hFSH:r-hLH) demonstrates improved pregnancy rates and cost efficacy versus human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in patients with severe FSH and LH deficiency. (2) Pituitary suppression (n = 2 statements): Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are associated with lower rates of any grade ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and cycle cancellation versus GnRH agonists. (3) Final oocyte maturation triggering (n=4 statements): Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) represents the gold standard in fresh cycles. The efficacy of hCG triggering for frozen transfers in modified natural cycles is controversial compared with LH peak monitoring. Current evidence supports significantly higher pregnancy rates with hCG + GnRH agonist versus hCG alone, but further evidence is needed. GnRH agonist trigger, in GnRH antagonist protocol, is recommended for final oocyte maturation in women at risk of OHSS. (4) Luteal-phase support (n = 3 statements): Vaginal progesterone therapy represents the gold standard for luteal-phase support.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi consensus provides a real-world clinical perspective on the specific approaches during the key steps of ART treatment from a diverse group of international experts. Additional guidance from clinicians on ART strategies could complement guidelines and policies, and may help to further improve treatment outcomes.

Dual Trigger for Final Follicular Maturation Improves Cumulative Live-Birth Rate in Ovarian Stimulation for Freeze-All In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Does dual trigger in freeze-all in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles improve the cumulative live-birth outcome compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Dual trigger for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative pregnancy and live-birth rates compared with hCG trigger in freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Dual trigger could increase the numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes and improve pregnancy rates.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This retrospective cohort analysis included data from 4438 freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2012 and December 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Women aged 20-49 years who underwent ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for autologous IVF/ICSI with a freeze-all policy in our centre were enrolled. Data on number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) were assessed and compared between patients who underwent a dual trigger and hCG trigger. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for factors known to independently affect the CLBR.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 4438 IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed, including 1445 cycles with single hCG trigger and 2993 cycles with dual trigger. The cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate (60.8% vs. 68.1%, P<0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.727; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638-0.828), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (52.9% vs. 58.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.796; 95%CI: 0.701-0.903), and CLBR (44.3% vs. 50.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.781; 95%CI: 0.688-10.886) were all significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. The clinical pregnancy rate (48.2% vs. 58.2%, P=0.002; OR: 0.829; 95%CI: 0.737-0.934) and embryo implantation rate (34.4% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001; OR: 0.823; 95%CI: 0.750-0.903) in each transfer cycle were also significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. After controlling for all potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the CLBR. The OR and 95%CI for hCG trigger were 0.780 and 0.641-0.949 (P=0.013).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The data used to analyse the effect of dual trigger on cumulative pregnancy and live-birth outcomes were retrospective, and the results may thus have been subject to inherent biases. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to verify the beneficial effects of dual trigger.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Dual trigger had a positive effect on CLBRs, suggesting that it could be used as a routine trigger method in freeze-all cycles.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was supported by grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1004800), the Natural Science Program of Zhejiang (LY19H040009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81601236). No authors have competing interests to declare.