Pregnancy outcome and neonatal data of children born after ICSI using testicular sperm in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in TESE-ICSI cycles: A comparison between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with testicular sperm extraction in obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia are limited, and few studies have addressed obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

DESIGN

This study analyzed couples who underwent testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia to determine whether impaired spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia patients would lead to worse reproductive outcomes and higher rates of pregnancy complications and fetal anomalies. This study is a retrospective, single-center analysis of all testicular sperm cycles performed between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 392 couples were considered in the study, leading to 1066 induction cycles, 620 (58.2%) from patients with obstructive azoospermia and 446 (41.8%) from non-obstructive azoospermia. The cumulative delivery rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (34% vs. 31%; p = 0.326). The miscarriage rate was similar between obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Fertilization rate instead showed a statistically significant difference (obstructive azoospermia: 66.1 ± 25.7 vs. non-obstructive azoospermia: 56.1 ± 27.0; p < 0.001). The overall maternal complication rate in the non-obstructive azoospermia group was higher (10.7% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.035), but there was no statistical significance for each pathology. There was no statistical difference in gestational age between the two groups for both single and twin pregnancies. Seven cases of congenital defects occurred in the obstructive azoospermia group, while two cases occurred in the non-obstructive azoospermia group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite impaired spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia patients, there were no substantial differences in reproductive outcomes compared to patients with obstructive azoospermia, even in terms of obstetric safety and neonatal well-being.

Comparative Analysis of Surgically Retrieved Sperms in Cases of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Azoospermia Treated for Infertility

Background

Azoospermia is a highly evolving subject in the last few decades. In the past, use of donor sperm was the only option providing a realistic chance of conception for couples affected by azoospermia. Introduction of sperm retrieval techniques and assisted reproductive technologies, especially intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has provided these men a chance to father their genetically own child and changed the management approach significantly.

Objective

The objective was to compare the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and ICSI outcomes of surgically retrieved sperms in cases of obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) as well as to evaluate the efficacy of sperm retrieval techniques.

Materials and Methods

A total of sixty azoospermic patients were included in the study. The patients were divided between OA (16) and NOA groups (44). A retrospective outcome analysis was done on SRR and ICSI results among them.

Results

The overall SRR in patients with NOA and OA was 47.7% and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, higher serum follicle-stimulating hormone has shown significantly decreased sperm retrieval. The size of testes was not found to be related to sperm retrieval. Fertilization and embryo formation rate were found to be higher in OA cases in comparison to those of NOA cases. Clinical pregnancy rate showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

Various sperm retrieval techniques can provide new dimensions for successful ICSI and managing azoospermia patients. Although SRRs as well as ICSI outcomes are lower in NOA patients than patients with OA, still they are potentially fertile. A systematic approach especially in patients with NOA is an important step. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is an attractive option for NOA patients in order to increase the chances of successful sperm retrieval.

Some of the Factors Involved in Male Infertility: A Prospective Review

Infertility is defined as the inability of couples to have a baby after one year of regular unprotected intercourse, affecting 10 to 15% of couples. According to the latest WHO statistics, approximately 50-80 million people worldwide sufer from infertility, and male factors are responsible for approximately 20-30% of all infertility cases. The diagnosis of infertility in men is mainly based on semen analysis. The main parameters of semen include: concentration, appearance and motility of sperm. Causes of infertility in men include a variety of things including hormonal disorders, physical problems, lifestyle problems, psychological issues, sex problems, chromosomal abnormalities and single-gene defects. Despite numerous efforts by researchers to identify the underlying causes of male infertility, about 70% of cases remain unknown. These statistics show a lack of understanding of the mechanisms involved in male infertility. This article focuses on the histology of testicular tissue samples, the male reproductive structure, factors affecting male infertility, strategies available to find genes involved in infertility, existing therapeutic methods for male infertility, and sperm recovery in infertile men.

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Azoospermic Men After Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using Testicular Sperm and Donor Sperm

Background

The safety of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with testicular sperm in azoospermic men has been a concern. We evaluated ICSI outcomes, including neonatal outcomes, in children born using testicular sperm or donor sperm.

Material/Methods

Ninety-nine males with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) and 126 males with obstructive azoospermia (OA) were included in this study. Sixty-one patients with NOA used donor sperm for ICSI on the day of oocyte retrieval when no spermatozoa were identified by micro-TESE on the day before oocyte retrieval. ICSI outcomes were compared among OA, donor, and NOA groups.

Results

There was no statistical difference in terms of female partner characteristics among OA, donor, and NOA groups. The normal fertilization rate (P=0.005), high quality embryo rate (P=0.014), implantation rate (P<0.001), clinical pregnancy rate (P=0.015), live birth rate (P=0.043) were significant lower in the NOA group, compared with the donor sperm group. The normal fertilization rate was significant lower in the NOA group than the OA group (P<0.001), but the live birth rate was not significantly lower (P=0.058). The high-quality embryo rate (P=0.014) and implantation rate (P=0.009) were lower in the OA group than the donor group. No differences between groups were observed in our study regarding neonatal parameters of the infants born.

Conclusions

The fertilization and pregnancy outcomes were negatively affected by using testicular sperm from males with NOA. Once a live birth was achieved, there was no difference in neonatal outcomes.

Surgically acquired sperm use for assisted reproductive technology: trends and perinatal outcomes, USA, 2004-2015

PURPOSE

To compare national trends and perinatal outcomes following the use of ejaculated versus surgically acquired sperm among IVF cycles with male factor infertility.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort includes US fertility clinics reporting to the National ART Surveillance System between 2004 and 2015. Fresh, non-donor IVF male factor cycles (n = 369,426 cycles) were included. We report the following outcomes: (1) Trends in surgically acquired and ejaculated sperm. (2) Adjusted risk ratios comparing outcomes for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using surgically acquired (epididymal or testicular) versus ejaculated sperm. (3) Outcomes per non-canceled cycle: biochemical pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy, and live birth (≥ 20 weeks). (4) Outcomes per pregnancy: miscarriage (< 20 weeks) and singleton pregnancy. (5) Outcomes per singleton pregnancy: normal birthweight (≥ 2500 g) and full-term delivery (≥ 37 weeks).

RESULTS

Percentage of male factor infertility cycles that used surgically acquired sperm increased over the study period, 9.8 (2004) to 11.6% (2015), p < 0.05. The proportion of cycles using testicular sperm increased significantly over the study period, 4.9 (2004) to 6.5% (2015), p < 0.05. Among fresh, non-donor male factor ART cycles which used ICSI (n = 347,078 cycles), cycle, pregnancy, and perinatal outcomes were statistically significant but clinically similar with confidence intervals approaching one between cycles involving epididymal versus ejaculated sperm and between testicular versus ejaculated sperm. Results were similar among cycles with a sole diagnosis of male factor (no female factors), and for the subset in which the female partner was < 35 years old.

CONCLUSION

Among couples undergoing ART for treatment of male factor infertility, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were similar between cycles utilizing ejaculated sperm or surgically acquired testicular and epididymal sperm.

A. Overcoming male factor infertility with intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Summary Objective: To evaluate the effect of male factor infertility on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes compared with a control group presenting isolated tubal factor. Method: This retrospective study included 743 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated male factor and a control group consisting of 179 couples undergoing ICSI as a result of isolated tubal factor, performed in a private university- -affiliated in vitro fertilization center, between January/2010 and December/2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to maternal age: women ≤35 years old and >35 years old. The effects of infertility causes on laboratorial and clinical ICSI outcomes were evaluated using Student's t-test and (2 test. Results: No differences in controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes were observed between male factor cycles and tubal factor cycles in the two age groups. Implantation (male factor 35.5% vs. tubal factor 32.0%, p=0.340), pregnancy (male factor 46.9% vs. tubal factor 40.9%, p=0.184) and miscarriage (male factor 10.3% vs. tubal factor 10.6%, p=0.572) rates were similar between the infertility groups, irrespective of female age. Considering maternal age, the cancelation rate was higher in older women (>35 years old) undergoing ICSI as a result of male factor infertility (17.4% vs. 8.9%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Our results showed that there is no difference in the outcomes of pregnancy between couples with male or tubal factor infertility, which indicates that ICSI surpasses the worse specific outcomes associated with male factor.

Processing and selection of surgically-retrieved sperm for ICSI: a review

Although the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been a revolution in the alleviation of male infertility, the use of testicular sperm for ICSI was a formerly unseen breakthrough in the treatment of the azoospermic man with primary testicular failure. At the clinical level, different procedures of testicular sperm retrieval (conventional TESE, micro-TESE, FNA/TESA, MESA, PESA) are being performed, the choice is mainly based on the cause of azoospermia (obstructive versus non-obstructive) and the surgeon's skills. At the level of the IVF laboratory, mechanical procedures to harvest the sperm from the tissue may be combined with enzymatic treatment in order to increase the sperm recovery rates. A number of techniques have been developed for viable sperm selection in males with only immotile testicular sperm available. However, large, well-designed studies on the benefit and safety of one over the other technique are lacking. Despite all the available methods and combinations of laboratory procedures which have a common goal to maximize sperm recovery from testicular samples, a large proportion of NOA patients fail to father a genetically own child. Advanced technology application may improve recovery rates by detection of the testicular foci with active spermatogenesis and/or identification of the rare individual sperm in the testicular suspensions. On the other hand, in vitro spermatogenesis or sperm production from embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells might be future options. The present review summarizes the available strategies which aim to maximize sperm recovery from surgically retrieved samples.

Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia

The clinical management of men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) seeking fertility has been a challenge for andrologists, urologists, and reproductive medicine specialists alike. This review presents a personal perspective on the clinical management of NOA, including the lessons learned over 15 years dealing with this male infertility condition. A five-consecutive-step algorithm is proposed to manage such patients. First, a differential diagnosis of azoospermia is made to confirm/establish that NOA is due to spermatogenic failure. Second, genetic testing is carried out not only to detect the males in whom NOA is caused by microdeletions of the long arm of the Y chromosome, but also to counsel the affected patients about their chances of having success in sperm retrieval. Third, it is determined whether any intervention prior to a surgical retrieval attempt may be used to increase sperm production. Fourth, the most effective and efficient retrieval method is selected to search for testicular sperm. Lastly, state-of-art laboratory techniques are applied in the handling of retrieved gametes and cultivating the embryos resulting from sperm injections. A coordinated multidisciplinary effort is key to offer the best possible chance of achieving a biological offspring to males with NOA.

Comparison of sperm retrieval and reproductive outcome in azoospermic men with testicular failure and obstructive azoospermia treated for infertility

We assessed the rates of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes, including the neonatal profile of infants conceived, in men with testicular failure. Three-hundred and sixty-five men with testicular failure who underwent micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction were included in this study. We compared their outcomes with 40 men with testicular failure who used donor sperm for injections due to failed retrieval, and 146 men with obstructive azoospermia who underwent percutaneous sperm retrieval. The retrieval rate in testicular failure was 41.4%, and the results were lower than the obstructed azoospermia (100%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.033; 95% CI: 0.007–0.164; P < 0.001). Live birth rates after sperm injections were lower in men with testicular failure (19.9%) compared with donor sperm (37.5%; adjusted OR: 0.377 (95% CI: 0.233–0.609, P < 0.001)) and obstructive azoospermia (34.2%; adjusted OR: 0.403 (95% CI: 0.241–0.676, P = 0.001). Newborn parameters of infants conceived were not significantly different among the groups. We concluded that the chances of obtaining sperm on retrieval and achieving a live birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are reduced in men with testicular failure. The profile of infants conceived after sperm injection does not seem to be negatively affected by testicular failure.

Pregnancy outcome according to male diagnosis after ICSI with non-ejaculated sperm compared with ejaculated sperm controls

The aim of this study was to describe pregnancy outcome in couples who had undergone ICSI using non-ejaculated sperm from men with non-obstructive azoospermia, obstructive azoospermia and aspermia compared with the outcome of ICSI with ejaculated sperm from men with severe oligozoospermia, treated during the same time period. This nationwide cohort study included all children born after ICSI with non-ejaculated sperm in Norway, from when the method was first permitted in Norway in April 2004 to the end of 2010, resulting in 420 pregnancies and a total of 359 children. In 235 of these children, the father was diagnosed with obstructive azoospermia, in 72 with non-obstructive azoospermia, in 31 with aspermia, and in 21 the male cause was unclassifiable. The control group consisted of 760 children from 939 pregnancies conceived by ICSI with ejaculated sperm. Sex ratio, birth weight, rate of pregnancy loss and congenital malformations were not significantly associated with sperm origin or the cause of male factor infertility.

Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction as an alternative for sperm acquisition in the most difficult cases of Azoospermia: Technique and preliminary results in India

CONTEXT:

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is an unfavorable prognostic condition for male infertility since spermatogenesis is disrupted. Sperm retrieval (SR) coupled with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the only option for men with NOA who seek fertility. Among the SR techniques, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) has been applied with encouraging results.

AIMS:

We describe how we implemented the micro-TESE procedure and present initial micro-TESE experience in a group of men with NOA and poor prognosis for SR.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN:

Case series of men with NOA treated in a tertiary healthcare center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

An Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) facility was setup to perform SR using microsurgery. Fourteen men with NOA and previous failed retrievals or unfavorable histologic results underwent micro-TESE while their female partners received ovarian stimulation for oocyte pickup (OCP). Micro-TESE was performed the day prior to OCP and testicular sperm were used for sperm injections. We assessed retrieval rates and ICSI outcomes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Outcomes of SR and ICSI were analyzed descriptively. Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact test were used to compare characteristics of men with successful and failed SR.

RESULTS:

The success of micro-TESE was 50.0% with no major complications. A clear microscopic distinction between enlarged and collapsed seminiferous tubules was seen in 35.7% of the cases, and sperm were retrieved in all but one of these cases. Patients with successful and failed retrieval did not differ with respect to baseline characteristics, use of medical therapy, presence of varicocele, and testicular histology. Sperm injections resulted in normal fertilization and embryo cleavage of 64% and 75%, respectively. A total of five transfers with an average of 1.5 embryos resulted in a cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per ICSI cycle of 28.6%, with an implantation rate of 33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS:

We were successful in integrating the micro-TESE procedures to the in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory. Our initial experience with micro-TESE applied to the most difficult cases of azoospermia is reassuring.

Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Since 1978, we have witnessed a successful evolution of assisted reproductive technology (ART), with improvement of the pregnancy rates and a growing demand. However, in recent years, there has been increasing concern regarding its safety due to the potential health impact on its infants. The raise of the developmental origins of adult disease has positioned low birth weight (LBW) as a significant health issue. Although multiple studies have associated ART with LBW, the etiology of this association remains largely unknown. We review the potential association between different components of ART and infertility with LBW, while acknowledging the limitations of interpretation of the existing literature.

An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males

The use of non-ejaculated sperm coupled with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become a globally established procedure for couples with azoospermic male partners who wish to have biological offspring. Surgical methods have been developed to retrieve spermatozoa from the epididymides and the testes of such patients. This article reviews the methods currently available for sperm acquisition in azoospermia, with a particular focus on the perioperative, anesthetic and technical aspects of these procedures. A critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of these sperm retrieval methods is provided, including the authors' methods of choice and anesthesia preferences.

Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: case series and systematic review

We compared pregnancy outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of male infertility according to the type of azoospermia. First, we analyzed our data from 370 couples who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection using sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia, and the outcomes were compared to a group of 465 non-azoospermic infertile males. Then, we performed a systematic review of the published data on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of children born after sperm injection using sperm from men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Live birth rates were significantly lower in the nonobstructive azoospermia group (21.4%) compared with the obstructive azoospermia (37.5%) and ejaculated sperm (32.3%) groups. A total of 326 live births resulted in 427 babies born. Differences were not observed between the groups in gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight and low birth weight, although we noted a tendency towards poorer neonatal outcomes in the azoospermia categories. The overall perinatal death and malformation rates were 2.8% and 1.6%, respectively, and the results did not differ between the groups. We identified 20 published studies that directly compared pregnancy outcomes between obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia. Most of these studies were not designed to detect differences in live birth rates and had lower power to detect differences in less frequent outcomes, and the reporting of neonatal outcomes was unusual. The included studies reported either a decrease or no difference in pregnancy outcomes with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia. In general, no major differences were noted in short-term neonatal outcomes and congenital malformation rates between children from fathers with nonobstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia.

Reproductive potential of men with obstructive azoospermia undergoing percutaneous sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to the cause of obstruction

PURPOSE

We evaluated the retrieval rates and reproductive outcomes of percutaneous sperm retrieval according to the cause of obstructive azoospermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied the records of 146 men with obstructive azoospermia who underwent sperm retrieval for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Patients were grouped by the cause of obstruction, including 32 with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, 59 with vasectomy and 55 with obstruction due to post-infection disease. Sperm were retrieved percutaneously from the epididymis or testis. We compared retrieval rates and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes, including neonatal results, in the groups of men with obstructive azoospermia.

RESULTS

The success of sperm retrieval was similar among the etiology groups, including 100% for congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, 96.6% for vasectomy and 96.3% for previous infection. Significantly fewer men in the congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens group needed testicular aspiration compared to those in the post-infection and vasectomy groups (3.1% vs 23.6% and 30.5%, respectively, p <0.001). Sperm cryopreservation was possible in 26.7% of the cases and did not significantly differ among the groups. Live birth rates after sperm injection were similar in the congenital (34.4%), vasectomy (32.2%) and previous infection (36.4%) groups. Birth parameters, prematurity and low birth weight rates were comparable among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous sperm retrieval is an effective method to retrieve sperm in men with obstructive azoospermia irrespective of the cause of obstruction. The chance of achieving a live birth and the profile of neonates born after sperm injection do not seem to be related to the cause of obstruction.

Male factor infertility and ART

For years, the management and treatment of male factor infertility has been 'experience' and not 'evidence' based. Although not evidence-based, current clinical practice involves extensive use of assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Where specific treatments are not indicated or have failed, ART have become popular adjunctive treatments for alleviating male factor infertility. According to the limited evidence available, intrauterine insemination (IUI) may be considered as a first-line treatment in a couple in which the female partner has a normal fertility status and at least 1×10(6) progressively motile spermatozoa are recovered after sperm preparation. If no pregnancy is achieved after 3-6 cycles of IUI, optimized in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be proposed. When less than 0.5×10(6) progressively motile spermatozoa are obtained after seminal fluid processing or sperm are recovered surgically from the testis or epididymis, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) should be performed. Although the outcome of no other ART has ever been scrutinized as much before, no large-scale 'macroproblems' have as yet been observed after ICSI. Yet, ICSI candidates should be rigorously screened before embarking on IVF or ICSI, and thoroughly informed of the limitations of our knowledge on the hereditary aspects of male infertility and the safety aspects of ART.

Outcomes for offspring of men having ICSI for male factor infertility

Since the introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using single sperm isolated from testicular tissue in men with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia, or using ejaculated sperm in those with poor semen quality, there have been concerns that this might have adverse effects on the offspring compared to conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and natural conceptions. ICSI is done for reasons other than male factor infertility, and on the whole has not been shown to have any more negative effects than those seen with IVF. There have however, been very few studies of ICSI with a focus on, or large enough numbers to examine, the specific outcomes associated with male factor infertility. From the limited information available in relation to the source of the sperm and aetiology of infertility in the presence of ICSI, there appears to be no increased risk of congenital malformations. There is, however, a small increase in both de novo and inherited chromosome abnormalities. In terms of growth and neurodevelopment, there are very few studies, and so far, no adverse outcomes have been found in young children whose fathers have a sperm defect. The origin of the sperm used in ICSI does not have a major influence on the early life outcomes for the offspring, but transgenerational and epigenetic effects remain unknown. When the male factor infertility is known or thought to be due to a Y-chromosome deletion, this information should be given to the young male offspring at a time that will ensure his own reproductive health and plans are optimized.

Update on surgical sperm recovery--the European view

Surgical sperm recovery has become a well-established procedure to obtain spermatozoa for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Although a tendency exists to treat all azoospermic patients by ICSI using surgically retrieved sperm, vasovasostomy remains the gold standard for post-vasectomy azoospermia. In men with obstructive azoospermia in whom vasovasostomy is not indicated, sperm can be easily obtained by either aspiration from epididymis or testis, or a testicular biopsy. In about half of men with non-obstructive azoospermia, sperm may be obtained by testicular biopsy but unfortunately no accurate tests are currently available to predict successful recovery. In these patients, not only recovery rates are limited but also the chance to establish an ongoing pregnancy is decreased compared to men with normal spermatogenesis. When no spermatozoa are recovered after testicular sperm extraction (TESE), the use of donor sperm or adoption is indicated. Given the extremely low pregnancy rates, ICSI using round spermatids is not an option and remains unlawful in some countries.

DNA mismatch repair and infertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the significance of the abnormal DNA repair mechanism in male infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS

DNA repair defects cause a variety of spermatogenic defects in mouse models. Evidence is accumulating to demonstrate the importance of DNA repair defects in human nonobstructive azoospermia. Epigenetic changes may also play a crucial role in infertility.

SUMMARY

The DNA in the cell needs to be constantly repaired to ensure fidelity of DNA replication, to maintain genome stability and to ensure propagation of species. The DNA repair and recombination machineries are highly conserved across the species and inactivation of these pathways may lead to replication and recombination errors. This review summarizes the different types of DNA lesions and DNA repair pathways, particularly focusing on highly conserved meiotic regulators, the DNA mismatch repair proteins. Targeted deletions of some of these proteins result in infertility and predisposes to tumor in mutant mouse models. There is evidence for loss of some of these proteins in human male infertility. Because defective DNA repair is associated with a mutator phenotype, the risk of transmission to the offspring of these otherwise infertile men conceived using an assisted reproductive technology needs further evaluation.

What to do when ICSI fails

The refinement of gamete micromanipulation techniques has made conception possible for couples with male factor infertility who otherwise would remain childless. Moreover, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has ensured that such refractory cases can now generate offspring as successfully as in couples that merely require in vitro insemination. However, despite the now sterling record of ICSI it does not assure a successful outcome for every patient. This can be due, for instance, to the inability of the spermatozoon to activate the oocyte, and applies obviously in cases where spermatozoa are absent from the ejaculate or testicular biopsy. In the present paper we describe in detail the reasons for such failure and review the options that may help overcome it. In particular, we outline the treatment protocol for the situation in which spermatozoa are unable to induce oocyte activation. Further, we report on the clinical outcome achieved with spermatozoa retrieved from the testis, and in cases of extreme oligozoospermia we also explore the option of replicating a single spermatozoon while gaining information on its genomic content. For the most extreme situation in which men have no identifiable germ cells, we will discuss the current status of efforts to accomplish neo-gametogenesis through embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Testicular sperm from patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: aneuploidy risk and reproductive prognosis using testicular sperm from fertile donors as control samples

OBJECTIVE

To establish a baseline incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in testicular sperm of fertile men and to determine the best control sample for comparisons with azoospermic males to estimate their reproductive prognosis.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Sixteen obstructive azoospermic (OA) and 19 nonobstructive azoospermic patients (NOA). Control samples were ejaculated sperm from ten fertile donors and testicular sperm from ten other fertile donors.

INTERVENTION(S)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in sperm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Sperm numerical abnormalities for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y; ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

RESULT(S)

In control samples, testicular sperm showed higher incidences of diploidy (0.27% vs. 0.10%) and disomy for chromosomes 13 (0.16% vs. 0.07%), 21 (0.25% vs. 0.12%), and sex chromosomes (0.34% vs. 0.21%) than ejaculated sperm. Comparisons with ejaculated control samples showed 12.5% OA and 68.4% NOA patients having significantly higher incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities. Compared with testicular control subjects, fewer OA (6.3%) and NOA (42.1%) patients had chromosomally abnormal sperm. NOA patients had lower ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates than OA patients, particularly those with abnormal FISH compared with testicular control samples.

CONCLUSION(S)

Sperm FISH analysis using testicular sperm control samples better identifies NOA patients with a lower likelihood of reproductive success.

Spermatogenesis affects the outcome of ICSI for azoospermic patients rather than sperm retrieval method

The study investigated the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with epididymal and testicular sperm of azoospermic patients exhibiting various disturbances in spermatogenesis, in order to understand the possible factors that might affect ICSI outcome. Of the 134 patients, 92 were diagnosed as being obstructive azoospermic (OA group) with normal spermatogenesis and the remaining 42 patients were diagnosed as being non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA group) with hypospermatogenesis. The 92 OA patients underwent 112 ICSI cycles, which were divided into two subgroups according to their sperm retrieval methods: 1) OA-PESA group (n=51) with sperm obtained by percutaneous sperm aspiration (PESA) cycles and 2) OA-TEFNA group (n=61) with sperm obtained by testicular fine needle sperm aspiration (TEFNA) cycles. The NOA patients diagnosed with hypospermatogenesis according to histopathological analysis and hormone analysis, underwent 42 ICSI cycles with TEFNA. The results showed that the fertilization, cleavage, and clinical pregnancy rates portrayed a significant difference (44.9% vs. 64.1%, P<0.001, 79.8% vs. 89.0%, P<0.001, and 21.4% vs. 40.2%, P=0.047, respectively) between NOA and OA groups. Moreover, the miscarriage rate in the NOA group was visibly higher even though it did not reach a statistical difference (33.3% vs. 15.6%, P=0.433) compared with the miscarriage rate of the OA group. The same statistical differences were observed between the subgroup OA-TEFNA and the NOA group. No statistical difference was observed between OA-PESA and OA-TEFNA groups for the fertilization, cleavage, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. This study indicates that defective spermatogenesis affects the ICSI clinical outcome of azoospermic patients rather than the sperm retrieval methods.

Successful multiple pregnancy achieved after transfer of frozen embryos obtained via intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular sperm from an AZFc-deleted man

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of successful triplet pregnancy after testicular sperm extraction (TESE) from a man with AZFc deletion and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A 38-year-old man affected by complete AZFc deletion and azoospermia.

INTERVENTION(S)

Spermiogram, Y-chromosome microdeletion screening, TESE for sperm recovery from testicular tissue on the same day as ICSI, transfer of frozen-thawed embryos, vaginal ultrasound examination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The Y chromosome genetic status of an azoospermic patient who underwent TESE and ICSI, the fertilization and pregnancy outcome.

RESULT(S)

The patient was found to be azoospermic, and the deletion screening showed complete AZFc deletion. After TESE, the recovered testicular sperm were selected for ICSI. Three good quality embryos were obtained and were frozen due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the female partner. After transfer of the thawed embryos, a triplet pregnancy was diagnosed by vaginal ultrasonography at the seventh week of gestation. Two male and one female healthy babies were born.

CONCLUSION(S)

This is the first report of a successful triplet pregnancy after the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in a couple in whom the male partner was azoospermic and a carrier of complete AZFc deletion. This deletion should not adversely affect a man's TESE retrieval prognosis or the fertilization, cleavage, and implantation of embryos. The offspring were healthy, although the two sons inherited the AZFc deletion.

Karyotyping, congenital anomalies and follow-up of children after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with non-ejaculated sperm: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

For men with azoospermia, it is possible to father their own progeny by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with epididymal or testicular sperm. Some studies show that children born after assisted reproductive technology (ART) are at increased risk of birth defects, other studies suggest that there is no extra concern about ICSI children conceived with epididymal or testicular sperm.

METHODS

Studies about the karyotypes of fetuses, congenital anomalies and the follow-up of the children born after ICSI with non-ejaculated sperm were identified by means of a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Eight relevant studies were identified; two studies reported karyotype, five reported malformations and one reported follow-up of children after ICSI. In total, there were 55 out of 1973 (2.8%) abnormal karyotypes in the ICSI with ejaculated sperm group, 0 out of 31 in the ICSI with epididymal sperm group and 5 out of 191 (2.6%) in the ICSI with testicular sperm group. Major malformations were found in 543 out of 12 377 (4.4%) in the ICSI with ejaculated sperm group, 17 out of 533 (3.2%) in the ICSI with epididymal sperm group and 31 out of 670 (4.6%) in the ICSI with testicular sperm group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no statistical differences, the study groups were small and heterogenic, with a number of potential biases. We therefore recommend a standardized methodology of follow-up studies after ART, with well-defined groups of ICSI with ejaculated sperm, ICSI with epididymal sperm and ICSI with testicular sperm, and a control group of naturally conceived children.

Secretory azoospermia or non-obstructive azoospermia?

In the non-obstructive azoospermia versus the secretory azoospermia it is first necessary to have a clear assessment and definition and then takes care of the patient before the surgical sampling taking into account the age of the woman and in fine try to optimize the residual spermatogenesis. Biopsy seems to be the "gold standard" in non-obstructive azoospermia. The mean level of retrieval (extracted) spermatozoa is of 50%, with 20% of pregnancy/cycle and 30% of delivery/coupe with a better success for frozen sperm samples.

[ICSI with non-ejaculated sperm: what about children?]

For men presenting azoospermia, the development of ICSI with epidydimal (MESA) or testicular (TESE) sperm, allowed them to father their own progeny. Little is known about the issue of these ICSI, in terms of efficiency and quality of the conceptus, and many controversies remain. Some studies emphasized that children born after Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) with surgically sperm retrieved were at increased risk of birth defects. In this context, we proposed a retrospective analysis of pregnancy issues with non-ejaculated sperm.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: An assisted reproductive technique and its outcome to overcome infertility

This review focuses on the outcome, merits and demerits of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for treatment of male factor infertility. Spermatozoa of infertile men are surgically retrieved from the epididymis or testis. Fertilisation and pregnancy rates after ICSI are found to be around 66% and 48%, respectively, with surgically retrieved spermatozoa. Major contributing factors to failed fertilisation after ICSI are the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved and availability of viable spermatozoa for injection. Children born after ICSI have an increased risk of major congenital deformity as compared with children born naturally. Both paternal and maternal risk factors seem to pose an increased risk of congenital malformations in the offspring born after ICSI. The ICSI technique per se is not an independent risk factor. Qualitative differences in development and social interaction between ICSI and natural children appears to be related to developmental processes of the entire family unit. Parents of ICSI children have a good relationship with their children.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in livestock species: an update

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a powerful technique in the field of assisted reproduction (ART) and provides exciting opportunities for studying the basic mechanisms of fertilization and early embryo development. Nevertheless, its application in agriculture and conservation biology has been greatly hampered by the low success rate reported for this method in respect of economically important species. Specifically, the rates of blastocyst formation and live newborn are greatly reduced when zygotes are generated by ICSI. Except for humans, ICSI remains a low efficiency technology in comparison with alternatives such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and its application is less widespread. In this paper, we discuss the present status, applications and factors affecting ICSI in pigs and other species.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution

The introduction of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 1992 has dramatically changed the management of severe male infertility. In severe male infertility, live birth rates with ICSI are superior to those with other non-donor treatments. In non-male infertility, however, pregnancy rates are not better with ICSI than with in vitro fertilization (IVF). With obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia, reasonable pregnancy rates are now possible with ICSI after recovery of sperm from the testes followed by ICSI. Genetic counselling is indicated for severe male infertility, whether or not ICSI is considered. ICSI is indicated in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to avoid contamination by extraneous DNA in the case of PCR-based testing and to increase the number of embryos available for testing. In turn, PGD may be indicated in pregnancies that are at high risk of aneuploidy because of genetic factors associated with azoospermia. As with IVF, not all couples succeed, but 2% of couples with failed ICSI cycles will conceive without treatment. ICSI outcome studies indicate that there is a significant increase in prematurity, low birthweight, and perinatal mortality associated with single and multiple births, similar to the outcomes of conventional IVF. However, as evidenced in long-term follow-up studies, the higher rates of urogenital abnormalities and increased use of healthcare may be associated with paternal characteristics.

[Semen characteristics and quality of the conceptus in fertilization in vitro]

OBJECTIVE

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with increased risks for the neonate, compared to natural fertility, mainly because of multiple pregnancies and increased maternal age. On the opposite, the impact of paternal factors has been scarcely studied, except for the relationship between surgically retrieved sperms and genetic abnormalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study has been realized using the large French register on in vitro fertilization (FIVNAT) that collects information on 80% of French ART activity. For the study, all the pregnancies obtained from oocyte recoveries between January 1996 and December 2003, for which information on cycles could be linked to the pregnancy were included, i.e. 34223 pregnancies, resulting in 27025 deliveries and 33945 neonates. Sperm quality was defined either according to the semen origin (spouse's ejaculate, epididymis, testis, or donor), or according to the spermiogramme values for concentration, motility and morphology. The statistical analysis included the use of multivariate logistic models, with the main prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The delivery, spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy rates were not influenced by semen origin nor by quality, all the 95% confidence intervals including 1. The neonates conceived through surgically retrieved sperms were at a slightly increased risk of hypotrophy (weight under the 10% centile of reference curves) and of malformation (OR=1.18, 95CI: 1.03-1.36 and OR=1.30 [0,95-1,84], respectively). On the opposite, when analysis was restrained to ejaculated semen, no risk was demonstrated.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The semen quality has little impact on pregnancy issue. Only the semen origin seems to act on hypotrophy and malformation, but these results deserve to be further analyzed for confirmation.

Severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermias, secretory and obstructive azoospermias: motility as a criterion of sperm viability

PURPOSE

Comparison of pregnancy rates in cases of Secretory Azoospermias (SA), Obstructive Azoospermias (OA) and severe Oligoasthenoteratozoospermias (OATZ). Evaluation of sperm motility as a quality criterion.

METHODS

In SA cases (n = 35), 9 samples were cryopreserved. In OA cases (epididymal aspiration: n = 91; testicular biopsy: n = 206), all samples were cryopreserved. 596 OATZ ejaculates were included.

RESULTS

In SA cases, 2 pregnancies were achieved from 9 ICSI cycles. In OA, motile sperm rates were higher in testicular biopsies. After thawing sperm motility was not different between testicular and epididymal origin. 2 pregnancies were achieved with immotile testicular sperm after thawing, but none with immotile epididymal sperm. In OATZ cases, one pregnancy was obtained from the 9 cryopreserved ejaculates and 35.3% with fresh motile sperm.

CONCLUSIONS

In SA cases, the use of donor sperm is recommended due to the lower pregnancy rate achieved. Motility, before and after cryopreservation, as a criterion of sperm viability is discussed and its use should be reconsidered in some cases.

ICSI outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: influence of the origin of surgically retrieved spermatozoa and the cause of obstruction

BACKGROUND

Spermatozoa can be retrieved from the testis and epididymis of men with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and used for ICSI. However, it is unknown whether the outcome of ICSI depends on the cause of obstruction or the origin of surgically retrieved spermatozoa.

METHODS

A cohort of 171 men with OA and normal spermatogenesis were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into three groups according to the site and origin of obstruction: 83 men had congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens; 55 and 33 had acquired epididymal and deferent duct obstructions, respectively. The outcome of 368 ICSI cycles was determined and compared according to the origin of spermatozoa: epididymal (n = 253) or testicular (n = 115).

RESULTS

Fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates did not differ between spermatozoa of different origin (58.9% versus 51.9% and 22.1% versus 24.3% with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa, respectively). However, the miscarriage rate was significantly higher for testicular spermatozoa (35.7% versus. 12.5% P < 0.05, chi2 test). Findings were similar whatever the aetiology of the OA.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of testicular spermatozoa, even those generated during normal spermatogenesis, alters embryonic development and that epididymal spermatozoa should be preferentially used, irrespective of the aetiology of OA.

The choice and outcome of the fertility treatment of 38 couples in whom the male partner has a Yq microdeletion

BACKGROUND

Patients with Yq microdeletions may suffer from fertility problems. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of the fertility treatment of these patients.

METHODS

For 38 patients with Yq microdeletions, data were collected about medical history, karyotype, testicular histopathology and the presence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate or testicular biopsies.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with an azoospermia factor region c (AZFc) deletion had at least one cycle with ICSI. The clinical pregnancy outcome was 22% per embryo transfer. Three babies have been born and two pregnancies are ongoing. Sex selection for female embryos in combination with ICSI in order to prevent the transmission of the fertility problems was discussed with 14 couples; eight were in favour of the selection. In addition, eight couples made the decision to use donor sperm because ICSI was impossible or objectionable and, in this group of patients, a total of nine babies were born.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the improvement of assisted reproductive technology, ICSI could be offered only to patients with an AZFc deletion. Insemination with donor sperm is a potential alternative for other patients.

Crude cumulative delivery rate following ICSI using intentionally frozen–thawed testicular spermatozoa in 51 men with non-obstructive azoospermia

This prospective study evaluated the crude cumulative delivery rate following delayed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using spermatozoa recovered by testicular extraction (TESE) and intentionally frozen in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). This procedure can be termed 'cryoTESE-ICSI'. This study involved a series of 118 patients who underwent testicular biopsy for diagnosis of NOA in the period from January 1998 to December 2002. Testicular histology confirmed the diagnosis of NOA. Testicular parenchyma was obtained surgically from both testicles under general anaesthesia. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa was performed in 51 of 118 patients (43%). Ninety-nine delayed ICSI procedures were performed. Frozen-thawed suspensions were used in all cycles. Application of pentoxifylline was required to stimulate spermatozoa in 52% of cases. Fertilization, embryo transfer, and ongoing pregnancy rates were 60, 98 and 29% respectively. The crude cumulative delivery rate was 49% after two cycles and 57% after four cycles. A total of 39 healthy children were born in 29 deliveries. Thus, cryoTESE-ICSI is an effective procedure for routine use in patients with NOA. The main advantages of cryoTESE-ICSI are to (i) avoid repeated surgical biopsy, (ii) ensure the availability of spermatozoa when the ovarian stimulation cycle is begun, and (iii) allow programmed biopsy and therefore dissociate it from ICSI.

Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration: a diagnostic tool for the prediction of complete spermatogenesis

The classification of azoospermia into obstructive or non-obstructive is largely based on medical history, physical examination and biochemical markers in serum and semen. However, the most accurate parameter for diagnosis is the testicular histology. The predictive value of the percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), FSH, LH, testosterone, inhibin-B and testicular volume was investigated for their accuracy to predict a complete spermatogenesis (Johnsen score > or =8) in order to replace the testicular histology. The specificity and sensitivity of FSH, inhibin-B, LH, testosterone, testicular volume, and the presence of sperm in a PESA procedure was evaluated in 147 azoospermic males attending the centre for infertility diagnosis. A positive PESA outcome presented the highest sensitivity and specificity to predict a Johnsen score > or =8 (93 and 94% respectively) compared with FSH (90 and 19%), inhibin-B (88 and 57%) and testicular volume (95 and 45%). Differences in clinical presentation were observed between patients with positive sperm retrieval with PESA, depending on the aetiology of obstruction. In conclusion, the presence of spermatozoa in the epididymis (PESA+) correlates with a Johnsen score > or =8 and is the most accurate parameter to predict complete spermatogenesis compared with clinical or biochemical parameters. Between obstructive azoospermic patients, the clinical parameters observed varied according to the aetiology.