1
|
Brännström M, Racowsky C, Carbonnel M, Wu J, Gargiulo A, Adashi EY, Ayoubi JM. Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:521-544. [PMID: 37328434 PMCID: PMC10477946 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Women suffering from absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) had no hope of childbearing until clinical feasibility of uterus transplantation (UTx) was documented in 2014 with the birth of a healthy baby. This landmark accomplishment followed extensive foundational work with a wide range of animal species including higher primates. In the present review, we provide a summary of the animal research and describe the results of cases and clinical trials on UTx. Surgical advances for graft removal from live donors and transplantation to recipients are improving, with a recent trend away from laparotomy to robotic approaches, although challenges persist regarding optimum immunosuppressive therapies and tests for graft rejection. Because UTx does not involve transplantation of the Fallopian tubes, IVF is required as part of the UTx process. We provide a unique focus on the intersection between these two processes, with consideration of when oocyte retrieval should be performed, whether, and for whom, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be used, whether oocytes or embryos should be frozen and when the first embryo transfer should be performed post-UTx. We also address the utility of an international society UTx (ISUTx) registry for assessing overall UTx success rates, complications, and live births. The long-term health outcomes of all parties involved-the uterus donor (if live donor), the recipient, her partner and any children born from the transplanted graft-are also reviewed. Unlike traditional solid organ transplantation procedures, UTx is not lifesaving, but is life-giving, although as with traditional types of transplantation, costs, and ethical considerations are inevitable. We discuss the likelihood that costs will decrease as efficiency and efficacy improve, and that ethical complexities for and against acceptability of the procedure sharpen the distinctions between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood. As more programs wish to offer the procedure, we suggest a scheme for setting up a UTx program as well as future directions of this rapidly evolving field. In our 2010 review, we described the future of clinical UTx based on development of the procedure in animal models. This Grand Theme Review offers a closing loop to this previous review of more than a decade ago. The clinical feasibility of UTx has now been proved. Advancements include widening the criteria for acceptance of donors and recipients, improving surgery, shortening time to pregnancy, and improving post-UTx management. Together, these improvements catalyze the transition of UTx from experimental into mainstream clinical practice. The procedure will then represent a realistic and accessible alternative to gestational surrogacy for the treatment of AUFI and should become part of the armamentarium of reproductive specialists worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Stockholm IVF-EUGIN, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Catherine Racowsky
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marie Carbonnel
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
- University Versailles, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France
| | - Joseph Wu
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Antonio Gargiulo
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eli Y Adashi
- Department of Medical Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jean Marc Ayoubi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
- University Versailles, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154516. [PMID: 35956131 PMCID: PMC9369769 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transplants (e.g., kidney) in that both living donors (LDs) and deceased donors (DDs) can be utilized for organ procurement. While many endpoints appear to be similar for LD and DD transplants (including graft survival, time to menses, livebirth rates), there are key medical, technical, ethical, and logistical differences between these modalities. Primary considerations in favor of a LD model include thorough screening of donors, enhanced logistics, and greater donor availability. The primary consideration in favor of a DD model is the lack of physical or psychological harm to a living donor. Other important factors, that may not clearly favor one approach over the other, are important to include in discussions of LD vs. DD models. We favor a stepwise approach to uterus transplantation, one in which programs first begin with DD procurement before attempting LD procurement to maximize successful organ recovery and to minimize potential harms to a living donor.
Collapse
|
3
|
Forbes RC, Karp S. Uterine Transplant-Progress, but Concerns Remain. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:797-798. [PMID: 35793122 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Forbes
- Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Seth Karp
- Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ayoubi JM, Carbonnel M, Racowsky C, de Ziegler D, Gargiulo A, Kvarnström N, Dahm-Kähler P, Brännström M. Evolving clinical challenges in uterus transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:947-960. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
5
|
Dorafshar AH, Hamidian Jahromi A, Horen SR, Schechter LS, Johannesson L, Testa G, Hertl M, Dewdney S, Aschkenasy J, Wood-Molo M, Brincat C, Cherullo E, Behel JM, Hebert C, Shulman R, Bassi S, Alecci AT, Konety B. Strategic Planning and Essential Steps for Establishing a Uterine Transplant and Rehabilitation Program: From Idea to Reality. Ann Surg 2022; 276:74-80. [PMID: 34793341 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
UTx is performed to address absolute uterine infertility in the presence of uterine agenesis, a nonfunctional uterus, or after a prior hysterectomy. After the initial success of UTx resulting in a livebirth (2014) in Sweden, there are over 70 reported UTx surgeries resulting in more than 40 livebirths worldwide. Currently, UTx has been performed in over 10 countries. As UTx is transitioning from an "experimental procedure" to a clinical option, an increasing number of centers may contemplate a UTx program. This article discusses essential steps for establishment of a successful UTx program. These principles may be implemented in cis- and transgender UTx candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Dorafshar
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sydney R Horen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Loren S Schechter
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- The Center for Gender Confirmation Surgery, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Martin Hertl
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Summer Dewdney
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Mary Wood-Molo
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Cynthia Brincat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jay M Behel
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Rush Center for Gender, Sexuality & Reproductive Health, Chicago, IL
| | - Charles Hebert
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Shulman
- Department of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Shruti Bassi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Badrinath Konety
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Polk H, Johannesson L, Testa G, Wall AE. The Future of Uterus Transplantation: Cost, Regulations, and Outcomes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:101-107. [PMID: 35045031 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) has evolved rapidly since technical success was first demonstrated, and is now practiced worldwide, using both living and deceased donors. As UTx transitions from an experimental to widely available standard clinical procedure, new challenges and questions are becoming more urgent. These include issues of cost and coverage, the establishment of guidelines and registries to ensure quality of care and monitor outcomes, regulatory oversight (including for the allocation organs from deceased donors), and the extent to which indications for UTx should be expanded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
da Graca B, Johannesson L, Testa G, Wall AE. The Ethical Evolution of Uterus Transplantation From Concept to Clinical Procedure. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:24-36. [PMID: 35045022 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility a path to motherhood that enables them to carry their own pregnancy. Debates about the ethics of UTx have evolved in tandem with its clinical evolution: clinical trials have provided evidence regarding risks and benefits to donors and recipients that were initially uncertain; technical advances have altered the balance between risks and benefits; and the experiences of donors and recipients has revealed questions that were not anticipated. As UTx transitions to a clinical procedure, questions remain about long-term risks and benefits, applications beyond carrying a pregnancy, and cost and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liza Johannesson
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
| | - Anji E Wall
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brännström M. Uterus transplantation in a Nordic perspective: A proposition for clinical introduction with centralization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:1361-1363. [PMID: 33998663 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mats Brännström
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Stockholm IVF-Eugin, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) offers women with absolute uterine factor infertility the option to gestate and birth their own biologically related child. The first birth following living donation UTx happened in 2014. The first birth following deceased donation happened in December 2017, with further successes since. Interest in deceased donation UTx is increasing. The authors established a database to track UTx clinical trials and outcomes. Utilising this database and existing literature, this article reviews the first reported cases of deceased donation UTx and outcomes, and drawing upon comparisons with living donor UTx, comments upon the future for this area of reproductive transplantation research. This is the first article to bring together the literature on deceased donation UTx procedures and outcomes.
Collapse
|