Social sperm freezing

Frequency, morbidity and equity - the case for increased research on male fertility

Currently, most men with infertility cannot be given an aetiology, which reflects a lack of knowledge around gamete production and how it is affected by genetics and the environment. A failure to recognize the burden of male infertility and its potential as a biomarker for systemic illness exists. The absence of such knowledge results in patients generally being treated as a uniform group, for whom the strategy is to bypass the causality using medically assisted reproduction (MAR) techniques. In doing so, opportunities to prevent co-morbidity are missed and the burden of MAR is shifted to the woman. To advance understanding of men's reproductive health, longitudinal and multi-national centres for data and sample collection are essential. Such programmes must enable an integrated view of the consequences of genetics, epigenetics and environmental factors on fertility and offspring health. Definition and possible amelioration of the consequences of MAR for conceived children are needed. Inherent in this statement is the necessity to promote fertility restoration and/or use the least invasive MAR strategy available. To achieve this aim, protocols must be rigorously tested and the move towards personalized medicine encouraged. Equally, education of the public, governments and clinicians on the frequency and consequences of infertility is needed. Health options, including male contraceptives, must be expanded, and the opportunities encompassed in such investment understood. The pressing questions related to male reproductive health, spanning the spectrum of andrology are identified in the Expert Recommendation.

Effects of cryopreservation in the presence of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADESs) on sperm parameters

Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADESs) are being considered as a potential alternative to traditional cryoprotective agents (CPAs) in sperm freezing. The study aimed to assess the effects of NADESs as a CPA on human sperm parameters. A total of 32 normozoospermic semen samples were collected from the Alzahra infertility treatment center (Iran) between July 2021 and September 2022. The samples were categorized into eight different groups: 1) a control (nonfrozen), and groups frozen with 2) SpermFreeze Solution, 3) ChX (Choline chloride and Xylitol), 4) ChS (Choline chloride and D-sorbitol), 5) ChG (Choline chloride and Glucose), 6) ChU (Choline chloride and Urea), 7) EtP (Ethylene glycol and l-proline), and 8) GlyP (Glycerol and l-proline). The study also analyzed the quality of sperm parameters, such as chromatin condensation and integrity, acrosome integrity, and survival, along with the expression of some genes that affect sperm fertility (TRPV1, TRPV4, SPACA3, and OGG1). The study found there were notable variations in sperm parameters (such as viability, chromatin condensation and integrity, and acrosome integrity) among frozen groups with some NADESs compared to the SpermFreeze Solution and control groups (P < 0.05). Analysis of gene expression demonstrated that the levels of TRPV1, TRPV4, SPACA3, and OGG1 genes were superior in the GlyP group compared to the other groups (P < 0.05). Additionally, the ChS and ChU groups exhibited preserved expression of these genes compared with the SpermFreeze Solution group. The use of NADESs led to the discovery of a more appropriate CPA that has low toxicity and is highly effective in maintaining the fertility potential of sperm.

Does paternal age affect the live birth rate in donor oocyte cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

While delayed parenthood is increasing worldwide, the effect of paternal age on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes remains unclear. The egg donation model appears to be relevant to studying the independent impact of paternal age on clinical outcome, but the available studies are heterogeneous and contradictory. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the relationship between paternal age and live birth rate (LBR) in egg donation cycles.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 30, 2021. All studies on egg donation cycles where LBR is reported according to male age were included. Study selection, bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers according to the Cochrane methods.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 10,527 egg donation cycles were finally included. The meta-analysis showed a slight but significant and linear decrease in LBR with increasing paternal age (estimate - 0.0055; 95% CI (- 0.0093; - 0.0016), p = 0.006), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 25%). No specific threshold was identified. A similar trend toward decreased clinical pregnancy rate with advancing paternal age was found but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that increasing paternal age is associated with a slight but significant and linear decrease in the live birth rate in egg donation cycles, with no apparent threshold effect. Although this requires further confirmation, this information is important for counseling men who are considering delayed childbearing.

An evaluation of the population characteristics, semen quality, and utilization status of autologous sperm cryopreservation and fertility preservation in for 662 patients: a 6-year monocentric retrospective study

Background

Sperm cryopreservation is an effective method of fertility preservation for disease-related and social sperm freezing. In total, 662 subjects (range: 15–65 years-of-age; mean: 33.49 ± 8.79 years-of-age) were included in this study to investigate the population characteristics, semen quality, and usage of autologous sperm preservation patients in Beijing. Of these, 351 were cancer patients (53.02%, 31.14 ± 7.32 years-of-age) and 311 were non-cancer patients (46.98%, 36.14 ± 9.54 years-of-age).

Results

We found that the number of preservation cases increased steadily from 2015 to 2019; 89.73% of these had a bachelor's degree or above; 54.83%, 41.54%, and 3.63% were single, married, and divorced, respectively. The cases of cancers and oligozoospermia accounted for 71.30% of all patients; therefore, most patients required fertility preservation due to disease. The cancer group had a significantly lower sperm concentration, rate of progressive sperm after the frozen-thawed test, total progressive motility sperm count after the frozen-thawed test, and recovery rate of progressive motile sperm (RRPM) than the non-cancer group (all P < 0.05). Sperm count-related parameters were significantly affected by testicular cancer, while sperm motility-related parameters and RRPM were significantly affected by leukemia. The utilization rate of preserved sperm was 6.34% after 6 to 78 months of follow-up. In terms of fresh or frozen embryo transfer, the clinical pregnancy rate was 56.76% or 50.00%, and the live birth rate was 24.32% or 21.43%, respectively.

Conclusion

The need for autologous sperm preservation was dominated by patients with diseases, followed by the need for social sperm freezing. Tumors had a major negative impact on semen quality, and the usage rates of stored semen were at lower level compared to the number of sperm cryopreservation. Medical staff and patients should pay attention to both cognition-action consistency and cost-effectiveness in fertility preservation.

Maintaining an adequate sperm donor pool: modifying the medical criteria for sperm donor selection

The shortage of donor sperm will increase due to greater access by lesbian couples and single women and due to extra rules imposed on sperm donation. Two steps should be distinguished in donor recruitment: an ethical phase where candidates are self-selecting on the basis of ethical rules, and a medical phase where criteria related to quality and safety of the sperm are imposed. The first phase functions as a bottle neck. Candidate donors who reject the ethical rules will not present themselves for donation in clinics and sperm banks. If the ethical rules remain unchanged, the medical rules that apply after the bottle neck should become less stringent if a sufficient number of donors are to be maintained. Lowering the sperm quality standards will lead to more IVF. Although this is regrettable, it will become unavoidable if the scarcity of donors increases.

Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility

Increasing numbers of women are undergoing oocyte or tissue cryopreservation for medical or social reasons to increase their chances of having genetic children. Social egg freezing (SEF) allows women to preserve their fertility in anticipation of age-related fertility decline and ineffective fertility treatments at older ages. The purpose of this study was to summarize recent findings focusing on the challenges of elective egg freezing. We performed a systematic literature review on social egg freezing published during the last ten years. From the systematically screened literature, we identified and analyzed five main topics of interest during the last decade: (a) different fertility preservation techniques, (b) safety of freezing, (c) usage rate of frozen oocytes, (d) ethical considerations, and (e) cost-effectiveness of SEF. Fertility can be preserved for non-medical reasons through oocyte, embryos, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, with oocyte vitrification being a new and optimal approach. Elective oocyte cryopreservation is better accepted, supports social gender equality, and enhances women's reproductive autonomy. Despite controversies, planned oocyte cryopreservation appears as a chosen strategy against age-related infertility and may allow women to feel that they are more socially, psychologically, and financially stable before motherhood.